With the JDK 23 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
mainline/JDK 24.
Testing: tier1-5, GHA
-
Commit messages:
- 8330206: Bump minimum boot jdk to JDK 23
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21296/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=2
On Fri, 10 May 2024 22:32:29 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) is looking to
> optimize vector math operations by leveraging the SLEEF library. For legal
> reasons the actual contribution of the SLEEF files needs to b
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:30:46 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) is looking to
>> optimize vector math operations by leveraging the SLEEF library. For legal
>> reasons the actual contribution of the SLEEF files needs to be handled
>> sep
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:33:43 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> The autoconf launcher script in the autoconf bundle created by
> `make/devkit/createAutoconf.sh` currently writes a config file into the
> bundle installation dir every time it runs. This prevents it from functioning
> when installed on
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 22:26:02 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> @Hamlin-Li We now have the necessary approvals in place for the new plan to
>> include all of SLEEF (and the pre-generated header files) in the JDK. I (or
>> somebody else from Oracle) will need to be the one committing/contributing
>> the
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:45:59 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update README to include RISC-V
>
>> With this solution I would recommend put
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 22:03:37 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) is looking to
>> optimize vector math operations by leveraging the SLEEF library. For legal
>> reasons the actual contribution of the SLEEF files n
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 12:08:50 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Can you help to review the patch?
>> This pr is based on previous work and discussion in [pr
>> 16234](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234), [pr
>> 18294](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18294).
>> * NOTE: This pr depends on
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 12:08:50 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Can you help to review the patch?
>> This pr is based on previous work and discussion in [pr
>> 16234](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234), [pr
>> 18294](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18294).
>> * NOTE: This pr depends on
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:30:35 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) is looking to
>> optimize vector math operations by leveraging the SLEEF library. For legal
>> reasons the actual contribution of the SLEEF files needs to be handled
>> separately.
enabling the rest of
> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) to move forward.
Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Update README to include RISC-V
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openj
On Fri, 10 May 2024 22:32:29 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) is looking to
> optimize vector math operations by leveraging the SLEEF library. For legal
> reasons the actual contribution of the SLEEF files needs to b
enabling the rest of
> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) to move forward.
Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull r
On Thu, 23 May 2024 23:22:51 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> Update the testing doc to remove some stale information (AOT_MODULES, removed
> in [JDK-8264805](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8264805)) and fix some
> spelling issues.
>
> Testing: tier1
This pull reque
On Fri, 24 May 2024 21:05:27 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> Update the testing doc to remove some stale information (AOT_MODULES,
>> removed in [JDK-8264805](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8264805)) and
>> fix some spelling issues.
>>
>> Testing: tier1
>
On Fri, 24 May 2024 12:50:59 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> doc/testing.html line 366:
>>
>>> 364: to setting JTREG_JOBS=1 JTREG_TIMEOUT_FACTOR=8, but using
>>> 365: the keyword format means that the JTREG variable is parsed
>>> 366: and verified for correctness, so JTREG="TIMEOUT_FACTOR=8"
>>
>>
> Update the testing doc to remove some stale information (AOT_MODULES, removed
> in [JDK-8264805](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8264805)) and fix some
> spelling issues.
>
> Testing: tier1
Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
c
Update the testing doc to remove some stale information (AOT_MODULES, removed
in [JDK-8264805](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8264805)) and fix some
spelling issues.
Testing: tier1
-
Commit messages:
- 8332849: Update doc/testing.{md,html} (spelling and stale information)
Ch
On Fri, 10 May 2024 22:32:29 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) is looking to
> optimize vector math operations by leveraging the SLEEF library. For legal
> reasons the actual contribution of the SLEEF files needs to b
On Fri, 10 May 2024 22:32:29 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) is looking to
> optimize vector math operations by leveraging the SLEEF library. For legal
> reasons the actual contribution of the SLEEF files needs to b
On Fri, 10 May 2024 22:32:29 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> [JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) is looking to
> optimize vector math operations by leveraging the SLEEF library. For legal
> reasons the actual contribution of the SLEEF files needs to b
[JDK-8312425](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8312425) is looking to
optimize vector math operations by leveraging the SLEEF library. For legal
reasons the actual contribution of the SLEEF files needs to be handled
separately. This enhancement adds the relevant files, enabling the rest of
[
On Wed, 8 May 2024 14:03:48 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> We need a custom hook in TestImage.gmk to modify behavior when building with
> custom source.
