(apologies if received twice)
With the greatest respect to Chris Hughes, I have to disagree with the
assumption that we just leave it up to DoC to come up with options and then
we all vote on our preferred option.
The mooted restructuring for next year are of such major change that I
wouldnt w
]
Sent: 16 July 2003 10:32
To: BD
Subject: RE: [BD] TOUR 2004
I agree with dave. we elect people that we beleved
would do the best for ultimate in the uk. How about
we let Chris put some ideas together and then we can
hold a vote to see what the whole ultimate community
thinks and we will all
I agree with dave. we elect people that we beleved
would do the best for ultimate in the uk. How about
we let Chris put some ideas together and then we can
hold a vote to see what the whole ultimate community
thinks and we will all have a good idea of wht the
sensable options are.
Phil
(Scraggy)
Re Dave Grayson's response to Roger
Dave- I don't agree.
Actually I don't agree with almost everything you said - but I'll just pick
up on the most important point.
I think it is reasonable that people get a chance to discuss (specifically
with Chris Hughes) what changes we ought to make to the co
Roger writes a mail containing some interesting points. For ease, I have
deleted most of the rest :-)
Milky raises a valid point, and one that I seem to remember airing with
Chris late on Saturday night (at least I hope it was him). He may have
been elected to change the Tour, but that doesnt m
[warning: some of this has a slight bias to it, but I'm trying to maintain
perspective...]
RT> IMHO there is still enough of a gulf between 1 and 8 (I think
RT> C2 were the only team to reach double figures against us this weekend..)
Ahem...Clapham 1 vs Fluid Druids semi-final finished 17-10, de
getting to be on a par with Rimini or a
Worlds event in terms of presentability to the press. Congratulations.
If only I could get our lot to wear the matching red shorts;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam Batchelor
Sent: 10 July
now obvious to all that the Tour needs to be split...
Cheers
Adam Batchelor
Retired illiterate megalomaniac! (Ok Timmy!)
- Original Message -
From: "James Hammersley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:59 PM
Subject:
All -
Stig raised a point yesterday about stucture of the tour going forward -
How is the change of the tour going to be managed? Does Chris Hughes as DOC
have complete say and freedom, or is there a 'committe' to deliver a new UK
tour?
James
_
