Hi,
So the subject of acceptability of screenshots of LibreOffice products
taken on Windows is on today's SC confcall agenda, and I'll be there
to listen/contribute to the discussion.
--
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting
Hi,
So I'd just like to bring this thread back to its real topic:
platforms used to take screenshots for documentation, website images
and marketing material. I updated the SC confcall agenda item,
proposing this motion for discussion:
Do we want to see screenshots taken indifferently from
@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed, 13 July, 2011 13:00:37
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: screen-shots Documentation Team
Hi,
So I'd just like to bring this thread back to its real topic:
platforms used to take screenshots for documentation, website images
and marketing material. I updated
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:31 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote:
Tom Davies wrote:
I agree with Italo that the different teams have different requirements to
achieve different results.
As a member of the SC, I would personally avoid to have the SC discuss
this issue (which, in my opinion, is
Hi David,
Am 13.07.2011 17:34, schrieb David Nelson:
I noted your change to the agenda item:
(Italo: I do not like the way this item for discussion has been
worded, according to what has been discussed in the mailing list)
I was invited to add an agenda item for discussion, and this is the
Hi :)
+1
Regards from
Tom :)
From: David Nelson li...@traduction.biz
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed, 13 July, 2011 16:34:05
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: screen-shots Documentation Team
Hi Italo, Drew,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4
Hi André,
2011/7/13 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
I fully agree with Italo here. The discussion here at the list (and even you
comment right now) is focused on the legal implications and what the SC
would think of it. Your wording for the agenda item is much broader and
requests a
:)
From: André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed, 13 July, 2011 16:45:38
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: screen-shots Documentation Team
Hi David,
Am 13.07.2011 17:34, schrieb David Nelson:
I noted your change to the agenda item:
(Italo: I do
Hi,
David Nelson wrote on 2011-07-12 11.45:
OK, I'll add it to the next agenda and would be there to listen, and
to present both sides of the issue, if invited. But if it's going to
be a private session then maybe non-SC members won't be party to the
discussions?
we have a public session
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
we have a public session every week.
Oh, sure, but Michael seemed to feel that this might be better
discussed in a private session? Would that be the intention? I can
sort-of understand that,
David Nelson wrote:
Oh, sure, but Michael seemed to feel that this might be better
discussed in a private session? Would that be the intention? I can
sort-of understand that, given the kind of debate that might ensue?
I don't see why this should be a private discussion.
Screenshots usually
: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: screen-shots Documentation Team
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
we have a public session every week.
Oh, sure, but Michael seemed to feel that this might be better
discussed in a private session
Tom Davies wrote:
I had hoped the discussion would just congratulate the Documentation Team on
neatly avoiding potential pitfalls that would take months to fix if MS used it
as a side-issue in a any future dealings with them. It makes sense to use
primarily Windows screen-shots in marketing,
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: screen-shots Documentation Team
Tom Davies wrote:
I had hoped the discussion would just congratulate the Documentation Team on
neatly avoiding potential pitfalls that would take months to fix if MS used it
as a side-issue in a any future dealings with them
Le 09/07/11 23:32, Simon Phipps a écrit :
As someone who also has worked in this field for the best part of a decade,
and given the advice Alex has already provided appears extreme, I would
suggest also seeking counsel from another specialist if TDF wishes to pursue
this path, perhaps from
Le 09/07/11 23:26, Bernhard Dippold a écrit :
Hi all,
Someone suggested I sling in some caselaw or other references on whether
copyright protection is available for UIs :
US
Just one caselaw review :
http://www.legalserviceindia.com/articles/crind.htm
Europe
In European Union Court of Justice
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Alexander Thurgood
alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 09/07/11 23:26, Bernhard Dippold a écrit :
Hi all,
Someone suggested I sling in some caselaw or other references on whether
copyright protection is available for UIs :
US
Just one caselaw review :
Hi all,
just to keep your eye on one of the phrases Alex wrote, I remove most of
this mail:
Alexander Thurgood schrieb:
[...]
I make part of my living out of representing IP rights holders in legal
actions against those who do not respect those rights, but also
defending those who happen to
Simon Phipps schrieb:
As someone who also has worked in this field for the best part of a
decade, and given the advice Alex has already provided appears
extreme, I would suggest also seeking counsel from another specialist
if TDF wishes to pursue this path, perhaps from SFLC.
+1
Bernhard
S.
Le 06/07/11 11:48, Tom Davies a écrit :
Everyone : To me, the point has more to do with SC communication. Once
again, a topic has raised its head that I considered dealt with, and
now it is back on the table.
Although not a member of the SC, the question of the legality of
screenshot usage and
make a 'permanent' ruling.
Apols and regards from
Tom :)
From: Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Fri, 8 July, 2011 9:11:10
Subject: [steering-discuss] Re: screen-shots Documentation Team
Le 06/07/11 11
Hi Tom, *,
@Tom: thank you very much for your kind words and your moral support
and practical help regarding Alfresco. However, usage of Alfresco is
really a bit off-topic for bringing to the attention of the SC.
Alfresco usage/non-usage is more a question of natural, Darwinian
Hi :)
In the MS vs TomTom case significant 'damages' were awarded to MS because
TomTom
were using a file-system that could be read by Windows
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_v._TomTom
http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Microsoft_v._TomTom_%282008,_USA%29
TomTom 'should' have been paying MS for the
On 8 Jul 2011, at 13:09, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Except screen-shots in Windows can't have any useful arrows or circles to
point
out the exact thing being talked about in the documentation.
Only screenshots of /Microsoft/ products.
They can't even be
cropped to show off particular
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 8 Jul 2011, at 13:09, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Except screen-shots in Windows can't have any useful arrows or circles to
point
out the exact thing being talked about in the documentation.
Only screenshots of
25 matches
Mail list logo
