All,
I noticed a strange behaviour, as I was using the mask like that = 0001
, CCM was trying to use all channels on 6608.
After changing it to = 0001, it worked.
Enable Poll status was enabled on the gateway. I thought I had the CCM
services
The mask works with or without spaces, when you had 0001
did you try to disable/enable the 6608 port.
Thanks
Narinder
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Christian Hennrich
Sent: Monday, 12 January
Hi,
I need clarification on this.
If question ask to configure say 3 ports on unity.
there two options:
- 3ports both Answering calls and MWI dialout
-2 ports Answering calls and 1 port MWI dialout
SO which approch is correct, I think for real world we use first option, but
for perspective
Hi,
I tried to set up SRST and unity scenario. Here is the problem
unity--HQ ---pstn-BR1 (SRST)
2001 3001
2001 call 3001 and CFNA redirect call to unity via pstn , redirecting number
works fine but only 8 digits passed to unity
Here is the out put of debug isdn
Jeremy, The would tell you in the lab what to do. If they say to configure
3 Unity ports and don't give you any more specific details... assume that
all 3 ports can do all rolls. answer calls, TRAP, MWI notification and
notification dialout.
thanks,
Ryan Trauernicht
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at
Anyway around getting multicast MOH to flow over to a SIP trunk?
Anytime I hit the hold and unhold the cool just hangs. Change it to unicast
and it works fine.
This is not a MTP or xcoding issue. I see the MTP invoked on a g711only
call. Any way around if they require multicast at HQ and
Hey .. It will be great if some one can suggest a reasonable and closeby
hotel to Cisco Lab, San Jose.
I have my lab scheduled there in March.
Regards,
Vikram Singh
Hi,
i recently have found a link to a blog of Vik Mahli. There he explains some
capabilities of sip-trunks:
http://malhi.net/blog/?p=31
Regarding his blog, multicast Music on Hold is not supported on sip trunks
HTH
/Robert
Ryan Trauernichtryanstudyvo...@gmail.com schrieb am Montag, 12.
Hi Vikram
What is your Date? My lab is scheduled for 24th March' 08 (SJ).
I always stay at Vegabond Inn which is quite okay (60-70$) a day and there
is a VTA rails that runs right from it and it takes you straight to Cisco
Building where the Exam is.
Unicast me to know more details...:-)
Hi,
I have successfully built a CUCM7 first node (publisher) in VMware Server
(Linux) with the following configuration:
Static IP/network info, no NTP, no SMTP, no DNS.
I am now trying to add a second node (subscriber) to the cluster (same
VMware, same bridged network), and I keep getting an
Hi,
I set up B-ACD scenario that shouldn't work but it worked!
I configure incoming dial peer as follows:
dial-peer voice 1000 voip
incoming called .
and then made a call to BACD pilot number , when call established, codec on
ipphone was G711. As far as I know if u match your custom incoming
Team,
For those of you who use the Proctor Lab equipment, please read on.
Configuration: using EZVPN with Laptop behind it... (2801 - hp laptop)
In my first real working lab yesterday, I configured the IP address of my
laptop lan to match the required PSTN MAC. (mac-changer freeware)
I wanted
found it : forward-digits 0 on the outbound POTS dialpeer (to FXS phone) is
enough :)
cheers,
Juan
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Hafþór Hilmarsson ha...@ok.is wrote:
Hi yuan I had this happen in the lab but a Reset after lunch on that
trunk fixed the issue if I remember correctly.
Hi all,wondered if someone experienced the fact the once the ATA gets
registered on an SRST router, it doesn't register back to the UCM anymore
once the callmanager comes back?
Any thoughts on this?
cheers,
Juan
Call drom CCM to CME phone via SIP trunk works great, but when the CME
phone Forwards to CUE, the CME phone stops ringing, the CCM phone
continues to ring forever (No transfer to Users VM)...Any ideas?
You need the Outbound Faststart marked on the trunk.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join our free online support and peer group communities:
My Bad. I thought it was H323 to SIP. SIP to SIP call Forwarding is not
supported in this release.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join our free online support and
IPC and IP Blue (7960) are different Phone types. So you would have to
delete the phone and re-add as IPC.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join our free online
I¹m assuming you are calling from a local CME phone.
