2009/8/2 Max (Weijun) Wang weijun.w...@sun.com:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Vinod Kutty wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build openjdk7-ea-b67, so I downloaded the self-extracting
binary plugs and tried to extract it.
You no longer need the binary plugs to perform an
2009/7/19 Ulf Zibis ulf.zi...@gmx.de:
Martin, Sherman, Neal,
do you like to sponsor and review my CR ?
Don't worry, it's very simple and small, best for getting familiar with the
workflow.
See:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100090
Thanks,
Ulf
As this bug is about
just needs to be adjusted.
-kto
So should I push the original webrev
http://fuseyism.com/xrender/webrev.01/ (which uses the standard header
instead) to the awt gate?
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 06/16/2009 07:25 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
On 06/16/2009 07:21 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote
:00 PM Anthony Petrov wrote:
On 6/17/2009 8:44 PM Andrew John Hughes wrote:
So should I push the original webrev
http://fuseyism.com/xrender/webrev.01/ (which uses the standard header
instead) to the awt gate?
Given Kelly's point, I'm approving the fix. Please use the CR number
6851515
2009/6/17 Anthony Petrov anthony.pet...@sun.com:
On 6/17/2009 10:13 PM Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Please update the README-builds.html file also as Kelly suggests. Thanks!
Ok here's an updated version with Xrender mentioned in README-builds:
http://fuseyism.com/6851515/webrev.03/
Ok
2009/5/31 lianshun Liu lsliu0...@gmail.com:
Hi,
When I've finished building OpenJDK, how can I make sure that it will work
well? Is there any test suites that can be used to test the JVM?
Thanks :)
Lianshun Liu
If you use IcedTea, it's just a matter of 'make check'.
--
Andrew :-)
Free
2009/5/29 Mark Reinhold m...@sun.com:
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 16:51:24 +0100
From: Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org
...
Looks like the Contributed-by info is wrong. I tried adding the line
as in the example and jcheck choked:
remote: Contributed-by: Andrew John Hughes ahughes
21, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/5/21 Mark Reinhold m...@sun.com:
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:17:21 +0100
From: Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org
Ok, new webrev created against jdk7/build:
http://fuseyism.com/6841728/webrev.01/
Looks good to me -- go ahead
snip...
Given how well this model works for IcedTea working with OpenJDK, I'm
confident it can also work for the JDK's incorporation of corba, jaxp, and
jaxws :-)
Indeed, IcedTea already downloads a tarball of the HSX repository and
deletes the OpenJDK6 version. Having to sync between HSX
2009/5/16 Mark Reinhold m...@sun.com:
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 18:32:14 +0100
From: Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org
2009/5/15 Mark Reinhold m...@sun.com:
One changeset is best. Â You need somehow to revert the changeset
Somehow I thought that's what you were going to say
2009/5/18 Joseph D. Darcy joe.da...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
snip...
Given how well this model works for IcedTea working with OpenJDK, I'm
confident it can also work for the JDK's incorporation of corba, jaxp,
and
jaxws :-)
Indeed, IcedTea already downloads a tarball
2009/5/15 Anthony Petrov anthony.pet...@sun.com:
On 5/15/2009 5:48 PM Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
The irony here is that yesterday I updated my laptop to Ubuntu 9.04, and
(a) the Mercurial package does not completely install correctly
(b) even if it did, it is version 1.1.2.something, and OpenJDK
2009/5/15 Mark Reinhold m...@sun.com:
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:16:01 -0700
From: jonathan.gibb...@sun.com
Yeah, tried that, didn't work for me; I had to do real work so I gave
up and downloaded and went back to using 0.9.5. :-(
Odd. I've been hacking on Jigsaw using hg 1.1.2 on my Ubuntu
2009/5/15 Mark Reinhold m...@sun.com:
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 23:31:58 +0100
From: Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org
2009/5/14 phil.r...@sun.com:
I do think I know what you want. But I consider its a slippery slope as
you have no way of knowing or keeping track of the consequences
2009/5/15 Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
The irony here is that yesterday I updated my laptop to Ubuntu 9.04, and
(a) the Mercurial package does not completely install correctly
(b) even if it did, it is version 1.1.2.something, and OpenJDK requires
0.9.5.
