Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
>Can we change the name of the list to something more descriptive,
>like "Children-L"?
Nah, children actually know when to STFU. I've yet to see anyone
here demonstrate that ability. :)
Jim
___
Join Excite! - http://www.exc
Richard wrote:
There's also the killfile, which is even more effective and requires
even less effort.
This is the key. If you're offended by him, plonk him.
That said I'd like to point out that personal attacks rarely if ever win
debating points. IMO you weaken your position considerably by st
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist
Censorshipspreadinglike Cancer)
> If
> you
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:30:33PM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:
> You do not need to sign anything to agree to a contract.
For something like this, I do. And I did not agree.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mail
> That is irrelevant on whether or not you or I agreed
> to a contract. One
> does not legally enter a contract by sending an
> email. One enters into
> a contract by signing one's name to a contract that
> is clearly worded
> as such. Which I did not do. In fact, when that list
> was first written
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 02:46:04PM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> Can we change the name of the list to something more descriptive, like
> "Children-L"?
How about, censorship-of-all-none-inane-idiotic-one-liner-posts-L?
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:45:40PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote:
> Don't worry, you haven't done anything different to change my opinion
> that your posts are, on balance, not worth my time to read - but we've
> been through that before
...
> Which still leaves the question as to why you find th
Can we change the name of the list to something more descriptive, like
"Children-L"?
;-)
-- Ronn! :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
At 05:01 PM 3/13/2004 -0330 Travis Edmunds wrote
>> > Did you agree to the US Constitution?
>>
>>So, you're reading my posts now, huh? I must be doing something
>>wrong.
No Erik, I just happen to see your quotes in other members' posts. Don't
worry, you haven't done anything different to c
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re:
FascistCensorshipspreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:25:31 -0500
On Sat, Mar 13,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:18:33PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote:
> Did you agree to the US Constitution?
So, you're reading my fucking posts now, huh? I must be doing something
wrong. Fuck!
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.m
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004, Damon Agretto wrote:
> Actually, you did.
So now you want to control not only what I can write, but you also want
to decide what I agreed to? What's next, do you want to take over where
Saddam Hussein left off? Sheesh, and he says I have issues.
> Erik you must have some i
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist
Censorshipspreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:45:06 -0500
&
At 12:03 PM 3/13/2004 -0800 Damon Agretto wrote:
>> Okay, then pay up, Damon.
>>
>> http://erikreuter.net/damon.html
Erik,
Did you agree to the US Constitution?
JDG
___
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re:
FascistCensorshipspreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:27:28 -0500
On Sat, Mar 13,
> Okay, then pay up, Damon.
>
> http://erikreuter.net/damon.html
Erik you must have some issues. Such an agreement is
not valid as YOU do not own Brin-L. If you can provide
such ownership, make proof available to the list.
Damon.
=
--
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:
> Actually you did, Erik. Are you not using the service as of now? Have
> you in the past used the service? To what extent have you used the
> service?
Okay, then pay up, Damon.
http://erikreuter.net/damon.html
--
Erik Reuter ht
> > Actually, you did. It clearly states that WE
> AGREE.
>
> Actually, I did NOT.
Actually you did, Erik. Are you not using the service
as of now? Have you in the past used the service? To
what extent have you used the service?
By using the service, you implicitly agree to obey the
guidelines.
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist
Censorshipspreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:16:14 -0500
On Sat, Mar 13,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 11:36:29AM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:
> Actually, you did. It clearly states that WE AGREE.
Actually, I did NOT.
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> Damon, read what you wrote, they are "guidelines",
> not rules. One does
> not "flagrantly violate" guidelines. I certainly
> never agreed to any
> hard and fast rules, and I certainly do not agree to
> never do anything
> that is mentioned in the guidelines. I only agree to
> something if it
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 11:22:56AM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:
> Erik wrote:
> > I'm not aware of any list rules to be "flagrantly violated".
>
> Erik, go to the bottom of this message (and EVERY Bin-L
> message). Click on that link. Look under "About Brin-L." Click on
> Ettiquete Guidelines. Go
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:47:37PM -0330, Travis Edmunds wrote:
> Erik wrote:
> >[{Aww, pooor Jonn. Can't figure out how to use the delete key
> >and gets his itsy bitsy brainy-wainy all worked up about it. Aww.}]
> Check out what's in those brackets...
