On 2/23/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could I possibly disagree with this sentiment more?
>
> "We have to maintain a principle that it doesn't matter where in the
> world one of these purchases is coming from," Rice said Wednesday.
>
> So, no problem if Libya buys it? Or Syria? Or
On 2/22/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so.
>
> Gunmen strike 27 Baghdad mosques, kill imams
>
> Great day in Baghdad. Why stop at 27 though?
Is this the American equivalent to running into the street and
shooting guns in the air? I just wondered if you were burning an Iraqi
flag while typi
my primary exposure to interaction between "liberals" and "fundamentalists" is
in the context of homeschooling, but I find it is a little more complicated
than that. Blind hostility against Christians such as Larry occasionally
expresses is rather rare, and tends to focus on specific behavors se
ROFL well said
>Liberals on the other hand, will typically be in favor of these kinds of
>pursuits. But be careful. If your critical thinking brings you to a
>conclusion that differs from theirssuddenly you are an ignorant
>demogague!
>
>The smug liberal can be almost as annoying as the re
um. I seem to remember a thread in which you were refusing to read your own
links... if that's critical thinking, I'll eat my laptop.
Dana
>Nice try, but in this case I think I'm on firm ground. Its not liberal
>groups that are agitating against those programs that promote critical
>thinking ski
checking what ID's? We're talking about about managing the ports, right? The
ones that are a security threat right now?
>What makes you think they get carte blanche? The people checking the IDs
>are still Americans working for the federal government.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dana
Yeah, I'm thinking there was a context issue there.
It of course must be approved by the DOD, Homeland Security and the
like.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:38 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: More info on th
What makes you think they get carte blanche? The people checking the IDs
are still Americans working for the federal government.
> -Original Message-
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:12 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush's First V
But he can't say that unless he is prepared to ask congress to pull the
contracts from any other foreign company along these lines.
This isn't the only one. I think there are ports on the web coast
managed by another foreign company.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/23/wirq23.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/02/23/ixportaltop.html
and so it begins...
Dana
>so.
>
>Gunmen strike 27 Baghdad mosques, kill imams
>
>Great day in Baghdad. Why stop at 27 though?
>
>There could be a sportsbook in the UK or somewhe
I started to say I agree with you, or at least it should be limited to
allies... but theoretically the UAE and Saudi Arabia are allies, huh ;) Very
theoretically, but in the realm of theory where this administration operates.
It's probably going to be difficult to differentiate between allies an
> gMoney wrote:
> this is greatand let me add that this is just basic common sense. The
> more we are paying attention too, the less attention we are paying to each.
>
I dunno. I've had to start driving a 27 mile commute so I got a car
with a super cool feature: bluetooth. It makes the car's
Then it should be an easy decision for anyone reading the two opinions
and wants to decide for themselves.
On 2/22/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Except that one opinion is based on a false premise that is not supported in
> history.
>
>
> > might be a solution.
> >
> >> in that
How about turning it around. If Iran attacks Israel, Israel will
counter-attack and turn the entire middle east into glass slag. The oil
fields of the middle east into giant burning pits of oil which will burn for
the next few hundred years. Can you say instant ice age.
So is it in America's bes
Except that one opinion is based on a false premise that is not supported in
history.
> might be a solution.
>
>> in that case i would say that the scholoarly thing to do is to say
>> that there are two opinions about the matter and cite the references
>> for each one. then the individuals can d
wow... what else needs to be said after that?
> Israel can't let that happen because an Iranian bomb means the end of
> Israel. The U.S. will protect Israel's right to exist, and that will
> mean bombing the hell out of Iran, so we might as well get to it.
~~
If they are requiring the sorts of access to information and personnel that
is mentioned in the other article, I can see it being allowed. They have
asked for far more access to internal and usually confidential/business
rated information than normal.
I still don't support the decision to let a
That's a relief. Perhaps it is not terribly accessible to me, because I am
still not sure I understand it, but ok... I'll take your word for it.
>It was not a suggestion (at least not on my part) that the answer lay
>in some Hollywood-style solution. Rather that while it would seem that
>the ans
saw it on google news earlier today. feel free to look up up.
>When did this happen?
>
>Why did this happen?
>
>Links?
>
>>
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197902
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.c
US and Canadian too? I had seen something about the Australian warnings, not
the others though.
I can (just barely) see Mush's position, but I think it's really dumb. How can
you require someone like me to show a picture ID to get into the FBI
headquarters here, but the UAE gets carte blanche
might be a solution.
> in that case i would say that the scholoarly thing to do is to say
> that there are two opinions about the matter and cite the references
> for each one. then the individuals can decide for themselves...
