Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea/OpenJDK versions

2014-04-17 Thread DJ Lucas
On 04/13/14 05:17, Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, While icedtea has a new version, OpenJDK is still at 1.7.0_51. My concern is that I built new binary JDK's, but that in our naming scheme, they should have the same version number as the previous ones. How should I name them? -

Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea/OpenJDK versions

2014-04-17 Thread DJ Lucas
On 04/17/14 19:11, DJ Lucas wrote: On 04/13/14 05:17, Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, While icedtea has a new version, OpenJDK is still at 1.7.0_51. My concern is that I built new binary JDK's, but that in our naming scheme, they should have the same version number as the previous ones. How

Re: [blfs-dev] CA Certificates

2014-03-09 Thread DJ Lucas
On 03/06/14 11:15, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote: Dear all, On http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/cacerts.html you indicate to download CA Certificates from: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/security/nss/lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt?raw=1 However,

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions

2014-02-22 Thread DJ Lucas
On 02/21/14 13:20, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Armin K. wrote: I know what you meant. I have no problems with shipping package specific notes for now. Maintaining seperate BLFS is something I can't do alone and maintaining same instructions in one branch, then generating two different books is

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Systemd Additions

2014-02-22 Thread DJ Lucas
On 02/22/14 11:29, DJ Lucas wrote: Profiling is really what we are looking for, and we already have the functionality for two pass profiling in our Makefile for BLFS. See the attached patch. Oh, I forgot to mention, I didn't check to see if bind includes a unit file, it was just used

[blfs-dev] possibly uneeded IcedTea patch (Was: [lfs-patches] r2759 - trunk/icedtea)

2013-11-15 Thread DJ Lucas
Author: fernando Date: Thu Nov 7 03:35:00 2013 New Revision: 2759 Log: Bump patches versions for icedtea-2.4.3. Added: trunk/icedtea/icedtea-2.4.3-add_cacerts-1.patch (contents, props changed) Bruce added the script into the BLFS cacerts package, so no longer need to use the

Re: [blfs-dev] BLFS Version 7.4 is released

2013-09-20 Thread DJ Lucas
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: After five years, The BLFS Team is happy to present version 7.4 of Beyond Linux From Scratch. Wow! It's been a long time since I've heard even mention of a BLFS release. I can barely believe that it is possible with the number of packages now days.

Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm

2013-09-01 Thread DJ Lucas
Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 04:45:29PM +0200, Igor Živković wrote: Is there any reason why libdrm is in the general libraries section? I'd propose to move it to X installation before MesaLib or at very least to X libraries section since it depends on X

Re: [blfs-dev] Security: OpenJDK, mkcacerts.sh - zero, none, no certificate installed

2013-07-20 Thread DJ Lucas
Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Em 20-07-2013 10:54, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Fernando de Oliveira Problem: no root certificates generated for some non-english locales. In this message, first, I describe the problem, then the solution. Many

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1

2013-07-11 Thread DJ Lucas
Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken touched it. Unfortunately, since icedtea-2.4.0, problems started. For all versions, I have been using book's

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1

2013-07-11 Thread DJ Lucas
DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Instructions in BLFS for OpenJDK were very robust. Originally, by DJ, I think last update was from Bruce, cannot remember if Armin or Ken touched it. Unfortunately, since icedtea-2.4.0, problems started

Re: [blfs-dev] known to build on 7.3

2013-03-14 Thread DJ Lucas
previous incarnation. I guess it shouldn't be necessary to provide anything more than CLASSPATH now, but am unsure. Did you do a system install or keep it isolated in /opt (like in BLFS)? -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1 installed files ownership

2013-02-27 Thread DJ Lucas
Randy McMurchy ra...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: If you did that as the root user, then the package is broken. They use their own install script as opposed to the system's install. I ran across this a long time ago, probably when system XUL patch went in. Replacing it broke stuff. --DJ

