First of all, I really appreciated Steve's presentation on git
yesterday. It encouraged me to finally play around with git.
In the process, I've come to a different conclusion on usage of the
.gitignore file then was stated during the meeting. It was suggested
that you should put .gitignore in y
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Bill Ricker wrote:
> > I was thinking the same.
> > There is one really good online 'book' and a good supplement, and a
> well reviewed pay-pdf,
>
> and a real book or too, plus some hourlong youtubes of folks you know
> somewhere you know, and other stuff.
>
>
Sweet! Thank you for the invitation!
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
> Boston.rb is *also* doing a git talk tonight, :) ,
> http://bostonrb.org/events/69 , over at the Athenaeum, and is currently
> planning to then go to CBC (usually 9-12ish, at a big table in the back)
Boston.rb is *also* doing a git talk tonight, :) ,
http://bostonrb.org/events/69 , over at the Athenaeum, and is currently
planning to then go to CBC (usually 9-12ish, at a big table in the
back). Friendly crowd, feel free to stop by and talk git. :)
I'll be at Cambridge Semantic Net instead,
The best thing is what you are doing, shining a light on misbehavior.
Ben Tilly wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>
>>> "RW" == Ricker, William writes:
>>>
>> RW> We got this thru the Leaders' lists. That's a busy weekend. Maybe Uri,
>> RW>
> "BT" == Ben Tilly writes:
BT> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Uri Guttman
wrote:
>> i would prefer to draw a gallon of blood! not much chance i would step
>> foot on any property with redmond's curse on it. i still harbor a
>> personal grudge from them intentionally lying to ou
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:09:42PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "JR" == John Redford writes:
>
> >> From: Andy Oram
> >> To: Uri Guttman
> >> Cc: Boston PM; William Ricker
> >> Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Meta-user group meeting! May 2nd summit about
> >> how to coordinate a user grou
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> "RW" == Ricker, William writes:
>
> RW> We got this thru the Leaders' lists. That's a busy weekend. Maybe Uri,
> RW> Ron and I will draw straws ...
>
> i would prefer to draw a gallon of blood! not much chance i would step
> foot on an
> "JR" == John Redford writes:
>> From: Andy Oram
>> To: Uri Guttman
>> Cc: Boston PM; William Ricker
>> Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] Meta-user group meeting! May 2nd summit about
>> how to coordinate a user group
>>
>> I have no doubt there are plenty of bad stories to share, from
I have no doubt there are plenty of bad stories to share, from DRDOS through
the EU anti-trust suit and the OOXML pseudo-standardization. I don't blame you,
but the conference will still be good.
---
i would prefer to draw a gallon of blood! not much chance i would step
foot on any property wit
> "RW" == Ricker, William writes:
RW> We got this thru the Leaders' lists. That's a busy weekend. Maybe Uri,
RW> Ron and I will draw straws ...
i would prefer to draw a gallon of blood! not much chance i would step
foot on any property with redmond's curse on it. i still harbor a
persona
We got this thru the Leaders' lists. That's a busy weekend. Maybe Uri,
Ron and I will draw straws ...
___
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
O'Reilly and Microsoft are co-sponsoring an all-day event in Cambridge
on Saturday, May 2 where user group leaders can discuss how they make
their groups work. We all fall into ruts and fail to notice the
possibilities presented by new ways people interact, new reasons for
joining, etc.
I think O'
Bill Ricker contacted me to suggest that I let you know that O'Reilly is about
to release a book on Git. For your viewing pleasure, here is a draft that has
gone through a copy-edit but needs to be proofed by the author (so there may be
small errors still):
ftp://ftp.oreilly.com/outgoing/Vers
> Mitchell N Charity wrote:
>> My thanks for the thoughtful reply.
>> Doubly so since complete silence would have been quite a bummer.
«I have made this letter longer than usual, because I lack the time to
make it short»
«Je n'ai fait celle-ci plus longue parceque je n'ai pas eu le loisir
de la fa
Mitchell N Charity wrote:
My thanks for the thoughtful reply.
Doubly so since complete silence would have been quite a bummer.
You're welcome, and I've been surprised at the silence. If nothing else,
I though I included enough questionable statements in my last posting to
spur some discussion
16 matches
Mail list logo