Dis you submit a challenge? I have seen these on US political topics and on the
Venezualan articles...
> I was looking through Wikipedia for some terms to point out on the
> various "Muslims is good people" threads. Terms like Dhimmi and Hudna.
> We'll ignore those for now and get to what upset
I'll agree that the situation is quite unclear, and likely to become ugly. And
we have stuck our troops into this. Jaysus.
> The situation is totally opaque to us. Who really bombed the Golden
> Dome? Was it Sunnis? Al Qaeda? Syrians? Iranian agents? They
> apparently have some guys in custody,
Boy are *you* naive. How do you account for the fact that we went *in* when
there was no fighting? Oh yeah, freedom... that's right everyone in Iraq is
now *much* better off. It's amazing what this administration can do with a few
definitions. We don't have a torture problem because, by defi
Could I possibly disagree with this sentiment more?
"We have to maintain a principle that it doesn't matter where in the
world one of these purchases is coming from," Rice said Wednesday.
So, no problem if Libya buys it? Or Syria? Or Somalia? North Korea?
I hope to God she was misquoted.
On 2
http://tinyurl.com/qd2l2
Looks like the various departments had been working on specifics for the
deal for sometime.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197895
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_li
I would fear more the idea of Syria and Iran seeing a joint purpose in
supporting general insurrection within Iraq. Yes they are on different
sides on a micro level, but higher up they are all Muslim Nationalists
right? Say they decide to split Iraq between them, seems like a nice prize
huh?
> -
So that's reptile, lizard and other stuff tastes like chicken.
On 2/22/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/060222_chicken_teeth.html
>
>
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/li
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/37314
On 2/22/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And as I said, a scholarly fight. I have history on my side and someone
> removed my edits because he says the source contradicts what I say. His
> source is controversial and is not know for histo
Oh don't worry, Google will resist all government attempts to get at your data.
Unless you live in China- then you're screwed.
>Jesus christ.
>
>Throw that together with the governments request for access to googles
>records huh?
>
>>
http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/060222_chicken_teeth.html
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197890
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusi
Props to you if go. I wonder what's going to happen. The Russian were clearly
disappointed by the outcome of their talks with Iran, and I think they have
finally come around to our way of thinking, that Iran is hell-bent on getting
the bomb and that just can't be allowed.
I always like to reme
An interesting sidenote:
On Lou Dobbs (I think), it was just pointed out that although the UAE
has been an ally since 1971, there are consular warnings to be aware
that terrorism is a threat in-country. This is from the US, Canadian,
British and Australian embasses (among others).
So although the
The situation is totally opaque to us. Who really bombed the Golden Dome? Was
it Sunnis? Al Qaeda? Syrians? Iranian agents? They apparently have some guys in
custody, but who knows if they are the guys who carried out the original
bombing. It doesn't make sense for the Sunnis to have done it, be
> Weegs wrote:
> Gunmen strike 27 Baghdad mosques, kill imams
> Great day in Baghdad. Why stop at 27 though?
>
The more mosques you attack, the more mosques people will expect you
to attack. You have to set the bar a little low so you can out-do
yourself the next time.
~
> Jerry wrote:
> Because, like any other bid process in the US, it was as much about
> who you know as what you bid. The British company, from what I have
> read, had good connections (read lobbying firms), had a decent bid,
> and a good track record.
>
This just seems like one of THE DUMBEST thin
so.
Gunmen strike 27 Baghdad mosques, kill imams
Great day in Baghdad. Why stop at 27 though?
There could be a sportsbook in the UK or somewhere
that might take action on 28 or so tomorrow.
wtf.
~|
Message: http://www.houseof
Because, like any other bid process in the US, it was as much about
who you know as what you bid. The British company, from what I have
read, had good connections (read lobbying firms), had a decent bid,
and a good track record.
Also, from what I have read, the UAE company is a great company and
h
Then why didn't they get the contract on these?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:54 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush's First Veto?
>
> From what I have read, there are many American companies with the
> ab
Maybe, but then again, maybe not.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Bush's First Veto?
>
> So what are they actually acquiring?
>
> The management of the ports correct? You don'
OK, but the workers at the place must still fulfill the qualification
required to work in the US.
If management wants to do something of course they will. However best I
can tell, UAE is more interested in money and trade power the Islamic
extremism.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry J
in that case i would say that the scholoarly thing to do is to say that there
are two opinions about the matter and cite the references for each one. then
the individuals can decide for themselves...