Re: [blfs-dev] Samba4

2013-01-31 Thread DJ Lucas
On 01/31/2013 12:39 PM, Thomas Trepl wrote: Hi, On 01/28/2013 06:48 PM, Thomas Trepl wrote (in another thread): Well, dropping heimdal was for sure not without a reason. At least at the moment, for me its not quite a problem to continue without as Samba4 seems to support mit-krb5 well (which

Re: [blfs-dev] Samba4

2013-01-31 Thread DJ Lucas
On 01/31/2013 02:40 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: Thomas Trepl wrote these words on 01/31/13 12:39 CST: It turns out that this is no longer true. Seems so that AD-controller functionality is indeed only available when having Heimdal around. [snip] Currently, there seems to be no way to get AD-DC

Re: [blfs-dev] krb5 + tcl,python

2013-01-27 Thread DJ Lucas
On 01/27/2013 03:22 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote: Hi all, I tried to compile krb5 (as prerequisite for Samba4) but the make process failed with following error: Which implementation of krb5? I am not positive, but I think the Samba devs went with Heimdal in-tree over MIT. While either may be

Re: [blfs-dev] A good example why Command Explanations are important

2013-01-25 Thread DJ Lucas
On 01/25/2013 10:40 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote: 3) The --libexecdir= switch points to a non-standard location. libexecdir location has always been /usr/lib/packagename, Yes, historically it was, however, it should now be where the package maintainer chooses for it to be

Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea-web on seamonkey problem

2013-01-11 Thread DJ Lucas
on their plate. :-) -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-dev] My status (Was: Happy new year)

2013-01-05 Thread DJ Lucas
On 12/31/2012 04:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I've updated the dates for the book to 2013 and archived the 2012 changelog. You won't see the update in -book since it is over 200K and I deleted the posting. The on-line book will be updated in a few hours. Here are some statistics: 1469

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r10911 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome x/installing

2012-12-30 Thread DJ Lucas
On 12/30/2012 04:17 PM, kre...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Modified: trunk/BOOK/x/installing/installing.xml === --- trunk/BOOK/x/installing/installing.xml2012-12-30 22:09:54 UTC (rev 10910) +++

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7 MANDATORY paths

2012-11-04 Thread DJ Lucas
if supported. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

2012-10-21 Thread DJ Lucas
On 10/20/2012 02:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: BTW, what do we call this version. It's icedtea-2.3.3, but the build says: java version 1.7.0_0 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-b36) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode) Right now we are calling

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

2012-10-20 Thread DJ Lucas
On 10/19/2012 12:37 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I've been looking at updating iced tea. rant I'm into problems because the make files have hard coded paths into make files. /usr/bin/head (which is in /bin) and /bin/touch (which is in /usr/bin/touch). What are these guys thinking? why can't they

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea)

2012-10-20 Thread DJ Lucas
that patch again at some point in the future. I have a java version written by SUSE that I've modified to replace the bash script, but I haven't gotten around to writing a verify function (required in the case of crypto not built with NSS). -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

2012-10-20 Thread DJ Lucas
On 10/20/2012 10:55 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: On 10/19/2012 12:37 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I've been looking at updating iced tea. rant I'm into problems because the make files have hard coded paths into make files. /usr/bin/head (which is in /bin) and /bin/touch (which

Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-book] [LFS Trac] #3162: Glibc 2.16.0 Suggestions

2012-08-22 Thread DJ Lucas
. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-dev] Xorg introduction page

2012-07-29 Thread DJ Lucas
of the x7- page names and entities as part of a more general cleanup. Even though it is pretty strait forward, the latter will affect a lot of pages, does anyone have objections? -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r10477 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome x/installing

2012-07-29 Thread DJ Lucas
./configure $XORG_CONFIG make lt;as rootgt; make install popd rm -r $packagedir done/userinput/screen -- Bruce I think that should meet everyone's expectations. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg Applications

