On 17:32 Tue 10 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> I'm a little reluctant to accept this, I'm not sure what the full
> ramifications are.
> But I think we want it.
>
> Is this in OpenJDK6 now?
>
OpenJDK6 changes have to go through 7 first, so no. But it's been in IcedTea6
since
before there w
On 15:31 Wed 11 May , [email protected] wrote:
> Changeset: 42c22d5a2cd0
> Author:bpatel
> Date: 2011-05-11 08:30 -0700
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/42c22d5a2cd0
>
> 7043684: Update man pages for JDK 7 tools
> Reviewed-by: skannan
>
> ! src/linux/doc
On 21:09 Wed 11 May , Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Omair,
>
> CR 7043921 . It need someone from jdk team to integrate it.
>
Omair has commit rights so he can just push it now.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU
On 14:03 Mon 16 May , Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 12:08 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > On 5/16/11 12:48 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> On 16/05/11 11:22, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> >>> Any idea why, for example Fedora's & Debian's, default warning sets
> >>> differ?
> >>
> >> Because the dist
On 07:25 Mon 16 May , Erik Trimble wrote:
> On 5/16/2011 6:03 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 05/16/2011 12:08 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> >
> >> The reason I'm asking is that I'm wondering if this is something we
> >> should expect to crop up in different parts of the code base, or
> >> whether
On 08:35 Mon 16 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On May 16, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > I think the issue is actually having -Werror enabled for all builds, not
> > just debug builds. Without that, these additional warnings would just be
>
On 09:47 Thu 19 May , David Holmes wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 05/19/11 05:29:
> > On 08:35 Mon 16 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> >> The -Werror option is a blessing and a curse. I find it highly commendable
> >> that teams (l
On 10:32 Thu 19 May , Alan Bateman wrote:
> David Holmes wrote:
> > :
> >
> >> In contrast, there are basically two Java compilers in general use
> >> (javac and ecj)
> >> and one is part of OpenJDK. Yet, the Java code does not have -Werror
> >> enabled by default and there
> >> are a mass o
On 17:00 Thu 19 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
snip...
>
> But yes, a great project would be to see if we could get to 'javac -Xlint:all
> -Werror' someday.
> We really should... in fact it should be a requirement moving forward that
> all java code be warning free, and stay that way.
>
S
On 13:11 Fri 20 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> We now have a Build Infrastructure project!
>
> Register for email at:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/build-infra-dev
>
> The repos will be at:
>http://hg.openjdk.java.net/build-infra/jdk7
>
> But I haven't been able to po
On 07:20 Fri 20 May , David Holmes wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 05/20/11 06:24:
> > On 09:47 Thu 19 May , David Holmes wrote:
> >> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 05/19/11 05:29:
> >>> On 08:35 Mon 16 May , Kelly
On 16:12 Fri 20 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On May 20, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 13:11 Fri 20 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>
> >> We now have a Build Infrastructure project!
> >>
> >> Regi
On 08:57 Fri 03 Jun , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> The documented Boot JDK to be used when building JDK7 repositories is JDK6
> Update 18, as listed here
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/raw-file/tip/README-builds.html#MBE
>
> However, as many people know, JDK releases newer than JDK6u18
On 09:59 Wed 15 Jun , Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 14/06/11 22:22, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
> >
> > i had done a contribution to openjdk7 and remembered it was very
> > hard to setup all the build thinks. Now a want to make some new
> > contributions and i struggle again with the build setup. H
On 16:15 Wed 15 Jun , Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 04:11 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > On 09:59 Wed 15 Jun , Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> On 14/06/11 22:22, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
> >>>
> >>> i had done a contribution to openjdk
On 11:24 Sun 10 Jul , Erik Trimble wrote:
> Folks,
>
> PPC isn't a currently supported architecture for OpenJDK - that is, no
> one has contributed any code to support it. I do know of several
> proprietary ports, but that doesn't help. :-) I don't even remember the
> last time it was pot
Hi,
Can someone please tell me why:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cf4edfcd7119
reverted my earlier fix:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/80368890a2a0
without any discussion?
