Re: [blfs-support] pnmixer - was Re: gvolwheel

2013-10-07 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:51:01PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >> >> Now to install it on the other current LFS systems on that box - >> looks like I'll probably use it to replace gvolwheel in future, >> > Installed it on all the "still viable" systems on the new box (7.0, > 7.

[blfs-support] pnmixer - was Re: gvolwheel

2013-10-07 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:51:01PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Now to install it on the other current LFS systems on that box - > looks like I'll probably use it to replace gvolwheel in future, > Installed it on all the "still viable" systems on the new box (7.0, 7.1, and 7.4x2). Fine. Decid

Re: [blfs-support] gvolwheel

2013-10-07 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 07:02:22PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 02:51:34PM +0200, Igor Živković wrote: > > > > I use pnmixer with "xterm -e 'alsamixer'" for VolumeControlCommand. It > > is also visually pleasing with tint2 on my openbox. > > > Thanks. Looks as if it might

Re: [blfs-support] gvolwheel

2013-10-07 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:57:31PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > It seems to me that it really wouldn't be that hard to develop a program > interface that merely calls amixer with the appropriate settings. The > user interface could be gtk, qt, java, python, or even tk. > > Personally, I have

Re: [blfs-support] gvolwheel

2013-10-07 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:37:43AM +0200, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > >On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 02:04:43 +0200 > >Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > > > > > > Aha, OK! Your mixer has to have the PCM device as well. So, if it does > > not appear on alsamixer, then you have to start some program that will > > ins

[blfs-support] google chrome browser building woes

2013-10-07 Thread alex lupu
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:07 AM, lux-integ wrote: > On Saturday 05 October 2013 16:46:52 Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > I'm re-sending the link you submitted: > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/chromi > um/chromium-30.0.1599.66.ebuild?view=markup > thanks very much

Re: [blfs-support] google chrome browser building woes

2013-10-07 Thread lux-integ
On Saturday 05 October 2013 16:46:52 Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > I'm re-sending the link you submitted: > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/chromi > um/chromium-30.0.1599.66.ebuild?view=markup thanks very much for the sending the link ( I sincerely hope other blfs

Re: [blfs-support] Time discrepency LFS 7.2 64bit/BLFS various

2013-10-07 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:50:10 +0100, Richard Melville wrote: > Slightly off topic: can anybody say how much of the post title has to > change before it's considered a different thread. I ask this because I > noticed right at the beginning that I had misspelt "discrepancy". I > didn't want to cha

Re: [blfs-support] Time discrepency LFS 7.2 64bit/BLFS various

2013-10-07 Thread Pierre M.R.
Richard Melville wrote: > I always thought that GMT and UTC were much the same, and that it was > a French plot to wrest control of "time" from us :-) It's true that if the leap seconds are abolished the Greenwich meridian is over Paris in less than one thousand years... Pierre -- http://linux

Re: [blfs-support] Time discrepency LFS 7.2 64bit/BLFS various

2013-10-07 Thread Richard Melville
> > To be short, UTC is based on atomic clocks. Because the earth revolution > speed varies (it always decreased till 1970), in UTC time the 0? > meridian (solar time) tends to drift East. The leap seconds are added to > UTC to keep the 0? meridian at Greenwich. > > In the regions where the legal t