sammy the bull gravano (sp?)
tw
On 12/2/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nice. I wonder how many caught the reference?
>
> On 12/2/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > *Points to sammy*
> > On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I need a definition on 'th
> Paul wrote:
> That particular article just seemed to me to be so far off base in so many
One other thing here, any idea how many Europeans support staying in
Iraq vs. pulling out? Breaking out Britain would be interesting too.
It's just that every time I'm in Europe and meet strangers I get t
Well... Because you asked so nicely. :)
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 9:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Strawberry Milk (WAS: Kudos to Sam)
Why can't it be both again?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jillian Kos
> Dana wrote:
> I agree with you, not that this will surprise many people.
It's an impressive refutation to be sure, but the real win is the
patience to read that drivel which amounted to blah blah blah Bush may
be Jesus Blah blah blah.
> Paul wrote:
> wish we could do is in our own country
>
Step #1? Yeah ...
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Mes
> Dana wrote:
> but... if they did that there's not telling WHO might get elected!
>
And thus the problem of getting involved with nation building in the
first place.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer
Why can't it be both again?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jillian Koskie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4:18 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Strawberry Milk (WAS: Kudos to Sam)
>
> Are you really faulting me? Or crediting me?
>
> >:)
> >
> >Yes, I think i
Yeah should work well in that run for school board
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4:59 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Strawberry Milk (WAS: Kudos to Sam)
>
> I hope my mom google's me someday and finds all this
I dunno, the megaphone thing is a toss up.
They both had the same idea at the same time.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 5:26 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Last night's apprentice (SPOILERS)
>
> I love the sh
On 12/2/05, Paul Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 03 December 2005 02:39
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: REAL news from Iraq
> >
> > ::blink::
> >
> > but... if they did that there's not telling WHO might get e
wish we could do is in our own country
On 12/2/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> 1.) Get rid of dictator.
> 2.) Restore peace.
> 3.) Foment local democracies.
> 4.) Form national parties from local groups.
> 5.) Hold national elections.
~~
I agree with you, not that this will surprise many people. Lest we seem a
mutual admiration society, I will leave it at that. The article is
unfortunately not unusual, but I thoroughly enjoyed seeing it so well
refuted.
And the accent was nice too :)
Dana
On 12/2/05, Paul Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECT
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 December 2005 02:39
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: REAL news from Iraq
>
> ::blink::
>
> but... if they did that there's not telling WHO might get elected!
>
ROFLMAO
~~~
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 December 2005 00:41
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: fun weekend reading
>
> I missed the original post but that's an impressive
> refutation, thank you. I have developed a sort of left-handed
> affection for Sam be
::blink::
but... if they did that there's not telling WHO might get elected!
On 12/2/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sam wrote:
> > How about "You're free, now choose your leader." Shocking it must be
> > to be able to vote without the risk of death.
> >
>
> Yeah, that's one of t
> RoMunn wrote:
> so I find it more than a little ironic that you see no problem with it.
> That argument is over, we won. See 1990-1991. Communism blows chunks.
>
I'm not saying that *I* would favor it, I'm saying it's presumptuous
to think everyone feels as we do. Again, I happen to know a coup
> Jeffry wrote:
> I love the show, although I consider it a game not a job interview.
>
You have no idea how real this show is! The show basically mimics
what it's like to work for a Big 3 management consulting firm
(McKinsey, Bain, BCG).
People are hired in as a "class" and they work cases th
*kiss* danka
On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure... for you.
>
> > Can't it be both??
> >
> > *Adorable smile*
> >
> > On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am undecided as to whether thatis the most romantic thing anybody
> > has ever said to me...
> Ray wrote:
> I am so happy to see that it's down to Randall and Rebecca. They were
> the best the whole time, and I think that The Donald is going pick
> Rebecca. A woman hasn't won yet, IIRC.
Randall is kind of a jerkoff though - he relies on his nice suits and
the same small psych tricks to
> Sam wrote:
> How about "You're free, now choose your leader." Shocking it must be
> to be able to vote without the risk of death.
>
Yeah, that's one of those demagogic things you're always hearing from
the President. It's worth crap.
As I said before there are a lot of East Germans, and probab
I missed the original post but that's an impressive refutation, thank you. I
have developed a sort of left-handed affection for Sam because he does
process information well when he tries -- the problem is the stuff he feeds
his brain imho.
