[Carbon-dev] G-Reg Server startup fails - trunk build

Hi, I see following error on G-Reg console while starting up. The server doesn't get started. SVN revision : 121949 [2012-03-05 16:54:30,141] ERROR {org.wso2.carbon.registry.indexing.AsyncIndexer} - Error while indexing. java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: when resolving method

Re: [Carbon-dev] Compilation failure in system test framework.

t; Afkham Azeez > Sent from my phone > On Feb 25, 2012 1:17 AM, "Krishantha Samaraweera" > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I see very obvious compilation failure in system-test-framework trunk >> [1]. This is the second time I came across with such an issue

[Carbon-dev] Compilation failure in system test framework.

Hi All, I see very obvious compilation failure in system-test-framework trunk [1]. This is the second time I came across with such an issue for last two days. Charitha also got a compilation failure while building the framework trunk yesterday. We all need to follow best practices before committin

Re: [Carbon-dev] Have we looked @ LoadUI? {was: Re: GS load testing with loadUI}

Hi, We need to evaluate the tool. If the tool fits for the purpose, will add UI load test item to our road map, Thanks, Krishantha. On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Hi all, > > Have we looked at LoadUI from a Test Automation PoV? > > http://www.loadui.org// > > Thanks,

Re: [Carbon-dev] G-reg automation scenarios

Hi Kishan, Please start automating given G-Reg features using admin services. For some cases, like custom handlers, you will have to write selenium tests. you can find the G-Reg test cases list at [1]. Thanks, Krishantha. [1] https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvhVRxNoCg0K

[Carbon-dev] Cannot start axis2server ships with ESB - trunk build

Hi, I got the following exception while starting axis2server ships with trunk ESB build. Can someone please have a look. [2012-02-13 19:12:40,024] ERROR - CarbonUtils Cannot read file ../..//home/krishantha/Downloads/esb/wso2esb-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT/samples/axis2Server/repository/conf/carbon.xml java.i

Re: [Carbon-dev] ESB Sample test framework

/ServerGroupManager.java On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera wrote: > I see this issue while gracefully shutting down the server. It might be > due to another test trying to start its execution while shutting down the > server. Hence you see 'Access Denied'

Re: [Carbon-dev] ESB Sample test framework

I see this issue while gracefully shutting down the server. It might be due to another test trying to start its execution while shutting down the server. Hence you see 'Access Denied' message. Thanks, Krishantha. On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Chamara Silva wrote: > Look in to the issue. > > T

Re: [Carbon-dev] Test Failure - System Stratos automated Cases

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera < > krishan...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Can you explain how you are running the framework. It seems that >> App-server is not

Re: [Carbon-dev] Test Failure - System Stratos automated Cases

Hi, Can you explain how you are running the framework. It seems that App-server is not running at the moment. You need to edit framework.properties file appropriately before start test execution. Thanks, Krishantha. On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > Hi, > > $Subject! >

Re: [Carbon-dev] Error when building System-test-framework in trunk

Fixed. Thanks, Krishantha. On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting following [1] error. How can I get rid of it? > > [1] > > Downloading: > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/oracle/ojdbc14/10.2.0.2.0/ojdbc14-10.2.0.2.0.jar > [INFO] > ---

[Carbon-dev] System test framework migration to TestNG status.

Hi All, We have finish with migrating test framework core to TestNG. Lets start migrating our test cases as well. A new test core module has been introduced, our plan is to get rid of older test core module after migrating all tests into TestNG. As a convention we are not going to maintain testNG

Re: [Carbon-dev] CApp not getting deployed correctly

I also got the same error when deploying Car files in ESB trunk build. Thanks, Krishantha. On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > Hi, > > When I try to deploy a CApp, I can see following messages at the back-end. > > INFO - GhostDeployer Ghost Deployer Deploying Artifact : >

Re: [Carbon-dev] System Test Framework Integration with Bamboo trunk build.