2012-07-12 Thread DJ Lucas
. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg Applications

2012-07-11 Thread DJ Lucas
, but both of those can wait. If you have the time and want to do what you have above, please do so as time and interest permit. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r10408 - in trunk/BOOK: introduction/important kde4/add kde4/core postlfs/filesystems postlfs/virtualization

2012-07-11 Thread DJ Lucas
', so the 'an' is appropriate to to avoid the 'a ell' combination. Ok, I will revert it. -Ragnar- My favorite place to look up English grammar quirks is the the online writing lab at Purdue University. It is a great resource to have handy. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/ -- DJ Lucas

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg Applications

2012-07-11 Thread DJ Lucas
to cover both scripted build and those of us who package. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg Applications

2012-07-11 Thread DJ Lucas
/ amp;amp; -md5sum -c ../app-xorg7-release;.md5/userinput/screen +md5sum -c ../applications.md5/userinput/screen ... Adding the spacing like you did is much easier to look at, and just ignore that sed...awk is better in this case. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses

Re: [blfs-dev] Shared library file locations

2012-07-08 Thread DJ Lucas
in the RedHat configuration. Do you mean to ditch the /usr directory completely? -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html

Re: [blfs-dev] Shared library file locations

2012-07-08 Thread DJ Lucas
On 07/08/2012 11:58 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: On 07/08/2012 03:43 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: The only downside is that for themes to work the environment variable XDG_DATA_DIRS=/share needs to be set. That could be fixed in the freedesktop source, or easier, symlink /share - /usr

[blfs-dev] GDM (very minor) issue and a suggestion

2012-07-08 Thread DJ Lucas
-nodaemon # End /etc/inittab -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] Proposed changes

2012-07-08 Thread DJ Lucas
, as in last year's suggestion (the change to google/linux is no longer appropriate, that has become google/webhp and is not linux specific). Any particular reason for rpm2cpio specifically? CLFS has an rpm2targz that we could add. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous

Re: [blfs-dev] Firefox/Thunderbird MimeType

2012-07-07 Thread DJ Lucas
On 07/05/2012 07:11 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 07:15:20 +0100 DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: We need to add the MimeType to the .desktop files for Firefox and Thunderbird. These are required to make them the default handlers in Gnome and KDE. I believe

Re: [blfs-dev] Firefox/Thunderbird MimeType

2012-07-07 Thread DJ Lucas
On 07/07/2012 11:23 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: What I have for mime types is... Firefox: MimeType=text/html;text/xml;application/xhtml+xml;x-scheme-handler/http; x-scheme-handler/https; Thunderbird: MimeType=text/calendar;text/x-vcard;text/directory;application/mbox; message

[blfs-dev] Firefox/Thunderbird MimeType

2012-07-05 Thread DJ Lucas
-handler/http;x-scheme-handler/https; Thunderbird: MimeType=text/calendar;text/x-vcard;text/directory;application/mbox;message/rfc822;x-scheme-handler/mailto;x-scheme-handler/news;x-scheme-handler/snews;x-scheme-handler/nntp;x-scheme-handler/feed -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned

Re: [blfs-dev] pam_ck_connector and pam_loginuid

2012-07-03 Thread DJ Lucas
(about 2 years old now). I'd like to keep pam_unix as a session module in system-session for logging though. In the case of sudo, it is an easy way to catch abuse cases of 'sudo su' or 'sudo bash' or similar. Do you have any other suggestions for the default PAM configuration? -- DJ Lucas

[blfs-dev] pam_ck_connector and pam_loginuid

2012-07-01 Thread DJ Lucas
that into login utilities pam configuration. I'll try and get a look at it Wed night or so (maybe even tonight...we'll see). -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ

Re: [blfs-dev] xorg problems

2012-06-27 Thread DJ Lucas
with an Nvidia card is something I've been meaning to do for a couple of years now and I have just never gotten around to it. Whatever the final solution is, please replace the example in the book, or post it so I can. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content