The inbound dial-peer would be a POTS dialpeer with tag 2000X. Think of the
CME phones as FXS ports. So in effect you have the following:
CME Phone INBOUND POTS leg CME Router - Outbound VOIP
BACD
The inbound leg is pots
I don¹t get any RDNIS so you are doing much better than me. I think this the
RDNIS with SRST has bugs that are fixed in 12.4(7). What IOS are you using?
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:
When you use ³Default² DP it literally looks for a DP called ³Default² and
will not use the default defined in Device Defaults with CCM.
Try saying the above statement 10 times!
If you rename the Default DP to ³HQ² then when adding the JTAPI Call Control
Group it will hang. Do not do this-
The Call forward NO Answer is the setting that is used when the Route Point
is unregistered (in this release).
Check the setting is forward to the Manager DN (VM checkbox is not marked)
and the CSS = CSS-Manager-Internal.
Ensure that CSS-Manager-Internal has pt-manager and pt-internal in this
Looks like the Calling Name is not being sent- is the Display IE checkbox
marked on the Gateway page- also no mgcp/mgcp on the router.
This is something I do very regularly and should work. Either you are not
hitting this Route Pattern or you have Calling # manipulations on the RL
which would
Yup that is exactly what I do. In CM i have 4 defined DP (HQ, SiteB, 711,
729). In IPCC I see 5 (adding in Default). I pick the HQ DP for the adding
in JTAPI and it just hangs.
Only way I can get around it was making the JTAPI integration just point to
publisher.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at
Hmmm...I¹m not running into that myself. I define the JTAPI provider like
so: 10.x.200.21,10.x.200.20 (PUB,SUB).
Then ensure CTI Manager is running on both. I¹ve never seen what you are
describing before:-(
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Vik, Ryan,
I have to 101% to agree with Ryan, that I ran in the same problem, if
I'm using pub and sub. Only using pub works.
I'm renaming the defautl DP to HQ and use that for the CTI Ports.
VIK do you rename the default DP or are you creating a new one?
Regards
Vik Malhi schrieb:
Vik, Put in the Sub,Pub (not Pub,Sub).
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Christian Hennrich
christian.hennr...@intact-is.com wrote:
Vik, Ryan,
I have to 101% to agree with Ryan, that I ran in the same problem, if I'm
using pub and sub. Only using pub works.
I'm renaming the defautl DP
Yeah- my mistake- I am putting in SUB,PUB and seems to work for me.
Are phones registered to the SUB/PUB OK?
Can you also check the CRS Serviceability Utility to ensure the information
about the CallManager nodes are correct.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor -
Correct.
In IPCC for the JTAPI Provider put Sub,Pub (192.168.187.12,192.168.187.11)
Then try to add in a group. It doesnt matter what DP I pick.
If I change the Provider to only the Pub and you are good to go.
Also restarting the node manager.
Thanks,
Ryan Trauernicht
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at
Try and reproduce this again next time out. Maybe you did accidentally have
the checkbox marked to go to VM- I have done spent hundreds of hours
troubelshooting myself over the past 4 years only to find that the CFWD to
VM checkbox marked.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical
Ryan/Christian- were you on one of Proctorlab¹s PODS or were you using your
own equipment? If it was PL can you let me know which POD you tested
onI¹ll try to get to the bottom of this.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone:
I am using my home lab. Not the PL.
Sorry!
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote:
Ryan/Christian- were you on one of Proctorlab's PODS or were you using
your own equipment? If it was PL can you let me know which POD you tested
onI'll try to get to the
What prompt do you choose to play when configuring the timeout to 30?
IF you dont pick a valid prompt doesnt it goto unsuccessful?
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Ryan Trauernicht
ryanstudyvo...@gmail.comwrote:
That options seems like it would save alot of time. I have always just
pulled the
I know when you put the frame-relay traffic-shaping on the physical
interface it turns all the CIRs down to 56k.
If you have 1 pipe that is MLP FRF which you need to put that command on the
interface and the other pip is just shaping FRF. I just wanted to make sure
you can not do the nested
You must do it the old school way if you are using a single physical
interface. The old school way being FRTS as opposed to class-based
shaping.
Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Another question is.
If you use the traditional way for low speed links... (cir, mincir, bc, be)
it is required to do the frame-relay traffic-shaping on the physical isnt
it?
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Ryan Trauernicht
ryanstudyvo...@gmail.comwrote:
That is what I thought.
do you
Just looking to see if this is overkill for a CB Shaping method and marking
(leaving everything alone on the layer 2switches). Also 5 percent (not
using percent) for SCCP and 4 FRF.12 calls for priority.