Marked as reviewed by mikael (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19139#pullrequestreview-2046326105
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:17:17 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Can you help to review the patch?
>> This pr is based on previous work and discussion in [pr
>> 16234](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234), [pr
>> 18294](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18294).
>>
>> Compared with previous
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:40:42 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you help to review the patch?
> This pr is based on previous work and discussion in [pr
> 16234](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234), [pr
> 18294](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18294).
>
> Compared with previous prs, th
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:16:50 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With the JDK 22 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
> mainline/JDK 23.
>
> Testing: tier1-5, GHA
Thank you for the reviews!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/1
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:16:50 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With the JDK 22 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
> mainline/JDK 23.
>
> Testing: tier1-5, GHA
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 023f7f17
Author: Mikael Vidstedt
With the JDK 22 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
mainline/JDK 23.
Testing: tier1-5, GHA
-
Commit messages:
- 8320799: Bump minimum boot jdk to JDK 22
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18563/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=1
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:15:23 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> **Summary:** Finally get rid of the mapfiles in Hotspot, and replace it with
>> compiler options and `JNIEXPORT` on all platforms.
>>
>> The bug that this PR solves,
>> [JDK-8017234](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8017234), wa
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:59:18 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Revert "8325963: Clean up NativeCompilation.gmk and its newly created parts"
>
> This reverts commit 1bd91cdebee1e9ec78ecf185529923eef40ff89c due to code
> signing failures on macOS.
>
> Thanks
Marked as reviewed by mikael (Reviewer).
-
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:47:01 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> The cups dependency was used for Solaris builds, and has been unused since
> [JDK-8244224](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8244224).
>
> Testing: tier1
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 876
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:47:01 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> The cups dependency was used for Solaris builds, and has been unused since
> [JDK-8244224](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8244224).
>
> Testing: tier1
Thank you for the review!
-
PR Comment: https://git
The cups dependency was used for Solaris builds, and has been unused since
[JDK-8244224](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8244224).
Testing: tier1
-
Commit messages:
- 8325800: Drop unused cups declaration from Oracle build configuration
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pul
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 19:02:13 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> Graphviz (aka. dotty/dot) is used when building "full" docs, and in
> particular for creating various module graph images (.svg). This change
> upgrades the Graphviz version used to 9.0.0 (latest).
>
>
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 19:02:13 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> Graphviz (aka. dotty/dot) is used when building "full" docs, and in
> particular for creating various module graph images (.svg). This change
> upgrades the Graphviz version used to 9.0.0 (latest).
>
>
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 19:32:01 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Quick question, since configure scans for dot, will platform-specific pandoc
> (like Windows pandoc) lead to different image outputs?
AFAIU pandoc is not involved in the generation of the .svg images. The .dot
files are generated by the t
Graphviz (aka. dotty/dot) is used when building "full" docs, and in particular
for creating various module graph images (.svg). This change upgrades the
Graphviz version used to 9.0.0 (latest).
In particular, the change:
* Updates the createGraphvizBundle.sh script (currently broken) to build
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 00:14:40 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
> Removed ea from the version string
Marked as reviewed by mikael (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22/pull/106#pullrequestreview-1864071852
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 07:50:36 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> > We run dsymutils on the libraries (e.g. `libjvm.dylib`) to extract the
> > debug symbols.
>
> So how does it know about empty files??? Does an empty src file create an
> empty object file which in turns creates an empty section in the li
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 02:46:03 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Are we passing the wrong set of files to dsymutils? I'm guessing it is
> actually passed a set of object files not source files.
We run dsymutils on the libraries (e.g. `libjvm.dylib`) to extract the debug
symbols.
