On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Who do you think did it?
> I'm going to guess you'll say Bush did it.
>
>
Clinton didn't do it...
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them kn
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I agree that peer reviewed data is good, but made up shit works as well when
> needed
>
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the
I agree that peer reviewed incontrovertible data is better. Merely
reflecting that some solid science cannot in fact be proven, and the
inclusion of hypotheses does not invalidate a set of conclusions
necessarily.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> But it is still importa
Who do you think did it?
I'm going to guess you'll say Bush did it.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> AND if you receive John McCain's this will make you laugh, because it's
> those "democrats" that raise our deficit to 12.4 trillion to begin with, um
> NOT!
>
> Our nati
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> ...if voters feel the money was wasted, those currently in office
> (everyone, not just one side of the aisle or the other) should be
> concerned in the upcoming elections.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/25/poll.stimulus.money/ind
Start with the 50 million hungry people in Africa
When you're done, if you ask nice, I'll give you more.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> not good enough sam, you're still parroting talking points.
>
> Lets put it this way. In your analysis what are the specific point
not good enough sam, you're still parroting talking points.
Lets put it this way. In your analysis what are the specific points.
Please support these with direct quotes from teh IPCC reports and
cross referenced by journal articles that support your points.
Otherwise its just your bloviating and
Here you go:
http://catallaxyfiles.com/2010/01/22/ipcc-and-peer-review/
We also know from the climategate emails that the data and models the
report uses was "modified" to hide the decline :)
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I'm referring to page number and paragraph s
Mores the pity.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I'll be here all week
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the laugh Sam, I needed it.
>>
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion c
I'll be here all week
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Thanks for the laugh Sam, I needed it.
>
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion
Who do you think bought Obama the election?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Given the recent SOCUS ruling on election ads all bets are off as far
> as i see. The massive impact of direct advertising by corporations
> will just overwhelm anything else.
>
> On Mon, Jan
Thanks for the laugh Sam, I needed it.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Trillions of dollars in spending and then taking over 1/6th of the
> economy by passing bills in the middle of the night, making deals in
> closed room sessions and totally blocking any Republican discussions
Trillions of dollars in spending and then taking over 1/6th of the
economy by passing bills in the middle of the night, making deals in
closed room sessions and totally blocking any Republican discussions.
The Republicans got things done without a super majority because they
were for the good of
Given the recent SOCUS ruling on election ads all bets are off as far
as i see. The massive impact of direct advertising by corporations
will just overwhelm anything else.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Anti-incumbent mood seems to be the order of the day, though it is
I'm referring to page number and paragraph sections of the report itself.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> specifics please and just don't quote your bloviators. Otherwise how
> else do we know you're not just blowing it out your ass.
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:10 PM,
specifics please and just don't quote your bloviators. Otherwise how
else do we know you're not just blowing it out your ass.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> They used fake models.
> Modified temperature readings.
> Blocked dissent.
> Phony Glacier data and phony Africa drought r
Runaway government? The problem is that voters gave Democrats the
White House and super-majorities in both houses of Congress and they
didn't do much of anything with them. The total opposite of runaway
government. Obama and Democrats haven't used their power and they are
being punished for being
> Runaway government has been stopped.
Not yet it hasn't - it's bounced off a bumper but hasn't stopped yet.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
In Mass we saw independents stopping the party that ignored the voters
and passed bills nobody wants except the lobbyists.
Runaway government has been stopped.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Anti-incumbent mood seems to be the order of the day, though it is
> rather
They used fake models.
Modified temperature readings.
Blocked dissent.
Phony Glacier data and phony Africa drought reports.
Why are you still supporting this?
BTW, it was in the summary.
Same standard? When politicians constantly lie to me I turn against
them. So yes.
Not so with you. You're l
What I don't understand is critics of the stimulus plan have no viable
alternatives.
But this has been said at the start of Obama's term, that he would pay
for inheriting the biggest economic
crisis facing the world and having to find some way out of it.
~
multiple times. Perhaps in your mind. But other than the
misrepresentation of the Himalayan data, what other prevarications are
you talking about. At he most 1 page out of 3000. What other errors?
You still have not answered my question, are you willing to apply the
same standard to the things yo
Anti-incumbent mood seems to be the order of the day, though it is
rather too early to know what's going to happen in November. Both
parties, and definitely Congress, have very poor favorable/unfavorable
ratings right now.
People who voted for Democrats in the last election want to see the
majori
We caught them lying multiple times in this report. Now we're supposed
to believe it's all true except what ever else is found to be a lie?
The boy that cried wolf ring a bell?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> so by your logic then anything published by the journal Na
Thank you for the article Robert, I had not seen it and I seem to be
wrong that it was an inadvertent mistake on the part of the people
including it in the IPCC report. I appreciate that.
See, recognizing that you were wrong about something and admitting it
isn't the difficult.