The
HI all,
I have a simple patch that allows the building of the Nimbus L'n'F
(which has a dependency on a specific version of JIBX, 1.1.5) to be
turned off so the user can trade build simplicity for a lack of Nimbus
support and curved buttons in Swing.
The bug report is here:
2009/5/14 Phil Race phil.r...@sun.com:
There's public API associated with Nimbus in javax.swing.plaf.nimbus
so I don't think many people will want to use that facility and it doesn't
seem appropriate to have it in the jdk7 source train.
-phil.
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
HI all,
I have
.
My fear is we will run over this problem again and again. If people
working on OpenJDK day in and day out are having issues with this,
then newbies are going to fare even worse.
-phil.
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/5/14 Phil Race phil.r...@sun.com:
There's public API associated
2009/5/14 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
If the OpenJDK was able to build with jibx 1.1.6 or 1.2.1,
or in general was able to build with more of the jibx versions
(I don't know how hard that would be) does that change things?
-kto
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/5/14 Phil Race phil.r
2009/5/14 Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
b58 also contains a fix for
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6565364 but this
appears to have been rolled in with
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6529590 so that the
bug has not been updated
2009/5/9 Xiomara Jayasena xiomara.jayas...@sun.com:
The OpenJDK source is available at:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/rev/59b497130f82
The OpenJDK source binary plugs for the promoted JDK 7 build 58 are
available under the openjdk
2009/4/9 Alan Bateman alan.bate...@sun.com:
Andrew Haley wrote:
:
The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
These are the patches in icedtea/patches and icedtea/patches/hotspot.
* Every patch should be assigned to someone.
* Every patch should be discussed.
2009/4/9 Alan Bateman alan.bate...@sun.com:
Andrew Haley wrote:
:
The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
These are the patches in icedtea/patches and icedtea/patches/hotspot.
* Every patch should be assigned to someone.
* Every patch should be discussed.
2009/4/9 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/4/9 Alan Bateman alan.bate...@sun.com:
Andrew Haley wrote:
:
The page is at http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches
These are the patches in icedtea/patches and icedtea/patches/hotspot.
* Every patch should
2009/4/9 Alan Bateman alan.bate...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
:
icedtea-bytebuffer-compact.patch - this looks to be a partial fix to
6593946. If so, 6593946 is already in jdk6/jdk6/jdk
(http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/3e7bfcdcf96f).
IcedTea6 is still based
2009/4/1 Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com:
We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK 6.
So, we're going to
2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew Haley wrote:
We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea patches have been committed to
OpenJDK 7 but not OpenJDK
2009/4/1 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew Haley wrote:
We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
been getting large, with some local patches that should have been
pushed upstream. Also, some IcedTea
2009/4/1 Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
I can certainly help out with any build related (makefiles etc.)
changes.
Good, because to my knowledge, those form the majority :)
However, my guess would also be that some require
2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/4/1 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/4/1 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew Haley wrote:
We at Red Hat have noticed that the list of IcedTea local patches has
been getting large, with some
2009/3/31 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew,
See this response sent by Tim on March 26.
-- Jon
Hi Neale:
I’m trying to build the JDK for the first time. I grabbed the sources from
the mercurial repository and followed the FAQ to perform the build. It
builds a heap of stuff
2009/3/31 Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com:
Clearly this review is of interest to a wider audience.
This fixes the build problem Jon found and reported as 6819847
Until the fix is approved and pushed, the workaround is to add:
IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS=true
to your build environment.
Tim
2009/3/31 Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I didn't think openjdk7 could build without binary plugs.