, Krishantha. On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Muhammed Shariq wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera < > krishan...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Muhammed Shariq wrote: >> >>> Hi Krishantha et al, >>

Re: [Carbon-dev] System Test Framework Integration with Bamboo trunk build.

our tenant on the test configuration and run tests on your tenant. Setting up stratos evn would be to call startos setup script though the automation framework. We may need to find a way for distributed deployment of each service. Thanks, Krishantha. > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Krisha

Re: [Carbon-dev] System Test Framework Integration with Bamboo trunk build.

gt; --Srinath > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera > wrote: > > We need to monitor how this works for few days. > > If everything runs smoothly then we can enable test failure > notifications. > > > > Thanks, > > Krishantha. >

Re: [Carbon-dev] System Test Framework Integration with Bamboo trunk build.

her there is a possibility of testing different carbon > versions of products, such as ESB 3.0.1 with BAM 2.0.0? > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera < > krishan...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> We need to monitor how this works for few days. >> If e

Re: [Carbon-dev] System Test Framework Integration with Bamboo trunk build.

We need to monitor how this works for few days. If everything runs smoothly then we can enable test failure notifications. Thanks, Krishantha. On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera < krishan...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have done the $subject on Bamboo ma

[Carbon-dev] System Test Framework Integration with Bamboo trunk build.

Hi, We have done the $subject on Bamboo machine and it is working. You can find the last successful test build at [1]. Test framework has been configured to use packs generated by trunk build. The test setup consists of five products (ESB, G-Reg, AS, BPS and DSS) with registry mounts on top of My

Re: [Carbon-dev] Event broker is registered after the message "WSO2 Carbon started in ...." when starting DSS in trunk build

Hi, This is specific to DSS, I don't see the same behavior with other products. Some DSS automation test fail because of this inconsistent start-up order. We can add a delay to automation tests and over come the failures. But it is better to check why we see this only with DSS trunk build. Can so

Re: [Carbon-dev] Bamboo scheduled build for trunk will be not available today.

Hi Charith, Will let you know once we finish with test framework deployment. Thanks, Krishantha. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Charith Wickramarachchi wrote: > Hi , > > I've disabled the Bamboo scheduled build for trunk till we get the > Automation test to work with the trunk . > > thanks,

Re: [Carbon-dev] system test framework and product integration tests

Your are correct. We came across the same issue when designing the framework. Since system tests runs with different configurations (e.g with registry mounts and different DBs) we need to run all most all product integration tests on top of product platform as well. We can not directly have depende

Re: [Carbon-dev] Unable to start BPS server when set offset value - trunk build

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Waruna Ranasinghe wrote: > Hi krishantha, > > this happens when the Registry and the BPEL databases are out of sync. > Thanks Waruna, you are correct. -Krishantha. > sent from my mobile. > On Jan 17, 2012 3:11 PM, "Krishantha Samaraw

Re: [Carbon-dev] Unable to start BPS server when set offset value - trunk build

org.eclipse.osgi.framework.eventmgr.EventManager.dispatchEvent(EventManager.java:230) at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.eventmgr.EventManager$EventThread.run(EventManager.java:340) Thanks, Krishantha. On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to start BPS serv

[Carbon-dev] Unable to start BPS server when set offset value - trunk build

Hi, I was trying to start BPS server (trunk build) and got the following error. Further investigation reveals that issue caused after changing default offset value. Our system automation tests are failing due to this error. Please have a look. Exception = [2012-01-17 14:40:35,699] ERROR

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Stratos-dev] System test framework progress update

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Srinath Perera wrote: > just to confirm .. is this runs with trunk packs created from the build > now? > Yes, we are setting the framework for trunk on bamboo machine. Thanks, Krishantha. > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Krishantha Samar

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Stratos-dev] System test framework progress update

pattern validation >>> 14) MySql Stored procedure >>> IN params, OUT params, INOUT params >>> 15) Faulty Service >>> Deploying faulty service >>> Edit and Redeploy faulty service >>> 16) Data Service Schedule t

[Carbon-dev] System test framework progress update

Hi, System test framework [1] is capable of testing starots and product platform. We already integrated Ravana, the perf test framewok into this framework. And it also contain test for G-Reg UI testing using Selenium2/Webdriver. This framework uses perl based deployment framework [2] to setup pro

Re: [Carbon-dev] Automation Tests for Mounting

+1, We have already configured test framework to setup product platform with registry mounts and run test against the mounted product setup in bamboo machine (only five products yet). But we don't have specific tests for registry mounts. Normally we run governance API test on the setup. Lets discus

