Hi all
I have been working on a yellow block for the DDR3 of the ROACH-2. As far
as I know this yellow block does not yet exist?
The same DRAM yellow block is used and interfacing the memory remains the
same (as for the ROACH-1). The DRAM also uses an asynchronous fifo to allow
long write bursts
Hi, Andrew,
On Jul 23, 2013, at 10:03 PM, Andrew Martens wrote:
> Well, I am certainly glad that there is a rational explanation.
Me, too!
> So the FFT has not been broken for ~2 years or so, just since anyone upgraded
> their tools.
Yes, it only affects people using the 14.x System Generator
Hi Dave
The only way that the script could generate logic that would result in correct
data would be correct if;
1. The Relational block could get a latency of 1 when no latency was specified
i.e default operation has latency of 1 in that toolflow version.
You're right! That's exactly the pro
Greetings all!
The ActelFusion MMS subsystem on the ROACH-1 boards has a "power up on
reset" option. During some testing a week or so ago, this option was
turned off on one of our ROACHes. So I was not surprised that I could
not program the FPGA with firmware. However, I was surprised to se
Hi, Andrew,
On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Andrew Martens wrote:
> The only way that the script could generate logic that would result in
> correct data would be correct if;
> 1. The Relational block could get a latency of 1 when no latency was
> specified i.e default operation has latency of 1 i
Hi Ryan
So I just finished a ROACH2 build, and everything from "copy base
package" through bitgen took almost 2 hours. It looks like this is
because I have 48 "shared memories", plus about another 20
"snapshots". The tools seem to be synthesizing each of these
separately.
I would expec
Hey all,
So I just finished a ROACH2 build, and everything from "copy base
package" through bitgen took almost 2 hours. It looks like this is
because I have 48 "shared memories", plus about another 20
"snapshots". The tools seem to be synthesizing each of these separately.
I would expect
Hi Dave
Thanks for sending your test model. Since it was saved using a newer Simulink
version, I had to simulate it using a newer toolflow version.
Sorry about that.
Doing so did indeed show the FFT problem you described. I then re-simulated my
test model in the newer Simulink version and
On 22 Jul 2013 18:00, "John Ford" wrote:
>
> > Hi Rich,
> >
> > In hoping to get a yellow block tutorial up and running (there is a
> > tutorial Dave George wrote a few years ago which I'll use as a starting
> > point), probably based around a bidirectional gpio block. But if you (or
> > anyone el
9 matches
Mail list logo