The correct fix would have been to bump the boot source language/target class
versions to 7, not
On 11:58 Wed 27 Jul , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can someone please tell me why:
> >
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cf4edfcd7119
> >
> > reve
Linux 3.0 was released last week:
https://lwn.net/Articles/452531/
This webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/pr748/
fixes the check in the HotSpot build to allow Linux 3.0 and on
through the version check.
This is against hotspot-comp/OpenJDK8 but our testing in IcedTea6
shows that the s
On 17:12 Wed 27 Jul , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 11:58 Wed 27 Jul , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> >>
&
On 15:02 Thu 28 Jul , Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 08:32 -0400, Keith McGuigan wrote:
> > This appears to remove support for version 2.7. Is that intentional?
>
> There has never been a 2.7 kernel.
> 2.6.39.3 is the last before the 3.0 series.
> https://secure.wikimedia.org/wi
On 09:17 Thu 28 Jul , Keith McGuigan wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks. Code looks good to me then.
>
Ok, can I push this or do you still need to do this via JPRT?
Either way, I need a bug ID please.
> --
> - Keith
>
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 08
On 11:07 Mon 01 Aug , Alexandre Boulgakov wrote:
> Hello Kelly,
>
> Do you know the answer to this one?
>
> Thanks,
> Sasha
>
> On 7/29/2011 11:37 AM, Alexandre Boulgakov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working on removing the javac -Xlint warnings from java.net.*.
> > After removing these w
On 16:02 Mon 01 Aug , Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 02:55 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > On 11:07 Mon 01 Aug , Alexandre Boulgakov wrote:
> >> Hello Kelly,
> >>
> >> Do you know the answer to this one?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
On 18:25 Wed 03 Aug , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> FYI...
>
> If you are interested in the jdk8 build infrastructure changes coming down
> the pipe, I invite you
> to join the build-infra-dev alias:
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-infra-dev/2011-August/29.html
>
> I expect thi
On 10:52 Tue 11 Oct , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> My plan of record has been to just unzip these bundles right into the
> repositories and get rid of this painful
> situation, that I have to confess, I created. :^(
> But I was thinking I could come up with some kind of way to paint these
> sources
On 13:52 Wed 12 Oct , Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
> 2011/10/12 Dr Andrew John Hughes :
> > FWIW, I recently did exactly that in IcedTea because I'm sick of all the
> > problems this drop solution causes.
> > This has cut things down from needing five tarballs (jaxp
On 14:28 Fri 14 Oct , [email protected] wrote:
> Changeset: 984f119f2ea7
> Author:ohrstrom
> Date: 2011-10-14 16:36 +0200
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/build-infra/jdk7/rev/984f119f2ea7
>
> Jaxws actually depends on jaxp, this becomes obvious when compiling
> with
On 15:42 Fri 21 Oct , Tim Ellison wrote:
> Is anyone else building OpenJDK 7 on Ubuntu 10.11? I found I need a
> couple of extra definitions to work around problems not seen on 10.4.
>
CCing build-dev instead as these are build issues, not porting issues.
> 1) "This OS is not supported"
>
On 09:11 Wed 09 Nov , Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Srinivas Ramakrishna:
>
> > Sorry for a rather naive question. I am building openjdk (6) from
> > scratch for the first time and am running into an issue when building
> > the AWT classes because of not finding the relevant Motif header files
> >
On 10:41 Wed 04 Jan , Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 06:16 AM, John Von Seggern wrote:
> > Way back in a bug report for Java 1.4, I found this note:
> >
> > "We statically link the C++ runtime in JDK and enabled linker script
> > to hide symbols from libstdc++ and other internal symbols."
On 20:43 Wed 04 Jan , John Von Seggern wrote:
> Kelly,
> Thanks for taking the time to answer my question. This information is
> very helpful.
>
> > So in general, doing static linking is a bad idea and should not be done
> > lightly, if ever.
>
The most obvious issue for me is security.