But I've been a bit disconnected from the jdk work lately.
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I didn't either. The last build I tried using the hotspot-comp tree
(to test a patch
2009/3/31 Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com:
Neale Ferguson wrote:
I¹m building the OpenJDK6 7 by way of the zeroJDK mechanism and am running
into problems.
Using gij with icedtea6 I get:
+ CLASSPATH=/home/neale/ecj-3.4.1.jar
+ /usr/bin/gij org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.Main -1.5
2009/3/31 Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com:
I wrote:
One question - if the user goes to the trouble to set any of
ALT_BINARY_PLUGS_JARFILE, ALT_BINARY_PLUGS_PATH,
ALT_BUILD_BINARY_PLUGS_PATH, ALT_CLOSED_JDK_IMPORT_PATH
(See the comments in jdk/make/common/Defs.gmk starting at line 127),
should we
2009/3/19 Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com:
Hi Folks
This is part of a project to move fixes that are already in OpenJDK6 forward
to OpenJDK7.
The fix for http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6695776 will
remove some binary artifacts from the source tree and instead build them
from
2009/3/4 Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com:
The jdk7 builds at
http://download.java.net/jdk7/archive/
are for the non-open-source jdk7.
The binary plugs for recent openjdk7 builds
are available in non-obvious places like
http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/promoted/b45/
but b45 is
2009/1/16 Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@sun.com:
Ubuntu 8.10, all updates incl. libc6-dev 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu7. Just
fetched latest sources from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/ forest.
g++ -DLINUX -D_GNU_SOURCE -DIA32 -DPRODUCT -I. -I../generated/adfiles
-I../generated/jvmtifiles
2008/12/22 Dmitri Trembovetski dmitri.trembovet...@sun.com:
Hi Mark,
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Dmitri,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 17:00 -0800, Dmitri Trembovetski wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 14:21 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
The JDK7 early access binary snapshot builds
2008/11/26 Kelly O'Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you set the variable WARNINGS_ARE_ERRORS to be empty, it should
be sent through to all the makefiles. It's the variable
WARNINGS_ARE_ERRORS that contains the option -Werror for hotspot
compiles, and it is -Werror that makes warnings fatal.
So
)/share/plugin
export ALT_BOOTDIR=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun
make sanity #Note: The sanity check passes even if ALT_BOOTDIR is unset
make make.output
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2008/11/21 Kelly O'Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, I meant to explicitly call out the 3 WARNING: messages
check passes even if ALT_BOOTDIR is unset
make make.output
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2008/11/21 Kelly O'Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, I meant to explicitly call out the 3 WARNING: messages.
The bcopy problem is a separate thing, more serious and needs to be
fix
On 21/11/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build the open JDK from source (using the b39 snapshot
release) on Ubuntu 8.10, but I get the following error message:
In file included from ../generated/incls/_precompiled.incl:286:
2008/10/23 Daniel Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi guys,
I could take care of applying the same patch than what I did
a few months ago for OpenJDK 6.
Namely, if you compile OpenJDK with the binary plugs, the SNMP
runtime will be compiled and included in rt.jar. If you compile
without the binary
that at lib/tools.jar.
There is something very strange going on here.
-kto
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 12:16 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Ok, then it sounds like something is either not being built into the jars
in bootstrap/jdk1.6.0 or they are being missing off
2008/10/22 Kelly O'Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I filed a jdk7 version of the bug
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6672710
Assigned it to me, but I'm not sure when I get it fixed.
I seem to recall that this wasn't the only thing needing fixing
so that the openjdk7 builds would build
2008/10/22 Christian Thalinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 11:54 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Then why aren't you using IcedTea?
Fair question. As I wrote in my blog[1], I have problems in building a
64-bit version on OpenSolaris, but I guess I would have the same problem
2008/10/22 Christian Thalinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 12:08 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Is that error from building the hotspot-tools jar? If so, you
probably need to add some additional packages to the list
in Makefile.am.
