If you want a different box or boards, feel free to contact me off list.
Where are you located?
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 8/30/2017 5:53 AM, Pete Turnbull via cctech wrote:
>
>> On 30/08/2017 05:29, Douglas Taylor via cctalk
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>> From: Jerry Weiss
>
>> The processor will probably halt due to non-existent memory address.
>
> No, it'll take a NXM trap (through 4); what happens then depends on what the
> trap handler is set to -
On 30/08/2017 17:02, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
On 8/30/2017 5:53 AM, Pete Turnbull via cctech wrote:
Hope this helps...
Yes, it does help. There are 3 issues that I am trying to resolve:
1. Running in 32kb of memory. If I use the 32kb MXV11 can I run RT11
V5.3?
If it works in
On 8/30/2017 5:53 AM, Pete Turnbull via cctech wrote:
On 30/08/2017 05:29, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
I'll send along a picture of the rear of the back plane. I'm getting
the impression I can't do what I want with the old cpu cards, M7270
and M7264.
I had really hoped to be able to put
> From: Jerry Weiss
> The processor will probably halt due to non-existent memory address.
No, it'll take a NXM trap (through 4); what happens then depends on what the
trap handler is set to - if anything.
> However, a P entered in ODT will attempt to continue the bootstrap.
See
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 8:04 AM, Jerry Weiss wrote:
>
>>
>> Next you'd need some sort of bootstrap. What's in the custom EPROMs on you
>> MXV11-AC might do. Or might not, depending on whether it uses any 11/23
>> (KDF-11) specific instructions or diagnostics, and includes an
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 4:53 AM, Pete Turnbull via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 30/08/2017 05:29, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
>> I'll send along a picture of the rear of the back plane. I'm getting
>> the impression I can't do what I want with the old cpu cards, M7270
>>
On 30/08/2017 05:29, Douglas Taylor via cctalk wrote:
I'll send along a picture of the rear of the back plane. I'm getting
the impression I can't do what I want with the old cpu cards, M7270
and M7264.
I had really hoped to be able to put together a simple system to
demonstrate the
On 8/30/2017 12:10 AM, Ethan Dicks wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk
wrote:
I have a BA11-M box with a backplane that I am sure has been upgraded to be
22 bit addressing.
If you send me a picture of the backplane part of the box (without
On 8/29/2017 11:43 PM, Jerry Weiss via cctalk wrote:
On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:52 PM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk
wrote:
I have a BA11-M box with a backplane that I am sure has been upgraded to be 22
bit addressing.
When I got this box it had an 11/23 Dual width Cpu,
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk
wrote:
> I have a BA11-M box with a backplane that I am sure has been upgraded to be
> 22 bit addressing.
If you send me a picture of the backplane part of the box (without the
outer shroud), I might be able to
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:52 PM, Douglas Taylor via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> I have a BA11-M box with a backplane that I am sure has been upgraded to be
> 22 bit addressing.
>
> When I got this box it had an 11/23 Dual width Cpu, MXV11-AC with custom boot
> ROMs and a 256KB
I have the DEC cards, but I think that box had a 4 x 4 backplane and came
with 16 bit addressing (M7264) and could be upgraded to 18. I'm out of
town so I can't really check. You might need a BA11-N, S, or BA23 box to
support the Emulex controller.
The Q-bus backplanes can be confusing and I
I have a BA11-M box with a backplane that I am sure has been upgraded to
be 22 bit addressing.
When I got this box it had an 11/23 Dual width Cpu, MXV11-AC with custom
boot ROMs and a 256KB MSV11-P memory board. The memory in the MXV11 had
been disabled so I suspect the backplane was
14 matches
Mail list logo