Is it really necessary to mark on the ingress or is is ok to trust what the
phones and CM
1. Let's say BR1 to HQ we are to use MLP with LFI but for BR2 to HQ we are to
use FRF.12 Fragmentation. What I understand is we will use MLP with LFI between
HQ-BR1 with NO frame-realy traffic-shaping command on major interface. Now on
BR2 to HQ as we are supposed to use FRF.12 , in this case
Hi All
A stupid Qestion please
I beleive the New Doc CD URL is follwing and this is the Home Page in the
lab
http://cisco.com/web/psa/products/tsd_products_support_configure.html
regds // anil
If I am asked not to trust the switch marking than I will definitely mark on
the ingress. If I am told to trust the phone than I will trust the phone on L2
and won't worry about ingress marking. I will go as per the lab requirenment's
Anyway that my view, may be someone else will shed some
You need Frame-relay Traffic-shaping command placed on the physical
interface (wha tI mean by that is Serial0/0... NOT s0/0.101) So not
the PVC
when you use FRF.12 traditional way (aka cir, mincir, bc, be) and MLP.
You do not put in on the physical interface when you use the CB Shaping
Do you need fast start enabled if you have an H323 Gateway that calls into
CUE?
Thanks,
ryan Trauernicht
What if we are to configure in the scenario I mentioned where it says configure
1. HQ to BR1 we are to use MLP with LFI
2. HQ to BR2 we are to use FRF.12 with MQC-FRTS (CB-Shapping way)
In the above scenario, on HQ major( Physica) interface is same. But as you
mentioned we should not
You will not be asked that. That can not be done. Option 2 needs to be
configured as traditional method.
thanks,
Ryan Trauernicht
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, anil batra anil...@yahoo.com wrote:
What if we are to configure in the scenario I mentioned where it says
configure
1. HQ to
Hi Ryan:
I did a test similar to yours, and i think is a limitation of CCM, if
anybody has another explanation, correct me if I am wrong.
Regards,
Jose
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
Hi Vik,
Let me explain my lab setup before you review the config. Due to
equipment limitation, the transcoder for HQ resides on the GK (I got no
6500) and during my trouble shooting process, I also added transcoder on the
GK (register back to itself) to see if it can resolve the problem.
For Campus QOS. If you configure a port on the 3550:
int fa0/1
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 100
switchport voice vlan 200
spanning-tree portfast
Does the mls qos trust cos still apply since it isnt a dot1q port. COS is
a 802.1q header. Or would you need to change it to mls
Vik can you shed some light on a access-list question... I see in some
examples that you match any any on the source port and not the destination
port when you are matching on the ingress of a FA (whether it be a
switchport a phone is connected to or a FA on a router).
Below is the access-list i
On a FA port w/ a 1q4t rx port type, I noticed that 'set port qos x/y
trust trust-cos' is needed to enable the rx drop thresholds.
hq-sw (enable) show qos info run 4/25
...
Queue and Threshold Mapping for 1q4t (rx):
All packets are mapped to a single queue.
Rx drop thresholds:
Rx drop thresholds
Hey Ryan,
I have not had any problems launching the BLS on my Macbook Pro
running OSX 10.5.6 Maybe try unzipping the IPexpert_MacOSX.app file
again.
Hope that helps,
Amp
Quoting Ryan Hicks ryanhicks0...@yahoo.com:
Has any one had any luck with the IPExpert voice BLS launching on
Mac OS
Hi Vik,
For SRST voice mail follow the CTI route point solution it, but till I am
facing the redirect number problem. THE CTI debug is paste below, could you
please let me know your suggestion please
Best is solution to upgrade the IOS in home lab ?
HQ#
*Jan 11 04:14:13.417: ISDN Se0/3/0:23
Ryan,
I think that as long as you have the mls qos dscp mapping in place (cos
to dscp), it shouldn't matter which you trust. The EF / CoS 5 data should
be treated the same.
Can anyone confirm / deny?
_
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
I have the same problem in IOS 12.13 and later, could please let me know the
workaround for this.
--- On Tue, 13/1/09, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote:
From: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unity and SRST wired problem , not the classic
bug question!
To:
I had that problem at graded labs and at home. Therefore, I have firstly not
mentioned it, but I will try again configuring everything in my way on PL and
give you an update.
Ryan, which license version do you have installed? On Graded Labs it was the
standard version.
Regards
54 matches
Mail list logo