Re: [Carbon-dev] System test framework status with trunk

ected to the server on port 5675 >>>> [2012-01-10 10:00:10,051] INFO >>>> {org.wso2.carbon.registry.eventing.internal.RegistryEventingServiceComponent} >>>> - Successfully Initialized Eventing on Registry >>>> [2012-01-10 10:00:10,063] INFO >&g

[Carbon-dev] System test framework status with trunk

sending to carbon-dev -- Forwarded message -- From: Nuwan Wimalasekara Date: Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:40 PM Subject: System test framework status with trunk To: Krishantha Samaraweera Hi Krishantha I could not find the latest product binaries already built. therefore i had to

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.2.3 packs to be released

Are we going to update maven repo with 3.2.3 artifacts ? Thanks, Krishantha. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda wrote: > RM's please sign with the same key that you used to sign packs. > Thanks. > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Madhuka Udantha wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Source

Re: [Carbon-dev] Test Automation Progress and Plan

same > machine as we are running the tests. > All enabled tests are passing now. Please refer to http://wso2.org/bamboo/browse/WSO2CARBON320-AUTOMATIONTEST-32. We will enable other tests case by case after testing locally. Thanks, Krishantha. > > --Srinath > > On Wed, De

Re: [Carbon-dev] Test Automation Progress and Plan

same > machine as we are running the tests. > Will check. Thanks, Krishantha. > > --Srinath > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Srinath Perera > wrote: > >> >

Re: [Carbon-dev] Test Automation Progress and Plan

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Srinath Perera wrote: > Goal is to get the Dashbaord working to build trunk, branch, and > support as a thin slice by Thursday with automation tests > Today we (Azeez, Samisa, and others) met to discuss the progress and > following are TODOs > > Dashboard is at h

Re: [Carbon-dev] Now we can start multiple Carbon servers within an integration TestSuite

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > With the following commit, we can start a number of Carbon server > instances from an integration TestSuite. Now it makes it very simple to > write an integration test case which involves multiple Carbon products. > Please take a look at the

Re: [Carbon-dev] [Architecture] Migrate to TestNG

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > Folks, > I was playing around a bit with TestNG ( > http://testng.org/doc/documentation-main.html#introduction) & it seems to > be the way to go for the type of integration testing we are doing. This may > involve major changes at the platfor

Re: [Carbon-dev] Discussion about changes to Carbon test framework in trunk

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > +1. I'd like to see how we can make use of this framework to automate > testing of concerns such as replicated caching, clustering, mounting and > also to understand how this can eventually grow to automate the testing of > multitenancy an

Re: [Carbon-dev] Deployment configuration script - training

Great work Dharshana. Hope the Deployment framework will be helpful for QAs to setup product platforms in future. Following are to-do list that we have to complete. Lets try to finish this before RC builds. 1. Option to configure cache.xml for product clusters. 2. Have a way to run DB script auto

Re: [Carbon-dev] G-Reg CarbonHome implementation issue in Test Automation Framework

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera wrote: > > Hi Senaka, > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: >> >>> Hi Kishan, >>> &g

Re: [Carbon-dev] G-Reg CarbonHome implementation issue in Test Automation Framework

Hi Senaka, On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > >> Hi Kishan, >> >> Set -Dcarbon.repo.write.mode=true. This was an issue until very recently >> and was fixed. >> > > Adding more to this, since the carbon.xml is

Re: [Carbon-dev] [QA] Use Jmeter heavily in test automation

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Charitha Kankanamge wrote: > Apache Jmeter is a very useful tool for both functional and performance > testing. At the moment, we use Jmeter in HB checker app to test console > level login for all Stratos services as well as Jmeter is used to test > concurrent login

[Carbon-dev] Snapshot repo required for automation work

Hi, Currently, automation team is using snapshot dependencies for ongoing automation work. The automation team have build the trunk and using artifacts at local repo. This approach doesn't scale when we are going to deliver the work to QA or Devs. And, our initial plan is to maintain maven based s

Re: [Carbon-dev] Has the Carbon 3.2.0 P2 repo been updated with 3.2.1 features?

