Luca wrote:
> no-reply received
Strange. I sent my ideas on improving the proposed XML syntax. Could you
please check your "spam" folder? Due to XML tags, my message could well
end up there.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linu
Ahh... maybe I realized what you meant with erroneous pasting.
The deps and circular dependencies... well I thought it was
understandable that idea must be improved to solve these two (I found
useless to write it in original posting -> sorry, to me it was obvious
otherwise I would have pasted w
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BLFS Development List"
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Python
> Luca wrote:
>> Some days ago I sent a mail to Alexander his opinion about the
&g
Luca wrote:
> Some days ago I sent a mail to Alexander his opinion about the Package
> Management (in Lfs book).
>
Randy, Luca quotes his own message incorrectly. The words "in LFS book"
were not in the mail I received. If they were there, my reply would be
very different.
--
Alexander E.
- Original Message -
From: "Luca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BLFS Development List"
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Python
> Some days ago I sent a mail to Alexander his opinion about the Package
> Management (in Lfs book).
- Original Message -
From: "Randy McMurchy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BLFS Development List"
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: Gnome-Python
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/12/07 17:34 CST:
>
>
> Here's a thought. C
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:21:14 -0500
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [cc'd to LFS-Dev as this is supposed to be a nice attaboy to the
> LFS devs]
>
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/11/07 19:45 CST:
>
> > It's the least I could do after you powered through so many
> > commits ove
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/12/07 17:34 CST:
> Perhaps move gnome-python to its own page and gnome-python-desktop to
> its own page, and leave the rest of the modules on the existing page.
>
> I"m wide open to suggestions or ideas that can help.
Here's a thought
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 08/12/07 16:50 CST:
> But due that all modules are in the same page, blfs-tool generates the full
> tree incuded when the user only need PyXML or Pycairo. Fun, fun...
Would you recommend that we split this up a bit?
Perhaps move gnome-python to its ow
all optional dependencies enabled the total is 205 packages :-0
Actually almost all of them are to build Gnome-Python and Gnome-Python-Desktop
modules. The other modules have few dependencies.
But due that all modules are in the same page, blfs-tool generates the full
tree incuded when the user onl
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 08/12/07 13:13 CST:
> I don't know if the dependencies are accurate or not, but to can build all
> listed modules other 108 packages need be build. And that following only the
> required and recommended dependencies.
That is incredible. No telling how many more
El Domingo, 12 de Agosto de 2007 20:29, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> I realize that this is gonna hurt in jhalfs :) If you have any
> suggestions on how to break things up a bit, let me know.
Yeah, I'm trying yet to depure all that circular dependencies when optional
ones are selected (G
nted to split up into
dependencies needed for each module is for this reason. For instance,
gedit wants to use the gtksourceview module from gnome-python-desktop.
If you were going to try to tackle all the modules in
gnome-python-desktop, you would be in dependency hell for a long time
(I know bec
El Domingo, 12 de Agosto de 2007 18:36, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> And by couple of hours, I meant 15 :) Anyway, it's in there now at
> r7047. The text is still quite lacking, but I believe the stats and
> dependencies are accurate.
I don't know if the dependencies are accurate or not, but to can
On 8/11/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Certainly. It's the least I could do after you powered through so many
> commits over the past couple weeks. Let me clean up the text a bit and
> I'll push it in in the next couple hours.
And by couple of hours, I meant 15 :) Anyway, it's in
[cc'd to LFS-Dev as this is supposed to be a nice attaboy to the
LFS devs]
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/11/07 19:45 CST:
> It's the least I could do after you powered through so many
> commits over the past couple weeks.
Once upon a time, I read a message from Alexander and he said that
On 8/11/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/10/07 16:23 CST:
> > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/09/07 10:59 CST:
> >> Let me know if you have any suggestions.
> >
> > Commit it. :-)
> >
> >
> > Good work, Dan. Thanks.
>
> Bump to the top of
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/10/07 16:23 CST:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/09/07 10:59 CST:
>> Let me know if you have any suggestions.
>
> Commit it. :-)
>
>
> Good work, Dan. Thanks.
Bump to the top of the list in case Dan missed it the first time
around. :-)
--
Randy
t the text at the top is from the Perl page. Most of
> the text needs work. I was just figuring out the mechanics so far. Possibly
> we can add id attributes to each of the submodules (e.g., gnome.ui) to make
> the xrefs nicer.
Yes, that would be good.
> I think I fixed all the pygtk
lanket page for all modules should
> >> be really easy.
> >
> > Ahh, yes, that's a great idea. Can I help work on that? Have you done
> > anything so far?
>
> I've done nothing except document all the dependencies for all the
> packages. I'd
ea. Can I help work on that? Have you done
> anything so far?
I've done nothing except document all the dependencies for all the
packages. I'd be glad to hand-off to you. I entered Trac tickets for
Gnome-Python, Gnome-Python-Desktop, and PyGTK.
It doesn't matter to me if you wa
On 8/8/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/08/07 13:01 CST:
>
> > I think pygtk should definitely be
> > in the book.
>
> I think we should turn the PyXML page into a 'Python modules' page
> similar to the 'Perl Modules' page. Almost every Python mo
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/08/07 13:01 CST:
> On 8/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Log:
>> Modified the Gnome-Python dependency list entity (use this until
>> Gnome-Python is put in the book)
>
> What's the plan for gnome
On 8/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log:
> Modified the Gnome-Python dependency list entity (use this until Gnome-Python
> is put in the book)
What's the plan for gnome-python? I think pygtk should definitely be
in the book. For gnome-python and gno
24 matches
Mail list logo
