Michael Harney wrote:
I have been informed today that I have been plonked by one of the
listmembers. Which listmember is irrelivant.
[snip]
If enough people express a
desire for me to leave I will do so and never return. The last thing I
want
is to make people uncomfortable.
I know you've
Julia wrote:
Julia
who's mostly been wanting chicken, steak and cheese lately, as far as
non-plant foods go
All at the same time? Or is that chicken steak, and cheese? ;-)
Reggie Bautista
_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection
Gary Nunn wrote:
For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
of being a plot device)?
Maybe the machines, who presumably were once enslaved by humanity, are now
obsessed with enslaving humanity in
Because he just mentioned them on-list, Doug decided to send
me a picture of his dogs. Here are Lucky, Ali, and Namiko:
http://www.sloan3d.com/cgi-bin/memberpix.cgi?person=doug
__
Steve Sloan . Huntsville, Alabama
From: William T Goodall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only rule we got at school was 'after c', and then one
just learned
all the exceptions. Everyone has a few words they can't spell
I think.
One of mine is 'resteraunt'. Oops! Restaurant.
Mine are: vacuum, caffeine, torture and a few
From: Nick Arnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But I definitely pay attention (no joke intended)to news about
connections between sleep apnea and AD/HD, etc.
Since the information about that was posted, we started wondering if
something like this might be effecting my daughter. She was showing
For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
of being a plot device)?
Maybe the machines, who presumably were once enslaved by humanity, are
now
obsessed with enslaving humanity in return.
I
Using humans or any other animal as an energy source is of course foolish
since the energy needed to create a human is far greater than the energy
that the human can generate. You could run machines on plants thus
converting sunlight into complex carbohydrates that can be used as fuel. But
why
I mean, Morpheus may not have been perfect, but I find Laurence
Fishburne to be very easy on the eyes. And I'm not complaining about
Keanu Reeves, either.
Yes, all we talk about is _eyes_. Not ears. My ears were definitely NOT
entertained by the dialogues (and monologues).
Best regards,
WindowsT comes with solitaire. Do Macs come with solitaire or any other
card games?
Nope, I guess. Ya know:
Linux is for networking,
Mac is for working,
Windows is for Solitaire
(originator of this unknown to me)
- Klaus
___
It could provide incentive for people to buy safer and smaller cars.
No. Not really. Heavier cars are safer in crashes, because they can simply
push aside smaller opponents, while losing only little speed. The negative
accleration is what kills you in a car crash. Heavier car = less negative
--- Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary Nunn wrote:
For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
of being a plot device)?
Maybe the machines, who presumably were once enslaved by
Yea, I guess I am hoping that if they are at least clever
enough to steal from philosophy then they are clever enough
to steal from Level 13, Brazil, Dark Planet, level 13 (the
movie), Max Headroom, etc.
_
Jan William Coffey
Benadryl! She's been taking it every night before she goes
to bed for a couple of months now and it has done wonders for
her. She's not complaining about being tired anymore. Her
behavior has improved markedly. It's wonderful.
All because of a link posted to this list!
That's why I
--- Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea, I guess I am hoping that if they are at least clever
enough to steal from philosophy then they are clever enough
to steal from Level 13, Brazil, Dark Planet, level 13 (the
movie), Max Headroom, etc.
--- Horn, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: William T Goodall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only rule we got at school was 'after c', and then one
just learned
all the exceptions. Everyone has a few words they can't spell
I think.
One of mine is 'resteraunt'. Oops!
--- Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Harney wrote:
I have been informed today that I have been plonked by one of the
listmembers. Which listmember is irrelivant.
[snip]
If enough people express a
desire for me to leave I will do so and never return. The last thing I
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 05:17 pm, Reggie Bautista wrote:
The Fool and William Goodall react as if that person was posting from
a religious extremest perspective, instead of reading what the poster
actually wrote.
LOL! You have got it completely backwards...some people post extremist
Hey John,
I hope Debbi can add something to this.
Diphenhydramine is an antihistamine, they are for allergies!
One can get pneumonia due to dehydration (and aggravate asthma).
This is true of all antihistamines.
Maybe ask Dr. about Valerian root tea for the sleep condition?
Camomille tea also
Reggie Bautista wrote:
Julia wrote:
Julia
who's mostly been wanting chicken, steak and cheese lately, as far as
non-plant foods go
All at the same time? Or is that chicken steak, and cheese? ;-)
Not all at once. Two out of three (one of the meats + cheese) is as
much as I
On 8 Jun 2003 at 14:52, Gary Nunn wrote:
waking up exhausted, and the morning headaches. There is nothing like
a headache induced by lack of oxygen. I would choose a migraine ANY
day over that. Of course, there were the weird things like not being
Agree totally. Of course, it's only happened
From: Han Tacoma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope Debbi can add something to this.
Diphenhydramine is an antihistamine, they are for allergies!
Diphenhydramine also makes you very sleepy. Very, very sleepy. That's the
PM part of Tylenol PM. It's just Tylenol with Benadryl.
So it is
Callers are paying $2 a minute for a supernatural adviser. They're
getting me instead.
ESP Net's online guidance site asserts that it is an unrealistic
expectation for callers to assume psychics are psychic. But its
contract is more ambiguous about occult powers. While it stated I could
not
At 11:27 AM 6/8/03 -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
Gary Nunn wrote:
For example, in the Matrix universe, what functional reason would the
machines have for plugging humans into a simulation (besides the obvious
of being a plot device)?
Maybe the machines, who presumably were once enslaved by
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 11:27 AM 6/8/03 -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
I've seen some of the other comments challenging the writing of the movies.
As science fiction, The Matrix and sequel(s) certainly have problems. But
as a reading of the Merovingian Heresy and as a Gnostic philosophy
Jan Coffey wrote:
I like to call this conversational monad a communicative fixed-point
impedance mismatch.
Really though, I wish this were a well known concept and their was a good
name for it. Then people could get out of that particular loop by simply
naming the instance and moving on.
At 02:52 PM 6/8/03 -0400, Gary Nunn wrote:
Benadryl! She's been taking it every night before she goes
to bed for a couple of months now and it has done wonders for
her. She's not complaining about being tired anymore. Her
behavior has improved markedly. It's wonderful.
All because of a
At 08:49 PM 6/8/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 05:17 pm, Reggie Bautista wrote:
The Fool and William Goodall react as if that person was posting from a
religious extremest perspective, instead of reading what the poster
actually wrote.
LOL! You have got it
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 06:43:48PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
What *really* gets me is when someone doing this projects the most
*extreme* position from theirs and attacks you for having said that,
when all you said was something maybe a few degrees from their
position. And then they cuss
In a message dated 6/8/2003 3:01:51 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I was pregnant with Sammy, I wanted to go to Tres Amigos twice a
week. Now I want to go to Olive Garden twice a week.
Julia
Tres Amigos is a furniture store here in Tucson.
What as
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 06:43:48PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
What *really* gets me is when someone doing this projects the most
*extreme* position from theirs and attacks you for having said that,
when all you said was something maybe a few degrees from their
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 12:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 08:49 PM 6/8/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
Religion is extremist by nature.
No, it's not.
What makes you think that?
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog :
Since I can't reply directly to Jeroens recent spamming, could someone
subscribed to both lists please ask him to take me off of his spam list.
TIA,
Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 01:34 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 12:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 08:49 PM 6/8/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
Religion is extremist by nature.
No, it's not.
What makes you think that?
Because it's not.
-- Ronn! :)
God bless America,
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 10:59 pm, Andrew Crystall wrote:
Your doctrine of absoloute non-religion is just as much a dogma as
any religion, it varies only in details. And it's also intollerant.
So if my non-religion is dogmatic, intolerant, and varies only in
details from religion, what does
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 01:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:34 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 12:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 08:49 PM 6/8/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
Religion is extremist by nature.
No, it's not.
What makes you
At 05:41 PM 6/8/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Since I can't reply directly to Jeroens recent spamming, could someone
subscribed to both lists please ask him to take me off of his spam list.
TIA,
Doug
Yeah, I had to turn back on my blocking filters.
Can I ask, is hotmail or other internet based
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:45:14AM +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
So if my non-religion is dogmatic, intolerant, and varies only in
details from religion, what does that make religion according to you?
Ooh! That would make religion dogmatic and intolerant! I'm glad
At 02:05 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 01:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:34 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 12:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 08:49 PM 6/8/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
Religion is
At 09:10 PM 6/8/03 -0400, Kevin Tarr wrote:
At 05:41 PM 6/8/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Since I can't reply directly to Jeroens recent spamming, could someone
subscribed to both lists please ask him to take me off of his spam list.
TIA,
Doug
Yeah, I had to turn back on my blocking filters.
Can I
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Spam van Baardwijk
But the way I am, I'd get into an argument with myself.
What would be really embarrassing would be to lose such
Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Spam van Baardwijk
But the way I am, I'd get into an argument with myself.
What would be really embarrassing
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 02:29 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:05 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 01:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:34 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 12:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At
Interesting in itself, and there's a Brin reference:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-1013033.html
Andy
Dawn Falcon
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
In a message dated 6/8/2003 6:42:20 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But the way I am, I'd get into an argument with myself.
What would be really embarrassing would be to lose such an argument.
What would be really really embarassing was starting a fist
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 02:29 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:05 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On 9 Jun 2003 at 1:45, William T Goodall wrote:
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 10:59 pm, Andrew Crystall wrote:
Your doctrine of absoloute non-religion is just as much a dogma as
any religion, it varies only in details. And it's also intollerant.
So if my non-religion is dogmatic,
On 9 Jun 2003 at 3:19, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 02:29 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:05 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 01:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:34 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:58:18AM +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
...the whole POINT of the Masorti movement is to think about our
lives.
Is it working?
--
Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 02:29 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:05 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 01:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:34 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On
On 8 Jun 2003 at 23:16, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:58:18AM +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
...the whole POINT of the Masorti movement is to think about our
lives.
Is it working?
It appears so to me, but then I'm hardly an uninterested observer. :)
How do you define
At 03:19 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 02:29 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 02:05 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 01:45 am, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:34 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
On Monday,
At 11:16 PM 6/8/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:58:18AM +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
...the whole POINT of the Masorti movement is to think about our
lives.
Is it working?
Erik Reuter
I think about having a Maserati in my life. It hasn't worked yet.
Kevin T. - VRWC
At 09:45 PM 6/8/03 -0600, Michael Harney wrote:
I disagree. That might be true of dogmatic religions that require you to
have specific beliefs, but there are religions that are not dogmatic,
religions based upon common belief, not required dogmatic belief. A couple
examples: Hicksite Quaker
At 11:56 PM 6/8/03 -0400, Kevin Tarr wrote:
At 11:16 PM 6/8/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:58:18AM +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
...the whole POINT of the Masorti movement is to think about our
lives.
Is it working?
Erik Reuter
I think about having a Maserati in my life.
55 matches
Mail list logo