>And as I said, a scholarly fight. I have history on my side and someone
>removed my edits beca
Security by the Coast Guard and the TSA assumes that the management is
working WITH them, not against them.
If, by some happenstance, persons hostile to the US were put in charge
of significant portions of the port management, then they could very
easily bring in huge amounts of things detrimental
Security is still handled by TSA and the Coast Guard, that won't change.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:59 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Bush's First Veto?
>
> Running it securely? With the same intensity as
Running it securely? With the same intensity as someone who is from this
country?
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:55 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush's First Veto?
>
> Something to consider is they may
Something to consider is they may well be much, much better at running
a port than a US company. From what I understand, the asian shipping
companies own the market because they do so much more shipping than
everyone else.
On 2/22/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what are they actuall
If my friend told me he was giving my keys to another person, I would
take my keys back. I would try to find someone else to hold them. If I
couldn't, I'd keep the keys myself.
If it is a security risk, it does not matter that there are only 3
foriegn companies that can do it. Security is job 1. W
So what are they actually acquiring?
The management of the ports correct? You don't think they are going to
bring in different people at varying levels? Change management practices?
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006
But the port it self is government owned, the land, the equipment, that is
owned by the US.
The people that work there are Americans, and pay taxes in the US.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:37 PM
> To: CF-Community
>
And as I said, a scholarly fight. I have history on my side and someone
removed my edits because he says the source contradicts what I say. His
source is controversial and is not know for historical accuracy, but it's
the source used so the fight is on. This is the overwhelming weakness of
wiki
Let it close. A week later someone will buy it.
At a minimum a coalition of the people that rely on these ports would come
together to buy it.
It's called capitalism.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:26 PM
> To:
Haven't done this in 2 weeks ...
Feb 5-11
5: Off
6: 3 miles running, .5 walking
7: 3 miles running, .5 walking
8: Off
9: 3 miles running, .5 walking
10: Off
11: 3 miles running, .5 walking
Feb 12-18
-
12: off
13: off
14: 1.5 miles running, .5 walking
15: 2 miles running, .5 walk
OK, but when your childhood best friend is sold you key to this other guy
what do you do?
Sure you can change your locks, but you can't give a new key to your best
friend because he is just going to sell it again.
You have the choice between UAE, Singapore, and maybe two other companies,
none of
But if no company in America wants to run it, then what do you do?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:13 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Bush's First Veto?
>
> I would go further and say that this is vital infrastru
My favorite lines ever:
Sandy: Hey, Patrick? Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?
Patrick: (looks at his watch) Not until four.
I still haven't seen the movie -- that's from one of the GF's daughter's
videos.
--Ben
Tim Heald wrote:
> The Sponge Bob movie.
>
> Isn't telecommuting gr
I fixed it and it was changed back to the false reading by someone else. I
fixed it again and entered a comment on the discussion page. I'll probably
be changed back again and I'll do it again. The issue is scholarship vs.
some position that someone is trying to push forward that has no historic
For all of Jimmy Carter's strengths as an ex-president, national
security is not what I remember him for.
No, it is so easy to throw out a word like racism, and expect everyone
on the recieving end to turn into a quivering mass of apologies. Not
going to happen.
This is not racial. It has element
So how do we then deal with the nuclear showdown that Iran is forcing upon
us right now?
Far as I can see we have 2 large military forces in countries on their
borders (Iraq and Afghanistan). Looks like we have a pretty good situation
should an invasion be needed.
If Syria steps out of line too
So you would sit on the sidelines and do nothing, or simply protest peacefully?
In a free, peaceful country that's fine, but when you are faced with an enemy
that will kill you for no other reason than who you are, that's a good way to
get dead real fast.
As to moral relativism, child molester
The Sponge Bob movie.
Isn't telecommuting great?
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:00 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Nothing Political In This Thread
>
> Now Playing: Marilyn Manson - I Want To Disappear "Me
Who was that man? I'd like to shake his hand! He made my baby fall in
love with me.
Yeeeaaahh.
--Ben
Jillian Koskie wrote:
> I'm gonna guess the same person who put the dip in the dip da dip da dip?
>
>> I'm confused.
>> Who put the bop in the bop she wop she wop
I am thinking in more state-actor terms, specifically Syria and Iran. The
reason we aren't currently stomping the guts out of Syria and Iran is that we
have a large military force deployed in theater and they are potentially
vulnerable to WMD attacks. Since both of these countries possess WMD, o
I'm gonna guess the same person who put the dip in the dip da dip da dip?
>I'm confused.
>Who put the bop in the bop she wop she wop?
>
>Michael Dinowitz wrote:
>>
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:1978
You can fix it.
