Re: [blink-dev] Re: How to get notified when WPT auto-roller disables a test?

An update to this: we have made this CL that implement the ideas proposed above. All the folders are defaultly opt-in unless the owners choose to opt out. The bugs will be filed against blink>infra>ecosystem if no other

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: User-Agent Client Hints on Android WebView

can anyone take a look at this? thanks. :) On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 1:40:38 PM UTC-4 Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 2:19 PM Victor Tan wrote: > >> Currently, we haven't confirmed the public plan for user-agent reduction >> on WeView. We won't do

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: view-timeline shorthand sets view-timeline-inset

LGTM3 On 8/23/23 12:22 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGMT2 On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:01 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 5:26 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:23 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2023

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Generic Sensor WebDriver endpoints

LGTM2 On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 21:20 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 > On 8/23/23 2:11 PM, Mathias Bynens wrote: > > Thank you for the detailed explanation. Proceeding as you described SGTM. > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 7:41 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa < > raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Generic Sensor WebDriver endpoints

LGTM1 On 8/23/23 2:11 PM, Mathias Bynens wrote: Thank you for the detailed explanation. Proceeding as you described SGTM. On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 7:41 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Thanks, Mathias. Mathias Bynens writes: > Question 1: Are they supportive of the Generic

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Generic Sensor WebDriver endpoints

Thank you for the detailed explanation. Proceeding as you described SGTM. On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 7:41 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa < raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com> wrote: > Thanks, Mathias. > > Mathias Bynens writes: > > Question 1: Are they supportive of the Generic Sensor API? > > Officially,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Generic Sensor WebDriver endpoints

Thanks, Mathias. Mathias Bynens writes: > Question 1: Are they supportive of the Generic Sensor API? Officially, no. It has been quite a while since we last asked them though. See the discussion with Mozilla here: - https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/35 and their

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Our application has no access to the top-level context, so there is no way for us to include our third-party trial script in the top-level context. We basically provide Salesforce with our embedded client URL, and they use it to load and embed our client in their iframe. On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

Still LGTM from me too. On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 8:58 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Still LGTM > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 5:47 PM Chris Thompson > wrote: > >> We have iterated on the Fetch spec PR >> and believe it is ready to >> land modulo some editorial

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: view-timeline shorthand sets view-timeline-inset

LGMT2 On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:01 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 5:26 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:23 PM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 2:46 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud < >>> andr...@chromium.org>

[blink-dev] Removing FocuslessSpatialNavigation runtime-enabled-feature

Hi all, We added the FocuslessSpatialNavigation feature to modify how spatial-navigation works back in 2019, however, it was never used for our use-case so I'd like to remove it. However, since it was mostly working I just want to double check that there aren't any other embedders currently

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: view-timeline shorthand sets view-timeline-inset

LGTM1 On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 5:26 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:23 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 2:46 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud < >> andr...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Contact emails >>> >>> >>> *andr...@chromium.org *Specification >>>

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

Still LGTM On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 5:47 PM Chris Thompson wrote: > We have iterated on the Fetch spec PR > and believe it is ready to > land modulo some editorial tweaks. > Please be sure to follow up on the PR once the reviewers get back to it. >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features (lookback windows, flex-lite)

LGTM3 On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 8:33 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 6:55 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > >> Thanks - the risk seems pretty low from a compat POV. >> >> LGTM1 >> On 8/9/23 12:43 PM, John Delaney wrote: >> >> > Is this based on metrics you have in front of you, or

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

We have iterated on the Fetch spec PR and believe it is ready to land modulo some editorial tweaks. >From our 1% Stable experiment, we saw a substantial decrease in insecure plaintext HTTP navigation requests, and no regressions in Core Web Vitals

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Yes, if you sign up for a 3rd party token and inject that into the site embedding your iframe before your iframe is created, that will give you access to unpartitioned storage (until the Deprecation Trial expires). Here's a demo that injects an 3P origin trial token then creates an iframe:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: view-timeline shorthand sets view-timeline-inset

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:23 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 2:46 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud > wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> >> *andr...@chromium.org *Specification >> >> >> *https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8926 >>

[blink-dev] Question about owner set of WorkerGlobalScope

Hi, All. The HTML spec said: A WorkerGlobalScope object has an associated owner set (a set of Document and WorkerGlobalScope Objects), but I don't find this in chromium codes. Is there any way to find the owner of the WorkerGlobalScope in chromium? Cheers, Wei. -- You received this message

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate: Remove "Sanitizer API MVP"

> Adding in Jack as the author of the mentioned article at https://web.dev/sanitizer/. It might be worthwhile to add a big red warning aside. Yes, It's easy for me to add red warning to article "do not use". But we need more concrete details for developer. Is this deprecation will have

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Generic Sensor WebDriver endpoints

ChromeDriver owner here. Thank you for applying the new process! This LGTM, with just a few questions. I know Gecko and WebKit don’t currently implement the Generic Sensor APIs. Question 1: Are they supportive of the Generic Sensor API? Question 2: Have they provided any signals on the proposed

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: view-timeline shorthand sets view-timeline-inset

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 2:46 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > Contact emails > > > *andr...@chromium.org *Specification > > > *https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8926 > *Summary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *The view-timeline shorthand is

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: view-timeline shorthand sets view-timeline-inset

Contact emails *andr...@chromium.org *Specification *https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8926 *Summary *The view-timeline shorthand is now a shorthand for view-timeline-name, view-timeline-axis, and view-timeline-inset.

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS Sticky State Container Queries

Contact emailsfuth...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://lilles.github.io/explainers/state_container_queries.html SpecificationNone Summary Use container queries to style descendants of sticky positioned containers based on whether the sticky positioned element is stuck to one of the edges of the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: AudioEncoderConfig.bitrateMode

LGTM3 On 22/08/2023 16:30, Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > > On 8/22/23 10:10 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: >> LGTM1. Mirroring video codecs makes sense. Glad to see Mozilla being >> supportive. >> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 8:51 PM 'Thomas Guilbert' via blink-dev >> wrote: >> >> Contact emails >> >>

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype And Ship: Allow transferring ArrayBuffer into VideoFrame, AudioData, EncodedVideoChunk, EncodedAudioChunk, ImageDecoder constructors

Thanks for the clarification! On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:20 PM Eugene Zemtsov wrote: > A transfer list is consistent with the approach taken by structuredClone > and > postMessage >