On 6 August 2010 10:02, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Contrary to what is stated here
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/raw-file/tip/README-builds.html#freetype
>
> byte code hinting is now enable by default since 2.4.0
>
> http://freetype.sourceforge.net/index2.html#release-freetype-2.4.0
On 13 August 2010 16:58, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:49 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
>
>> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/12/10 10:58 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> There isn't a document but I'm happy to write one if you'd like,
> either as a section of README-builds.html o
On 16 August 2010 10:22, Gary Benson wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> On 13 August 2010 16:58, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> > We are currently discussing whether we want to continue using the
>> > jdk7/build forest, and instead use the jdk7/tl forest for build
On 18 August 2010 09:53, Gary Benson wrote:
> Christian Thalinger wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:51 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> > I had assumed this was a file in the hotspot repo, but it's
>> > actually in the top repo. Feel free to push this change into
>> > the tl forest, or whereever yo
On 24 August 2010 13:18, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 18 August 2010 09:53, Gary Benson wrote:
>> Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:51 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> > I had assumed this was a file in the hotspot repo, but it'
On 21 September 2010 07:33, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> This appears to be another case where the hotspot and jdk repo makefiles
> differ.
>
> hotspot does:
>
> # statically link libgcc and/or libgcc_s, libgcc does not exist before
> gcc-3.x.
> ifneq ("${CC_VER_MAJOR}", "2")
> STATIC_LIBGCC += -sta
On 20 October 2010 13:07, Andreas Kohn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to update my local JDK7 build, and stumbled across a problem
> when building with a JDK7 from ~2010-09-10:
>
> build-bootstrap-javac:
> [javac] Compiling 78 source files to
> /local/andreask-nonbackup/jdk7/build/linux-amd64/langt
On 9 November 2010 17:41, Pete Brunet wrote:
> I notice that com/sun/image is missing from my OpenJDK7 clone, i.e. it's
> not in the classes directory or the rt.jar files in the two image
> directores (jre and jdk). Also the demo itself isn't in the OpenJDK7
> tree. Both the demo and the com/sun
On 09:30 Wed 17 Nov , Gary Benson wrote:
> Hi Ramakanth,
>
> It looks like you're using IcedTea, so I'm copying in distro-pkg-dev
> which is the mailing list most IcedTea stuff is discussed on.
>
> It also looks like you're using Fedora 8, which is very old. I'm not
> saying you won't be abl
On 09:27 Thu 18 Nov , Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 11:31 +0530, ramakanth varala wrote:
> > My target is to get openjdk build for target board (ARM) .
> >
> > In the process i thought i would build openjdk first to my host
> > machine i.e of fedora 8.
>
> Fedora 8 is very outd
On 18 November 2010 12:44, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Does the OpenJDK project have any "Field of Use" restrictions? Are
> "kiosk"/"set top box" style installation allowed?
>
> Thanks
http://openjdk.java.net/legal/
--
Andrew :-)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http:
I'm quite puzzled as to how this hasn't been spotted before now, but I
tried to build jdk7/jdk7 today (b118 from hg), using exactly the same
script as I usually do, and immediately failed due to a missing
separator in the jdk Sanity.gmk Makefile:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/andrew/projects
On 22:15 Mon 22 Nov , Patrick Reinhart wrote:
> Am 22.11.10 22:09, schrieb Dr Andrew John Hughes:
> > I'm quite puzzled as to how this hasn't been spotted before now, but I
> > tried to build jdk7/jdk7 today (b118 from hg), using exactly the same
> > script a
On 14:06 Mon 22 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Nov 22, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 22:15 Mon 22 Nov , Patrick Reinhart wrote:
> >> Am 22.11.10 22:09, schrieb Dr Andrew John Hughes:
> >>> I'm quite puzzled
ty due to the spacing and thus it
was trivially satisfied.
> -kto
>
> On Nov 22, 2010, at 2:33 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> > Any enlightenment on how this only just started happening? Has the
> > alsa check been disabled previously?
> >
> > David
> >
>
On 11:36 Wed 24 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
>
> Try this:
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
>
> Sorry about that.
>
Looks ok to me.
I assume the motivation is so that MILESTONE doesn't have to be duplicated
in setting JPRT
On 20:15 Wed 24 Nov , kevin diggs wrote:
> The section of the page:
>
> http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/
>
> for downloading has a heading that says:
>
> Linux platform
>
> If this is for x86 only then please label it as such (more than having
> i586 buried in the file/link name).
