Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:31:50 -0500
From: Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Blackbox Web Design
Man, some browsers just suck. The design rendered beautifully in the
brosers I developed it with, but ie, and apparently others, choked on it
as some folks reported
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:03:16 -0500
Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wacha guys think of this?
http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox
We can add some more cutie graphics if that's what people like, but I
also know the blackbox crowd is a minimalistic one. (I know I am.) We'll
see what people
Thread wrote:
Wacha guys think of this?
http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox
-Thread
Very nice, i like it. amazingly, it is very
readable with lynx, links, mozilla, or MSIE.
My one suggestion would be to move the two light grey
boxes on the right over to the left, to give more room
for
ÄúºÃ
±¾ÓʼþÊÇÉÆÒâÓʼþ£¬Èç¹ûÄú²»ÐèÒªÇëɾ³ý
´òÈÅÖ®´¦£¬¾´ÇëÔÁ£¡£¡£¡
ÂÌÉ«²úÆ·--³ÏÕ÷µØÇø¶À¼Ò´úÀí
±¾²úÆ·Êǹú¼ÒרÀûÄÉÃ×ÐͲúÆ·£¬¹úÄÚÎÞͬÀà²úÆ·
¿ÉÒÔ¶ÒÔÚÍ¿ÁÏÖУ¬·¿ÎÝ×°ÐÞºó3-4Ìì
¿ÉÏû³ý²úÉúµÄ·ÏÆø£¬¼´¿ÉÈëס
ÓпÉÏû³ýÈÕ³£µÄÓÍÑ̺Íù棬
²¢Ô´Ô´²»¶ÏÊͷŸºÀë×Ó
¿ÉÔ¤·ÀºôÎüµÀºÍÐÄѪ¹Ü¼²²¡
In message: Re: Blackbox Web Design (20020107233150.A1360@Thread)
on 07/01/2002 (Mon 23:31) Thread wrote:
Man, some browsers just suck. The design rendered beautifully in the
brosers I developed it with, but ie, and apparently others, choked on it
as some folks reported it not being variable
In message: Re: Blackbox Web Design ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
on 08/01/2002 (Tue 08:14) Joe MacDonald wrote:
. . . looks pretty good in dillo 0.6.2. Although it would be nice if
the center column had a minimum width specified as a percentage of the
window-size.
Ah, turns out that's just dillo's
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Thread wrote:
Wacha guys think of this?
http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox
We can add some more cutie graphics if that's what people like, but I
also know the blackbox crowd is a minimalistic one. (I know I am.) We'll
see what people like.
Well,
Thread wrote:
Wacha guys think of this?
http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox
We can add some more cutie graphics if that's what people like, but I
also know the blackbox crowd is a minimalistic one. (I know I am.) We'll
see what people like.
-Thread
Best design so far.. Great
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 19:38, Imad wrote:
Thanks for the help, and for bbkeys!
Thanks for the thanks!! =:)
Best,
--Imad (e)magius Hussain
_
There is much to be known and above all, much to be loved... Indeed,
the
WOW! This I REALLY like, Thread! =:) And I'm ECSTATIC to read that
we've finally come up with a fix for the door whack monkey glitch in
the centralcome out and fling small things into people's eyes
YAROOH!!! =:)
LOL
Seriously, I dig this design heavily.
I may have to, um, borrow
On Mon, Jan07,02 23:31, Thread wrote:
Man, some browsers just suck. The design rendered beautifully in the
brosers I developed it with, but ie, and apparently others, choked on it
as some folks reported it not being variable width. It was, in fact,
designed to be variable width.
Should be
jerrold poh wrote:
can somebody tell me the name of this patch and/ore where i
can download it? i looked around but couldn't find it.
http://blackbox.thelinuxcommunity.org/patches.html, go down to the
bottom and look for the patch called
window resizing and button gra version 0.1
I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've
removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've also
removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up the
style sheet a little, changes to the left nav, removed the right hand column
On 08-Jan-2002 ray@crytek wrote:
I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've
removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've also
removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up the
style sheet a little, changes to the
I uploaded a new epistrophy the other day. There are a few very small
fixes to signal handling, and config file parsing. However, if anyone
one is well versed in the ancient art of lex and yacc, I would love
you long time if you'd give me a shout.
--
Scott Moynes
msg04769/pgp0.pgp
On Tue, Jan08,02 12:14, Scott Moynes wrote:
I uploaded a new epistrophy the other day. There are a few very small
fixes to signal handling, and config file parsing. However, if anyone
one is well versed in the ancient art of lex and yacc,
I would love you long time
haha... having recently
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 02:06:49PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
Recently installed 0.61.2pre4 on my home workstation. Everything seemed
fine 'til just a short while ago.