Re: [blfs-dev] Release Plan (Was: Separate Xorg packages)

2012-06-27 Thread DJ Lucas
. I'd like to see some of the (not so) new additions stick around for a while. :-) One thing to note is that my release proposal is just that, a proposal. I'd like to get some agreement this is the right thing to do and the approach is reasonable. See minor points above. -- DJ Lucas

Re: [blfs-dev] Separate Xorg packages (Was: Xorg-7.7-1 upgrade)

2012-06-27 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/26/2012 04:02 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: On 06/19/2012 08:18 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Embedding the md5 and wget files in the book seems like an OK idea to me. The only caveat is to consider the release plan. Right now, I'd like to release a coordinated LFS/BLFS

Re: [blfs-dev] Separate Xorg packages (Was: Xorg-7.7-1 upgrade)

2012-06-22 Thread DJ Lucas
. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] Separate Xorg packages (Was: Xorg-7.7-1 upgrade)

2012-06-22 Thread DJ Lucas
the wget lists, as most people will want only the 5 drivers, but maybe better to keep it for consistency's sake. IDK, guess we'll just see how it turns out. Of course, without a wget list for drivers, the additional drivers page can be merged with the main page. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been

[blfs-dev] Separate Xorg packages (Was: Xorg-7.7-1 upgrade)

2012-06-19 Thread DJ Lucas
! ;-) -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7-1 Update

2012-06-12 Thread DJ Lucas
separate packages that are those that are not part of the katamari, not from x.org, or those few from the x.org folks that must be separated for proper build order to still use the groups of packages. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed

Re: [blfs-dev] openjdk test report

2012-06-11 Thread DJ Lucas
(presumably icedtea-2.2.1). -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] openjdk test report

2012-06-11 Thread DJ Lucas
/TestResult.java and set DEFAULT_MAX_OUTPUT_SIZE above 10 to get the full output for that test (I just added a zero). For that particular one, it is a padding error (known issue). -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean

[blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7-1 Update

2012-06-11 Thread DJ Lucas
Update is complete, save for the index entries in the app, driver, font, lib, and proto sections. I ran out of time for them (I may still get it tonight, if not, Friday, but not much has changed). Otherwise, it's done. Let me know if you find any problems. -- DJ -- This message has been

[blfs-dev] Old files

2012-06-07 Thread DJ Lucas
archive/kde/core/pre-install-config.xml archive/obsolete/gpdf.xml postlfs/config/bootdisk.xml postlfs/editors/joe.xml postlfs/security/tripwire.xml x/installing/xorg7.xml x/wm/sawfish.xml x/wm/fluxbox.xml pst/sgml/openjade.xml pst/printing/lprng.xml ## Last updated in 2012 Snip 795 udpated pages -- DJ

Re: [blfs-dev] Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] X11R7.7

2012-06-07 Thread DJ Lucas
printproto, libXp, and xinit from the wget lists since they are not part of the katamari. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK Test failures

2012-06-06 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/02/2012 09:32 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: Okay, so digging into the test results on the new OpenJDK/IcedTea, the following jdk test failures can be ignored while testing on icedtea-2.2: Just append the following to icedtea-2.2/test/jtreg/excludelist.jdk.jtx to actually skip the tests Snip

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK Test failures

2012-06-06 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/06/2012 11:09 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: On 06/02/2012 09:32 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: Okay, so digging into the test results on the new OpenJDK/IcedTea, the following jdk test failures can be ignored while testing on icedtea-2.2: Just append the following to icedtea-2.2/test/jtreg

[blfs-dev] OpenJade requires Perl4::Corelibs

2012-06-05 Thread DJ Lucas
FYI, getopts is gone, so we may see a bit more of this. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJade requires Perl4::Corelibs