It's a shame we don't hear from you more often. I found th
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 December 2005 22:32
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: fun weekend reading
Ok, I'll bite. I don't comment on this subject very often but this article
is supreme in its inaccuracies, as it blithely repaints world history in a
my favorite are the dicknuts that are still bellied up to the same
bar we bellied up to when were twenty fucking one. now that
we are 32, isnt it time to leave the pool hall and find some normalcy?
sad part is... that is their normalcy.
tw
On 12/2/05, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
jillian is just a flirt in a tease outfit.
:) ive seen her kind before.
tw
On 12/2/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry, didn't realize your mother passed.
>
> Google sure is expanding :)
>
> On 12/2/05, Ray Champagne wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
certainly no job interview as he asked the one dude about him being gay
and then trump went on to ask him almost as if it was the first gay man he
had ever talked to "So, you mean to tell me you are not attracted to these
beautiful women here, the women sitting next to you?"
and i was like, dude,
tsk :) you know what I mean... that bargain might not be such a bargain if
you have to decontaminate it ;)
Dana
On 12/2/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's an idea. I've always thought about starting a crack house,
> personally. This looks like a possible opportunity.
>
> On 12/
How about "You're free, now choose your leader." Shocking it must be
to be able to vote without the risk of death.
On 12/2/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> No, because the people have empowered the police to carry guns to
> enforce publicly enacted law.
>
> The broader point it's ill-advised to oust an exi
It's an idea. I've always thought about starting a crack house,
personally. This looks like a possible opportunity.
On 12/2/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just wondering. We apparently had a little epidemic of labs in New Mexico so
> it's something I wonder about when I consider rehabbing s
Wait, worse than stuff we see at work?
On 12/2/05, Jason Lemahieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I cannot believe was how TERRIBLE those two chicks' movie thing was. It
> was THE worst thing I have ever seen.
>
> 'Just enter your username and password...' huh? what??? stfu
>
> I was lookin
> Sam wrote:
> So if local police carry guns does it mean we're not really free?
>
No, because the people have empowered the police to carry guns to
enforce publicly enacted law.
The broader point it's ill-advised to oust an existing gov't (that's
been around for multiple generations) by gunpoint
nice. I wonder how many caught the reference?
On 12/2/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> *Points to sammy*
> On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I need a definition on 'the bull'.
> >
> > >Jillian i'll fight the bull for you..
> > >
> > >whatever the F that
> Dana wrote:
> I think he really means they don't have to go together, not that they can't.
> But I'll let him speak for himself.
>
Yeah, that's it - thanks for the correction.
~|
Protect Your PC from viruses, hackers, spam and
On 12/2/05, Ken Ketsdever wrote:
> I am saying that you are being condescending stating that "only anti-war
> folks are smart enough etc..". As if they are a small minority of
> egotistical folks who think they are smarter than the majority etc...
I would never imply all anti-war people think t
front page must have changed -- that's something about the NDP leader (?)
On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/index.html
>
> >http://www.vermontguardian.com/dailies/122005/1202.shtml
> >
> >
> >
> >http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/
we don't live in singapore
>Precisely why the law needs to go far beyond that: ban all public use of
>cell phones, anywhere and everywhere. A ringing cell phone is a $25 fine.
>Talking on a cell phone in public is a $100 fine. The phone is confiscated
>and destroyed.
>
just wondering. We apparently had a little epidemic of labs in New Mexico so
it's something I wonder about when I consider rehabbing something.
On 12/2/05, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No meth - as in the drug. Just copious amounts of human secretions.
>
> I have a feeling that
http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/12/2/131222.shtml
President Bush is Winning World War IV
Martin L. Gross
Friday, Dec. 2, 2005
There is no doubt President Bush is now a captive of the press, which
loudly proclaims he "is on the ropes."
Katrina was supposedly mishandled; his choice of Har
No meth - as in the drug. Just copious amounts of human secretions.
I have a feeling that the daughters are being charged with elder abuse or
neglect. Mom was in really bad shape.
On 12/2/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> why did they take the daughters away? If meth was involved you might
I agree. Personally.
On 12/2/05, Chris Stoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I understand this, but was guilty of it myself simply because the teacher
> is
> usually teaching to the lowest common denominator (i.e. dumb-asses). So
> for
> those who are reasonably computer savvy (those of us on thi
I love the show, although I consider it a game not a job interview.
I'm not surprised that Randall and Rebecca are the top 2; I think they've
both shined throughout.
Rebecca stood by that woman 1 week; Loyalty is good. The next week she
made a hard business decision and turned on her (so
I'm sorry, didn't realize your mother passed.
