Em 04-03-2014 02:17, Armin K. escreveu:
On 4.3.2014 5:51, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
There are definitely problems, here.
1. Directories have wrong names and one is missing in webkitgtk-1.10.2.
/usr/include/webkitgtk-1.0
/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/webkitgtk
/usr/share/webkitgtk-1.0
2.
Em 04-03-2014 09:22, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
2. The only thing very different between Qt4 and Qt5 is QTDIR, QTLINK
versus QT5DIR, QT5LINK. I will replace by QT4DIR, QT4LINK.
There are problems:
1. Is it right having in the environment QT$DIR instead of QTDIR?
2. In Qt5 we have:
{{{
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:22:52 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Libexec WebKitGTK [Was ... r12813 ...]
Em 04-03-2014 02:17, Armin K. escreveu:
.
.
I am thinking of
Em 03-03-2014 11:30, Armin K. escreveu:
On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, thomas kaeding wrote:
This might be important for anyone wanting to build pygtk.
It's a patch to pygobject.
https://bug668522.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=209543
Forwarding to blfs-dev since it's a blfs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 04-03-2014 09:22, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
2. The only thing very different between Qt4 and Qt5 is QTDIR, QTLINK
versus QT5DIR, QT5LINK. I will replace by QT4DIR, QT4LINK.
There are problems:
1. Is it right having in the environment QT$DIR instead of
On 03/04/2014 03:33 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 03-03-2014 11:30, Armin K. escreveu:
On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, thomas kaeding wrote:
This might be important for anyone wanting to build pygtk.
It's a patch to pygobject.
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 03-03-2014 11:30, Armin K. escreveu:
On 03/03/2014 03:06 PM, thomas kaeding wrote:
This might be important for anyone wanting to build pygtk.
It's a patch to pygobject.
https://bug668522.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=209543
Forwarding to
On 03/04/2014 05:06 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 04-03-2014 12:05, Armin K. escreveu:
I've missed one step (for future reference), see below:
On 03/04/2014 04:04 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 03/04/2014 03:33 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 03-03-2014 11:30, Armin K. escreveu:
On
Em 04-03-2014 13:32, Armin K. escreveu:
On 03/04/2014 05:06 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 04-03-2014 12:05, Armin K. escreveu:
I've missed one step (for future reference), see below:
On 03/04/2014 04:04 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 03/04/2014 03:33 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
which seems exactly the fix needed from
pygobject-2.28.6-introspection-1.patch.
Unfortunately, I do not feel we can end the discussion before 7.5 is
released.
My doubts, first, is this new patch required or optional, because the
other one is optional? second,
On 03/04/2014 08:52 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 04-03-2014 13:32, Armin K. escreveu:
On 03/04/2014 05:06 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 04-03-2014 12:05, Armin K. escreveu:
I've missed one step (for future reference), see below:
On 03/04/2014 04:04 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On
Hello everyone,
I'm in process of looking at what would be necessary and how hard it
would be to convert current LFS repositories from subversion to git.
One of the steps (optional though) is conversion of subversion user
names to proper git format Real name em...@address.meh.
I have extracted
Em 04-03-2014 17:23, Armin K. escreveu:
Didn't you get a problem, when testing the patch?
Only if I first apply pygobject-2.28.6-introspection-1.patch that is in
the book, then, apply pygobject-2.28.6-git_fixes-1.patch, it works.
With just
patch -Np1 -i
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 11:46:13PM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm in process of looking at what would be necessary and how hard it
would be to convert current LFS repositories from subversion to git.
One of the steps (optional though) is conversion of subversion user
names to
Em 04-03-2014 17:19, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
which seems exactly the fix needed from
pygobject-2.28.6-introspection-1.patch.
Unfortunately, I do not feel we can end the discussion before 7.5 is
released.
My doubts, first, is this new patch required or optional,
oh didn't know that LFS planned to migrate to git :( I hope the mail on
lfs-book will be as usable as they are with svn, because it the easiest
way to follow the updates to translate efficiently. I know that git,
used on CLFS, gives weird commits reports and it's hard to use them.
Well I
Hello, I've taken some time to write some basic instructions on how to
get a basic git server up and running.
The instructions can be found at:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~krejzi/blfs-git/general/gitserver.html
Patch against latest blfs svn can be found at:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:11:16AM -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
On 02/27/14 00:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I have a problem with the book's instructions building strigi. clucene
is listed as an optional dependency and I have that installed. The book
has
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:11:16AM -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
On 02/27/14 00:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I have a problem with the book's instructions building strigi. clucene
is listed as an optional dependency and I have that installed. The book
has
cmake
19 matches
Mail list logo
