Tarique, I'm definitely not 'copying out' ;-)
I'd love to contribute to CakePHP as I believe its the best thing to
happen to PHP in all the time I've been programming with it (since
PHP3).
I was trying to illustrate that perhaps, if the documentation was
available then the learning process
On 1/22/07, RichardAtHome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd love to contribute to CakePHP as I believe its the best thing to
happen to PHP in all the time I've been programming with it (since
PHP3).
Nice to know that - I wont go as far as saying CakePHP is the best
thing or bother with I am older
Ok I am going to throw my 2 cents into this conversation and put a stop to
it.
The code is what is important, the documentation is being worked on by
volunteers, as is the rest of the project. The only person who works full
time on this code is me. Nate works on the code, but he also has a job
, and yes, I'm a little pissed off right :P
-Original Message-
From: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dr. Tarique Sani
Sent: 22. januar 2007 10:40
To: cake-php@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Unoffical API / Beta RFC [new]
On 1/22/07, RichardAtHome [EMAIL
tbh, I wasn't being off topic (kinda ;-). Jippi was asking what people
would like to see in a documentation project and I answered: Example
code.
It snowballed from there.
I'm definitely not having a dig at all the hard work done by everyone
on the CakePHP project. If I didn't think it had
: Unoffical API / Beta RFC [new]
tbh, I wasn't being off topic (kinda ;-). Jippi was asking what people
would like to see in a documentation project and I answered: Example
code.
It snowballed from there.
I'm definitely not having a dig at all the hard work done by everyone
on the CakePHP project
Well Mariano I don't blame you for writing that. I tried not to sound
like a whiner, but evidently I didn't succeed, and I regret that.
As for contributing some documentation, as I pointed out in the earlier
message, I do not think I am a good person to write about Cake because
I don't properly
Hi Ralph,
contributing is the way to go ;) but if you can't contribute - make a
ticket - not with the exact documentation but with what you would like
to find in the manual ... its a good way of informing people from the
docs team what is missing ...
btw. come to #cakephp people will always
Ralph,
This is why I pointed out maybe you are not like that at all. I
wasn't making a judgement about the way you behave, I was just pointing
out that it's so simple to contribute, you don't need to be a Cake
expert to do so. Just small things you found on the way are good
enough. Like your SQL
Kudos for ralph who elequently illustrated my *only *problem with
CakePHP.
Cake is a top bit of coding. Seems to do so much of what I want, but
the practical documentation is lacking.
Code examples are crutial. Even generic ones. Specific ones are even
better.
No-one comes to Cake without a
On 1/22/07, RichardAtHome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO, the best introduction to cake was done on the IBM site:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/os-dw-os-php-cake1.html
And that just illustrates why great code should be released often and
early. People do contribute :)
I agree that
Certainly the PHP manual is an excellent example to copy. But the PHP
manual is full of much more detailed explanations... I should say that
it HAS some explanations. If your discuss feature could lead into
some true augmentation of the documentation, that would really be
wonderful. But I don't
Hi,
This is senthil ,
if you find any such manual for cakephp ,
please inform me also.
with regards,
senthil
On 1/20/07, Jonathon Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like a great work in progress. I would definitely go there as a
resource to find out how to unleash more power of CakePHP.
And what about contributing, instead of asking for things? If you *did*
understand some things that are not yet documented, then why haven't
you documented and submitted them?
Maybe I'm wrong here, and you are not like that at all, but IMHO a lot
of open source projects suffer of people
Christian Winther [cwi.dk] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The login system shouldn't require any special browser enabled features...
Its just a plain old 'POST' form.
Does it not work for you or ?
I enter a login and password, hit Submit and it displays the same page
again. It's a POST form, so
Hi
It does use Session's - Not any cookies :) ( 'Remember Me' hasnt been
implemented yet :) )
I tried to sign up and login with a test user, and it does work fine
for me :o
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Greetings list
As we all know CakePHP has a great API website ( http://api.cakephp.org
) However, it lacks some features / goodies that can raise it to 'the
next level'.
So after some reading and learning - I have come up with a draft on how
it COULD look / work.
-- http://docs.cakephp.nu/ --
Posted a new one at
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/cake-php/t/c0189bfe2a49a9cc :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
That is very cool - it could be very handy. But unless you want to be
moderating it, you'll want a rule of no questions asked here -
otherwise the discuss this function could get clagged up with people
asking the same questions. This is what happens to the Macromedia
Livedocs (of course, a
Jippi wrote:
As we all know CakePHP has a great API website ( http://api.cakephp.org
) However, it lacks some features / goodies that can raise it to 'the
next level'.
So after some reading and learning - I have come up with a draft on how
it COULD look / work.
-- http://docs.cakephp.nu/ --
Looks like a great work in progress. I would definitely go there as a
resource to find out how to unleash more power of CakePHP.
I can see a few places where you might be able to Web 2.0 it up a
little bit with Sciptaculous or Mootools ( I prefer Scripta because of
the ample documentation. I
Greetings list
As we all know CakePHP has a great API website ( http://api.cakephp.org )
However, it lacks some features / goodies that can raise it to 'the next
level'.
So after some reading and learning - I have come up with a draft on how it
COULD look / work.
-- http://docs.cakephp.nu/ --
Christian Winther [cwi.dk] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- http://docs.cakephp.nu/ -- [...]
This post is meant as a RFC ( Request For Comments ) post on how it should
look, or perhaps some features that would be nice.
Try resizing the window and fonts: 600px width, for example, to see
page
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Unoffical API / Beta RFC
Christian Winther [cwi.dk] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- http://docs.cakephp.nu/ -- [...]
This post is meant as a RFC ( Request For Comments ) post on how it should
look, or perhaps some features that would be nice.
Try resizing the window
Christian Winther [cwi.dk] wrote:
Greetings list
As we all know CakePHP has a great API website ( http://api.cakephp.org )
However, it lacks some features / goodies that can raise it to 'the next
level'.
So after some reading and learning - I have come up with a draft on
how it
COULD look
25 matches
Mail list logo