>
> Do you smell it?
>
>
> I'm not aware of any list rules to be "flagrantly
> violated".
Erik, go to the bottom of this message (and EVERY
Bin-L message). Click on that link. Look under "About
Brin-L." Click on Ettiquete Guidelines. Go to the
bottom where it says "We further agree that:" 3rd
Clause. Also take not of the
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist
Censorshipspreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:53:55 -0500
If you'
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:38:29PM -0330, Travis Edmunds wrote:
> And it just so happens that certain words, deemed profanity, are
> frowned upon here.
It just so happens that they are not "frowned upon" here, also. It just
so happens that
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship
spreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:57:17 -0500
Nick and Julia,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:46:48AM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:
> But two can play this game: We'll concede (for now, for argument's
> sake) that the Fool has a right to be onboxious, offensive, and
> flagrantly violate list rules.
I'm not aware of any list rules to be "flagrantly violated".
> Un
> He should have the right. Whether I think he should
> exercise it as often
> as he does is another matter. But he should have the
> right.
Unfortunately, this is a PRIVATE list, and whether the
Fool has the right to do or not is entirely up to the
listowners.
But two can play this game: We'll
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:47:39AM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:
> What gives you the right to be discourteous and offensive on the list?
He should have the right. Whether I think he should exercise it as often
as he does is another matter. But he should have the right.
> just parroting Brin's phi
> I do not Believe 'profanity' exists.
And other people do. Why are your beliefs so much more
important than anyone elses?
What gives you the right to be discourteous and
offensive on the list?
Do you believe in the concept of IAAMOAC or are you
just parroting Brin's philosophical musings to f
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 05:10:56PM +, Richard Baker wrote:
> Erik said:
> > Better a fool than a self-important, human-rights denying,
> > irrational, reality-challenged mind-rotted religious bigot.
> Can I have an insult too?
Sure, you can have it if you want it. It was not named for anyon
Erik said:
>> Personally, Erik, if you really want anarchy, there's always UseNet.
>
> Personally, JDG, if you really don't want to read Fool's opinion,
> there always the delete key.
There's also the killfile, which is even more effective and requires
even less effort.
> Better a fool than a s
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:45:06AM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote:
> I think that there is a difference between asking the Admins to
> "ignore" the request and to "reject" the request. Your request that
> Jon's request be ignored seems to be, at best, bad manners.
I would hardly consider you the a
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:23:53AM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Let's see what Julia and Nick say. If they feel I'm wrong, I'll let
> it go.
You are wrong. Let it go.
I'll be very disappointed if the administrators succumb to these attacks
on Fool and make any statements intended to silence him.
>>Nick and Julia, I think you should ignore Jon. He seems to think he
>>has a right to control other people on this list, but you should not
>>help him to achieve such control.
I think that there is a difference between asking the Admins to "ignore"
the request and to "reject" the request. Your r
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:23:53AM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Let's see what Julia and Nick say. If they feel I'm wrong, I'll let
> it go.
Mindless appeal to perceived authority. I would have expected better
from you.
> Nice little manipulation of my words there. Do you always argue by
> twis
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist
Censorshipspreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:53:55 -0500
On Sat, Mar 13,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:21:39AM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I don't have your blase attitude when it comes to being
> abused by other people.
If you're sorry, then stop your attempts to force your opinions on
others.
If you're not sorry about your intolerant attempts to abuse s
From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship
spreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:57:17 -0500
On Sat, Mar 13,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 02:18:34AM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> Nick and Juilia, I formally request that The Fool be given a warning
> or some sort of reprimand for this obscenity-laced post as well as
> his repeated attacks over the last 6 weeks or more against John
> D. Giorgis. I would like to
From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist
Censorshipspreadinglike Cancer) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:24
> From: Jon Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Profanity is not welcome."
I do not Believe 'profanity' exists.
> Your anonymity does not give you the right to spam this list with
> uncivilized behavior.
From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fascist Censorship spreading like Cancer thruout Gov't
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:25:03 -0600
Nick and Juilia, I formally request that The Fool be given
44 matches
Mail list logo