2012-06-05 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/05/2012 04:33 AM, Armin K. wrote: On 06/05/2012 11:20 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: FYI, getopts is gone, so we may see a bit more of this. -- DJ Lucas I have used this patch to build OpenJade with perl 5.16.0 ... And since the perl script is only used for some locale related files

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK and libreoffice-3.5.4.2 failures (Was: OpenJDK Test failures)

2012-06-04 Thread DJ Lucas
./autogen.sh and see if it works, but if it was released before February, then you will need the hsqldb changes also mentioned here. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/24011 -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content

Re: [blfs-dev] Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] libX11 1.5.0

2012-06-02 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/02/2012 04:49 AM, Armin K. wrote: At last. You can start upgrading Xorg section now. -- Not quite. There are still two outstanding bugs https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=47255hide_resolved=0 -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous

[blfs-dev] OpenJDK Test failures

2012-06-02 Thread DJ Lucas
://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/files/BLFS/OpenJDK-1.7.0.4/ -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information

Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea notes

2012-05-24 Thread DJ Lucas
to that is that a new VM is created for each test, which has a rather obvious effect on the wall clock. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org

Re: [blfs-dev] Observations about firefox and xulrunner

2012-05-19 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/19/2012 04:20 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Sat, 19 May 2012 01:01:28 +0100 Bruce Dubbsbruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: For FF, the command tar -xvf firefox-build-dir/dist/firefox-12.0.en-US.linux-$(uname -m).tar.bz2 -C /usr/lib/firefox-12.0 --strip-components=1 hung on me. I already

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r10221 - trunk/BOOK/xsoft/graphweb

2012-05-19 Thread DJ Lucas
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: a...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: andy Date: 2012-05-19 16:21:51 -0600 (Sat, 19 May 2012) New Revision: 10221 Modified: trunk/BOOK/xsoft/graphweb/firefox.xml Log: Neither Seamonkey or Thunderbird can use xulrunner Really? I haven't

Re: [blfs-dev] Observations about firefox and xulrunner

2012-05-18 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/18/2012 06:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: When I started FF, I looked at Help-About. Since I was using twm, I couldn't close that window! There is no close button for 'About' and twm doesn't have a window close function that I could find. This isn't a BLFS issue, but I thought it was

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads

2012-05-17 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/16/2012 10:52 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: On 16-05-2012 22:22, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: On 14-05-2012 20:26, DJ Lucas wrote: On 05/14/2012 10:38 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: --- Em seg, 14/5/12, DJ Lucas escreveu: De: DJ Lucas Assunto: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads Para

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads

2012-05-15 Thread DJ Lucas
Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr wrote: Le 15/05/2012 01:26, DJ Lucas a écrit : Okay, well this is gonna be ugly compared to typical book instructions, but: x86_64 production bin file is in place. It no longer includes IcedTea-Web. I have not built on i686 yet. Help would

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea web

2012-05-15 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/14/2012 08:43 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: On 05/12/2012 12:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Looking at iced tea web, it looks like xulrunner is a required dependency. It's looking for mozilla-plugin.pc. When I search the web, it looks like that's the only thing that installs it. Not sure though

Re: [blfs-dev] Recent build notes

2012-05-15 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/15/2012 06:18 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 05:44:14PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: Couple of things I noticed on my latest build. The DRM backend is broken in cairo with Xorg-7.7, no idea if this is the result of the export symbols patch or latest xorg. Anybody built

Re: [blfs-dev] Recent build notes

2012-05-15 Thread DJ Lucas
if necessary). Doh! Good point. I'll fix that tomorrow. Thanks Yeah, I suffered a major space cadet moment on that one. Funny now, but I was like Permission denied? Huh? It's 755! WTH?!?! 10 minutes of the same cycle later the light bulb comes on. Oh...Yep I'm a dumb a**! LOL -- DJ Lucas

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads

2012-05-14 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/14/2012 07:21 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 06:26:56PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: I suspect a number of them are related to running in twm (windows not automatically anchored in awt tests). I know we include twm for a minimal build of xorg, but I didn't think anybody

