Hello all
After completing lab 2 of volume 2 Gatekeeper section I found the following
behaviour when testing call hold between phones registered to CUCM and CME
respectively:
By saying successful I mean the ability to place call on hold and resume
Calls from CUCM phones bound for CME phones placed
I would expect this - it's not a rocket science. Possibly another issue
thanks to VMware - I was wondering if anyone seen this also.
thanks,
kobel
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, wolfsrudel wrote:
> i've tested this today and works fine, all call are first delivered to
> the first agent.
>
> O
Hi:
You need software mtp from ios not from ucm, make sure that ios mtp are
configured and registered, to be sure that mtp is working verify it with sh
sccp or from ucm.
Once you have ios mtp registered add a mrg and include all ucm software mtp and
cnf, then do not include this mrg to
Hi:
Wich vmware version do you have installed?
I'm working with esxi and I've never seen this
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:28:32 +0200
From: findko...@gmail.com
To: wolfsru...@gmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX CSQ hunting order issue
I woul
VMWare ESXi 4.0.0
UCCX 7.0(1)_Build168
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Angel Perez wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Wich vmware version do you have installed?
>
> I'm working with esxi and I've never seen this
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading
Same here...
Some weird things that can cause issues similar to yours:
did you check that ccx was in-service state?
did you check dbreplication at ucm? -> utils dbreplication repair all
did you try to resynch jtapi?
did you reset axl/cti services at ucm?
did you installed ccx from c
I live here in the RTP area but have decided to take the lab in San
Jose. Here are my reasons:
1. Later Start Time
2. Longer Lunch
3. Better Weather
4. Just have a gut feeling about SJC
Amp
Quoting Jeff Garvas :
I heard that the West coast facility starts later, so someone east of that
loca
@Amp
So you choose a lab location based on lunch?
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Amp wrote:
> I live here in the RTP area but have decided to take the lab in San Jose.
> Here are my reasons:
>
> 1. Later Start Time
> 2. Longer Lunch
> 3. Better Weather
> 4. Just have a gut feeling about SJC
>
Guys
Dubai also have one right ???
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:50 PM, ccie voice wrote:
> @Amp
>
> So you choose a lab location based on lunch?
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Amp wrote:
>>
>> I live here in the RTP area but have decided to take the lab in San Jose.
>> Here are my reasons:
>
Yes sure,
Now Dubai is available
Regards,
Mouhammad
> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:01:22 +0530
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations
> From: lakpr...@gmail.com
> To: cci...@gmail.com
> CC: amccar...@cciequest.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com;
> engnasse...@hot
The better one is the one in wich you pass :)
From: engnasse...@hotmail.com
To: lakpr...@gmail.com; cci...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:33:48 +0300
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations
Yes sure,
Now Dubai is available
Reg
This!
RTP start time is 7:15 Eastern, while San Jose is 8:00.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Angel Perez wrote:
> The better one is the one in wich you pass :)
>
> --
> From: engnasse...@hotmail.com
> To: lakpr...@gmail.com; cci...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 20
I wouldn't think it would be required unless explicitly stated to do
so. If your phones go into SRST-mode, they will still use the dial rule
configured under CUCM since it is downloaded to the phone itself.
*Matthew Berry*
/A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/
*_Vitals:_*
No not based on lunch. With the longer lunch time I will be able to
have some time to think about what I have completed, what I need to
complete, and if I need to change anything that I have done.
Quoting ccie voice :
@Amp
So you choose a lab location based on lunch?
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010
How long is lunch at RTP or at San Jose?
Wilson
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:01 AM
To: ccie voice
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Mouhammad Nasser
Subje
Congrats ! Great job done.
From: Moataz Mamdouh
> Date: Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed CCIE Voice ( # 26129 )
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
>
> Dears
>
> Thanks for everyone who replied on my mail , much appreciated .
>
> During my CCIE study journe
Quick question.
In the lab, if the HQ site is setup with two sub-interfaces that connect
to BR1 and BR2 (i.e. meaning, they're both running off the same
interface), how would you configure MLP for one site and FRF.12 for
another site?
According to my understanding, MLP will require that "fra
The only way is to have separate interfaces, however you can use FRTS
for both sites.
On 06/10/2010 03:35 PM, Matthew Berry wrote:
Quick question.
In the lab, if the HQ site is setup with two sub-interfaces that
connect to BR1 and BR2 (i.e. meaning, they're both running off the
same interf
So FRTS for both sides is allowed. However, FRF.12 and MLP can only
exist on separate physical interfaces?
*Matthew Berry*
/A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/
*_Vitals:_*
*GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044
*Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
*Skype*: ciscovoiceguru
*Twitter*: cis
Hi Matthew,
Volume 2 Lab 1 Question 5.3 covers this scenario. If one of the
sub-interfaces uses FRTS, you'll indeed have to use FRTS on both - but
this does not preclude using FRF.12.
The proctor guide has a good explanation.
cheers, sd
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie
With FRF.12 you could shape in the policy-map. However you could also
use FRTS (frame-relay map-class) too
Since the lab have a single physical interface at HQ for two PVCs to
BR1/BR2, and you used MLP LFI between HQ/BR2 which required FRTS which is
enabled on the PHYSICAL interface, you must al
Hi:
Your mixing traffic shapping with link fragmentation and interleaving
The first one (frame relay traffic shapping or cb traffic shapping) limits the
amount of bandwith that you send to a link for example to avoid service
provider policing to this traffic.
The second one is a lin
I've not seen Dubai added to CCIE Voice, I know it offers other tracks but
not voice. Has this announcement been made?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mouhammad
Nasser
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:34 PM
To: lakpr...@gm
dubai is here!
Dubai Voice Seat Registration Opened
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/thread/11326
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Rogers Ochieng wrote:
> I’ve not seen Dubai added to CCIE Voice, I know it offers other tracks but
> not voice. Has this announcement been made?
>
>
>
> From: ccie_
Hello,
In vol 2 lab 6 UCCX task 10.2 there is a requirement to provide reporting
based on options choosen by callers.
I.e. a caller is presented with a menu of options (press 0 for operator,
press 1 for directory, etc) and may choose a digit to proceed - the customer
should be able to check which
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone had purchased an E1/T1 simulator such as an Adtran
Atlas 550 for their home labs? If so, can you advise which models and modules
you have purchased?
>From what I can see this would be cheaper than using another 2800 to terminate
>the offices...
Thanks for your ass
Wow! That's great news! I'm in Kenya and the closest I had was India,
previously Brussels.
-Original Message-
From: wolfsrudel [mailto:wolfsru...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:47 PM
To: r.ochi...@mfient.com
Cc: Mouhammad Nasser; lakpr...@gmail.com; cci...@gmail.com;
ccie_voic
Hello Angel
Thanks a lot for this it has worked by configuring IOS MTP.
May I ask you if call transfers worked fine for you as well?
In my setup call transfers are not working properly. If for instance I send
a call from a CME phone to a CUCM phone then press transfer, the CME phone
remains on
28 matches
Mail list logo