>
On 09:38 Thu 25 Nov , Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:39 -0600, kevin diggs wrote:
> > This question is a little ... weird ... but ...
> >
> > Is the thought of trying to build your sdk with gcj ... heresy (sp?).
> > If not please give me ... your thought as to whether it has a
On 15:08 Mon 29 Nov , Dalibor Topic wrote:
> On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
> >> Hm. It's been a long time since I heard of anyone use the binary plugs for
> >> anything.
> >> Certainly neither regular OpenJDK builds nor IcedTea bui
On 14:44 Mon 29 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> Need reviewers and comments:
>6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the
> install image
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk_release/webrev/
>
> With JDK6 Updates we purposely resisted many rebranding chang
On 11:04 Wed 01 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> Adding a CC to build-dev...
>
> On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Erwin Vervaet wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'd like to bring up the topic of the ease of building the OpenJDK.
> >
> > Let me start with a bit of background. I attended an interesting
On 14:06 Fri 10 Dec , Vikram Aroskar wrote:
> hi Per,
>
> not a hotspot or build issue. NFS problem in releasing file locks.
> please move all your workspace and build output directory to local
> machine harddisk and try again.
>
Easiest thing to try is to set ALT_OUTPUTDIR to a directory on
> I'm quite sure that's not it. I have never installed or setup NFS
> on this laptop - and I installed Fedora 14 from scratch on it recently.
>
> On 12/10/2010 07:10 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > Easiest thing to try is to set ALT_OUTPUTDIR to a directory on a lo
>
> Regarding the HPI-problem I only have a wild guess. Recently there was
> a change which removed HPI (see:
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6348631). So
> perhaps this interferes with your build JDK which is quite old as far
> as I saw ("1.6.0-rc-b104"). Perhaps building wit
On 16:29 Tue 21 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I'm back with another stab at a webrev and modified proposal.
>
> 6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install
> image
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-build-eclipse/webrev/
>
> The above change creates a
On 14:19 Wed 22 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 16:29 Tue 21 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >> I'm back with another stab at a webrev and modified proposal.
> >>
> >>
On 09:56 Thu 23 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 05:32 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> > Kelly O'Hair said the following on 12/23/10 11:51:
> >> Need reviewer: OpenJDK7 binary plug logic removal
> >>
> >> 7008723: Remove binary plugs creation and use from openjdk
> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.
On 15:50 Tue 28 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> These changes are only adding the year 2010, to the copyright for
> files modified in 2010.
> The "first" year should be preserved.
>
> The pattern "YEAR1, YEAR2," in the Oracle copyright line is the
> equivalent of the old Sun
> copyright year r
On 11:48 Tue 04 Jan , Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 03:09 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote:
> > I too like the idea that the version of OpenJDK that comes pre-built with
> > your Linux distro is pre-installed and just works. But... I wonder how/if
> > the Linux Distro's will configure simultaneo
On 16:46 Wed 05 Jan , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Need reviewer: Remove SKIP_OPENJDK_BUILD
>
> Now that the binary plugs are gone, this logic doesn't make much sense.
>
> 7009969: Remove SKIP_OPENJDK_BUILD from top Makefile
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-build-skip-openjdk/webrev
On 19:33 Mon 24 Jan , Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, January 24, 2011 18:00, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 01/24/2011 04:54 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >> http://download.java.net/jaxp/1.4.5/dev/jaxp-1_4_5-dev.zip
> >
> > TVM,
>
> I made sure to place a copy in the icedtea drops backup dir
On 16:43 Wed 02 Feb , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
> > Some messages in the build logs are getting corrupted, perhaps
> > because of parallism. For example,
> >
> > ../../../src/plugin/solaris/jvm_natives/server.c:2031: warning: cast
> > t
On 19:45 Tue 08 Feb , Rinaldo DiGiorgio wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> >
> > I take that back. Welcome rinaldo to the OpenJDK commit list!
> > I will put you down as a reviewer. I didn't think you had the OpenJDK ID
> > yet.
> Thanks -- never expected to be h
On 12:34 Wed 09 Feb , Rinaldo DiGiorgio wrote:
> >> has a new process
> >> and alias for getting access, once you send to it you get an invitation to
> >> join.
