;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Scott Monasmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; John
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Sent: Tue Apr 08 20:27:48 2008
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
>
> Except there are a fairly number of CC
CTED]>
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Tue Apr 08 20:27:48 2008
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
Except there are a fairly number of CCIE's who are or were Cisco Employees.
Cisco employees get at least three attempts to take the lab at no cost e
voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
I second Scott on his opinion. Just think... on the average, it takes 4
attempts to pass and each attempt cost about $1400. And how many CCIE there
are in the world
te: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:39:54 -0500From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL |
> CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
> John,
>
> I respect your response to this post, but I can't
> help but feel like I am being tested
: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:39:54 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
John,
I respect your response to this post, but I can't help but feel like I am being
tested more on semantics then I am on technically ab
Monasmith
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 1:40 PM
To: John
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
John,
I respect your response to this post, but I can't help but feel like I
am being tested more on semantics then I am on techn
day
just because of that interacting and ability to defend what you have done.
John.
From: Erik Goppel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 1:49 PM
To: John
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
John,
i fully agree with both of
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 12:40 PM
To: John
Cc: Erik Goppel; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
John,
I respect your response to this post, but I can't help but feel like I am
being tested more on semanti
; working it may not be the correct solution given the specific (and
> oftentimes subtle) requirements of the question.
>
>
>
> John.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Erik Goppel
> *Sent:* Monday, April 07, 2008 1:
April 07, 2008 1:40 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
The thing is, that the testscripts they run (as far as i`ve heard and
experienced) only test some basic but major behaviour.
And if the main parts are successfull, they wi
M, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > So you are saying that all of the questions in a section are
> > > inter-related
> > > > > and depends on each other for full points? So if i failed one
> question
> > > > > that's critical for the test
Thanks for the info. That makes total sense to me.
JD
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:40:21 +0200From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
The thing is, that the testscripts they run (as far as i`ve heard and
experienced) only test some
; > > > So you are saying that all of the questions in a section are
> > > inter-related
> > > > > and depends on each other for full points? So if i failed one
> > question
> > > > > that's critical for the test success of the other quest
gt; > though
> > > > i get all other questions correctly, i still failed because i didn't
> get
> > > > first question correctly. Now that makes sense. And i thought they
> > award
> > > > points based on each correct question regardless of how you answer
> othe
> first question correctly. Now that makes sense. And i thought they
> award
> > > points based on each correct question regardless of how you answer other
> > > questions.
> > >
> > > JD
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __
ions.
> >
> > JD
> >
> >
> >
> > ____
> > Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:35:57 +0200
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First
they award
> points based on each correct question regardless of how you answer other
> questions.
>
> JD
>
>
>
>
> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:35:57 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
>
> Subjec
3:05:21 -0500
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >
>
> > Yeah, as I thought:
> >
> > "Reevalua
lab exam and its
grading process? JD
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:44:46 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
Here is an excerpt from the report card.
"Your
uestions about the lab exam and its grading process?
>
>
> JD
>
>
> --
> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:44:46 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Subject: Re: [O
5 Apr 2008 13:44:46 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First
Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
Here is an excerpt from the report card.
"Your CCIE Certification Lab exam was scored based on grading policies th
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:57:39 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Devildoc, I do feel your frustration. I finished my last attempt in a
little over 5 hours an
But who does the re-evaluating of the score? The same proctor or a different
proctor?
JD> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:05:21 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECT
That seems to me like Cisco can careless about their customer support. We are
their customers. We spend lots of money to get certified, so the least they
can do is providing us with feedback. If there are multiple ways to implement
a solution, then how do we know which way to implement if we
rly. Even then, i don't know
if i would get points for it, so i rather concentrate my time on other sections
and just leave the scripting alone.
JD> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 10:56:34 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Fail
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jason sung
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 2:45 PM
To: Scott Monasmith
Cc: CCIE Voice Online Study List; Devildoc
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] First Failed Attempt at CCIE LAb
Here is an excerpt from the report card.
"Your CCIE Certification Lab ex
Here is an excerpt from the report card.
"Your CCIE Certification Lab exam was scored based on grading policies that
are adhered to uniformly by our proctors worldwide. Marking was based on
whether the answer you provided works. Candidates are not required to use a
set methodology in achieving a c
They told me the reason why they don't hold the voice exams is because they
would take up a lot more storage (hard drives/images of 3 servers, router
configs, etc.) vs. just backing up a few config files from a router/switch
to a text file for the R&S lab.
Sorry.
On 4/5/08, Jonathan Charles <[EM
Yeah, you are right... holy crap...
Due to the equipment used, rereads are not available for the Voice and
Storage Networking exams.
Jonathan
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What?!?!?
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Scott M
What?!?!?
Jonathan
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Scott Monasmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct. BUT not available for voice though, Jonathon.
>
>
>
>
> On 4/5/08, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, as I thought:
> >
> > "Reevaluation of Results
> >
> > If you are conc
Correct. BUT not available for voice though, Jonathon.
On 4/5/08, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, as I thought:
>
> "Reevaluation of Results
>
> If you are concerned your results are in error, you may request a
> "reread" until 14 days after your lab date via an email to
> [E
Yeah, as I thought:
"Reevaluation of Results
If you are concerned your results are in error, you may request a
"reread" until 14 days after your lab date via an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Each reread costs $250.00 USD and consists of a
proctor loading your configurations into a rack to recreate t
There is a rescore option... isn't there? There was for the R&S...
Jonathan
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Scott Monasmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Devildoc, I do feel your frustration. I finished my last attempt in a little
> over 5 hours and spent the next 3 hours verifying my work. I wa
Devildoc, I do feel your frustration. I finished my last attempt in a little
over 5 hours and spent the next 3 hours verifying my work. I walked out of
the exam feeling like I nailed it. However, based on my score report, it
reflected a score of about 74-76 points. There were 3 sections where the
s
I ran into the same problem with the R&S lab... there might be 3 or 4
ways to do something, but only one of them gets you points... not sure
if this is the same thing on the CCIE Voice lab... but I would bet it
is.
No idea on how they grade the test.
But I think a lot has to do with how you use t
Hello All,
I just had my first attempt at the Voice CCIE lab last week, and of course, i
failed. I knew right away after the lab that i failed. The reason why I
failed was not due to the lack of or inadequate amount of knowledge that I
possessed but rather the lack of time. I was so nervous
36 matches
Mail list logo