-
PR Comme
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 21:05:49 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> When building on macOS, dsymutil generates a warning for some files:
>
> `warning: no debug symbols in executable (-arch x86_64)`
>
> It turns out that the files in question have one thing in common: they're
> e
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 21:05:49 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> When building on macOS, dsymutil generates a warning for some files:
>
> `warning: no debug symbols in executable (-arch x86_64)`
>
> It turns out that the files in question have one thing in common: they're
> e
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 02:41:29 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> When building on macOS, dsymutil generates a warning for some files:
>>
>> `warning: no debug symbols in executable (-arch x86_64)`
>>
>> It turns out that the files in question have one thing in common: they're
>> empty. Specifically, th
When building on macOS, dsymutil generates a warning for some files:
`warning: no debug symbols in executable (-arch x86_64)`
It turns out that the files in question have one thing in common: they're
empty. Specifically, the source files have include guards which, on macOS, end
up excluding all
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 21:44:04 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> The libinstrument library is linked against libjava and libjvm, twice. This
> is mostly harmless but Xcode 15.x generates a warning:
>
> Creating support/modules_libs/java.instrument/libinstrument.dylib from 12
> file(s
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 21:44:04 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> The libinstrument library is linked against libjava and libjvm, twice. This
> is mostly harmless but Xcode 15.x generates a warning:
>
> Creating support/modules_libs/java.instrument/libinstrument.dylib from 12
> file(s
The libinstrument library is linked against libjava and libjvm, twice. This is
mostly harmless but Xcode 15.x generates a warning:
Creating support/modules_libs/java.instrument/libinstrument.dylib from 12
file(s)
ld: warning: ignoring duplicate libraries: '-ljava', '-ljvm'
In particular, note t
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 02:25:20 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> When building linux-aarch64 at Oracle using jib,
> --openjdk-target=aarch64-linux-gnu is always specified regardless of if
> building natively or cross compiling (on linux-x64). Among other things this
> has the (harmles
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 02:25:20 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> When building linux-aarch64 at Oracle using jib,
> --openjdk-target=aarch64-linux-gnu is always specified regardless of if
> building natively or cross compiling (on linux-x64). Among other things this
> has the (harmles
When building linux-aarch64 at Oracle using jib,
--openjdk-target=aarch64-linux-gnu is always specified regardless of if
building natively or cross compiling (on linux-x64). Among other things this
has the (harmless) effect of tricking configure into thinking that it's cross
compiling even for
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 21:48:13 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> This is a backout of
> [JDK-8320863](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320863). That fix only
> works on a very limited selection of Xcode versions, and is causing the build
> to fail on other versions, including at least 12, 13 and 1
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:31:36 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> In JDK-8319818 the stringop-overflow warnings were disabled for linux-aarch64
> (fastdebug). With the changes in JDK-8319883 additional stringop-overflow
> warnings are produced with GCC 13.2.0, this time for linux
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 00:31:36 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> In JDK-8319818 the stringop-overflow warnings were disabled for linux-aarch64
> (fastdebug). With the changes in JDK-8319883 additional stringop-overflow
> warnings are produced with GCC 13.2.0, this time for linux
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 15:36:29 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Looks okay from a build perspective. In the end, I guess some hotspot
> developers need to weigh in if this is acceptable.
>
> I presume you have tried to analyze what makes the Thread:current access
> different in these files, so t
In JDK-8319818 the stringop-overflow warnings were disabled for linux-aarch64
(fastdebug). With the changes in JDK-8319883 additional stringop-overflow
warnings are produced with GCC 13.2.0, this time for linux-x64-zero
(fastdebug). The warnings are related to GCC thinking JavaThread:current (an
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 17:40:36 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> The contents of the build README has been poorly kept up to date in places.
> With the move to Github, the need to have markdown syntax that looks good on
> Github has become apparent. The entire document has been in need for a while
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 23:37:06 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> Oracle is updating the version of GCC for building the JDK on Linux to 13.2.0.
>
>
> **Note: The changes discussed below were broken out into a separate change
> and integrated through #16584.**
>
> Apart from
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:55:12 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> Oracle is updating the version of GCC for building the JDK on Linux to
>> 13.2.0.
>>
>>
>> **Note: The changes discussed below were broken out into a separate change
>> and integrated through #165
t;
> The linux/zero build generates lots and lots of dangling pointer warnings. As
> with the first warning I tried to understand why but also gave up in the end.
> Like the first warning I disabled it instead, for zero builds. Again
> appreciating feedback/suggestions.
Mikael Vidstedt ha
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:07:53 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> This PR is splitting out the GCC 13.2.0 warning related changes from #16550,
> excluding the Oracle/devkit parts, for clarity and to make potential
> backports more straightforward.
>
> GCC 13.2.0 generates t
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 18:08:17 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> This PR is splitting out the GCC 13.2.0 warning related changes from #16550,
>> excluding the Oracle/devkit parts, for clarity and to make potential
>> backports more straightforward.
>>
>> GCC 13.
