They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-10 Thread KZK
http://www.cathnews.com/news/507/56.php The influential Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna has suggested that belief in evolution as accepted by science today may be incompatible with Catholic faith. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/b

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-10 Thread Dave Land
On Jul 10, 2005, at 3:43 PM, KZK wrote: http://www.cathnews.com/news/507/56.php The influential Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna has suggested that belief in evolution as accepted by science today may be incompatible with Catholic faith. Too many damn fools don't even know that evolutio

RE: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-10 Thread Kevin Street
KZK wrote: > http://www.cathnews.com/news/507/56.php > > The influential Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna has suggested > that belief in evolution as accepted by science today may be > incompatible with Catholic faith. Wouldn't it be embarrassing if they held a Dark Age and nobody came?

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-11 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: "KZK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Brin-L" Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 5:43 PM Subject: They were For it before they were Against it > http://www.cathnews.com/news/507/56.php > > The influential Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of

RE: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-11 Thread Horn, John
> Behalf Of Dan Minette > > The problem with the Cardinal's statement is a bit subtler > than one might guess at first glance. > List members who have been here a few years know that I differ > with the multiverse interpretation of QM: the many worlds > interpretation (MWI) of QM. Only on Bri

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-11 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Jul 11, 2005, at 8:34 AM, Dan Minette wrote: The Cardinal draws the line in the wrong placeso I'm not defending his editorial. I'm just pointing out that his error is not the typical creationist error. Indeed not. Both MWM and multiverse seem pretty hard to swallow; what do you think

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-11 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 2:12 PM Subject: Re: They were For it before they were Against it > On Jul 11, 2005, at 8:34 AM, Dan Minette wrote: > > > Th

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-11 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Jul 11, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Dan Minette wrote: From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Jul 11, 2005, at 8:34 AM, Dan Minette wrote: The Cardinal draws the line in the wrong placeso I'm not defending his editorial. I'm just pointing out that his error is not the typical creation

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-11 Thread Maru Dubshinki
On 7/11/05, Warren Ockrassa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see how the multi-world or multiverse model is more > conservative than Bohm's idea, though. It sounds considerably more > complex and requires a hell of a lot more effort to make it happen. An > entire universe at each decision node?

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-11 Thread Gary Denton
On 7/10/05, KZK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.cathnews.com/news/507/56.php > > The influential Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna has suggested > that belief in evolution as accepted by science today may be > incompatible with Catholic faith. This disagrees with previous Catholic Ch

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-11 Thread Robert J. Chassell
Too many damn fools don't even know that evolution is just a theory. Dave Like Gravity Maru True. Darwin's Laws are `worse'; that is to say, they have more authority than Newton's: after all, we know that Newton's Laws of Motion are wrong under circumstances that seldom interfere w

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-13 Thread Gary Denton
Jeanne D'Arc discovered that the Cardinal developed this Op-Ed with the Discovery Institute - the Protestant Creationist unthink tank that is pushing Intelligent Design. One of the comments mentions an internal document that was leaked from the Discovery Institute that advocated using ID as a we

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-13 Thread KZK
Gary Denton wrote: Jeanne D'Arc discovered that the Cardinal developed this Op-Ed with the Discovery Institute - the Protestant Creationist unthink tank that is pushing Intelligent Design. One of the comments mentions an internal document that was leaked from the Discovery Institute that advo

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-14 Thread Leonard Matusik
on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:53:59 -0500 Gary Denton wrote: >On 7/10/05, KZK wrote: >> http://www.cathnews.com/news/507/56.php >> >>The influential Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna has suggested >> that belief in evolution as accepted by science today may be >> incompatible with Catholic faith.

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-14 Thread William T Goodall
On 14 Jul 2005, at 1:19 pm, Leonard Matusik wrote: Maybe I haven't kept up with it properly I think we have the answer! -- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/ "The Macintosh uses an experimental pointing

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-14 Thread KZK
Leonard Matusik wrote: on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:53:59 -0500 Gary Denton wrote: On 7/10/05, KZK wrote: http://www.cathnews.com/news/507/56.php The influential Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna has suggested that belief in evolution as accepted by science today may be incompatible with Cath

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-14 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 08:28 AM Thursday 7/14/2005, William T Goodall wrote: "The Macintosh uses an experimental pointing device called a 'mouse.' There is no evidence that people want to use these things." -John C. Dvorak, SF Examiner, Feb. 1984. Carpal Tunnel syndrome, however, is evidence that there needs to

Re: They were For it before they were Against it

2005-07-15 Thread Leonard Matusik
Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:28:34 +0100 William T Goodall wrote: >On 14 Jul 2005, at 1:19 pm, Leonard Matusik wrote: >> Maybe I haven't kept up with it properly >I think we have the answer! One of the more lucid posts I've seen you place William. As I assume you have kept up with the topic, hold fo