Google sure is expanding :)
On 12/2/05, Ray Champagne wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www
Are you really faulting me? Or crediting me?
>:)
>
>Yes, I think it's Jillian's fault. Temptress that she is. :)
>
>Nick McClure wrote:
>>
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100
Sure... for you.
> Can't it be both??
>
> *Adorable smile*
>
> On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am undecided as to whether thatis the most romantic thing anybody
> has ever said to me... or the creepiest.
> >
> > >Well if it would win me jillians heartCome here fr
why did they take the daughters away? If meth was involved you might
actually need that hazmat suit
On 12/2/05, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So far it appears the taxes have been paid in years past. We'll see if
> they
> get paid this year. The thought is that the state will
close? I think the word you are looking for is wallowing...
On 12/2/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, is it just me or has this list been getting closer and closer to the
> gutter in the last couple of months?
>
> Not complaining, just checking
>
> > -Original Message-
>
So far it appears the taxes have been paid in years past. We'll see if they
get paid this year. The thought is that the state will take the house and
sell it to pay for the mom's care, if she's still alive. I'm sure they're
not going to let her go back home.
Of course, even if they sold it for unp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam wrote:
> What's her email?
>
> On 12/2/05, Ray Champagne wrote:
>
>>I hope my mom google's me someday and finds all this stuff out about me.
>> She'd be so proud.
>>
>
>
>
~|
Discover CFTicket - The l
What's her email?
On 12/2/05, Ray Champagne wrote:
> I hope my mom google's me someday and finds all this stuff out about me.
> She'd be so proud.
>
~|
Purchase Dreamweaver with Homesite Plus from House of Fusion, a Macromedia
Yes, I am talking to myself... with a subject line like that, who could
resist? Did want to add that it will proabably go for unpaid taxes before
that.
On 12/2/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> if your use of the property is open and notorious -- ie you cut the grass
> -- there is a case to
if your use of the property is open and notorious -- ie you cut the grass --
there is a case to be made yes.
On 12/2/05, Dawson, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Google "Abandoned Property" or "Eminent Domain".
>
> As previously mentioned, it might not apply to you.
>
> M!ke
>
> -Origina
I hope my mom google's me someday and finds all this stuff out about me.
She'd be so proud.
Nick McClure wrote:
> Right then, Thanks Cum dumpster!
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4:55 PM
>>To: CF-Community
>>Su
Right then, Thanks Cum dumpster!
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4:55 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Strawberry Milk (WAS: Kudos to Sam)
>
> Fuck off.
>
~~~
:)
Yes, I think it's Jillian's fault. Temptress that she is. :)
Nick McClure wrote:
> So, is it just me or has this list been getting closer and closer to the
> gutter in the last couple of months?
>
> Not complaining, just checking
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Bill Wheatley [mai
Fuck off.
Nick McClure wrote:
> So, is it just me or has this list been getting closer and closer to the
> gutter in the last couple of months?
>
> Not complaining, just checking
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4
So, is it just me or has this list been getting closer and closer to the
gutter in the last couple of months?
Not complaining, just checking
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4:41 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Str
Can't it be both??
*Adorable smile*
On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am undecided as to whether thatis the most romantic thing anybody has ever
> said to me... or the creepiest.
>
> >Well if it would win me jillians heartCome here frank
> >
>
>
I am undecided as to whether thatis the most romantic thing anybody has ever
said to me... or the creepiest.
>Well if it would win me jillians heartCome here frank
>
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk an
I understand this, but was guilty of it myself simply because the teacher is
usually teaching to the lowest common denominator (i.e. dumb-asses). So for
those who are reasonably computer savvy (those of us on this list) computer
courses tended to be slow moving at times. Had I not been able to do
Well if it would win me jillians heartCome here frank
On 12/2/05, Dawson, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't "Fight the bull for you" mean that
> you will gladly take it up the ass by an ugly lesbian, named Frank, with
> a huge strap-on dildo?
>
> I hop
Thats a shame. I hope i never get so unable to take care of myself
that my house turns into a nasty place like that.
On 12/2/05, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, since the topic came up, I decided it was finally time to post my
> crazy neighbor story. I have these crazy neighbo
Personally I think that people should have to learn some simple
etiquette before they are sold computers, cellphones or cars. It's
not the fact that cellphones exist that is the problem, it's the fact
that people do not know how and when to use them.