> >> Response was very fast and you get a nice form to fill out.
> >>
> >
> > Is this new process documented somewhere?
>
On 16:38 Thu 10 Feb , Gary Meyer wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
> > Build folk,
> >
> > The following fix should make it possible to (again) build langtools on a
> > Mac.
> >
> > Dan Smith reports:
> > - When building the GenStubs in OS X, the Java 6 to
On 07:57 Fri 11 Feb , Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 07:09 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > On 16:38 Thu 10 Feb , Gary Meyer wrote:
> >> On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> >>
> >>> Build folk,
> >>>
> &
On 14:09 Fri 18 Feb , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Excuse the long email, sometimes it can't be avoided.
>
I much prefer long e-mails, especially ones with good news like this,
to things happening behind closed doors :-)
> I've been asked to try and start up some discussions around how the
> Open
On 18:29 Fri 18 Feb , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 14:09 Fri 18 Feb , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>
>
> >> But there have been some roadblocks for the open source community.
>
On 18:08 Mon 21 Feb , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
snip
>
> >
> > So this is going to be yet another system? What will happen to the
> > existing
> > pretty much unused OpenJDK bug database?
&g
On 18:26 Mon 21 Feb , Brad Wetmore wrote:
>
> >>> Definitely. Making OpenJDK bug DB IDs usable in changesets would be
> >>> a good start (probably involves jcheck...)
> >>
> >> I'll have to punt on that, someone else is working on it, but the
> >> intent is to have a
> >> completely open bug
On 00:00 Tue 22 Feb , Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>
> >> Kelly just wrote:
> >> >> It's not clear...and slightly augmented by the openjdk bugzilla.
> >> >
> >> > I think Andrew was referring to http://bugs.openjdk.java.net.
> > I was. I'm not sure what else the phrase "OpenJDK bug data
It seems that the OpenJDK build installs a man page for javaws,
yet there is no javaws implementation in OpenJDK.
http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=633
This only happens on 32-bit platforms, hence why I've never seen it
myself. I've posted a webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.
On 12:54 Tue 22 Feb , Alan Bateman wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > It seems that the OpenJDK build installs a man page for javaws,
> > yet there is no javaws implementation in OpenJDK.
> >
> > http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=633
>
On 08:26 Tue 22 Feb , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 12:54 Tue 22 Feb , Alan Bateman wrote:
> >> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> >>> It seems that the OpenJDK build installs a man page
On 17:28 Wed 23 Feb , Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 08:26 Tue 22 Feb , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 22, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> >
> > > On 12:54 Tue 22 Feb , Alan Bateman wrote:
> > >> Dr Andrew John
On 09:39 Mon 07 Mar , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
General comments:
* Could this not be broken up into smaller changesets to make it easier to
review and catch regressions?
* There seem to be some whitespace changes that shouldn't be there.
e.g.
- sane-msvcrt_path \
+ sane-msvcrt_path
On 10:51 Tue 08 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Many thanks for the feedback:
>
> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 03/08/11 04:30:
> > On 09:39 Mon 07 Mar , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >
> > General comments:
> >
> > * Coul
On 09:33 Wed 09 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 03/09/11 03:24:
> > On 10:51 Tue 08 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> >>>> Just to clarify for people, BUILD_CLIENT_ONLY refers to building the
> >>
gt; -
>
> David Holmes said the following on 03/09/11 09:33:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 03/09/11 03:24:
> >> On 10:51 Tue 08 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> >>>>> Just to clarify for people, BUILD_CLIENT_O
On 18:32 Tue 08 Mar , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> First, if we talk about the mercurial forests, it has nothing to do with the
> Mercurial Forest Extension.
> What we really have is a set of nested repositories, sometimes called our
> "forest" of repositories.
>
> This email is just about the a
s you have independent entities
(the VM and javac et. al.). I don't think it makes sense with code that
has to then be imported into the JDK build.
> -phil.
>
>
> On 3/9/2011 4:48 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > On 18:32 Tue 08 Mar , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >
On 06:40 Fri 11 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> Fredrik Öhrström said the following on 03/10/11 20:22:
> > I think it is important that a recent stock mercurial install
> > can check out the full openjdk with a single clone
> > command.
