On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 09:29:00PM +0200, sacarde wrote:
>
>
> but how do I do to select the font in X ?
>
You don't, it's done automatically. I think fontconfig does it all
now [but perhaps NOT for xorg core fonts], so if you want to override
something to cause a particular font to be preferr
Alle venerdì 10 settembre 2010, linux fan ha scritto:
in xorg.conf I substitute in dir fonts:
/usr/lib/X11/font
with
/usr/share/fonts/X11/
but how do I do to select the font in X ?
thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.o
On 9/10/10, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Ah! The book expects these to be in /usr/lib/X11/fonts, and then
> makes symlinks for the OTF and TTF fonts. How old-fashioned! My
> fonts have been in /usr/share/fonts since the days of LFS-6.4.
ISTR fontconfig finds all fonts in /usr/share/fonts.
In some cir
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:41:58AM +0200, sacarde wrote:
>hi,
> I have a question:
>
>after step xorg7-font , I found:
>
>in /usr/share/fonts/X11/
>I have dirs: 100dpi 75dpi cyrillic encodings misc OTF TTF Type1 util
I have the same thing:
drwxr-xr-x 2 root ro
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:41:58AM +0200, sacarde wrote:
> hi,
>I have a question:
>
> after step xorg7-font , I found:
>
> in /usr/share/fonts/X11/
> I have dirs: 100dpi 75dpi cyrillic encodings misc OTF TTF Type1 util
>
>
> but in /usr/lib/X11
> I have:
> drwxr-xr-x 7 root roo
b-vol wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I am about to try and install avifile. I notice it needs qt3. I have
> already
> installed qt-4.4.3 and enabled qt3 compatibility. Does anyone know if this
> is suffcient for avifile or if qt-3.3.8b MUST be installed?
I don't know for sure, but I suspect that
OK, thanks. I can usually figure out how to get an application
working, but when messing around with users and groups, I always have
this haunting fear that I have unwittingly opened up a giant security
hole :) So it is good to have some confirmation :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/lis
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Andrew Barnes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, thanks for your advice. As I understand it then:
>
> (i) It is important to distinguish between what the /etc/passwd and
> /etc/group file formats allow, and what the useradd utility can do,
> the first being more g
OK, thanks for your advice. As I understand it then:
(i) It is important to distinguish between what the /etc/passwd and
/etc/group file formats allow, and what the useradd utility can do,
the first being more general than the last
(ii) It is possible to create groupless users, by editing the
/e
Andrew Barnes wrote these words on 04/11/08 12:30 CST:
> [snip explanation and questions about users and groups]
(My explanations below assume you use shadowed group and passwd
files.)
=
A user must have a default group assigned to be of any value.
In
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> rblythe wrote:
>
>> I am going to be installing f77 based on the information from the blfs
>> wiki on compiling gcc-3.4.6 with c and f77 compilers only. My questions
>> are:
>>
>> 1) Is it possible to only install f77 (--enable-languages=f77) ?
>>
>
> If I remembe
rblythe wrote:
> I am going to be installing f77 based on the information from the blfs
> wiki on compiling gcc-3.4.6 with c and f77 compilers only. My questions
> are:
>
> 1) Is it possible to only install f77 (--enable-languages=f77) ?
If I remember correctly, you must install the 'C' langua
Simon Geard schreef:
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 14:06 -0600, Archaic wrote:
Nautilus doesn't display $HOME on the desktop, but it does display
$HOME/Desktop, which is close enough for me.
Actually you can put your $HOME on the desktop. With the configuration
editor you can set in /apps/nautilus/p
The whole point of the discussion was to avoid those 2 bloated DE's. :)
Nautilus doesn't display $HOME on the desktop, but it does display
$HOME/Desktop, which is close enough for me. Better, even, since $HOME
tends to be a lot more cluttered than I want my desktop to be. I tend to
use it to ke
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:22:42PM +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
>
> You could install Gnome :)
The whole point of the discussion was to avoid those 2 bloated DE's. :)
> Nautilus doesn't display $HOME on the desktop, but it does display
> $HOME/Desktop, which is close enough for me. Better, even, si
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 14:06 -0600, Archaic wrote:
> I've found a few different things that allow you to put application
> icons on the desktop. However, this isn't what I want. I want to put
> files/dirs on my desktop. It's the one sinful little desire ;) where I
> actually like the flash and dash
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:12:11PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> I think there is a way to edit the context menu, but I'm not sure. At
> the very least, you can add nautilus scripts. They can be shell
> scripts or whatever. See here:
I've found a few different things that allow you to put ap
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I think there is a way to edit the context menu, but I'm not sure.