In my classes I'm constantly telling people to
Loitering law. It was on the books from 1997-2002. When its sunset
came in 2002 there was a push to make it permanent but Bauman vetoed
it.
On 12/2/05, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They did? How'd I miss that?
>
> On 12/2/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > A few
They did? How'd I miss that?
On 12/2/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A few years ago they passed a law that you can be arrested in Madison
> just for standing on the street.
>
> On 12/2/05, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.vermontguardian.com/dailies/122005/1202.shtm
Google "Abandoned Property" or "Eminent Domain".
As previously mentioned, it might not apply to you.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:17 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: anal leakage and government conspiracy in
I should say just standing around in public. I didn't mean standing in
the street itself.
On 12/2/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few years ago they passed a law that you can be arrested in Madison
> just for standing on the street.
A few years ago they passed a law that you can be arrested in Madison
just for standing on the street.
On 12/2/05, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.vermontguardian.com/dailies/122005/1202.shtml
>
>
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/11/28/D8E5RPBO5.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
~
http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/index.html
>http://www.vermontguardian.com/dailies/122005/1202.shtml
>
>
>
>http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/11/28/D8E5RPBO5.html
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help De
http://www.vermontguardian.com/dailies/122005/1202.shtml
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/11/28/D8E5RPBO5.html
~|
Find out how to get a fax number that sends and receives faxes using your
current email address
http://w
But without heads there would be no ears with which to hear it.
>Think of how blissfully quiet a headless city would be.
>
>> Dude, you've spent too much time in Kansas. If that were the law around
>> here, we'd be a headless city
>>
~
Think of how blissfully quiet a headless city would be.
> Dude, you've spent too much time in Kansas. If that were the law around
> here, we'd be a headless city
>
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's
Sell before it hits the papers.
jk :)
On 12/2/05, Deanna Schneider wrote:
> Seriously? Cause the neighbors already been doing the lawn and we've been
> doing the sidewalk.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's cust
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Third offense results in a beheading.
YEAH! CHOP THEM DOMES RIGHT THE FUCK OFF!
w00t!
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www
-100
sorry.
On 12/2/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Precisely why the law needs to go far beyond that: ban all public use of
> cell phones, anywhere and everywhere. A ringing cell phone is a $25 fine.
> Talking on a cell phone in public is a $100 fine. The phone is confiscated
> and destroyed
Not in WI, no.
On 12/2/05, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seriously? Cause the neighbors already been doing the lawn and we've been
> doing the sidewalk.
>
> On 12/2/05, Dawson, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well, all you have to do is mow the yard for seven years. The
Awesome law, would make me want to go out and get a cell phone. I'm married
so I haven't had a good beheading in a long time.
On 12/2/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Third offense results in a beheading.
>
~|
Find out how
Seriously? Cause the neighbors already been doing the lawn and we've been
doing the sidewalk.
On 12/2/05, Dawson, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, all you have to do is mow the yard for seven years. Then, by law,
> you will become the owner of the property. But you can't clean the pe
But if there is an accident don't they get a ticket, and are considered at
fault because of that.
> -Original Message-
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 3:07 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: learn to drive
>
> NY has had a law against dri
*Points to sammy*
On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need a definition on 'the bull'.
>
> >Jillian i'll fight the bull for you..
> >
> >whatever the F that means :)
> >*crosses fingers hoping sam is right*
> >
> >
> >
> >On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Dude, you've spent too much time in Kansas. If that were the law around
here, we'd be a headless city
G wrote:
> Precisely why the law needs to go far beyond that: ban all public use of
> cell phones, anywhere and everywhere. A ringing cell phone is a $25 fine.
> Talking on a cell phone in
Precisely why the law needs to go far beyond that: ban all public use of
cell phones, anywhere and everywhere. A ringing cell phone is a $25 fine.
Talking on a cell phone in public is a $100 fine. The phone is confiscated
and destroyed.
Third offense results in a beheading.
> NY has had a law
NY has had a law against driving while talking on a hand-held cell phone for
well over a year now...nothing has changed. There are still the same number of
idiots using cell phones and swerving all over the place.
--- On Friday, December 02, 2005 2:22 PM, Ray Champagne scribed: ---
>
> They're
It was a joke, dude. Napoleon is famous for saying things like "I've done that
like a hundred times already"
I'm not trying to dredge up an more rhetoric :)
--- On Friday, December 02, 2005 2:10 PM, Sam scribed: ---
>
> Didn't see it.