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Pradeep Fernando wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Supun Malinga wrote: > > Hi azeez, > > Not yet. Will do this by tomorrow. > > For now you can use, [1] > > [1] > http://builder1.us1.wso2.org/~carbon320/releases/carbon/3.2.1/2011-07-14_09-56-52/p2

Re: [Carbon-dev] Does HTTP/REST work with Registry WS API

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Sumedha Rubasinghe wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > >> $subject? >> >> Can I use only HTTP style calls without SOAP with the same API? >> > > Nope. We haven't enabled REST for the same services exposed by WS API. > However, S

Re: [Carbon-dev] Problem with Monitoring WSO2 ESB using JConsole

Hi Jorge, Edit jmx.xml at CRBON_HOME/repository/conf/advanced and set your IP as the host name. localhost Thanks, Krishantha. On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Jorge Infante Osorio wrote: > Hi folks. > > I read this interesting article > http://wso2.org/library/knowledge-base/2011/04/monitoring

Re: [Carbon-dev] RC3 Packs - 3.2.0

Hi Amila, Can you copy p2-repo as well. BTW in builder machine p2-repo.zip is 148 bytes, please check. Thanks, Krishantha. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Charitha Kankanamge wrote: > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi > wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Ami

Re: [Carbon-dev] Context root disappearing in Websphere

Hi all, The same issue [1] has been raised sometime back and it has been resolved without doing a proper fix. Thanks Krishantha [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-7371 On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Nuwan Bandara wrote: > Surprisingly this does not happen in other app servers (Tomcat e

Re: [Carbon-dev] Question on Integration Tests

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Isuru Suriarachchi wrote: > > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In our integration tests, is it possible to make a few modifications to >> the product installation before it starts up? For an example can I replace >> the

Re: [Carbon-dev] G-Reg Test Coverage in Automated Test Framework: ~ 50%

gt; >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Chamara Silva wrote: >> >>> Thilini can we have test coverage now? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Chamara >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera < >>>

Re: [Carbon-dev] G-Reg Test Coverage in Automated Test Framework: ~ 50%

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera wrote: > >> >> I believe that the reports are correct. But, you need to run the >> governance API, WS Client and the JCR Client, Check-in Check-out client as >> well, which will improve the coverage. I'm not s

Re: [Carbon-dev] G-Reg Test Coverage in Automated Test Framework: ~ 50%

> > > > I believe that the reports are correct. But, you need to run the governance > API, WS Client and the JCR Client, Check-in Check-out client as well, which > will improve the coverage. I'm not sure why the bean classes were not > covered. Ideally, if you used the service, the bean classes wou

Re: [Carbon-dev] [QA Test Framework] Focus on functional coverage across more features instead of covering all possible scenarios related to a particular use case

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Charitha Kankanamge wrote: > I had an offline chat with Samisa last friday regarding the current test > coverage. We understood that it is essential to have a horizontal coverage > across features instead of spending time on automating all possible > scenarios rel

Re: [Carbon-dev] Fwd: Greg Test Automation Hackathon

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera < > krishan...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: >> >>> What is the %

Re: [Carbon-dev] Fwd: Greg Test Automation Hackathon

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > What is the % coverage of functionality now? > > I would say it is 35%. Thanks Krishantha. > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera < > krishan...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Hi Samisa, &

Re: [Carbon-dev] Fwd: Greg Test Automation Hackathon

>> >>> Most probably we can double our automation speed if we can have contact >>> person in greg development team instead of disturbing to all the >>> people.because sometimes we take long times to understand greg code. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ch

Re: [Carbon-dev] G-Reg checkin/out client automation

maven can not do much things when it comes to automating command line tool. Thanks, Krishantha [1] https://wso2.org/repos/wso2/trunk/commons/qa/db-configuration-scripts/build.xml > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera < > krishan...@wso2.com> wrote: >

Re: [Carbon-dev] G-Reg checkin/out client automation

amework can read in. That way, we > can > > directly use the output from this to generate statistics using > performance > > testing framework. > > > > /sumedha > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera > > wrote: > > > >&g

