Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Stephan, Stephan Ficht píše v Čt 10. 02. 2022 v 12:30 +0100: > wrt the subject line and reading through this thread comes in my > mind: > > "contributors of code" is subset of "contributors of anything" is > subset > of "community" is subset of TDF to fulfill its written objectives. Thank

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 2/10/22 14:56, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Comes to my mind - as you deal with the donors daily, and particularly ask them why do they want to stop their recurring donations (in case they do), I wonder if there is an aggregated data available somewhere? The majority of recurring donations is

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Michael Weghorn
Hi all, On 08/02/2022 17.01, sophi wrote: Le 07/02/2022 à 19:16, Paolo Vecchi a écrit :   * Members of the ecosystem and others also suggested that we should     spend more money in development   * Bugs, a11y issues and features can be harder to taken care of by     volunteers and are not

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Thank you for your support Michael! I confirm that my proposal does not contemplate at all offering LTS version or any other services in exchange for donations. Ciao Paolo On 10/02/2022 13:36, Michael Weghorn wrote: Hi all, On 08/02/2022 17.01, sophi wrote: Le 07/02/2022 à 19:16, Paolo

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Stephan, Stephan Ficht píše v Čt 10. 02. 2022 v 14:28 +0100: > Yeah, on the one hand it's satisfaction, and from my POV dealing > with > donors nearly every day, on the other hand, and in many cases, it's > even > an incentive, a support, and an expectation to improve what the wide >

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Lothar, Lothar K. Becker píše v Čt 10. 02. 2022 v 11:12 +0100: > It was one of my first and foremost task as chair - and let me add it > was hard time consuming work - that everybody was heard and could > speak, it is simply not true, that contributors wasn't heard. I am sorry, I didn't

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Regis Perdreau
Hi, Some parts of LibreOffice are not covered by the ecosystem... Although we sometimes have customers who ask for improvements : May be those topics below are not fashionable but they contribute to give some credibility to LibreOffice - VBA compatibility - Basic bugs - Base enhancement -

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Regis, Regis Perdreau píše v Čt 10. 02. 2022 v 11:21 +0100: > Some parts of LibreOffice are not covered by the ecosystem... > Although we sometimes have customers who ask for improvements : If you talk about customers - it sounds like there is a company willing to pay to fix those. With my

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Lothar K. Becker
Hi Kendy, Am 10.02.2022 um 10:49 schrieb Jan Holesovsky: because from what I can see, TDF was not listening to the contributors the last 2 years too much. sorry to step in here but at this point I have to take part: It was one

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > On 09/02/2022 15:57, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > It is important to understand that "community" means "contributors"; as > > opposed to "users". "Users" are not part of the "community", until > > they start contributing; via code, QA, translations, marketing under > >

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Kendy, On 10/02/2022 10:49, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi píše v St 09. 02. 2022 v 19:56 +0100: He asked himself quite a few interesting questions: "Without sharing too much, there are some moral questions popping up for me. Who owns the community? Who owns ownCloud itself?

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Olivier, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Other users express their happiness translating, adding linguistic stuff, > documenting and building culture in askbot, telegram channels and regional > meetings. > I would consider those users contributors. > I wonder who is actually listening to users. > I

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread sophi
Hi Stephan, Le 10/02/2022 à 12:30, Stephan Ficht a écrit : Hello, wrt the subject line and reading through this thread comes in my mind: "contributors of code" is subset of "contributors of anything" is subset of "community" is subset of TDF to fulfill its written objectives. So, everyone

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Stephan Ficht
Hi Olivier, +1 Am 10.02.22 um 13:50 schrieb Olivier Hallot: One cent in donation is a manifest of satisfaction on LibreOffice. It sums to ~1M yearly of users satisfaction. Yeah, on the one hand it's satisfaction, and from my POV dealing with donors nearly every day, on the other hand, and in

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Kendy, On 09/02/2022 15:57, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi píše v St 09. 02. 2022 v 15:09 +0100: The community and our valuable members of the ecosystem have been asking us to invest more in development It is important to understand that "community" means "contributors"; as

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Stephan Ficht
Hello, wrt the subject line and reading through this thread comes in my mind: "contributors of code" is subset of "contributors of anything" is subset of "community" is subset of TDF to fulfill its written objectives. So, everyone and everything being an important piece in the mosaic for