>
> Do you really want me to argue my support for the war
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't "Fight the bull for you" mean that
you will gladly take it up the ass by an ugly lesbian, named Frank, with
a huge strap-on dildo?
I hope I'm wrong...
-Original Message-
From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:0
There, there. You're pretty, and geeky, and pretty geeky.
--Ben
Jillian Koskie wrote:
> Now I'm not a trophy... so I'm not pretty and geeky?
>
>>*snugs* heh nah you're no trophy
~|
Protect your mail server with built in anti-
I need a definition on 'the bull'.
>Jillian i'll fight the bull for you..
>
>whatever the F that means :)
>*crosses fingers hoping sam is right*
>
>
>
>On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Oh... I'm a geek. Too geeky maybe.
>>
>> >where have you been? being a geek is the
Bill Wheatley wrote:
> Well you can talk just make sure you keep it geeky. Or you would lose
> your trophy tech geek status.
An atrophied trophy? A trophy atrophying?
AAAH! head go 'splodey.
--Ben
~|
Find out how CFTicket can
Jillian i'll fight the bull for you..
whatever the F that means :)
*crosses fingers hoping sam is right*
On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh... I'm a geek. Too geeky maybe.
>
> >where have you been? being a geek is the new cool thing!
>
>
~
Well, all you have to do is mow the yard for seven years. Then, by law,
you will become the owner of the property. But you can't clean the pee
for seven years, either.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 1:46 PM
To:
Just tell her you'd fight the bull for her!
On 12/2/05, Bill Wheatley wrote:
> Err when i said nah you're no trophy i didn't mean you couldn't make a
> good trophy just that you would be more then a trophy :)
>
> Shit i need writers.. then i wouldnt put my foot in my mouth all the time.
>
~~~
Oh... I'm a geek. Too geeky maybe.
>where have you been? being a geek is the new cool thing!
~|
Purchase Studio MX from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and
support the CF community.
http://www.houseoffusion.
where have you been? being a geek is the new cool thing!
Jillian Koskie wrote:
> Now I'm not a trophy... so I'm not pretty and geeky?
>
>
>>Yea trophy. You just have to see there and look pretty and wave
>>technical gadgets around like an ipod or something. And i can go yes
>>shes mine..shes my
NSFW - but those of who haven't seen the infamous tubgirl, I have found her.
http://www.bakudai.com/tubgirl.jpg
Don't eat anything before looking.
cheers, and happy friday!
Bill Wheatley wrote:
> Well thank dana for this topic. She had to push the envelope . :)
>
> She knows what shes a woman.
Mirror, signal, then look... that is what I was taught. Worked for me for
the last 15 years.
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 11:42 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: learn to drive
So they signaled then looked, or they looked
Now I'm not a trophy... so I'm not pretty and geeky?
>Yea trophy. You just have to see there and look pretty and wave
>technical gadgets around like an ipod or something. And i can go yes
>shes mine..shes my tech geek heh.
>
>Well you can talk just make sure you keep it geeky. Or you would lose
>y
and bill goes ten steps back with that one everybody...
welcome bill to the nike in the jaws club.
dude, trophy is good = she's hot.
not a trophy means she's just a slug.
dude.
On 12/2/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *snugs* heh nah you're no trophy
>
>
> On 12/2/05, Jillian Kos
Err when i said nah you're no trophy i didn't mean you couldn't make a
good trophy just that you would be more then a trophy :)
Shit i need writers.. then i wouldnt put my foot in my mouth all the time.
On 12/2/05, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yea trophy. You just have to see there
Okay, since the topic came up, I decided it was finally time to post my
crazy neighbor story. I have these crazy neighbors, see. Well, I did,
anyway. Up until about a year ago, I was sure only 2 people lived there -
mom (elderly) and daughter (developmentally disabled). Eventually another
neighbor
Yea trophy. You just have to see there and look pretty and wave
technical gadgets around like an ipod or something. And i can go yes
shes mine..shes my tech geek heh.
Well you can talk just make sure you keep it geeky. Or you would lose
your trophy tech geek status.
*snugs* heh nah you're no trop
Probably neither
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:42 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: learn to drive
So they signaled then looked, or they looked then signaled?
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael T. Tangorre [ma
Well thank dana for this topic. She had to push the envelope . :)
She knows what shes a woman...all you woman know EXACTly what happens
when you do anything.
On 12/2/05, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> stay away from the olestra woman.
> depends work.
>
> tw
>
>
> On 12/2/05, Jillian Koskie <[E
1 - 100 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
