On 06/08/2006, at 12:33 PM, jdiebremse wrote:
The US has also been a leader in the
crisis in Sudan.
:-o
I'm just going to have to withdraw from this thread.
Charlie
Different Realities Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is if you're replacing him with a vacuum. Saddam could have
> waited
> another 6 month or a year, with more and more pressure. The
> "Coalition" could have genuinely won the "hearts and minds" of the
> Iraqis. There must have be
On 6 Aug 2006, at 2:06AM, Dan Minette wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:brin-l-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of William T Goodall
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 8:01 PM
Isn't the real question about whether the state owns one's body or
oneself? And how wome
At 08:01 PM Saturday 8/5/2006, William T Goodall wrote:
On 5 Aug 2006, at 11:59PM, Dan Minette wrote:
If a women died trying to abort in a back alley, that is certainly
a human
death. But, from the right-to-life movement's perspective, 500
deaths of
women attempting abortion must be weighted a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of William T Goodall
> Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 8:01 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: Wealthy couples travel to U.S. to choose baby's sex
>
>
> On 5 Aug 2006, at 11:59PM, Dan Minette
On 5 Aug 2006, at 11:59PM, Dan Minette wrote:
If a women died trying to abort in a back alley, that is certainly
a human
death. But, from the right-to-life movement's perspective, 500
deaths of
women attempting abortion must be weighted against the deaths of
millions of
people when women
At 04:47 PM Saturday 8/5/2006, Dave Land wrote:
Fine, then.
If that's the case, I suppose that lunar orbital dynamics are not
entirely off topic,
Sorry 'bout that. I forwarded the message from another list and
forgot to change the subject line (which referred to a comment made
in an earli
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 06/08/2006, at 7:13 AM, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Modernized now.
Pop culture topicalised now...
It's always fun when pirates are in fashion.
Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 06/08/2006, at 7:13 AM, Robert Seeberger wrote:
Modernized now.
Pop culture topicalised now...
Charlie
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 06/08/2006, at 3:19 AM, Dan Minette wrote:
Given the situation, I don't think there was a way to ratchet up
pressure
from what it was. The US was forward deployed and combat ready in
a way
that it wasn't ready to sustain for a year.
Because of the way they ramped up. There was a UN
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Andrew Crystall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It was not an "error" to overthrow Saddam. Sure, your government
> lied to you about the reasons,
Which lies were these?
JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
> Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 5:34 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: RE: Wealthy couples travel to U.S. to choose baby's sex
>
>
> And I was refusing to have my pro-choice
Dave Land wrote:
>
> If that's the case, I suppose that lunar orbital dynamics
>
Long time ago, I used to work on this topic...
> are not
> entirely off topic, so you may enjoy reading about "3753 Cruithne",
> Earth's "second moon", with its very unusual compound "kidney
> bean"/"horseshoe" orbit
> Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
> > > Dan Minette wrote:
> > > > >DanM wrote:
> > <>
> > > ...The thesis is that the mother and
> > > society owe the child at least a chance at life.
> > > For a right-to-life
> > > person, every child has an inalienable ri
Fine, then.
If that's the case, I suppose that lunar orbital dynamics are not
entirely off topic, so you may enjoy reading about "3753 Cruithne",
Earth's "second moon", with its very unusual compound "kidney
bean"/"horseshoe" orbit with a period around the "kidney bean" of
about 380 days, while t
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060805/ap_on_go_ot/sept11_commission_7
The Sept. 11 commission was so frustrated with repeated misstatements
by the Pentagon and FAA about their response to the 2001 terror
attacks that it considered an investigation into possible deception,
the panel's cha
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'"
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: What are WMD?
> Correct the header. :-)
>
> Dan M.
Modernized now.
xponent
Header Follies Maru
rob
Correct the header. :-)
Dan M.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Charlie Bell
> Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 8:49 AM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: More From the National Intelligence Estimate
>
>
> On 05/08/2006, at 11:34 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Nick Arnett
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 7:45 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: RFK Jr. interview
>
> On 8/4/06, Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > It is in the first Key
On 5 Aug 2006 at 23:49, Charlie Bell wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2006, at 11:34 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
>
> >
> > It was not an "error" to overthrow Saddam. Sure, your government lied
> > to you about the reasons, and by all means call them to account for
> > it, but overthrowing that sort of unstabl
On 8/5/06, Andrew Crystall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was not an "error" to overthrow Saddam. Sure, your government lied
to you about the reasons, and by all means call them to account for
it, but overthrowing that sort of unstably dangerous tyrant isn't a
mistake.
That's part of what re
On 3 Aug 2006 at 11:43, Dave Land wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I just signed a petition at http://firstfreedomfirst.org/ aimed
> at ensuring freedom of -- and from -- religion in America. It is
> sponsored by Americans United for Separation of Church and State,
> among others. I'm for that, too.
'Far as
On 05/08/2006, at 11:34 PM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
It was not an "error" to overthrow Saddam. Sure, your government lied
to you about the reasons, and by all means call them to account for
it, but overthrowing that sort of unstably dangerous tyrant isn't a
mistake.
It is if you're replacing
On 4 Aug 2006 at 8:48, Nick Arnett wrote:
> Now that you have read this, surely you cannot still believe that the
> administration's arguments for the were supported by the intelligence. How
> do we deal with this? An easy answer would be to blame conservatives and
> run to the left. But blame
25 matches
Mail list logo