They also have version control so you can see who changed it.
On 2/22/06, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> I was looking through Wikipedia for some terms to point out on the various
> "Muslims is good people" threads. Terms like Dhimmi and Hudna. We'll ignore
> those for now and get to
Is it Halloween yet?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jillian Koskie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Nothing Political In This Thread
>
> Sure, if you like.
>
> >Pig tails?
> >
> >>I have decided once and for all that n
Only if we know there's a problem. And then there are the back and forth
fights like in the early days of the ColdFusion entry about adding or
removing Bluedragon or resources.
As for these studies, I'd like to know which ones as I've heard much lower
numbers in Slashdot a month or two ago.
>
Now Playing: Marilyn Manson - I Want To Disappear "Mechanical Animals"
On 2/22/06, Jillian Koskie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> uhm... err...
>
> piercings. sex. food.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:19
The process is run by a group known as CFIUS.
http://www.treasury.gov/offices/international-affairs/exon-florio/
Here is a little more info on it.
> -Original Message-
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 1:53 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject
I'm confused.
Who put the bop in the bop she wop she wop?
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> Ramalama Ding Dong by Showaddywaddy
>
>
>> Baw widdi baw bi daw bi dang a dang diggy with the diggy jump the diggy
>> to up jump the boogie.
>>
>> I paraphrase, of course.
>>
>> --Ben
>>
>> Jillian Koskie wrote:
This scene involves a bottle of lube, a ball gag, and my friend here,
Ralph the Wonder Llama. Don't worry -- he's worked in film before.
Jerry Johnson wrote:
> Ben, Ben, Ben.
>
> The women with fake breasts AND scripts are out of your league.
>
> You need to find one with just the breasts. The
Yes. That is true. Oh wait...
On 2/22/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have we gone so far as to say everything is relative and nothing is true
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197850
I have heard of studies that say Wikipedia is statistically about as accurate
as an encyclopedia- somewhere around 97% accuracy. While that is pretty good,
it still means there is 3% inaccuracy.
The good thing about Wikipedia is that informed people like yourself can fix
the inaccuracies.
> F
Like Black Rob, WOAH!
tw
On 2/22/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm. About that girls of CF calendar
>
>
> > Sure, if you like.
> >
> >>Pig tails?
> >>
> >>>I have decided once and for all that next Halloween I am going to be a
> >>>cheerleader and I will take pictures for y
> Full Metal Jacket is not Hollywood? I am asking. Otherwise I am not sure why
> you're
> confused?
I am confused because you seem to be suggesting that what we're saying
in using FMJ as an example is 'blow everything up' as that's the
*Hollywood way.*
The lines were quoted to illustrate a point
Hm. About that girls of CF calendar
> Sure, if you like.
>
>>Pig tails?
>>
>>>I have decided once and for all that next Halloween I am going to be a
>>>cheerleader and I will take pictures for you all.
>>>
Cheerleader outfits!
Bad jokes!
Bad jokes about cheerleader outfits!
>
I was looking through Wikipedia for some terms to point out on the various
"Muslims is good people" threads. Terms like Dhimmi and Hudna. We'll ignore
those for now and get to what upset me. In the Dhimmi entry where it's speaking
about the treatment of non-Muslims in Muslim lands, someone made
Sure, if you like.
>Pig tails?
>
>>I have decided once and for all that next Halloween I am going to be a
>>cheerleader and I will take pictures for you all.
>>
>>>Cheerleader outfits!
>>>Bad jokes!
>>>Bad jokes about cheerleader outfits!
>>>
>>>--Ben
Pig tails?
>I have decided once and for all that next Halloween I am going to be a
>cheerleader and I will take pictures for you all.
>
>>Cheerleader outfits!
>>Bad jokes!
>>Bad jokes about cheerleader outfits!
>>
>>--Ben
>
>
~
Are you sure, Micheal? 'Cause I have some pictures around here
somewhere under the cracker crumbs...
On 2/22/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All three and the obligatory TPIWWP. :)
>
>
> > uhm... err...
> >
> > piercings. sex. food.
~~
An iraqi civil war is a stated aim of Al Qaeda. So yeah, i wouldn't be
surprised at all if this was them.
>I heard al Qaeda did this to provoke a civil war. Looks like it might work.
>
> On 2/22/06, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>> Not only inevitable, but that is what we have been standing in the
>> midd
pierced nugget? chicken nugget?
>Umm the first two sound fun.
>
>How about:
>
>piercings. sex. nugget.
>
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197840
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.
I have decided once and for all that next Halloween I am going to be a
cheerleader and I will take pictures for you all.
