there are/were even more prolific candidates
Best, BR
*From:*George Sheldrick
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 4, 2018 16:17
*To:* b...@hofkristallamt.org; ccp4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
*Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Dear Bernhard,
I agree with you sentiments, but was wondering which 'poor Russian
.UK; b...@hofkristallamt.org
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Hi Bernhard,
While I do not disagree with anything you have said,. Your results are based on
the assumption of a 40-hour work week and one-month vacation in a year.
I don't know about now but back then Russian scienti
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Bernhard Rupp
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 1:30 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
I was just fascinated by the math: 800 x 3 = 2400, and given a
work year of 1600 hrs this makes for 1.5 papers
: George Sheldrick
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 16:17
To: b...@hofkristallamt.org; ccp4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Dear Bernhard,
I agree with you sentiments, but was wondering which 'poor Russian small
molecule crystallographer' you had in mind?
Yuri
of your article on ScienceDirect. No
sign up, registration or fees are required – they can simply click and
read”
*From:* CCP4 bulletin board *On Behalf Of
*Patrick Shaw Stewart
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 4, 2018 12:59
*To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
*Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
”
From: CCP4 bulletin board On Behalf Of Patrick Shaw
Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 12:59
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Bernhard, did you know that Researchgate is a controversial organization? They
have been criticised for encouraging
Bernhard, did you know that Researchgate is a controversial organization?
They have been criticised for encouraging users to upload copyrighted
material, see below. Their business model also seems to involve charging a
high fee to spam their users - we tried it once but decided we were just
AI researchers are boycotting Nature journals:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/05/why-are-ai-researchers-boycotting-new-nature-journal-and-shunning-others
May be there is something we can in our field?
2018-07-02 10:01 GMT+03:00 George Sheldrick :
> Since neither I nor my university can
Since neither I nor my university can afford Elsevier journals, I have
no access to papers published in them. In view of their excessive
profits, for some years I have not submitted papers to them and have
declined all requests to referee for them. If everyone did that, they
might reconsider
: Sunday, July 1, 2018 7:13:44 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Jacob,
This is a known thing in other circles - see e.g.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.6590
"Extending ArXiv.org<http://ArXiv.org> to Achieve Open Peer Review and
Publishing
y to this message and follow
> with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the
> future.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Hughes,
> Jon
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2018 6:1
6:13 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
great idea! 2 hours at €200 per hour makes €1000 - sounds like an eminently
reasonable starting point for negotiations. if the publishers don't like our
price, they can
] [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
great idea! 2 hours at €200 per hour makes €1000 - sounds like an eminently
reasonable starting point for negotiations. if the publishers don't like our
price, they can do the reviewing themselves - and after a while no one will
bother to buy the resulting rubbish
IL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
great idea! 2 hours at €200 per hour makes €1000 - sounds like an eminently
reasonable starting point for negotiations. if the publishers don't like our
price, they can do the reviewing th
: [ccp4bb] [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
The one I don't get is why not pay reviewers? $1000 per review? If you look at
publishers' profit margins, you will see that they can afford it. I actually
think the scientific community should go on a "review strike" until reviewers
get
sure grant money continues to flow
in.
F.
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Hughes, Jon
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2018 12:12:50 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
great idea! 2 hours at €200 per hour m
: [ccp4bb] [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
The one I don't get is why not pay reviewers? $1000 per review? If you look at
publishers' profit margins, you will see that they can afford it. I actually
think the scientific community should go on a "review strike" until reviewers
get
not occur in the future.
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Petr
Leiman
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 4:47 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Indeed! Scientists in the Soviet Blo
h some capitalists need to add a few
> lines to their balance sheets
> best, jon
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Robbie
> Joosten
> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2018 13:42
> An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Robbie
Joosten
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juni 2018 13:42
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Yes, but think of all the money they miss due to your pirating of their paper
ten'; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: RE: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
>
> Agreed, but for 10 years old papers this seems a bit of overkill
>
>
>
> From: CCP4 bulletin board On Behalf Of Robbie
> Joosten
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 12:11
> To: CCP4BB@JIS
Agreed, but for 10 years old papers this seems a bit of overkill..
From: CCP4 bulletin board On Behalf Of Robbie
Joosten
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 12:11
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Were they open access papers? If they were, than OUP is being
: [ccp4bb] Oxford University Press
Hi Fellows,
just an advisory that Oxford University Press is pretty aggressive in
enforcing copyright - I had to remove 2 Bioinformatics papers
from ResearchGate.
Fortunately, authors have choices, too
Cheers, BR
Hi Fellows,
just an advisory that Oxford University Press is pretty aggressive in
enforcing copyright - I had to remove 2 Bioinformatics papers
from ResearchGate.
Fortunately, authors have choices, too..
Cheers, BR
--
Bernhard
24 matches
Mail list logo