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Paolo Vecchi
+1 Maybe the only thing missing is "users" as subset of community. I guess that the "contributors of anything" are also "users" of LibreOffice and that any "user" is a potential "contributor of anything" ;-) Ciao Paolo On 10/02/2022 12:30, Stephan Ficht wrote: Hello, wrt the subject line

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Olivier Hallot
Thanks for making it clearer. I'd like to imagine LibreOffice with myriads of code contributors and no users. Better not. Fact: users donate. Currently donation is not tied to any TDF obligation, it is an expression of satisfaction or good will. Donation is a also pain that users go thru

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Thanks Olivier! I'm pleased that you clarified the importance of users so well but I'm also worried about the fact that this clarification was needed in the first place. Ciao Paolo On 10/02/2022 13:50, Olivier Hallot wrote: Thanks for making it clearer. I'd like to imagine LibreOffice

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Daniel, On 10/02/2022 14:53, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote: El 10/2/22 a las 08:30, Stephan Ficht escribió: So, everyone and everything being an important piece in the mosaic for the big picture for a FLOSS office suite, called LibreOffice. Crystal clear, for some of us at least This reminds

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 2/10/22 17:53, Michael Meeks wrote: It would be deeply unfortunate if the above was read as questioning the legitimacy and composition of the new board - and that before they have been seated and/or taken a single decision. It would be good to clarify that reading. I am not

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > I was actually disagreeing with a statement saying that users are not part > of the community. > Then we have to agree to disagree. Sole users (i.e. without contributing anything to the community) are to my mind never part of a FLOSS project community. The rest

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 2/10/22 17:27, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Yes, but it looks like the discussion is blocked one step before reaching a consensus on this very simple point. If the discussion stays as such, I have to say that I don't feel I am represented - as a TDF Member - by any member of the just elected board

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Michael Weghorn
Hi Thorsten, On 10/02/2022 17.55, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Sole users (i.e. without contributing anything to the community) are to my mind never part of a FLOSS project community. Just to mention it, the KDE Code of Conduct [1] contains this: Our community is made up of several groups of

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Simon Phipps
Hi Thorsten! Thanks for your positive contribution which I agree with completely (although I do have a comment, see below). On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 5:09 PM Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Hi *, > > with the lively discussion ensuing here, it is perhaps worth sharing > my position ahead of the board

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi all, On 10/02/2022 12:59, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Hi *, Paolo Vecchi wrote: On 09/02/2022 15:57, Jan Holesovsky wrote: It is important to understand that "community" means "contributors"; as opposed to "users". "Users" are not part of the "community", until they start contributing; via

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread sophi
Hi Kendy, Le 10/02/2022 à 17:27, Jan Holesovsky a écrit : Hi Italo, Italo Vignoli píše v Čt 10. 02. 2022 v 16:31 +0100: Yes, but it looks like the discussion is blocked one step before reaching a consensus on this very simple point. If the discussion stays as such, I have to say that I don't

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi all, I'd just like to comment on the exchange below, from my perspective: Le 10/02/2022 à 15:27, Italo Vignoli a écrit : Then there is a number of donors who ask to stop the recurring donation. Some of them provide a reason, which in some cases is that he wanted to donate once and not

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Daniel A. Rodriguez
El 10/2/22 a las 08:30, Stephan Ficht escribió: Hello, wrt the subject line and reading through this thread comes in my mind: "contributors of code" is subset of "contributors of anything" is subset of "community" is subset of TDF to fulfill its written objectives. So, everyone and

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Michael Weghorn
Hi Italo, thanks for your reply. On 10/02/2022 16.31, Italo Vignoli wrote: On 2/10/22 13:36, Michael Weghorn wrote: Of course, in case the main intention were for TDF to provide more business-like services (like an LTS version or creating an impression of "donate a certain amount of money

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *, with the lively discussion ensuing here, it is perhaps worth sharing my position ahead of the board call tomorrow: Paolo Vecchi wrote: > Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers > to address our donors specific needs > I think it is worth considering,