I had a few rxvt (v 2.7.6) sessions open along with gkrellm (v1.2.2) and
Evolution (v1.0) and esd (v 0.2.22). I
* Derek Cunningham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
haha... having recently watched Full Metal Jacket (on DVD no less :), I can
only hear the above line in a female vietnamese voice, followed by me so
horny haha... perhaps a rephrase? :)
I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
--
Scott
On Tue, Jan08,02 12:45, Scott Moynes wrote:
* Derek Cunningham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
haha... having recently watched Full Metal Jacket (on DVD no less :), I can
only hear the above line in a female vietnamese voice, followed by me so
horny haha... perhaps a rephrase? :)
I'm
Yeah, if we don't need the boxes on the right side, we can do away with
them. Also, I was sort of fond of the black fading around the edges..
But whatever people like...
http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox/lightgfx.html
Thread
Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, if we don't need the boxes on the right side, we can do away with
them. Also, I was sort of fond of the black fading around the edges..
But whatever people like...
http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox/lightgfx.html
Netscape 4.7 still fails miserably in
On Tue, Jan08,02 14:50, Bill Beal wrote:
Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, if we don't need the boxes on the right side, we can do away with
them. Also, I was sort of fond of the black fading around the edges..
But whatever people like...
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 18:38, Imad wrote:
The best way is to run xev and see what X calls your
keys. Then, you just put the key (XLookupString gives 1 characters:
f), etc. in your ~/.bbkeysrc as shown in the README.
That's what I tried, but I kept getting XLookupString gives 0
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:59:23PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 18:38, Imad wrote:
The best way is to run xev and see what X calls your
keys. Then, you just put the key (XLookupString gives 1 characters:
f), etc. in your ~/.bbkeysrc as shown in the README.
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 08:39, xOr wrote:
Well, my vote still holds with http://speed.seas.upenn.edu/~rarya/bb2/
It's got, and had my vote from the beginning. Good use of space in all
browsers from what I can see.
Jamin W. Collins
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 11:45, xOr wrote:
Has this problem gone away in any releases since 0.61.2pre4?
Unfortunately, the last version I tried for a prolonged period thus far
still exhibited it at least once that I caught, and that was version
0.62.0pre0. I've since upgraded that box to
its perfect - simple, fast, easy to read and find what you want.
I really like it too :]
- Original Message -
From: Jamin W. Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Blackbox Web Design
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 08:39, xOr wrote:
Well, my vote still holds with
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, xOr wrote:
You can set up bbkeys to show the windows on all workspaces in its
list. So then when you hit alt-tab (or whatever you want) and get a
list of all windows and just release th emodifier key (alt in this
case) to switch to the window of your choice.
How do i
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, Joe MacDonald wrote:
Actually, the way it works right now is far more useful to me. I tend
to have a lot of shells open in different workspaces and when I want
to get at one I've minimized, it is far more helpful for me to only
see the list of ones I've minimized in the
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:12:39AM +0100, Mark Weinem wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, xOr wrote:
You can set up bbkeys to show the windows on all workspaces in its
list. So then when you hit alt-tab (or whatever you want) and get a
list of all windows and just release th emodifier key (alt
Look on http://movingparts.net/bbkeys_archived.shtml and search for
windows. =:)
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:59, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 18:38, Imad wrote:
The best way is to run xev and see what X calls your
keys. Then, you just put the key (XLookupString gives 1
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:59, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:
Look on http://movingparts.net/bbkeys_archived.shtml and search for
windows. =:)
As usual, you and xOr rock. Thanks for the advice.
Jamin W. Collins
=:D
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 17:07, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 15:59, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:
Look on http://movingparts.net/bbkeys_archived.shtml and search for
windows. =:)
As usual, you and xOr rock. Thanks for the advice.
Jamin W. Collins
--
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 02:06:49PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
Recently installed 0.61.2pre4 on my home workstation. Everything seemed
fine 'til just a short while ago.
I had a few rxvt (v 2.7.6) sessions open along with gkrellm (v1.2.2) and
Evolution (v1.0) and esd (v 0.2.22). I
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:42:37 +0100 J.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We all know that Blackbox is wrapped around the fact that it's highly
minimalistic. This is good. Minimalism is the way every Open Source
identity should follow. Yet, why should minimalism mean bad design? Even
though Blackbox
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:02:50 +0100 ray@crytek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've
removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've also
removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up the
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, mattias/spikboll wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:02:50 +0100 ray@crytek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've
removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've
also
removed most of the nested
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:02:50PM +0100, ray@crytek wrote:
I've put my HTML skills to the test and reworked Threads design. I've
removed all images except the 'blackbox' and the 'blackbox title'. I've also
removed most of the nested tables, most of the width=100%, cleaned up the
style sheet
38 matches
Mail list logo