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 01:25:32 GMT, Hao Sun wrote:
>> Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add comment for stringop-overflow warning
>>
>> Co-authored-by: Hao Sun
>
_current_resource_mark'
> [-Werror=dangling-pointer=]
>
> Lots and lots of warnings related to ResourceMark. Thanks to @stefank for
> suggesting moving the ASSERT implementation of the ResourceMark constructor
> to the .cpp file. With that change there's no need to expl
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:07:53 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> This PR is splitting out the GCC 13.2.0 warning related changes from #16550,
> excluding the Oracle/devkit parts, for clarity and to make potential
> backports more straightforward.
>
> GCC 13.2.0 generates t
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:07:53 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> This PR is splitting out the GCC 13.2.0 warning related changes from #16550,
> excluding the Oracle/devkit parts, for clarity and to make potential
> backports more straightforward.
>
> GCC 13.2.0 generates t
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 05:20:18 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update copyright years
>
> src/hotspot/share/memory/resourceArea.cpp line 1:
>
>
This PR is splitting out the GCC 13.2.0 warning related changes from #16550,
excluding the Oracle/devkit parts, for clarity and to make potential backports
more straightforward.
GCC 13.2.0 generates two new warnings:
* linux-aarch64-debug
src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_aarch64/atomic_linux_aarch64.h
t;
> The linux/zero build generates lots and lots of dangling pointer warnings. As
> with the first warning I tried to understand why but also gave up in the end.
> Like the first warning I disabled it instead, for zero builds. Again
> appreciating feedback/suggestions.
Mikae
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 21:30:24 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> FWIW I just followed the preexisting pattern in the same file, e.g.
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/7d25f1c6cb770e21cfad8096c1637a24e65fab8c/make/hotspot/lib/CompileJvm.gmk#L1100.
>> @magicus Let me know if you want me to chan
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 22:10:20 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> Oracle is updating the version of GCC for building the JDK on Linux to
>> 13.2.0.
>>
>> Apart from the "obvious" changes, I'll add some color to the CompileJvm.gmk
>> changes. In part
t;
> The linux/zero build generates lots and lots of dangling pointer warnings. As
> with the first warning I tried to understand why but also gave up in the end.
> Like the first warning I disabled it instead, for zero builds. Again
> appreciating feedback/suggestions.
Mikael
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 13:24:21 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Oracle is updating the version of GCC for building the JDK on Linux to
>> 13.2.0.
>>
>> Apart from the "obvious" changes, I'll add some color to the CompileJvm.gmk
>> changes. In particular, I ran into two different types of new war
Oracle is updating the version of GCC for building the JDK on Linux to 13.2.0.
Apart from the "obvious" changes, I'll add some color to the CompileJvm.gmk
changes. In particular, I ran into two different types of new warnings with GCC
13.2.0:
1. linux-aarch64-debug + stringop-overflow
`src/hot
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 23:00:39 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> Oracle is updating the version of Visual Studio for building the JDK on
> Windows to Visual Studio 2022 17.6.5.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 806529aa
Author:Mikael Vidstedt
URL:
Oracle is updating the version of Visual Studio for building the JDK on Windows
to Visual Studio 2022 17.6.5.
-
Commit messages:
- 8319573: Change to Visual Studio 17.6.5 for building on Windows at Oracle
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16533/files
Webrev: https://webrev
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 23:02:18 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> The linux-arm32 build generates a somewhat spectacular number of warnings,
> all for the same code - the offset_of macro in hotspot:
>
>
> src/hotspot/share/utilities/globalDefinitions_gcc.hpp:144:40: warning:
> r
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 23:02:18 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> The linux-arm32 build generates a somewhat spectacular number of warnings,
> all for the same code - the offset_of macro in hotspot:
>
>
> src/hotspot/share/utilities/globalDefinitions_gcc.hpp:144:40: warning:
> r
The linux-arm32 build generates a somewhat spectacular number of warnings, all
for the same code - the offset_of macro in hotspot:
src/hotspot/share/utilities/globalDefinitions_gcc.hpp:144:40: warning:
requested alignment 16 is larger than 8 [-Wattributes]
alignas(16) char space[sizeof (kla
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:49:14 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> macOS 10.x is no longer receiving updates - the most recent/last release was
> 10.15.7 back in July of 2022. It's time to bump the target macOS version
> (min/max) for macosx-x64. macOS 11.x is still receiving updates.