Re: [Carbon-dev] G-Reg checkin/out client automation

this checkout problem and update you. Thanks, Krishantha. > > Anyway, talk with Damitha & make the result output file format compatible > with what our performance testing framework can read in. That way, we can > directly use the output from this to generate statistics using

[Carbon-dev] G-Reg checkin/out client automation

Hi all, I have improved the perl script which I have been using to test G-Reg checkin/out client as a test framework. Currently, the framework has around 36 test cases and covers 80% of the checkin/out functionalities, including some customer scenarios. I will be able to add more tests once G-Reg

Re: [Carbon-dev] Invitation: Group B : Code review (Registry Search Service) @ Thu Feb 3 2pm - 3pm (carbon-dev@wso2.org)

Hi Lahiru, You missed my name, I am also in Group B. -Krishantha. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote: > more details > »

Re: [Carbon-dev] Packs available [was Fwd: "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

Hi Senaka/Janaka, Is there any possibility of getting a new G-Reg build. We hit with few blocking issues related to G-Reg main functionalities and AFAIK those are fixed now. So it would be great if we can have a new build to proceed with testing. Thanks, Krishantha. On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:18

Re: [Carbon-dev] Packs available [was Fwd: "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

Hi, Please fix the following issues at G-Reg server startup. 1. Exception in thread "Thread-8" java.lang.NullPointerException at org.wso2.carbon.registry.indexing.IndexingManager.run(IndexingManager.java:151) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) 2. [2011-01-28 13:51:40,532]

Re: [Carbon-dev] Packs available [was Fwd: "WSO2 Carbon Continuous Build was SUCCESSFUL"

Hi G-Reg Team, Please fix the G-Reg version as well. Thanks, Krishantha. On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Charitha Kankanamge wrote: > AS folks, > > Appserver version of these packs are wso2appserver-4.0.0-SNAPSHOT which we > have already released during 3.1.0 chunk1 release. What will be the c

Re: [Carbon-dev] Registry Checkin client.. Is the name correct..?

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > >> Well, the proposed name sounds good. But, I have one concern. Would people >> imagine that this tool could do anything on the registry (or think of it as >> another client

Re: [Carbon-dev] Adding an ESB with a webcontext as a monitored server fails in BAM 1.2.0

Hi Prabath, What is the BAM build you are using? .In BAM-b008 build you have to create h2 data source manually. But h2 data source is available by default from BAM-b009 build. Thanks, Krishantha. On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Prabath Siriwardana wrote: > Both ESB and BAM running on different

Re: [Carbon-dev] Latest BAM test build

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Sumedha Rubasinghe wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera < > krishan...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Ajith Vitharana wrote: >> >>> >>>

Re: [Carbon-dev] Latest BAM test build

Hi, On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Ajith Vitharana wrote: > > Hi all > > Find the latest BAM here [b009]. > > [b009] > http://builder.wso2.org/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.0.1/bam/1.2.0-b009/ > I'm getting error [1] at BAM s

Re: [Carbon-dev] Latest BAM test build

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > http://builder.wso2.org/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.0.1/bam/1.2.0-b005/ I don't see any activity details though Activity filter gadget.. But message are stored to BA

Re: [Carbon-dev] Latest BAM test build

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Yumani Ranaweera wrote: > >> Ratha, >> >> Could you please check this issue[1]. Its a blocker on BAM activity >> monitoring using handlers. (NOTE: BAM DB was on oracle) >> >> [1] -https://wso2.org/jir

Re: [Carbon-dev] Latest BAM test build

I cannot use this build to test Activity filter. Hit with the following issue. So I'm waiting for the next build :D [2010-12-01 15:31:43,062] ERROR - Servlet.service() for servlet bridgeservlet threw exception {org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[carbonEngine].[carbonhost].[/].[bridgeservlet]

Re: [Carbon-dev] wso2greg 3.5.0 webapps folder is empty

Hi Roberto, Don't worry about empty webapps/ROOT/WEB-INF/plugin. We pick up all bundle jars from /repository/components/plugins directory which we have to refer when making the web app repo. Deployment guide on ESB + Jboss is available at [1]. you can follow the same guide for G-Reg, since we foll

Re: [Carbon-dev] How to synchronize SimpleURLRegistry with governance registry?