> >
> > I.e. you should not have to install special extension
On 17:35 Thu 10 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 03/10/11 10:26:
> > On 22:09 Wed 09 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> >> My original reply does not seem to have made it to build-dev.
> >>
> >> I've updated the w
On 18:05 Tue 15 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> Further to my earlier review request for 7025066 I've now broken this
> down into four parts:
>
> - support for BUILD_CLIENT_ONLY
> - support for cross-compilation incl basic ARM/PPC support
> - AWT related changes for cross-compile/arm/pp/ plus SE-
On 09:14 Thu 10 Mar , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Other ideas were considered:
> >> * Folding jaxp/jaxws into the root or jdk8/jdk repo
> >
> > Sounds good. jd
On 08:43 Tue 15 Mar , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Steve Poole wrote:
>
> >>
> >> A singular process that everyone uses? Good Luck with that. I think that
> >> is called "herding cats". :^)
> >> Sorry, I've been doing this too long, if there is a variation on doing
On 07:59 Wed 16 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> See inline ...
>
> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 03/16/11 07:43:
> > On 18:05 Tue 15 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> >> BUILD_CLIENT_ONLY:
> >>
> >> http://cr.openjdk.java
In this HotSpot change:
changeset: 1932:f95d63e2154a
user:stefank
date:Tue Nov 23 13:22:55 2010 -0800
summary: 6989984: Use standard include model for Hospot
changes are made to how the files to compile are collated in the Makefiles.
Namely, this line is added:
+CORE_PATHS
On 09:42 Wed 30 Mar , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:26 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > This change (arrived at by both myself and Gary Benson separately):
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbenson/zero-shark-fixes-04-1/
> >
&g
On 20:15 Thu 31 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 03/31/11 06:31:
> > On 09:42 Wed 30 Mar , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >> On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:26 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >>> This change (arrived
On 08:50 Wed 06 Apr , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> Just an FYI...
>
> Anyone working with C/C++ should be well aware of the functions we should be
> avoiding:
> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+security/funclist
>
> Microsoft has used the term "banned" and has a much more ex
On 14:15 Tue 12 Apr , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> FYI...
>
> -kto
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: "Kelly O'Hair"
> > Date: April 12, 2011 14:07:11 PM PDT
> > To: core-libs-dev
> > Cc: Rama Pulavarthi
> > Subject: Heads up, new jaxws source drop bundle
> >
> >
> > 7034918: Integrat
On 13:46 Tue 12 Apr , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> Some shared libraries do not have and will not have mapfiles, at least for
> now, we
> give these an exception to the mapfile check (which just issues a warning).
>
> 7033957: Library built without a mapfile: libxinerama.so
> http://cr.openjdk.ja
On 16:18 Tue 12 Apr , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > On 13:46 Tue 12 Apr , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>
> >> Some shared libraries do not have and will not have mapfiles, at least for
>
On 14:48 Fri 15 Apr , luxInteg wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am attempting to compile openJDK-7 on a computer whth these:-
> --cpu amd64 2cores
> --OS cblfs 64-bit linux gcc-4.5.2 kernel-2.6.35.7 jdk-6u24, ant-1.8.1,
> make-3.82,unzip-5.55,zip-3.0
>
>
> here are the environmental veriables I
On 18:03 Sat 16 Apr , luxInteg wrote:
snip...
> > What kind of Linux is this?
>
> This is blfs linux built by compiling sources from scratch.
BLFS has instructions on building IcedTea6 which uses OpenJDK6 here:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/general/icedtea6.html
--
Andrew
On 11:41 Tue 19 Apr , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> I imagine there are probably hundreds of variable names that if set in the
> environment,
> could impact the build, on purpose or by accident :^(.
> We do check for JAVA_HOME and LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
> Is JAVAC some kind of typical or standard envi
On 15:14 Fri 15 Apr , Phil Race wrote:
> For jpeg its something we could consider for JDK 8 although I think its been
> called libjpeg since JDK 1.0 without apparent problems.
But you use an in-tree libjpeg (at least at present).
Having the option of linking against a system libjpeg at compil
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