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea web

2012-05-14 Thread DJ Lucas
backport the --with-gtk={3,2} patch that came across on 5/11, else if built against gtk-2 and used with Midori, Epiphany, or other webkit based browsers built against gtk+-3, it will fail to work. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed

[blfs-dev] OT: twm [Was: Re: OpenJDK downloads]

2012-05-14 Thread DJ Lucas
On 05/14/2012 08:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 5/14/12, DJ Lucasd...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Heh, no I'd shoot myself if subjected to it for too long. Just meeting the most minimal requirements for a Java rebuild, and for that, a decent WM was not high prioritybut will be in about 10

[blfs-dev] XUL Runner and Firefox

2012-05-13 Thread DJ Lucas
that way by default is that the Mozilla devs choose not to cater to developers, but rather end users...understandable give the huge Windows target, but a minor PITA for us and a source of mild disagreement. Anybody think this is a bad compromise? -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned

Re: [blfs-dev] XUL Runner and Firefox

2012-05-13 Thread DJ Lucas
I've installed java. Andy Understood. There is an easier workaround someplace. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs

Re: [blfs-dev] XUL Runner and Firefox

2012-05-13 Thread DJ Lucas
is referring to the build size...actually...IDK. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: [blfs-dev] XUL Runner and Firefox

2012-05-13 Thread DJ Lucas
of this is in /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-12.0/sdk/lib/libxul.so -rwxrwxr-x 1 root root 463M May 13 13:45 libxul.so, but stripping it gets it down to 24M. Oh. Nix the -g flag in the XUL runner build and install everything. Firefox should be no different than any other package in BLFS. -- DJ Lucas

[blfs-dev] OpenJDK downloads

2012-05-13 Thread DJ Lucas
with the files already renamed, or just let the makefile handle it with a note saying that if you want to build offline, you'll need to download these files before hand? -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http

Re: [blfs-dev] xulrunner is required for icedtea source build

2012-05-10 Thread DJ Lucas
Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr wrote: Le 08/05/2012 22:22, Pierre Labastie a écrit : The Firefox and Seamonkey pages have a paragraph that mentions how you can install all the development libs. If they need changing to accommodate icedtea please let me know. Andy Thanks for

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner

2012-05-02 Thread DJ Lucas
be given back to the community. As far as future plans, unless somebody sees some value in the closed version, I do want Oracle's JDK removed from the book, and I plan to rename the IcedTea page OpenJDK as IcedTea is just the build tool. I hope that clears up any confusion. -- DJ Lucas

Re: [blfs-dev] Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.19.0

2012-05-02 Thread DJ Lucas
itself. Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I thought this was seen with ATI and NVidia drivers too. :-/ Also, Cairo is up to 1.12.2 (current patch applies and I already symlinked it in the repo). -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r10058 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome postlfs/editors x/lib

2012-05-02 Thread DJ Lucas
of separating the packages in the first place. We might as well just write a Makefile with a World target. The fonts are another thing. We probably need only the font-util package and an assortment of TTF fonts now that the legacy packages are gone. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned

Re: [blfs-dev] Gnome 3.4 status

2012-04-23 Thread DJ Lucas
. I'll post anything else I notice as I come across it. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See

Re: [blfs-dev] Planning

2012-04-19 Thread DJ Lucas
are successful with what is currently in the book (also, no need to fake gcj home with ecj, and no more need for xerces and xalan). -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev

[blfs-dev] Java Common page

2012-04-15 Thread DJ Lucas
-bin.2.11.0.zip -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] KMS, Gallium, kernel firmware, etc.