Hi, You have two options, either you can use G-REG Eclipse plugin which directly support uploading a file system directory into G-REG or write a simple remote registry client using RegistryClientUtils.importToRegistry() function. Please refer to registry filesampleutils sample for more details. W

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.1 RC1 Build

Hi, I found some UI issues while testing G-Reg using IE7. Is there any possibility of fixing them for this release. 1. Unable to add collections - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/REGISTRY-557 Above issue has been fixed by Chanaka and committed to trunk but the fix is not available in 3.0.1 2. Impa

Re: [Carbon-dev] How can I use the " WSO2 Governance Registry permissions" to assign permisions to individual users ?

e "ttt_role" . But the permisssions (no matter > 'Deny' permissions or 'Allow' permissions ) set to the role > "everyone" have higher priority over the role "ttt_role" . > How to validate the permissions set to

Re: [Carbon-dev] How can I use the " WSO2 Governance Registry permissions" to assign permisions to individual users ?

Hi, User based permission model is deprecated feature. Only role based permission model is allowed. Therefore you have to assign users to a role and set permission to that role. Thanks, Krishantha. 2010/9/2 dzh045 > Hi: > In the WSO2 Governance Registry ,I just find the > permissi

[Carbon-dev] Fwd: [Registry-user] Failover of registry

Forwarding to carbon-dev for wider community (ESB) attention. Thanks, Krishantha. -- Forwarded message -- From: Hodchenkov, Paul Date: Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM Subject: [Registry-user] Failover of registry To: "registry-u...@wso2.org" Hi! I have read nice article http:/

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.1 Code Freeze

Hi Senaka, Following issues are still there in alpha3 release. Can you please have a look. IMO, we need to fix them before the release. [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-7645 - Lifecycle stage monitor is empty [2] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-7647 - Impact Analysis gadget doesn't wor

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.1 Alpha1 build

Hi All, There are two issues with G-Reg dashboard gadget rendering. Please have a look. [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-7645 - Lifecycle stage monitor is empty [2] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-7647 - Impact Analysis gadget doesn't work Thanks, Krishantha. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at

Re: [Carbon-dev] Test automation framework

This is fixed now. We have to run cmd.exe first and tell it to execute ant. After the fix I found that some client processes (sample 13) hang when running all the tests. Suho is currently looking at to the issue. Thanks, Krishantha. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Chamara Silva wrote: > Autom

Re: [Carbon-dev] Gadet Server Cluster Issue

Hi, As a workaround can you restart the gs2 node and see. AFAIK, restarting will sync permissions on cluster. Thanks, Krishantha. On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Callejas Albalate wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have doubt, we have two gadget server (gs1,gs2) working on cluster, all > runs well

Re: [Carbon-dev] Install BAM Mediation Statistics Data Publisher Feature on ESB 3.0.0

Hi, BAM publisher features haven't been added to standard repo yet. Can you try out the following repo which is based on final RC. http://builder.wso2.org/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.0.0/5RC30/p2-repo/ Thanks, Krishantha. On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Nestor Tarin Burriel wrote: > Hi, > > I'm

Re: [Carbon-dev] Fwd: Help Required --> Impact Data and Lifecycle Data in WSO2 greg 3.5.0

gt; Thanks, > Sisira Pillarisetty > ________ > > > From: > Krishantha Samaraweera > To: carbon-dev@wso2.org Cc: sisir...@tcs.com Date: 07/19/2010 03:03 PM > Subject: Re: [Carbon-dev] Fwd: Help Required --> Impact Data and Lifecycle > Data in WSO2 greg 3.5.0 >

Re: [Carbon-dev] Fwd: Help Required --> Impact Data and Lifecycle Data in WSO2 greg 3.5.0

Hi, What is the browser you are using? You have to use the registry path to view the impact analysis data eg : /_system/governance/wsdls/http/www/ecubicle/net/youtubedownloader.asmx.WSDL Lifecycle data gadget visualize LC stages of services which has 'ServiceLifeCycle' assigned. Thanks, Krishan

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.0.0 Iridium - RC29

Hi Dumindu, Is it possible to get a new BAM build within today with all fixes done so far. Thanks, krishantha. On 7/7/10, Krishantha Samaraweera wrote: > We came across regression issue yesterday [1] and few documentation issues > related to release note, Readme etc.. Doc issues hav