The context menu seems to be hard coded in
nautilus-2.14.1/src/file-manager/fm-directory-view.c
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/
Archaic wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:48:21PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
Openbox is worth a look too. http://icculus.org/openbox/
It looks nice, but it suffers from the same problem that caused me to
leave fluxbox: no panel or taskbar.
I use pypanel for this with openbox3.
--
http://l
On 5/20/06, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know. It may be possible I've not looked into it, I learnt to
live without seeing stuff on the desktop. I launch rox from the right
click menu and then navigate into the Desktop folder to see what's there.
I install most of gnome and l
Archaic wrote:
It looks nice, but it suffers from the same problem that caused me to
leave fluxbox: no panel or taskbar. I'd have to install a large chunk of
gnome or KDE to get them. Hrmm. I may be talking myself into staying
with Xfce afterall... ;)
Fluxbox has a toolbar
Now to side-track t
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:48:21PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
>
> Openbox is worth a look too. http://icculus.org/openbox/
It looks nice, but it suffers from the same problem that caused me to
leave fluxbox: no panel or taskbar. I'd have to install a large chunk of
gnome or KDE to get them. Hrmm
Archaic wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:11:31PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
But no, you will not be missing out any any major functionality that I
can think of. It's cool eye candy and not much else.
That's what I figured. I'm not a big fan of eye candy. I'm also not a
big fan of complex wi
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 17:59 -0600, Archaic wrote:
> I've never had a desire to build this, but I'm messing around with the
> beta xfce and it has it as an optional dep. The stable xfce does, too,
> but I've never used it. From what I can tell, it simply allows xfce to
> use svg icons instead of png
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:11:31PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> But no, you will not be missing out any any major functionality that I
> can think of. It's cool eye candy and not much else.
That's what I figured. I'm not a big fan of eye candy. I'm also not a
big fan of complex windowed envir
On 5/19/06, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've never had a desire to build this, but I'm messing around with the
beta xfce and it has it as an optional dep. The stable xfce does, too,
but I've never used it. From what I can tell, it simply allows xfce to
use svg icons instead of png icons. T
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:54:47AM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
>
> /begin nag
Well some would say that you are being mean/rude/whatever. I, however,
think you stated exactly what needed to be said in a manner is strong
enough to stand out and make people take notice. Well done, sir.
--
Archai
On 10/25/05, Rainer Peter Feller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 11:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Probably because *nobody* here knows anything about libc5.
> or nobody wants to admit that s/he is that old that s/he knows anything
> about libc5
Grazie
Luca
--
http://linuxfro
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 11:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Luca Dionisi wrote:
>
> > I was just wondering: have I said something wrong in my previous
> > post in this thread?
> > Why no answers from anyone in ten days?
> >
> > Luca
>
> Probably because *nobody* here knows anyth
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Luca Dionisi wrote:
I was just wondering: have I said something wrong in my previous
post in this thread?
Why no answers from anyone in ten days?
Luca
Probably because *nobody* here knows anything about libc5.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> I was just wondering: have I said something wrong in my previous
> post in this thread?
> Why no answers from anyone in ten days?
>
Ok. Take as much from the list below as fits.
/begin nag
This list works by people volunteering personal time to h
I was just wondering: have I said something wrong in my previous
post in this thread?
Why no answers from anyone in ten days?
Luca
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail not delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This account is the target for 100+ spam each day, please contact me using
alternative means.
Original Message
> I have corrected your document.
>
> +++ Attachment: No Virus found
> +++ Bitdefender AntiVi
Jean-Philippe Mengual wrote:
> Hi,
> Could someone explain to me why, in the book blfs, is Fcron-2.9.5.1
> replace cr¨ontab I used on Debian? Cannot I install crontab? Why
> replacement?
I'm not sure of the original reasons, but I use fcron because it seems
better than Vixie Cron at handling machi
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 16:43 +0200, Jean-Philippe Mengual wrote:
> Hi,
> When I have finished everything, I'll want to install pdftotext, which
> is in the package xpdf-tools. But this package contains a lot of
> useless tools for me. So, is it possible to extract pdftotext only,
> and to install on
35 matches
Mail list logo
