I don't do much, either, except go to work and write an installer that no
one uses. :) I'd like to translate it to C...
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 10/5/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote these words on 10/05/05 12:54 CST:
It seems to me that there is some dead wood that should be pruned from
BLFS. glib-1.2 hasn't been able to compile unpatched since gcc-3.3. I'd drop it as
unmai
Although the applications using gtk+-1 are slowly being updated to
gtk+-2, it is not yet time to remove it from BLFS.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I'll disagree here. There are many useful GTK+-1 applications out
there. XMMS being one of them. Noted on the XMMS home page:
"For the fifth year in a row XMMS has been voted Favourite Audio
Tool by the readers of LinuxJournal."
Not that their self-advertising is worth a w
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 10/05/05 15:12 CST:
> Just a suggestion in case the majority don't want gnome1 in the book.
It's *impossible* to determine a majority. The *readers* of the book
are what matters. It is impossible to poll them.
We recently removed Courier from the book. But f
On 10/5/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 10/05/05 13:37 CST:
>
> > Though gnome1 is useful for gnucash, it is not yet ported to gnome2.
> > Perhaps gnucash should be made into an hint instead of keeping it in
> > the book?
>
> Why? What useful pu
Richard A Downing wrote:
> Guys,
>
> You might have noticed that I have not committed anything recently.
[deleted]
>
> To put it simply, I just don't enjoy being an editor - and I'm
> embarrased that I have not felt able to do more. Maybe I'm missing
> something, so please help me make up my
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
>> Of course, you have to have some cash
>
>
> And not be married - a finanical management application is of no use to
> me whatsoever - I already know my wife spends money faster than I can
> earn it, I don't need a computer to tell me tha
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I hate it when people do that to a perfectly innocent thread. Start
your own! By Hijacker.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
My daughter called while I was typing this... I knew I shouldn't have
sent it while on the telephone with her
sash wrote:
All I do for the project is keep order, common courtesy and
consideration on IRC and occasionally offer a grammar suggestion or
find a typo in the book<.> However, Gerard
sash wrote:
> All I do for the project is keep order, common courtesy and
> consideration on IRC and occasionally offer a grammar suggestion or find
> a typo in the book However, Gerard values my contribution even though it
> seems meager me. I value everyone's contributions and enjoy learning
> fr
Richard A Downing wrote:
Of course, you have to have some cash
And not be married - a finanical management application is of no use to
me whatsoever - I already know my wife spends money faster than I can
earn it, I don't need a computer to tell me that :)
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscra
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 10/05/05 13:16 CST:
>
>>As for gnome-1, I'm not sure
>>why anyone would be using that.
>
>
> It is a must for GnuCash. Which is a really, really good
> financial/cash manager application.
>
Of course, you have to have some cash
R.
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Randy McMurchy wrote:
GnuCash works with current LFS-SVN and fills a void that really
can't be solved with any other open source package.
Aside from those recently reviewed by The Grumpy Editor, of course:
http://lwn.net/Articles/149383/. Note, I'm not suggesting th
Randy McMurchy wrote:
GnuCash works with current LFS-SVN and fills a void that really
can't be solved with any other open source package.
Aside from those recently reviewed by The Grumpy Editor, of course:
http://lwn.net/Articles/149383/. Note, I'm not suggesting that GnuCash
be removed, j
On 10/5/05, Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a gtk2 fork of xmms, beep media player. Just make the
> following symlinks for compatibility:
>ln -sf beep-config /usr/bin/xmms-config
>ln -sf libbeep.so /usr/lib/libxmms.so
Yeah, I use this, but it's sometimes still buggy.
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 10/05/05 13:37 CST:
> Though gnome1 is useful for gnucash, it is not yet ported to gnome2.
> Perhaps gnucash should be made into an hint instead of keeping it in
> the book?
Why? What useful purpose would that do?
GnuCash works with current LFS-SVN and fills
All I do for the project is keep order, common courtesy and
consideration on IRC and occasionally offer a grammar suggestion or find
a typo in the book However, Gerard values my contribution even though it
seems meager me. I value everyone's contributions and enjoy learning
from all of you. We'
On 10/5/05, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Second that. For XMMS alone, it's worth keeping glib-1, gtk+-1. I
> personally will err on the side of gtk-2 every time, but inevitably
> something forces me to install gtk-1. As for gnome-1, I'm not sure
> why anyone would be using that.
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 10/05/05 13:16 CST:
> As for gnome-1, I'm not sure
> why anyone would be using that.
It is a must for GnuCash. Which is a really, really good
financial/cash manager application.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C L
On 10/5/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote these words on 10/05/05 12:54 CST:
>
> > It seems to me that there is some dead wood that should be
> > pruned from BLFS. glib-1.2 hasn't been able to compile unpatched since
> > gcc-3.3. I'd drop it as unmaintained, alo
Andrew Benton wrote these words on 10/05/05 12:54 CST:
> It seems to me that there is some dead wood that should be pruned
> from BLFS. glib-1.2 hasn't been able to compile unpatched since gcc-3.3. I'd
> drop it as unmaintained, along with all the gtk1 applications. Gnome-1,
> Xmms, bin the lo
Richard A Downing wrote:
my
experience is that others on the team quite often (and usually rightly)
criticise my decisions - this makes me unwilling to make the attempt
unless it's a very simple case. I'm not sure that there are many simple
cases anymore, at least not with Xorg going modular and
Richard A Downing wrote:
Guys,
You might have noticed that I have not committed anything recently.
Same here! The bugs needing attention, I plain don't use. Worse, for
now I'm stuck with *dial-up* and a dog of a computer. I wont resign yet.
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscra
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 10/05/05 11:12 CST:
> You might have noticed that I have not committed anything recently.
So what, neither has Igor. I did notice you updated Bluefish not too
long ago. Any contribution helps. You don't need to feel obligated to
make commits. Just do what yo
Guys,
You might have noticed that I have not committed anything recently. I'm
considering leaving the team (note: not going away in a huff or to spend
more time with my wife :-) - but thought I would air this first and get
your reaction.
On my normal system I don't build LFS in a standard way.
26 matches
Mail list logo
