The links in the unofficial resources page will take you to pre-
defined searches in the blogosphere for cakephp which will give you a
lot of relevant results from many indexed blogs.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I been looking all over the cakephp site since it first came up and
> > searched Google for it but I have never found the "office blog list".
> > I'm interested in seeing if there are other blogs (besides the few I
> > found in my daily search for cake informa
do Sordi.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:59 PM, scs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I been looking all over the cakephp site since it first came up and
> searched Google for it but I have never found the "office blog list".
> I'm interested in seeing if there are othe
I been looking all over the cakephp site since it first came up and
searched Google for it but I have never found the "office blog list".
I'm interested in seeing if there are other blogs (besides the few I
found in my daily search for cake information) that I can use to look
for
Although I also visit Daniel's blog quite often, I also visit blogs of
many of the people that idle and help out in the Cake IRC channel from
freenode. People like teknoid have loads of very useful information
that is not covered by Daniel, or the other prolific bloggers (such as
tips that gwoo o
Cake Team for reviewing the Blog List so quickly. It seems more
> relevant now and that means a better "shop window" for Cake. It's
> nice to belong to a community where people can put their differences
> aside in favour of what's best for all. Thanks to Nate for taking the
Congratulations to the core team for being so open to the community
requests.
This is only proves how mature is the relation with the community.
Julio Vinicius Protzek
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Thanks Cake Team for reviewing the Blog List so quickly. It seems more
relevant now and that means a better "shop window" for Cake. It's
nice to belong to a community where people can put their differences
aside in favour of what's best for all. Thanks to Nate for taking
On 5 Jun 2008, at 00:50, Daniel Hofstetter wrote:
> I think it doesn't matter where an article is published, thanks to
> search engines.
I beg to differ. Depending on the popularity of the blog, the quality
of SEO done, the search terms used etc etc it's more or less a game of
luck to find w
@TommyO
The main points are really that (a) the featured blog list should
contain the best blogs, (b) the community could have some input to
recommend the ones they like.
A featured blog doesn't have to be the "highest" quality, but simply
amongst the best ones that exist. I
Hi Tommy,
> My opinion is that although prolific, CakeBaker's posts are NOT "of
> the highest quality". I often have to tell noobs "don't do it that
> way" or "that's not true" when they insist on following one of the
> articles. Sorry, Daniel, but since it's been put out there and the
> argume
Seems a lot of people took up this argument for the sake of argument.
My two cents does not care about personal relations between the Daniel
and the core team.
My opinion is that although prolific, CakeBaker's posts are NOT "of
the highest quality". I often have to tell noobs "don't do it that
w
@Villas: don't worry, I am not upset. It takes more than a simple
exchange of words to upset me. When a latino is upset, believe me,
you'll notice ;)
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 20:49 -0700, villas wrote:
> I may have been over-enthusiastic about the blog list, but goodness
> knows
I fully accept the answer 'no' to my original question.
I am sure that the Cake team will reconsider the quality of the blog
list when they have time to do so.
I hope my idea of letting the community vote for the best bloggers
will also eventually find favour.
Thanks for all other poin
Well, I cast my vote too.
If we can remove Daniel's blog and keep nate's, I also cast
my vote to include www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net as they share
nearly the same amount of Cake related posts.
You have to realize, since you "happen to be the lead developer",
there are no more "personal deci
You got my vote!
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Daniel Hofstetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi Nate,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. I added some corrections inline.
>
> [snipped]
>
> > Also, Daniel has a pathological aversion to taking any kind of
> > responsibility for anything he does or s
Hi Nate,
Thanks for your feedback. I added some corrections inline.
[snipped]
> Also, Daniel has a pathological aversion to taking any kind of
> responsibility for anything he does or says. is latest post (http://
> cakebaker.42dh.com/2008/06/02/new-callback-methods-for-components/) is
> a per
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Hofstetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi Nate,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. I added some corrections inline.
OK! 1 set all
@Everyone - Can we stop this now - please?
Tarique
--
=
Cheese
Hi Nate,
Thanks for your feedback. I added some corrections inline.
[snipped]
> Also, Daniel has a pathological aversion to taking any kind of
> responsibility for anything he does or says. is latest post (http://
> cakebaker.42dh.com/2008/06/02/new-callback-methods-for-components/) is
> a per
@Mariano
> I for one would like this thread to DIE once and for all. It's clear
> that the cakephp.org blog list will remain as-is, period.