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Marina Latini
On 10.02.2022 17:56, Michael Weghorn wrote: Hi Michael (W.), I absolutely agree with what you wrote. My deepest thank you for being so open-minded! On 10/02/2022 16.31, Italo Vignoli wrote: On 2/10/22 13:36, Michael Weghorn wrote: Of course, in case the main intention were for TDF to provide

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi, Am 10.02.22 um 16:54 schrieb Jan Holesovsky: Hi Andreas, Andreas Mantke píše v St 09. 02. 2022 v 19:58 +0100: once I read this sentences the first time, I thought I was in a different film in 2010. But maybe I didn't understand the situation in OOo project at that time. I may be wrong,

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Simon Phipps
Hi all! On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:45 PM sophi wrote: > > Their is even no written proposal at the moment, but only a discussion > on the pros and cons and what it could bring to the project. But it > seems impossible to discuss because the ecosystem companies won't allow it. > And yet it seems

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Paolo Vecchi
+1 from me Ciao Paolo Note to self: propose to institute a position for an honorary member of the board. On 10/02/2022 22:32, Andreas Mantke wrote: Hi, Am 10.02.22 um 16:54 schrieb Jan Holesovsky: Hi Andreas, Andreas Mantke píše v St 09. 02. 2022 v 19:58 +0100: once I read this

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Marina Latini
On 10.02.2022 17:44, sophi wrote: Hi Sophie, hi all, And I feel the same. Hiring developers is not the only way forward, it's one of them. We, as members, knows the ecosystem companies have needs and I (for myself) understand perfectly the market pressure. But here, as a member of TDF, we

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Marina Latini
On 10.02.2022 17:53, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Michael, all, It seems reasonable to explore what people should be hired to do - before hiring them =) That has the benefit of working out what skills are needed in the job advert and/or interview process for example. The 'discussion' here

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Michael Weghorn
Hi Thorsten, all, On 10/02/2022 18.07, Thorsten Behrens wrote: It is putting the cart in front of the horse though, to start with: * we want TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice and then follow with * therefore we must employ two developers Whether or not that's an adequate summary

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Michael Weghorn
Hi Michael, all, On 10/02/2022 17.53, Michael Meeks wrote: There is a huge amount of need around LibreOffice development. It is easy to find a hundred different "top priority" issues each dear to the heart of a user, each user convinced that if only we had eg. 'Reveal Codes' in writer

[board-discuss] Separating users/community/contribution? (was: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs)

2022-02-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Michael, [reordered for the sake of a linear argument] Michael Weghorn wrote: > and I remember that the importance of users was emphasized at some in-person > event I attended (probably Akademy) as well. > And I would agree. A user-facing project (opensource or not) that doesn't care about

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Italo, Awesome, thank you so much for the summary! All the best, Kendy Italo Vignoli píše v Čt 10. 02. 2022 v 15:27 +0100: > On 2/10/22 14:56, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > > Comes to my mind - as you deal with the donors daily, and > > particularly > > ask them why do they want to stop their

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Andreas, Andreas Mantke píše v St 09. 02. 2022 v 19:58 +0100: > once I read this sentences the first time, I thought I was in a > different film in 2010. But maybe I didn't understand the situation > in OOo project at that time. I may be wrong, it is a long time ago, but from what I

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Italo, Italo Vignoli píše v Čt 10. 02. 2022 v 16:31 +0100: > Yes, but it looks like the discussion is blocked one step before > reaching a consensus on this very simple point. If the discussion > stays > as such, I have to say that I don't feel I am represented - as a TDF > Member - by any

Re: [board-discuss] Re: Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Italo, On 10/02/2022 15:31, Italo Vignoli wrote: On 2/10/22 13:36, Michael Weghorn wrote: I have the impression that a fundamentally important question is what the purpose/task of TDF-internal developers would be. Yes, but it looks like the discussion is blocked one step before reaching

Re: [board-discuss] Enable TDF to contribute more code to LibreOffice with in-house developers to address our donors specific needs

2022-02-10 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi píše v St 09. 02. 2022 v 19:56 +0100: > He asked himself quite a few interesting questions: > "Without sharing too much, there are some moral questions popping up > for > me. Who owns the community? Who owns ownCloud itself? And what > matters > more, short term money or