&g
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 18:01:44 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> macOS 10.x is no longer receiving updates - the most recent/last release was
>> 10.15.7 back in July of 2022. It's time to bump the target macOS version
>> (min/max) for macosx-x64. macOS 11.x is still receivi
cosx-x64 to 11.00.00, which is
> the same version used for macosx-aarch64.
Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Drop redundant MACOSX_METAL_VERSION_MIN variable
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.o
cosx-x64 to 11.00.00, which is
> the same version used for macosx-aarch64.
Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:25:13 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> In GHA, the versions of macOS (note: the version used for build/test, **not**
> the target macOS version we compile for) and Xcode are starting to show age.
> It's time to update to more modern versions.
>
> T
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 19:25:13 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> In GHA, the versions of macOS (note: the version used for build/test, **not**
> the target macOS version we compile for) and Xcode are starting to show age.
> It's time to update to more modern versions.
>
> T
In GHA, the versions of macOS (note: the version used for build/test, **not**
the target macOS version we compile for) and Xcode are starting to show age.
It's time to update to more modern versions.
This change bumps the macOS to 13 (from 11) and Xcode to 14.3.1 (from
12.5.1/11.7). This is a p
cosx-x64 to 11.00.00, which is
> the same version used for macosx-aarch64.
Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- Update stale comment (again)
- Update stale comment
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.o
macOS 10.x is no longer receiving updates - the most recent/last release was
10.15.7 back in July of 2022. It's time to bump the target macOS version
(min/max) for macosx-x64. macOS 11.x is still receiving updates.
This change updates the target version for macosx-x64 to 11.00.00, which is the
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 17:05:33 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> This change bumps the version of Xcode used for building at Oracle to Xcode
> 14.3.1 and updates the docs accordingly. The change also updates the devkit
> creation logic to work around issues with macOS.
This pull request has
This change bumps the version of Xcode used for building at Oracle to Xcode
14.3.1 and updates the docs accordingly. The change also updates the devkit
creation logic to work around issues with macOS.
-
Commit messages:
- 8317560: Change to Xcode 14.3.1 for building on macOS at Ora
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:22:07 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With the JDK 21 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
> mainline/JDK 22.
>
> Testing: tier1-5, GHA
Thank you for the reviews!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/1
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:22:07 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With the JDK 21 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
> mainline/JDK 22.
>
> Testing: tier1-5, GHA
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 83c0e451
Author: Mikael Vidstedt
With the JDK 21 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
mainline/JDK 22.
Testing: tier1-5, GHA (in progress)
-
Commit messages:
- 8306630: Bump minimum boot jdk to JDK 21
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15934/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:16:46 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> On Windows, when a directory exists in the "unix" root with the same name as
> a directory in the "test" dir, fixpath will corrupt test arguments to jtreg
> (and possibly other arguments as well). Fixpath sees a string like this:
>
> tes
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:52:09 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> Use most recent devkit when using jib.
>
> Test: staged, configured from scratch and verified micros locally
Marked as reviewed by mikael (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15313#pullrequestreview-158
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:24:00 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> As part of the ongoing work to enable -Wconversion with gcc there are a
> number of occurrences of code in the GoogleTest code itself which need
> fixing. These have been addressed in version 1.14.0 of GoogleTest. This
&g
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:05:28 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>> As part of the ongoing work to enable -Wconversion with gcc there are a
>> number of occurrences of code in the GoogleTest code itself which need
>> fixing. These have been addressed in version 1.14.0 of GoogleTest.
y just
> around the corner..
>
> Testing: GHA, tier1-5 (still in progress)
Mikael Vidstedt has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains tw
As part of the ongoing work to enable -Wconversion with gcc there are a number
of occurrences of code in the GoogleTest code itself which need fixing. These
have been addressed in version 1.14.0 of GoogleTest. This change is picking up
that version, adjusting the relevant build configuration fil
On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 23:11:27 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
> JDK-8312985: Remove EA from the JDK 21 version string with first RC promotion
> on August 10, 2023
Marked as reviewed by mikael (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/pull/165#pullrequestreview-156626161
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 02:38:37 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Please review this simple change to allow a test to request that its symbol
> files be copied across into the test image.
>
> Testing:
> - sanity test - tiers 1-3
> - direct testing in the context of
> [JDK-8311541](https://bugs.openjdk.
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
