>From: Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On 10/9/07, Walter Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Providing BLFS in info format does not require dumbing down *LFS or making
>> any other major changes to its content. All that's required is to put aside
>> what one likes or dislikes and conside
>From: Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On 10/9/07, Walter Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I could probably do that but chrooting while running the host and using
>> the host's browser to read BLFS would be easier. Either way, it does not
>> make sense to me that regardless of wha
On 10/9/07, Walter Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Providing BLFS in info format does not require dumbing down *LFS or making
> any other major changes to its content. All that's required is to put aside
> what one likes or dislikes and consider that Texinfo is a part of LFS so why
> not p
On 10/9/07, Walter Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I could probably do that but chrooting while running the host and using
> the host's browser to read BLFS would be easier. Either way, it does not make
> sense to me that regardless of what it lacks, you can at least read info
> pages
It happened again! D'oh! Resending, sorry
>From: Trent Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Tuesday 09 October 2007 08:22:26 pm Walter Barnes wrote:
>> After completing LFS and knowing that it includes Texinfo I fully expected
>> BLFS to be available as an info page; I was very surprised to find tha
For some reason this went to Trent instead of the list so I'm resending
>From: Trent Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Tuesday 09 October 2007 07:57:35 pm Walter Barnes wrote:
>> That looks good but the problem is that the prerequisites include things
>> that are not a part of LFS (a working unprivle
On 10/9/07, Walter Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >>>From an earlier post on this thread:
> >>
> >> I don't really understand why BLFS is not available in
> >> info format so you can easily read it in a fresh LFS
> >>
> >> Walter
> >>
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 08:22:26 pm Walter Barnes wrote:
> After completing LFS and knowing that it includes Texinfo I fully expected
> BLFS to be available as an info page; I was very surprised to find that
> this is not the case.
It's simply a matter of taste. Personally I don't like info/ema
>From: Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Walter Barnes wrote:
>>> From: Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>> First thing to note is that what's in LFS isn't supposed to be a
>>> feature complete system. It tries to create a general development
>>> system for you to build on. So, if links needs
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 07:57:35 pm Walter Barnes wrote:
> That looks good but the problem is that the prerequisites include things
> that are not a part of LFS (a working unprivledged user acount and an
> internet connection).
I haven't looked at the program, but I'm assuming it converts to a
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:48:46 -0500
david567 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randolph D Dach wrote:
> >
> > Is there any way to change that font or do I have to rebuild the
> > GTK packages???
>
> http://plasmasturm.org/code//gtk-chtheme/
>
> works for gtk+-2.
>
> David Jensen
> --
Tks
That w
>From: rblythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Take a look at this:
>http://linux.maruhn.com/sec/unhtml.html
>
>It is called unhtml. It turns html pages into text. I used it when I
>built the BLFS system I am using now and I also included it in this hint:
>http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/f
Randolph D Dach wrote:
>
> Is there any way to change that font or do I have to rebuild the GTK
> packages???
http://plasmasturm.org/code//gtk-chtheme/
works for gtk+-2.
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.htm
Hi everyone
I'm having a little problem trying to find an answer to a slight
problem I have. I am using the latest LFS/BLFS build, Xorg-7.2,
WindowMaker, Gtk+2. I am trying to get all my GTK applications to
show a different font on the toolbar(file,edit,view,etc). It is stuck
on sans which is
Walter Barnes wrote:
>> From: Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> First thing to note is that what's in LFS isn't supposed to be a
>> feature complete system. It tries to create a general development
>> system for you to build on. So, if links needs to be part of your base
>> install, you shoul
>From: Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>First thing to note is that what's in LFS isn't supposed to be a
>feature complete system. It tries to create a general development
>system for you to build on. So, if links needs to be part of your base
>install, you shouldn't feel like you're doing somet
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 10/9/07, Walter Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> From: Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> Installing one or two tools like Links isn't exactly a major change to
>>> the system - it's a trivial build that'll take a minute or two of your
>>> time to perform. W
On 10/9/07, Walter Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Installing one or two tools like Links isn't exactly a major change to
> >the system - it's a trivial build that'll take a minute or two of your
> >time to perform. Would you really prefer to spend
>
> find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/net: this may be a bug in
> your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option.
> Earlier results may have failed to include directories that should have been
> searched.
>
> There have been instances in the not too di
>From: Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 00:09 -0700, Walter Barnes wrote:
>> Well that's a shame. I'd really like to be able to download whatever
>> packages I need, put them on a partion reachable with my LFS system
>> along with BLFS then boot into LFS and start working on
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 00:09 -0700, Walter Barnes wrote:
> Well that's a shame. I'd really like to be able to download whatever
> packages I need, put them on a partion reachable with my LFS system
> along with BLFS then boot into LFS and start working on BLFS without
> making any making any major c
>From: Simon Scheiwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 19:59 -0700, Walter Barnes wrote:
>>> Is there a tool in LFS that I can use to convert HTML/PDF to another
>>> format?
>>>
>>> I'm a Linux newbie so I don't know if the base LFS has this
>>> capability. Any help will be greatly
22 matches
Mail list logo
