Mark Crispin wrote:
dmail is built as part of the IMAP toolkit, so its behavior will be
affected by the change to CREATEPROTO.
Right. I knew that. I was just looking for a way to do it without
compiling it in as the "default" format. Tho, I'm not sure there's
a problem with doing that.
It's m
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Chris Ross wrote:
CREATEPROTO=mbxproto
Yeah, I knew about that method. I was just wondering if there
was a way to make dmail (from procmailrc, for example) know to
instantiate new mail folders as mbx instead of mbox.
dmail is built as part of the IMAP toolkit, so its behav
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Erik Kangas wrote:
#!/bin/bash
if [ ! -e "$HOME/$1" ] && [ $1 != ".inbox" ]; then
/usr/local/bin/mbxcreat "#driver.mbx:$1"
fi
/usr/local/bin/dmail "+$1"
I recommend using "mailutil create" instead of "mbxcreat" since the latter
program is no longer supported.
We didn't find
Chris Ross wrote:
Mark Crispin wrote:
The easiest way to do this is to edit file
imap-200?/src/osdep/unix/Makefile
to set
CREATEPROTO=mbxproto
instead of the current unixproto. Then rebuild the entire UW IMAP
toolkit.
Yeah, I knew about that method. I was just wondering if there
was a
In regard to: Re: Mailbox format how-to, Chris Ross said (at 5:49pm on Nov...:
Mark Crispin wrote:
The easiest way to do this is to edit file
imap-200?/src/osdep/unix/Makefile
to set
CREATEPROTO=mbxproto
instead of the current unixproto. Then rebuild the entire UW IMAP toolkit.
Yeah, I kn
Mark Crispin wrote:
The easiest way to do this is to edit file
imap-200?/src/osdep/unix/Makefile
to set
CREATEPROTO=mbxproto
instead of the current unixproto. Then rebuild the entire UW IMAP toolkit.
Yeah, I knew about that method. I was just wondering if there
was a way to make dmail (
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Chris Ross wrote:
- modify sendmail.cf (and friends: submit.cf?) to call tmail instead
of mail.local. The tmail man page has a little info on this.
- Modify by calls in my procmailrc to use dmail instead of just
specifying the mailbox name (i thing. this right?)
So far, so g
Hello there. I am investigating converting my mail server to using
MBX format (vs. mbox) for everything. Using tmail for delivery (via
sendmail 8.12), and uw-imap 2004 for access to INBOX and personal folders.
So, my question is this. Is there some sort of how-to for building
a system? I kn
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Timo Veith wrote:
Because I don't have a recent version of uw-imap (not even modern) and I
would prefer to leave uw-imap as it is, do you think it is a good idea
to use exim for filtering out the X-UID header?
If you can do this, yes that is an excellent idea.
-- Mark --
http://
Hello Mark,
thank you very much for making this clear. I have another question. See
below.
Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 16:56 schrieben Sie:
> In other words, I believe that a spam/virus came in with
> X-UID: 32
> in the header. There is no legitimate reason for any incoming
> message to do t
10 matches
Mail list logo