Now, how about th
> ...if voters feel the money was wasted, those currently in office
> (everyone, not just one side of the aisle or the other) should be
> concerned in the upcoming elections.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/25/poll.stimulus.money/index.html
Traditionally - false.
That said, the recent el
so by your logic then anything published by the journal Nature or
Science is automatically invalid because once there were some invalid
data published in that data.
In other words that's thorough crap. All it does is invalidate the
Himalayan data, it does not change one whit the data involving th
Nice fail Judah
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> That's not true, and it goes to the heart of why I have objected to the
> "science" from the start. They specifically put the glacier claim in to
> influence policy, and that admission taints everything the IPCC has done:
>
That's not true, and it goes to the heart of why I have objected to the
"science" from the start. They specifically put the glacier claim in to
influence policy, and that admission taints everything the IPCC has done:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1245636/Glacier-scientists-says-knew-da
No one involved said it was put in the IPCC as a known lie nor was it
an attempt to influence politicians. It didn't even make it into any
of the summary documents for decision makers. Nice fail there Sam.
Judah
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Dude, the guy said he put it in the
Hmmm, so tell me Mr Scientist, do you agree with the IPCC report
knowingly putting false info in the report so the stupid politicians
would react?
Didn't Gore pull the same stunt about Manhattan being 20ft under water
in five years?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I
Dude, the guy said he put it in the IPCC even though it was a lie to
influence politions. That and climate gate emails tell me it's all
political.
You, like Rather, claim I know the report is all faked but I feel it's
all true anyway.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> A
...if voters feel the money was wasted, those currently in office
(everyone, not just one side of the aisle or the other) should be
concerned in the upcoming elections.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/25/poll.stimulus.money/index.html
--
Scott Stroz
---
The DOM is retarded.
htt
I'd love to see Sam apply the same standards when it comes to things
he agrees with. Then again if wishes were cars all beggars would be
driving Rolls-Royces.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Ah, so one mistake invalidates an entire project? I'm sure that the
> people y
Ah, so one mistake invalidates an entire project? I'm sure that the
people you work for are happy to know that they don't have to pay you
if anyone finds a bug in your code.
Judah
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I'm going to call that the Dan Rather defends.
>
> On Sun, Jan 24,
dude. thats effin GREAT
that song is fun... i wish i could see pink punch jessica simpson
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Looks like fun. You should indeed be proud. You have very beautiful girls.
> As a father of two girls I thought I was going to have it tough when
Do you have the firewall opened up to allow connections to the SQL Server from
outside the local network?
>For local connections use [local] as the server name if you chose the
>default instance name on install, otherwise, use the
>[computername/instance]
>
>
>>
~
>
> Really? At times the US Education system surprises.
>
Who said anything about the US education system?
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
A
Looks like fun. You should indeed be proud. You have very beautiful girls.
As a father of two girls I thought I was going to have it tough when they
hit the tweens/teens. You sir are in for it even more! God Speed.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com
Really? At times the US Education system surprises.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> And one of the very few who knows who he is. kudos.
>>
> Really. We covered him in highschool.
>
>
>
~|
Want to reach th
>
> And one of the very few who knows who he is. kudos.
>
Really. We covered him in highschool.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
ht
I hear both of you on remote development.
Traditionally I have preferred to have a mirror of the production site locally.
Regardless of how fast my connection is, I have always had a better
experience managing stuff locally than on the remote.I find the lag to
be annoying, and this may be because
>
> So what do you do when you're on vacation in the boonies and the
> messenger pigeon comes with that "the world will collapse in on itself
> if program X isn't doing Y by Z time"?
>
This is a little hard to follow. If what you're asking is what I think the
answer is that "I'm on vacation. Sorr
What error do you get? What does the IIS logging say? What does the
certificate look like? Send me some screenshots of your IIS manager and cert
off-list.
msmall - at@@ - microsoft.com
>Http and https doesn't work. http in iis is up because I get the
>iisstart.htm page since it's the onl
I'm going to call that the Dan Rather defends.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> The claim that Himalayan glaciers would be all gone by 2035 was not
> supported by the evidence at hand. The claim should not have made it
> into the IPCC report. Everyone, as far as I'm awar
And proud you should be, however they seem to not know the words of the
song.
Either way, congrats it was good to watch and well produced :-)
-Original Message-
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 25 January 2010 11:07 PM
To: cf-community
Subject
A couple of weeks back I had said that I wanted to do more videos of the
girlswe'll, while Momma was away scrapbooking, we were busy producing a
music video :)
Warning: This is just a proud parent's showcasing of his daughters. If that
doesn't interest you, don't click :)
http://www.yout
Http and https doesn't work. http in iis is up because I get the
iisstart.htm page since it's the only thing that exists but all exchange
sites are out, exadmin, exchange, public, etc. SSL cert isn't an issue since
it was renewed last week and that is what broke the sites. I'm not sure
about the
48 matches
Mail list logo