2012-04-15 Thread DJ Lucas
, framebuffer, penguins and nice fonts right from the start. Okay, so that has been tested then. I will revisit this a little later and do the same. Intel and Nvidia users have the same issues, or is this limited to Radeon devices? -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses

Re: [blfs-dev] Java Common page

2012-04-15 Thread DJ Lucas
On 04/15/2012 03:30 AM, Armin K. wrote: On 04/15/2012 08:39 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: Anybody have an objection to a Java Components page such as is done with Perl or Python as opposed to 10 new package pages? Items such as ECJ, JUnit, JAI, Jakrata, Net-Commons, Xerces, XalanJ, etc. could be placed

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.6-2 upgrade

2012-04-14 Thread DJ Lucas
not sure about xorg-server-1.12.1 (haven't looked at it), but if x.org is preparing for a distribution version bump anyway, I'd personally just let it hang for a couple of weeks. Issues like the drivers above, and new libx11 will be fixed by the time a distribution release is made. -- DJ Lucas

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg Build Instructions

2012-04-11 Thread DJ Lucas
Armin K. kre...@email.com wrote: Hello there. I've been looking at Xorg build instructions lately. Introduction page includes little script that automates building of every package in the section. Every package section have only configure (a bit different at some stages), make and make

Re: [blfs-dev] Remove lesstif and xpdf?

2012-04-10 Thread DJ Lucas
, but I'd expect it to be done. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] What happened to the x-setup.html page?

2012-04-08 Thread DJ Lucas
much voodoo in docbook 8) The important stuff is the changes in xorg-config, changes in clutter (apart from the link), metacity, mutter, totem are really just minor rewording now that I understand the hw/sw acceleration a little more. Looks good to me! -- DJ Lucas -- This message has

Re: [blfs-dev] Open = Libre Office

2012-04-08 Thread DJ Lucas
Andrew Benton a...@benton.eu.com wrote: Hello, Based on the information Fernando is spoon feeding me I think I may be close to being able to compile Libre Office. If I get it to work and run (I can't promise anything ;) I'd like to replace Open Office with Libre Office (in the book). IE, remove

Re: [blfs-dev] What happened to the x-setup.html page?

2012-04-06 Thread DJ Lucas
and overlooked that that instruction was NOT duplicated. DJ ? Ah yes, it didn't get transferred over to the single page. Will get on it in a sec. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman

Re: [blfs-dev] What happened to the x-setup.html page?

2012-04-06 Thread DJ Lucas
On 04/06/2012 11:14 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: On 04/06/2012 07:43 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:37:24PM +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: Apologies if I missed a previous discussion, but I noticed the x-setup.html page no longer exists (not linked). I was specifically looking

Re: [blfs-dev] [resend] gdm

2012-04-04 Thread DJ Lucas
On 04/03/2012 10:00 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: I've never heard of AD I read that as Active Directory. Don't knwo for sure if that's what DJ meant. -- Bruce Yes. It's been a long time, but I have managed to make linux workstations play nice in AD. -- DJ Lucas

Re: [blfs-dev] xulrunner breakage

2012-04-04 Thread DJ Lucas
if that is only libcrfm or do they just regularly break API/ABI in the same minor? -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs

Re: [blfs-dev] xulrunner breakage

2012-04-04 Thread DJ Lucas
Andrew Benton a...@benton.eu.com wrote: On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:38:07 +0100 DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: IOW, add the following at the end of the instructions (fixes my libproxy issue, and allows libmusicbrainz to install): Finally, while still the root user, add symlinks

[blfs-dev] xulrunner breakage

2012-04-03 Thread DJ Lucas
) libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x7f26e5807000) libgcc_s.so.1 = /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x7f26e55f2000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x7f26e5269000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f26e6a43000) -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous

Re: [blfs-dev] FHS 3.0 adaptation

2012-04-03 Thread DJ Lucas
://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18427 -- Fixed Notice my examples all revolve around Gnome? And I thought KDE was a PITA. :-) Still a Gnome user. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman

Re: [blfs-dev] [resend] gdm

2012-04-03 Thread DJ Lucas
and avoidable by using /usr as the prefix and standard libexec dirs. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >