On 8 Jun 2003 at 21:10, Nick Arnett wrote:
> > This is my favorite sleep apnea site: http://www.sleepnet.com/
>
> I am now learning more about somnoplasty...
Heh. I'm just plain insomniac and not only have doctors attempts to
cure it miserably failed, most of the sleep tablets make me intensely
At 02:06 AM 6/9/03 -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 22:47:20 -0500
At 03:19 AM 6/9/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
--- Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:49 PM 6/8/03 +0100, William T Goodall wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 05:17 pm, Reggie Bautista wrote:
> >> The Fool and William Goodall react as if that person was posting from a
>
> >> religious extremest perspective, instead of
--- Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 9:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
>
>
> >
> > On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 02:29 am,
--- Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 02:06 AM 6/9/03 -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
>> "Yes, it is."
> "No, it isn't."
> "Yes, it is!"
> "No, it isn't!"
> "Yes, it is!!"
> "No, it isn't!!"
> "YES, IT IS!!!"
> "NO, IT ISN'T!!!"
>
"Times up."
"What do you mean time is up? I cam in here
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 07:06 am, Jon Gabriel wrote:
William, you ARE intolerant. Here's why: intolerance is defined as:
"unwilling to grant equal freedom of expression especially in
religious matters." (m-w.com)
My dictionary defines intolerance as 'not enduring difference of
opinion'. S
> >
> >Religion is extremist by nature.
>
> No, it's not.
>
> -- Ronn! :)
Even religions which say that their god(s) is the "only
true god"? As an outsider, that sounds pretty extreme to me!
---David
Identify, for 2 points:
"I mean, it's one th
David Hobby wrote:
> Identify, for 2 points:
>
> "I mean, it's one thing saying you've got the best god, but
> sayin' it's the ONLY real one is a bit of a cheek, in my
> opinion."
Hairy Patch-it's "Crappe Jugular"?
Regards, Ray.
___
http://www.mccmedi
On 9 Jun 2003 at 15:06, Jeroen van Baardwijk wrote:
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Pensinger wrote:
>
> > Since I can't reply directly to Jeroens recent spamming,
>
> In fact, you *can* reply directly to me. As I said in a previous
> message, the solution is quite simple. Hint: it's in the he
Damon wrote:
>
> Heh heh...I got 0 years in prison and no fines...
>
> I especially enjoyed #19 as I live right next to
> Allentown and often go to
> the Mall there...
>
> Damon.
It's good to know that something aroused
your interest. ;-)
-- Matt
14.5 yrs, 0£ fine, though I stretched
some thi
In a message dated 6/9/2003 5:43:25 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> ---David
>
> Identify, for 2 points:
>
> "I mean, it's one thing saying you've got the best god, but
> sayin' it's the ONLY real one is a bit of a cheek, in my
> opinion."
Peter O'Toole in The
>-Original Message-
>From: Ronn!Blankenship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 2:58 PM
>To: Killer Bs Discussion
>Subject: Re: World cancer death rates have increased by 35%
>from 1987 to
>1995 says WHO, and they'll double again by 2020.
>
>
>At 04:27 PM 6/7/03 -040
>-Original Message-
>From: William T Goodall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 6:57 PM
>To: Killer Bs Discussion
>Subject: Re: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
>
>
>
>On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 01:09 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> In a message dated 6/7/2003
--- Chad Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: William T Goodall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 6:57 PM
> >To: Killer Bs Discussion
> >Subject: Re: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
> >
> >
> >
> >On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 01
> From: Ronn!Blankenship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> > ...the whole POINT of the Masorti movement is to think about our
> >> > lives.
> >>
> >>Is it working?
> >>
> >>Erik Reuter
> >
> >
> >I think about having a Maserati in my life. It hasn't worked yet.
>
> That may not be exactly what t
>Now is the energy needed to supply all of these small enough
>for the system
>to be sustainable?
>
>I doubt it.
I agree. The math shows that they could not get enough bodies together to
generate the energy required, even if they were quite good at synthesisizing
foodstuff (like a HeeChee food F
--- Chad Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Now is the energy needed to supply all of these small enough
> >for the system
> >to be sustainable?
> >
> >I doubt it.
>
> I agree. The math shows that they could not get enough bodies together to
> generate the energy required, even if they were q
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: William T Goodall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Se
From: Jan Coffey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2 points
1) With the energy needed to extract these, is it still workable? Is the
energy needed for mining small enough for the system to be sustainable?
2) The human body will generate energy from the above mentioned chemicals.
However, living cells are not sus
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
>
> Yea, but that's just becasue the force of gravity at the sun is greater.
> An ounce of fl
From: "Kevin Tarr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 10:00 PM 6/6/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> >I have been informed today that I have been plonked by one of the
> >listmembers. Which listmember is irrelivant.
> >
> >The listmember informed me that my "intollerance" was reminiscent of
Jeroen.
> >When I rece
Dan said:
>> Yea, but that's just becasue the force of gravity at the sun is
>> greater. An ounce of flesh on earth has far more mass than the
>> average
>
> ounce of material in the sun. (weight = mass*gravitational force)
Is an "ounce" a unit of mass or weight? I never did grasp those old
uni
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
> Dan said:
>
> >> Yea, but that's just becasue the force of gravity at the sun is
> >> great
--- Bryon Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail.com> wrote:
> >From: Jan Coffey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >2 points
> >
> >1) With the energy needed to extract these, is it still workable? Is the
> >energy needed for mining small enough for the system to be sustainable?
> >
> >2) The human body will generate e
Dan said:
> No, what I meant to say was that the total energy in an average ounce
> of material on the earth is greater than the total energy of an
> average ounce of material on the sun, because the mass of the material
> on the earth would be so much greater.
Ah, okay. Thinking in masses is so
From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 02:25:39 -0500
At 02:06 AM 6/9/03 -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:19:21AM -0700, Chad Cooper wrote:
> An ounce of flesh has more energy than an ounce of solar material, I
> think, by a magnitude.
This is nonsense.
> A body needs few things to create energy - Water, Oxygen, Carbon, and
> Hydrogen - most of which can be extracted from
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:14:59PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Here's one: did you know that all the urinals in Pennsylvania Station say
> "American Standard" on them? :-D
4.4lpf/1.0gpf
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
_
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> >From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
> >Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 02:25:39 -0500
>
> >We now return you to your regularly scheduled list for
At 09:42 AM 6/9/03 -0700, you wrote:
and...
Found this little "nugget" on the net. ;-)
"The sportive lemur (Lepilemur mustelinus), a very small folivore, engages
in coprophagy--it eats its own feces, for a "second-stage" digestion.
So do rabbits.
-- Ronn! :)
God bless America,
Land that I
At 02:07 PM 6/9/03 -0400, Bryon Daly wrote:
From: Jan Coffey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2 points
1) With the energy needed to extract these, is it still workable? Is the
energy needed for mining small enough for the system to be sustainable?
2) The human body will generate energy from the above mentioned
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:20:47 -0400
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:14:59PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Here's one: did you know that all the u
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:29:24PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Say what?
I thought you were an American Standard urinal expert. Didn't you ever
read one? I mean, what else do you have to do while you're going?
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
__
>Chad,
>
>Are you speaking hypothetica-probably or did you do some calculating?
>
>If you did I would like to see your work.
I did an earlier calculation with 2 assumptions, 1> each human generates 100
watts of heat at rest, and the total Wattage in use in the US today, which
is 3.5 GW. It would
At 04:20 PM 6/9/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:14:59PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Here's one: did you know that all the urinals in Pennsylvania Station say
> "American Standard" on them? :-D
4.4lpf/1.0gpf
Were they imported from Canada?
-- Ronn! :)
God bless America
At 03:20 PM 6/9/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> >From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
> >Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 02:25:39 -0500
>
> >We now return yo
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:36:33PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 04:20 PM 6/9/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:14:59PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> >> Here's one: did you know that all the urinals in Pennsylvania Station say
> >> "American Standard" on them? :-D
> >
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:31:59 -0400
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:29:24PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Say what?
I thought you were an Ameri
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:37:31 -0400
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:36:33PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 04:20 PM 6/9/03 -0400, Erik Reu
From: Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 15:20:48 -0500
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> >From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussi
Someone wrote:
and...
Found this little "nugget" on the net. ;-)
"The sportive lemur (Lepilemur mustelinus), a very small folivore, engages
in coprophagy--it eats its own feces, for a "second-stage" digestion.
Ronn! replied:
So do rabbits.
So do guinnea pigs, but only certain "special nuggets..."
Andy wrote:
No.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=spam
spam n.
Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent
indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or
newsgroups; junk e-mail.
The key word there is USUALLY
You've been on this list how long, and you still expect Je
At 04:14 PM 6/9/03 -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 02:25:39 -0500
At 02:06 AM 6/9/03 -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From:
Kevin Tarr wrote:
>
> At 03:20 PM 6/9/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >I mean, I don't think I've necessarily seen every toilet in the ladies'
> >room at Casa de Garcia to say for *sure* what brand they are (and IIRC,
> >it's Crane, but it's been so long since they changed their Sunday hours
> >to clo
At 04:22 PM 6/9/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
The Japanese do low-flow toilets a lot better, because they've been
doing them for longer and have had more time to experiment with what
works and what doesn't. All the ones in our house are made by Toto.
(Insert WoO crack here.)
Is "WoO" a transl
"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 04:22 PM 6/9/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
> >The Japanese do low-flow toilets a lot better, because they've been
> >doing them for longer and have had more time to experiment with what
> >works and what doesn't. All the ones in our house are made by Toto.
>
At 04:30 PM 6/9/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 04:22 PM 6/9/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
> >The Japanese do low-flow toilets a lot better, because they've been
> >doing them for longer and have had more time to experiment with what
> >works and what doesn't.
From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 16:33:26 -0500
At 04:22 PM 6/9/03 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
The Japanese do low-flow toilets a lot better,
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 3:30 PM
Subject: RE: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
> >Chad,
> >
> >Are you speaking hypothetica-probably or did you do some calculating?
> >
> >
>-Original Message-
>From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:19 PM
>To: Killer Bs Discussion
>Subject: Re: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
>
>
>On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:19:21AM -0700, Chad Cooper wrote:
>
>> An ounce of flesh has more energy than a
From: Jan Coffey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yea, so the question is, is the story crap, or have they accounted for all
of
this and will reveal it in the next movie? Like:
I'm hoping for the latter, but I fear the former. A lot of tv/movie sci-fi
producers
seem to think that the audience is dumb and wo
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:56:02PM -0700, Chad Cooper wrote:
> I did get this wrong. What I should have correctly said is a cubic
> centimeter of flesh contains more energy than a cubic centimeter of
> solar gas.
How is that relevant?
> I believe that the assuption made in the movie is that fles
I wrote:
As science fiction, The Matrix and sequel(s) certainly have problems. But
as a reading of the Merovingian Heresy and as a Gnostic philosophy
parable, The Matrix and Matrix: Reloaded really hang together quite
nicely. The philosophical stuff that is spouted in great gouts in the
secon
William T Goodall wrote:
Religion is extremist by nature.
Not all religions. And please don't think that all people who call
themselves Christians are part of the same religion. Some are extremists,
some aren't. Some people can be extremists who are members of churches that
aren't usually ext
- Original Message -
From: "Chad Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:56 PM
Subject: RE: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Mon
Gary wrote:
It is not surprising that the plot lines to Thirteenth Floor and Matrix
were so similar. It seems that similar movies tend to appear together -
for example - Armageddon and Deep Impact. Matrix was released March 31,
1999 and Thirteenth Floor was released mid April 1999.
The way I under
Jan wrote, in regards to the Matrix sequel:
Speaking of eye candy, anyone notice the distinct lack of hot women? Lots
of
hot boys I understand, but no really sexy girls. It's all buck and no doe.
I've seen the women the bros run around with, so what's the deal?
That all depends on how you define "
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:31:49PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
> Not all religions. And please don't think that all people who call
> themselves Christians are part of the same religion.
I could just as well say, please don't call yourself Christian if
you don't want me to think you are irrati
Ray Ludenia wrote:
>
> David Hobby wrote:
> > Identify, for 2 points:
> >
> > "I mean, it's one thing saying you've got the best god, but
> > sayin' it's the ONLY real one is a bit of a cheek, in my
> > opinion."
>
> Hairy Patch-it's "Crappe Jugular"?
>
> Regards, Ray.
"Crappe", you say
From: "Reggie Bautista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spam van Baardwijk
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 16:10:21 -0500
Andy wrote:
No.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=spam
spam n.
Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial
- Original Message -
From: "Reggie Bautista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 5:45 PM
Subject: RE: Picking apart the Matrix - no spoilers
> And sometimes, multiple authors will have similar ideas more or less
> simultaneously as a reaction to somet
>> I did get this wrong. What I should have correctly said is a cubic
>> centimeter of flesh contains more energy than a cubic
>centimeter of solar
>> gas. Dan's assumtion about mass was correct. A cubic
>centimeter of gas
>does
>> not weigh near what a cubic centimeter of flesh does.
>
>At 1 at
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:31:49PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
>
> > Not all religions. And please don't think th
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:24:44PM -0700, Chad Cooper wrote:
> I am right on the whole wattage thing(IMHO and I don't want to argue
> about it).
If you mean how much electrical power is used in the US, you are
definitely wrong. And that is not my humble opinion, it is fact.
I'm with Dan on the w
--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:29:24PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> > Say what?
>
> I thought you were an American Standard urinal expert. Didn't you ever
> read one? I mean, what else do you have to do while you're going?
>
Among a group of friends y
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:48:31PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
> As there have been many irrational, cruel athiests.
Heh. I'm not an atheist, as I've said before. But there are much much
fewer irrational atheists than irrational Christians.
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 19:05:06 -0400
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:31:49PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
> Not all religions. And please don
> >>(Even religion, if anyone wishes.)
As a non-practicing Ba'hai extremist I don't really care if we discuss
religion or not discuss religion.
Can if I could only remember if I am a non-practicing (Ba'hai extremist) or
a (non-practicing Ba'hai) extremist
=
--- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Japanese do low-flow toilets a lot better, because they've been
> doing them for longer and have had more time to experiment with what
> works and what doesn't. All the ones in our house are made by Toto.
> (Insert WoO crack here.)
Toto makes
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:48:31PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
>
> > As there have been many irrational, cruel athie
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:46:26PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Guilt by association can be a double-edged sword,
That's kind of the point (pun intended)
> especially when you condemn an entire people for the acts of a group.
I am not condemning an entire "people". A religion is not a "people". I
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:59:29PM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
> Toto makes the very best working Toilets,
Toto also makes fiber-optic ferrules and receptacles. I was amused when
my colleague forwarded me "Toto" as a possible source for a part we
needed. He didn't know Toto made toilets.
--
"Erik
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:08:03PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
> Do you count Marxists as atheists?
Never thought about it. But I would negatively judge anyone who counted
themselves as Marxists. (dangerous naivete, mostly)
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
On 9 Jun 2003 at 18:48, Dan Minette wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:31:49PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
> >
> > > Not all religions. And please don't think that all people who
> > > call themselves Christians are part of the same religion.
> >
> > I could just as well say, please don't ca
On 9 Jun 2003 at 20:04, Erik Reuter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:46:26PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> > Guilt by association can be a double-edged sword,
>
> That's kind of the point (pun intended)
>
> > especially when you condemn an entire people for the acts of a
> > group.
>
> I am no
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:15:50AM +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> Judaism is both a people and a religion.
A people generally means those living in a certain area or those born of
certain people. In as much as Judaism is a religion and in the context
I was discussing, it is not a people because t
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:04:28AM +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> for the vast majority of the participants. The Isralie / Palestine
> conflict is and has allways been about LAND and water rights, not
> religion.
Baloney. If that were so, why is Jerusalem such a sticking point? It
may be about
--- The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > There is also the possibility that these growth
> > hormones might stimulate already "primed" cells to
> > transform from pre-cancerous into full-blown
> > malignancy. Which is why I drink organic milk
a
I got 97 years and a 5000 pound fine. Ah misspent youth.
john
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 10:13 PM, Gary Nunn wrote:
Find out just how much of a model citizen you are A word of
caution... remember that this is a British website and them British
tend
to do things a bit different :-)
htt
--- Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > There is also the possibility that these growth
> > > hormones might stimulate already "primed" cells to
> > > transform from pre-cancerous into ful
John wrote:
> I got 97 years and a 5000 pound fine. Ah misspent youth.
Hey, jailbird! 2000 less than me, but you're almost as Evil (tm) as
I.
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read the blog. Love the blog.
http://aclipscomb.blogspot.com
___
http://w
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 12:48 am, Dan Minette wrote:
Now, if you want to argue that any organized ideology/philosophy is a
religion, like Willy does, then you can probably wiggle out of this.
But,
since nothing has every been accomplished on a significant scale
without
such a foundation,
>-Original Message-
>From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:42 PM
>To: Killer Bs Discussion
>Subject: Re: Picking apart the Matrix - spoilers
>
>
>On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:24:44PM -0700, Chad Cooper wrote:
>
>> I am right on the whole wattage thing(IM
I don't seem to be receiving any messages, Nick, and it *looks* like my settings are
in order. Any ideas?
Jim
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
___
http://www
Today's Leonard Pitts column has something to do with it:
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/living/columnists/leonard_pitts/6044921.htm
or http://tinyurl.com/dw7u if that one got split.
It's a discussion of Eric Rudolph as a "Christian terrorist". I thought
it was very interesting. Also tou
I have a question for Erik on this thread, and nothing of his to really
quote to give me an opening without quoting a long message (and that
might be irritating):
What is your opinion of Quakers? They're a sect of Christianity, but
they espouse some beliefs that many Christians don't regarding wa
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:40:47PM -0700, Chad Cooper wrote:
> >From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:24:44PM -0700, Chad Cooper wrote:
> >
> >> I am right on the whole wattage thing(IMHO and I don't want to argue
> >> about it).
> >
> >If you mean how much e
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:58:00PM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
> I have a question for Erik on this thread, and nothing of his to
> really quote to give me an opening without quoting a long message (and
> that might be irritating):
>
> What is your opinion of Quakers? They're a sect of Christian
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:48:32PM -0400, Jim Sharkey wrote:
> I don't seem to be receiving any messages, Nick, and it *looks* like
> my settings are in order. Any ideas?
Nick, I think I've been getting all of Jim's messages :-) And juicy ones
they are, too! Better divert them back his way, now
I wrote:
> Not all religions. And please don't think that all people who call
> themselves Christians are part of the same religion.
Erik replied:
I could just as well say, please don't call yourself Christian if
you don't want me to think you are irrational or extremist. Guilt
by association. The
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:11:55PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
> They are simply being completely closed-minded about religion, and
> judging every religious person based on a stereotype.
You are being close-minded and irrational, and underestimating William
and Fool. Their opinion is based on
In a message dated 6/9/2003 4:19:39 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 2 points, though. And one point to William Taylor--I had totally
> forgotten about _The Ruling Class_!
What? You mean it was actually in it?
Though I've found 2 copies of Harold & Maude at the used
I'm posting before checking the rest of the 150+
messages-
--- Han Tacoma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I hope Debbi can add something to this.
> Diphenhydramine is an antihistamine, they are for
> allergies!
>
> One can get pneumonia due to dehydration (and
> aggravate asthma).
> This is true
In a message dated 6/9/2003 4:51:19 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As a non-practicing Ba'hai extremist
What type of weapon does a Ba'hai extremist use?
A nine pointed nerf shuriken?
I'm still waiting for the comic strip.
Ba'hai and Lois.
William Taylor
-
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: Plonkworthy?
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:11:55PM -0500, Reggie Bautista wrote:
>
> > They are simply being completely closed-minde
I wrote:
> They are simply being completely closed-minded about religion, and
> judging every religious person based on a stereotype.
Erik replied:
You are being close-minded and irrational, and underestimating William
and Fool. Their opinion is based on clear thinking and a lot of facts.
What fact
Erik (Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:37:31 -0400) writes:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:36:33PM -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> > At 04:20 PM 6/9/03 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:14:59PM -0400, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> > >> Here's one: did you know that all the urinals in Pennsylvania S
On 9 Jun 2003 at 20:29, Erik Reuter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:15:50AM +0100, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> > Judaism is both a people and a religion.
>
> A people generally means those living in a certain area or those born
> of certain people. In as much as Judaism is a religion and in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/9/2003 4:19:39 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > 2 points, though. And one point to William Taylor--I had totally
> > forgotten about _The Ruling Class_!
>
> What? You mean it was actually in it?
Not that
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Coffey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: Toilets was: Re: Plonkworthy?
>
> Simple really, the pressure needed to move x amount of material through a
> narrow opening is more th
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
