On 12/5/05, Luca Dionisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I get closer to the solution I'll write down a note on this thread.
>
Hi all
I finally completed the installation of core GNOME 2.12.2
This time I've got Nautilus to use all the icons it has.
I can see a computer, a trash-can, folders, text
Of Couurse
It's a typo.
:)
I'm installing 2.12.2
Thanks.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Luca Dionisi wrote these words on 12/05/05 04:12 CST:
> I'm still working on a new installation. I'm trying with the latest
> version of gnome (2.12.3)
That's a neat trick. According to the GNOME Roadmap and Development
page (http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirteen), 2.12.3 isn't due out
until Feb
On 12/5/05, Lennon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I will re-download and
> > install Nautilus, to see if I can do a better job of tracking down the
> > problem.
> Ok, I got around to doing this today. I'm sad to say that it is still
> giving me the problem, and I can't get even the
I wrote:
> I will re-download and
> install Nautilus, to see if I can do a better job of tracking down the
> problem.
Ok, I got around to doing this today. I'm sad to say that it is still
giving me the problem, and I can't get even the slightest error from
it. I tried re-installing shared-mime-info
Luca Dionisi wrote:
> given an installation that wants to save configuration in gconf2 or in the
> scrollkeeper database, is the behaviour of that installation similar to
> the
> one I described?
Yes. Or atleast, any differences there are don't seem to change things any.
> 2- If yes,
Hi Lennon
On 11/23/05, Lennon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luca Dionisi wrote:
> > If I got it, you mean that any pkg installation that
> > wants to add things to that database will use this program. Right?
> Yes. It works in a similar way to gconf - package provides raw files,
> runs that ap
On 12/1/05, S. Anthony Sequeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 09:52 +0100, Luca Dionisi wrote:
> > That is: I've got a setuid-root bash script. It prints out the
> > effective
> > and real uid.
> > But when I run it, I won't have root privileges... Why?!?
>
> A security feature
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 09:52 +0100, Luca Dionisi wrote:
> That is: I've got a setuid-root bash script. It prints out the
> effective
> and real uid.
> But when I run it, I won't have root privileges... Why?!?
A security feature. Check out Google.
> Is my system acting normally?
Yes.
I'd go for
On 11/24/05, Lennon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And now I think of it, you can limit scrollkeeper-update to being used
> by install users by adjusting it's permissions so:
> chgrp install $(which scrollkeeper-update) && chmod o-rx $(which
> scrollkeeper-update)
Hi Lennon
I'm trying to do som
On Thu, November 24, 2005 21:43, Lennon Cook said:
> And now I think of it, you can limit scrollkeeper-update to being used
> by install users by adjusting it's permissions so:
> chgrp install $(which scrollkeeper-update) && chmod o-rx $(which
> scrollkeeper-update)
An excellent idea. Why didn'
Luca Dionisi wrote:
> I'm not sure that the update tool will report it as an error
> and cause the installation to fail.
It does. I ran into this with basically every GNOME package before I
realised I could make scrollkeeper-update SUID. The main problems are
the Scrollkeeper log file, and a tempo
On 11/24/05, Lennon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/24/05, Luca Dionisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Concerning scrollkeeper, I'm not happy with having _another_ executable
> > setuid root. If this became a common scenario, someone could try and
> > find a bug in it to exploit.
> It does
Luca Dionisi wrote these words on 11/24/05 05:13 CST:
> I'm wondering: is making install dirs really enough? Do the tools used by
> installation script to update the scrollkeeper/mime/desktop/whatsoever
> database _only_ create new files in install dir ? Or they try to update
> existing files? Th
Hi Lennon
First of all, thank you again for the reply. I appreciate, but I
still have some doubt.
Concerning scrollkeeper, I'm not happy with having _another_ executable
setuid root. If this became a common scenario, someone could try and
find a bug in it to exploit.
This thing is not the _importa
Luca Dionisi wrote:
> If I got it, you mean that any pkg installation that
> wants to add things to that database will use this program. Right?
Yes. It works in a similar way to gconf - package provides raw files,
runs that app to register them in the database. Ofcourse, the
workaround for gconf is
Thanks.
On 11/22/05, Lennon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had the same problem, and ended up working around it by replacing
> Nautilus with ROX-Filer (but, I dislike Nautilus anyway). The thing of
I don't dislike Nautilus, and I want to give it a try.
> The Scrollkeeper database won't cau
Luca Dionisi wrote:
> Then, launching gnome-session, all the icons in nautilus windows
> (and in the desktop) are the same default sheet. :(
I had the same problem, and ended up working around it by replacing
Nautilus with ROX-Filer (but, I dislike Nautilus anyway). The thing of
note here, I think,
On Tue, November 22, 2005 14:08, Luca Dionisi said:
> On 11/22/05, S. Anthony Sequeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Then, launching gnome-session, all the icons in nautilus windows
>> > (and in the desktop) are the same default sheet. :(
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean here, could you expla
On 11/22/05, S. Anthony Sequeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Then, launching gnome-session, all the icons in nautilus windows
> > (and in the desktop) are the same default sheet. :(
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here, could you explain:
>
> 1) Exactly what you are seeing (default sheet?)
> 2)
On Tue, November 22, 2005 12:10, Luca Dionisi said:
> Hi folks
>
> Has anyone succeded in installing Gnome using package-users ?
Yes, though I have yet to use it 'in anger', I'm installing additional
X packages ATM.
> I've just finished the installation of Gnome Core packages by
> following the
21 matches
Mail list logo