>Cheerleader outfits!
>Bad jokes!
>Bad jokes about cheerleader outfits!
>
>--Ben
~|
Message: http://www.hou
I have decided once and for all that next Halloween I am going to be a
cheerleader and I will take pictures for you all.
>Cheerleader outfits!
>Bad jokes!
>Bad jokes about cheerleader outfits!
>
>--Ben
~|
Message: http://www.hou
American companies can't afford to do it because of union costs.
On 2/22/06, Nick McClure wrote:
> But the London company got the contract via a public bid.
>
> The congress would have to remove the contract from the British company,
> which would in essence prevent the sale to the UAE, as the UAE
Ben, Ben, Ben.
The women with fake breasts AND scripts are out of your league.
You need to find one with just the breasts. Then bring your own script.
On 2/22/06, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean besides the fact that they sing about corn bread?
>
> But I was thinking less about th
I get so many arguments over that one.
Everyone insists that is Granmaster Flash and the Furious Five, but it
is Melle Mel doing that singing, man.
On 2/22/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't touch me cause I'm close to the edge..
I heard al Qaeda did this to provoke a civil war. Looks like it might work.
On 2/22/06, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> Not only inevitable, but that is what we have been standing in the
> middle of for a while now. Unfortunately, our leaders are just
> starting to come to that conclusion.
>
~
> Groups such as FOF and similar groups are amoung the motivating groups
> for conservatives.
I would counter that they (FoF) are among the most motivated of
conservatives. Which says something about the more moderate
conservatives as much as it does about the liberals.
My parents are both conser
All three and the obligatory TPIWWP. :)
> uhm... err...
>
> piercings. sex. food.
>
>
>>How can you say that Sugar Hill is unpolitical?
>>And Jillian there quoting from the start of every Nascar race.
>>
>>Try again.
>
>
~|
Mes
Ramalama Ding Dong by Showaddywaddy
> Baw widdi baw bi daw bi dang a dang diggy with the diggy jump the diggy
> to up jump the boogie.
>
> I paraphrase, of course.
>
> --Ben
>
> Jillian Koskie wrote:
>> Boogity.
>>
>> *** *** ***
>>
>> That's all I have to say.
>>
>>
>
>
~~~
My name is Been Dm!
--Been
Tim Heald wrote:
> I always knew you were a redneck rocker.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> But I was thinking less about that and more about packin' up
>> my bags and heading out West, where real
But the London company got the contract via a public bid.
The congress would have to remove the contract from the British company,
which would in essence prevent the sale to the UAE, as the UAE wouldn't want
to buy a company without the American ports as part of the deal.
But the US would then ha
I always knew you were a redneck rocker.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:30 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Nothing Political In This Thread
>
> You mean besides the fact that they sing about corn bread?
>
> But
Umm the first two sound fun.
How about:
piercings. sex. nugget.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jillian Koskie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:29 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Nothing Political In This Thread
>
> uhm... err...
>
> piercings. sex. f
Cheerleader outfits!
Bad jokes!
Bad jokes about cheerleader outfits!
--Ben
Jillian Koskie wrote:
> uhm... err...
>
> piercings. sex. food.
>
>
>> How can you say that Sugar Hill is unpolitical?
>> And Jillian there quoting from the start of every Nascar race.
>>
>> Try again.
>
>
~~
Well, no congress doesn't have to prove anything, but then you are dealing
with racism.
Hell even Jimmy Carter said it wasn't a problem.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:10 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush
Ah, yes. I sit corrected.
Jillian Koskie wrote:
> I believe you mean... Bawitdaba!
>
>> Baw widdi baw bi daw bi dang a dang diggy with the diggy jump the diggy
>> to up jump the boogie.
>>
>> I paraphrase, of course.
>>
>> --Ben
>>
>> Jillian Koskie wrote:
>>> Boogity.
>>>
>>> *** *** ***
>>>
>
You mean besides the fact that they sing about corn bread?
But I was thinking less about that and more about packin' up my bags and
heading out West, where real women com equipped with scripts and fake
breasts.
--Ben
Jerry Johnson wrote:
> How can you say that Sugar Hill is unpolitical?
> And
Not only inevitable, but that is what we have been standing in the
middle of for a while now. Unfortunately, our leaders are just
starting to come to that conclusion.
On 2/22/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Retaliatory attacks are occurring on Sunni shrines.
>
> Is a civil war all but inevitabl
Why the mention of the people then, when that is always used to represent an
individual right?
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:24 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anti Bush sentiment here
>
> I do support th
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