It happens when building HotSpot. Strange
2008/6/19 Ken Cavanaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mark Reinhold wrote:
Andrew: Thanks for the patch!
The CORBA code isn't maintained directly in OpenJDK, but rather in a
sub-project of GlassFish (https://glassfish-corba.dev.java.net/).
That's why there's no CORBA Group. (The same goes for JAXWS
2008/8/26 Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 00:46 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I'm currently stuck on this strange issue whereby
sun_java2d_opengl_OGLContext_OGLContextCaps.h is not being generated.
Has anyone else seen this? To try for yourself, you
On 25/08/2008, Andrew John Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IcedTea b33 appears to fix the CORBA issue I found with b32, so I've
moved straight to working on that rather than b32. However, there are
again a number of issues building this in IcedTea and I haven't
managed to overcome
On 22/07/2008, Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Jeffrey Baker wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Kelly O'Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jeffrey Baker wrote:
[snip]
Second problem: the build dumped core in test_gamma with an error in
On 25/06/2008, Dmitri Trembovetski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip..
anybody ever tried it on windows. In theory with cygwin you should be
able to get enough of the gnu toolchain to get it working. But icedtea
Theories seldom work well when applied to Windows, unfortunately,
as
2008/6/23 Dalibor Topic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:43 -0700, David Herron wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
In my JavaOne talk Sandeep and I had worked up a hack with the same
purpose. He's been busy enough that he hadn't had a chance to turn
2008/6/24 Joseph D. Darcy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, since b07 back in March, *no* binary plugs are required to build the
OpenJDK 6 sources from Sun. The only remaining plug is for SNMP support,
which is not required functionality according to the platform spec and is
thus not tested by the JCK.
On 19/06/2008, Tim Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Reinhold wrote:
Andrew: Thanks for the patch!
The CORBA code isn't maintained directly in OpenJDK, but rather in a
sub-project of GlassFish
(https://glassfish-corba.dev.java.net/).
That's why there's no CORBA Group. (The same
and VS2008.
While I can understand some changes being necessary for major releases
(e.g. the move from GCC 3 to 4),
every single release shouldn't need work; this suggest an issue with
the build system itself.
-kto
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
GCC will NOT work under Solaris/SPARC, and I'm
GCC will NOT work under Solaris/SPARC, and I'm pretty darned sure it won't
work under Solaris/x86 or Solaris/x64. There are some significant GCC-isms
which the JDK does not currently support.
That said, it would not be terribly difficult to modify the source to get
GCC to work, but you'd
tongue-in-cheek BTW does anybody know where to get a SHCK? (/bin/sh
Compatibility Kit) How can we be sure any /bin/sh interpreter is actually
compatible with /bin/sh ?? /tongue-in-cheek
- David Herron
tongue-firmly-in-cheekI hear the license terms mean people can't
really talk about
2008/6/3 Kelly O'Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As far as I know, only Ubuntu (and only 8.04?) depends on bash.
No other OS seems to have a problem using plain old antique sh.
---
Ideally, these sh scripts used in the build process should be changed
to be something else, maybe small Java apps.
2008/5/12 Andrew Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
We already use 'make -j' when building the .o files, and the dependencies
should be ok for the .o files. So for native compilations I don't
think we have a problem.
That's interesting; it certainly didn't used to work.
On 31/03/2008, Volker Simonis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Clemens,
I recently successfully built the whole OpenJDK using gcc 3.3.3 on
Suse Enterprise Linux 9.3 (see
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/simonis/archive/2008/01/hotspot_develop.html#Build).
I had no linking problems. Currently
, but figure it's worth the
look, if the time is there.
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew John Hughes
Sent
On 09/02/2008, Kelly O'Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI...
I started a wiki page for OpenJDK Build issues at:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJdkBuilds/Home
It should be setup for anyone to add pages or edit them.
-kto
I notice that the content of this page at the moment is a bug
201 - 264 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
