Hi Laurence,
On 22.10.17 23:04, Laurence wrote:
> The BOINC client v7.8.3 is available for testing on Linux
>
> For Debian/Ubuntu
>
> sudo apt-add-repository ppa:costamagnagianfranco/boinc
> sudo apt-get update
> sudo apt-get install boinc-manager
kind of :)
For the regular user of Debian-deriv
The BOINC client v7.8.3 is available for testing on Linux
For Debian/Ubuntu
sudo apt-add-repository ppa:costamagnagianfranco/boinc
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install boinc-manager
For Fedora/RedHat/CentOS
sudo dnf config-manager --set-enable updates-testing
sudo dnf install boinc-manager
Presumably it would be worth enquiring into the coverage offered by the
distribution-specific packaged versions, before committing any resources. What
proportion of our Linux volunteers (both current and potential) are running a
dialect of Linux for which there is an active package maintainer?
Hello,
On 17.10.17 00:15, David Anderson wrote:
> Our policy for a long time was:
>
> - provide a .sea release (including manager) for current Ubuntu/x86,
> with no effort to make it run anywhere else.
> - provide a client-only (no manager) release built on an old Linux
> system,
> everything
https://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/AdminTasks
and
https://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/AdminAlphaTest
On 10/16/2017 2:16 AM, Laurence wrote:
Thanks, I did not know about this. Is this documented anywhere? How are the
results collected? I notice that there is an absence for the Linux operating
Our policy for a long time was:
- provide a .sea release (including manager) for current Ubuntu/x86,
with no effort to make it run anywhere else.
- provide a client-only (no manager) release built on an old Linux system,
everything static, for maximum compatibility.
We have a "compatability
On 16.10.17 23:07, Laurence Field wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> On 16/10/17 16:46, Steffen Möller wrote:
>>
>> And he also builds the complete packages together with the server side
>> components afterwards that go to the experimental section of Debian -
>> see the boinc-server-maker package
>> https:/
Hi Steffen,
On 16/10/17 16:46, Steffen Möller wrote:
And he also builds the complete packages together with the server side
components afterwards that go to the experimental section of Debian -
see the boinc-server-maker package
https://packages.qa.debian.org/b/boinc/news/20171005T094923Z.html.
On 16.10.17 15:07, Laurence wrote:
> Hi Jord,
>
> On 16/10/17 12:24, Jord van der Elst wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Richard Haselgrove
>> mailto:r.haselgr...@btopenworld.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Berkeley has outsourced the distribution of Linux clients to the
>> package maintai
Hi Jord,
On 16/10/17 12:24, Jord van der Elst wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Richard Haselgrove
mailto:r.haselgr...@btopenworld.com>>
wrote:
Berkeley has outsourced the distribution of Linux clients to the
package maintainers for individual distributions, for several
yea
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Richard Haselgrove <
r.haselgr...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> Berkeley has outsourced the distribution of Linux clients to the package
> maintainers for individual distributions, for several years now.
>
Laurence is the release manager for Linux, I suspect he knows
Berkeley has outsourced the distribution of Linux clients to the package
maintainers for individual distributions, for several years now.
The latest versions endorsed by Berkeley and offered on
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download_all.php are:
Recommended version: 7.2.42 (28 February 2014)
'Devel
Start here: https://boinc.berkeley.edu/alpha/index.php
There's an absence of Linux entries, because we do not have a 7.8.3
available for testing 'from Berkeley', but only via people like Gianfranco
from his personal PPA. If he (or you) were to request that the people
testing that version would add
Thanks, I did not know about this. Is this documented anywhere? How are
the results collected? I notice that there is an absence for the Linux
operating system but as 3/4 of the resources are from Windows user, the
Windows client is obviously more important.
Laurence
On 16/10/17 10:47, Jor
Laurence, the test number comes from
https://boinc.berkeley.edu/alpha/test_summary.php with no red reports at
all: https://boinc.berkeley.edu/alpha/test_details.php?version=7.8.3
The only (major) problem still there is for the Spanish person, but I think
that's either a missing character and thus
On 16/10/17 00:49, David Anderson wrote:
7.8.3 has 90% test coverage and it looks good.
Where does the 90% come from?
Any objections to releasing it?
A few issues need to be addressed before releasing on Linux. There is no
reason why this should block the Windows and Mac releases though. We ca
7.8.3 has 90% test coverage and it looks good.
Any objections to releasing it?
-- David
___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
https://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom o
17 matches
Mail list logo
