Re: [blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: Allow as=fetch in navigation early hints preload

Thank you Yoav for the suggestions! I'll add more words and context next time. On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:18 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:57 AM Kenichi Ishibashi > wrote: > >> Contact emailsba...@chromium.org >> >> ExplainerNone. This feature is standardized. >> >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-image-set

Thanks Noam! I'll add support for the other cases behind the feature flag and we'll ship it when we are "interoperable enough". Regards, Traian On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 6:41 AM Noam Rosenthal wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 2:28 PM Manuel Rego Casasnovas > wrote: > >> If we have plans

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-image-set

Hi Rego, If we have plans to fix issues on this feature later, why not fixing > them before and then shipping when things look good? Sounds good. I'll fix the issues first, and then I will update the Intent. Checking the tests results in wpt.fyi: > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: single-page apps

LGTM1 On 1/23/23 2:26 PM, Khushal Sagar wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:55 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Khushal, On 1/19/23 3:12 PM, Khushal Sagar wrote: Contact emails bo...@chromium.org, hvanops...@chromium.org, jakearchib...@chromium.org, khushalsa...@chromium.org,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: User-Agent Reduction Phase 5 (platform and OsCpu reduction)

Hi blink-dev, UA Reduction Phase 5 is currently ramping up to 50% of the stable release population. Thanks. Victor On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 2:31:08 PM UTC-5 Victor Tan wrote: > Hi blink-dev, > UA Reduction Phase 5 is currently ramping up to 10% of the stable release > population. We

Re: [blink-dev] Virtual Method is not being overridden

Sounds like there is a mistake of some sort in the code. Can you post a CL so we can look at the actual code? On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:25 AM Rahul yadav wrote: > Dear all , > > I have created a new module in blink/renderer/modules > And my class is extending CanvasRenderingContext class. > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: data: URL in SVGUseElement

Hi All, I wanted to provide some updates on outreach I've done last week. I manually went through a list of sample sites in the use counter , and contacted ~10 sites which will be impacted. Among those sites, 3 sites responded so

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: single-page apps

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:55 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi Khushal, > > On 1/19/23 3:12 PM, Khushal Sagar wrote: > > Contact emails > bo...@chromium.org, hvanops...@chromium.org, jakearchib...@chromium.org, > khushalsa...@chromium.org, vmp...@chromium.org > > Explainer > >

[blink-dev] Virtual Method is not being overridden

Dear all , I have created a new module in blink/renderer/modules And my class is extending CanvasRenderingContext class. I have defined my funcitons "virtual" in CanvasRenderingContext . But in my class they are not being overridden . I am getting error as : "member function declared with

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: single-page apps

Hi Khushal, On 1/19/23 3:12 PM, Khushal Sagar wrote: Contact emails bo...@chromium.org, hvanops...@chromium.org, jakearchib...@chromium.org, khushalsa...@chromium.org, vmp...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/view-transitions/blob/main/explainer.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:21 PM 'Steinar H. Gunderson' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:37:21AM -0500, Mike Taylor wrote: > > I spent quite a lot of time trying to understand the issues around > nesting > > syntax. It looks like the CSSWG resolved to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:37:21AM -0500, Mike Taylor wrote: > I spent quite a lot of time trying to understand the issues around nesting > syntax. It looks like the CSSWG resolved to adopt "Option 3", with > representatives from all 3 engines voting in favor - and the WebKit blog > survey also

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

I think that we should ship this. It's a high profile and in-demand new feature , so I have a few questions and comments first. Taking a look at the open spec issues ( https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/labels/css-nesting-1)

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 5:37 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi Steiner, > > I spent quite a lot of time trying to understand the issues around > nesting syntax. It looks like the CSSWG resolved to adopt "Option 3", > with representatives from all 3 engines voting in favor - and the WebKit > blog survey

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

Hi Steiner, I spent quite a lot of time trying to understand the issues around nesting syntax. It looks like the CSSWG resolved to adopt "Option 3", with representatives from all 3 engines voting in favor - and the WebKit blog survey also resulted in "Option 3" as the top choice. Do we know

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Add containerName and containerQuery, update conditionText

Hi! So, I haven't found any usage on the websites chromestatus gave me. But looking at WebArchive results I can see that the usage is very small and the update won't change