I may have been over-enthusiastic about the blog list, but goodness
knows why you and Nate seem upset. This wasn't intended to be
contro
would like this thread to DIE once and for all. It's clear
that the cakephp.org blog list will remain as-is, period. If you want
to, as you say, "help" the CakePHP community, then devote your time
writing tests, patches, or documentation.
TRUST ME. That's more valuable than arg
>> My blog is not an "official blog", it just happens to be my blog.
Well, I called it official because it's on the home page blog list.
Sorry if your idea of official meant something else.
>> I happen to be the lead developer of this project.
I respect your role an
Errr we do too, just look at the Google Group wiki pages.
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 14:43 -0700, Beth wrote:
> BTW, Symfony allows people to just add their own blogs ;)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
t; "No One Really Cares. Come on people, it's just blogging. You're not
> > > > writing the next Dan Brown thriller. Quit over-analyzing and post it
> > > > already. Just throwing that out there."
>
> > > > IMO Cakebaker is much more thoughtful than ju
rown thriller. Quit over-analyzing and post it
> > > already. Just throwing that out there."
>
> > > IMO Cakebaker is much more thoughtful than just "throwing it out".
> > > But, in any case, why wouldn't he be allowed to express questionable
> > > p
; personal opinions and make mistakes? Let the one who has never been
> > argumentative or made a mistake, cast the first stone. It certainly
> > shouldn't be you!
>
> > Your next post is no doubt a fascinating insight into Cake, the
> > "Greater Internet F**
On Jun 3, 4:10 pm, Nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry folks, my last post was a bit heavy-handed. I'm just tired of
> people being so demanding, particularly in areas where they have no
> basis for being so.
You are forgiven :)
> Yes, CakePHP itself is an Open Source project, and yes, the
takes? Let the one who has never been
> > argumentative or made a mistake, cast the first stone. It certainly
> > shouldn't be you!
>
> > Your next post is no doubt a fascinating insight into Cake, the
> > "Greater Internet F**kwad Theory". To be honest,
ldn't be you!
>
> Your next post is no doubt a fascinating insight into Cake, the
> "Greater Internet F**kwad Theory". To be honest, I couldn't even
> make myself click into that one. I suppose you think this warrants
> your own presence on the blog list just b
never been
argumentative or made a mistake, cast the first stone. It certainly
shouldn't be you!
Your next post is no doubt a fascinating insight into Cake, the
"Greater Internet F**kwad Theory". To be honest, I couldn't even
make myself click into that one. I suppose you
At the risk of getting embroiled in yet another heated debate, I'm
going to respond to this *once*:
While his recent posts have been somewhat informative and helpful, in
my opinion they are more than outweighed by the months of posts which
were critical, argumentative, and just generally unhelpfu
Certainly a +1 (yaay) for CakeBaker's blog.
His one is very informative, very much Cake related and I think one of the
first few Cake blogs in the wild.
He has been blogging about CakePHP since 1947 ;)
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Daniel Hofstetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Wow, thank
Daniel you got my vote as well :-)
cheers
On Jun 3, 5:14 pm, Daniel Hofstetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, thank you for your support, guys :)
>
> --
> Daniel Hofstetterhttp://cakebaker.42dh.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Wow, thank you for your support, guys :)
--
Daniel Hofstetter
http://cakebaker.42dh.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
Another vote for CakeBaker :D
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Another vote for CakeBaker :-)
On Jun 3, 5:59 am, BurntSushi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I second this motion. CakeBaker's blog, as my memory has it, was
> posted on the official Cake web site until the new re-design (if I'm
> wrong here, I stand corrected).
>
> I visit both CakeBaker's and Snoo
I second this motion. CakeBaker's blog, as my memory has it, was
posted on the official Cake web site until the new re-design (if I'm
wrong here, I stand corrected).
I visit both CakeBaker's and Snook's blogs on a daily basis, and while
Snook's blog is fantastic (Snook's blog is on the official s
How does the Cake Team choose the list of blogs mentioned on
cakephp.org?
If the listing is chosen objectively, it should include those blogs
with the highest quality and quantity of posts. Especially those
which are helpful to general Cake users.
On what basis therefore is CakeBaker's blog ex
38 matches
Mail list logo