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.0.0 Iridium - RC29

We came across regression issue yesterday [1] and few documentation issues related to release note, Readme etc.. Doc issues have been fixed and Dumindu is working on fixing [1] Thanks, Krishantha. [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/BAM-196 - Endpoint stats are duplicating in hourly analytic On T

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.0.0 Iridium - RC27

Hi Dumindu, I saw few L1 issue fixes done yesterday. Can we get new BAM build to do some regression tests before the final QA build on 1st July. Thanks, Krishantha. On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Dumindu Pallewela wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Krishantha Samar

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.0.0 Iridium - RC26

6.1/<http://builder.wso2.org/%7Ecarbon/releases/carbon/3.0.0/5RC26.1/> > > Thanks, > Dumindu. > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera < > krishan...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for the build Samisa. >> >> Seems like

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.0.0 Iridium - RC26

ttp://builder.wso2.org/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.0.0/5RC26/<http://builder.wso2.org/%7Ecarbon/releases/carbon/3.0.0/5RC26/> > > <http://builder.wso2.org/%7Ecarbon/releases/carbon/3.0.0/5RC26/>Samisa... > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera < >

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.0.0 Iridium - RC25

Hi Dumindu, Is it possible to get a new BAM build. There are several fixes that we need to verify. Thanks, Krishantha. On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Dumindu Pallewela wrote: > http://builder.wso2.org/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.0.0/5RC25/

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.0.0 Iridium - 4RC24

Hi Dumindu, Will it be possible to provide us a new BAM pack. So we can verify recent fixes for high priority cases and continue testing. Thanks, Krishantha. On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Milinda Pathirage wrote: > Fixed some issue with docs link and uploaded packs again. Now BAM also > avai

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.0.0 Iridium - RC20

don't know wht happened, but it was working earlier and we > did a setup in ozone. Anyway i'll look into that. > Thanks. > -Ratha. > > Krishantha Samaraweera wrote: > > Hi Dumindu, > > > > Still we couldn't get mediation stats working. Issue seems to be wi

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon-3.0.0 Iridium - RC20

Hi Dumindu, Still we couldn't get mediation stats working. Issue seems to be with mediation stat data publisher. Mediation stat publishing is one of the main functionality of BAM and we are struck due to below mentioned blockers. Can you please look into the issues ASAP. Please refer to [1] [2] f

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.0 - Iridium - RC15

8751 On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Sameera Jayasoma wrote: > This is fixed please try now. > > Thanks > Sameera > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I added p2

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.0 - Iridium - RC15

sole.run(FrameworkConsole.java:224) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Thanks, Krishantha. On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Fixed, please check now. > Samisa... > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: >> >> >> On Mo

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.0 - Iridium - RC15

Hi Samisa, On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > BAM packs are now available. >From where I can get BAM publishers. I don't see them in the p2-repo. Thanks, Krishantha. > Samisa... > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, May 24, 201

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.0 - Iridium - RC9

Hi, Feature management UI crashed with IBM JDK 1.5 [1] and the issue has been already fixed and verified. Thanks, Krishantha. [1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-7349 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Locally available at > http://10.100.1.43/~carbon/releases/car

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.0 - Iridium - RC8

Hi, We are getting following error when navigate to registry browser [1]. Stracktrace printed on comment and rating boxes in registry browser. Issue seems to be specific to IBM 1.5 JDK. Please refer to [1] for exception details [2] [2010-04-25 22:43:02,202] ERROR - org.apache.axis2.databinding.A

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.0 - Iridium - Beta build 05

Hi, I see following echo message when running server startup script . May be April fool joke! krishan...@krishantha-laptop:~/Desktop/beta5/wso2greg-3.5.0/bin$ sh wso2server.sh You Fool!!! Download the pack from http://builder.wso2.org/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.0.0/3Beta05.1/wso2greg-3.5.0.zip

Re: [Carbon-dev] Carbon 3.0.0 - Iridium - Beta build 04

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > http://builder.wso2.org/~carbon/releases/carbon/3.0.0/3Beta04/ > > > http://builder.wso2.org/~carbon/rel

  1   2   >