We lost a tree. But the storm, 3 centers in a row, including the one that
devastated Tuscaloosa, went right over and past us. The center was just a
few miles south of us in Suches, GA. It was an EXHAUSTING night. Between
pacing and watching the updates and watching the storm, including watching
th
Yeah, I've been racing around trying to figure out who needs to sign up now
and who can wait. I think there's only a few companies left that need to be
moved.
I stopped hosting email on my servers a while ago. Simply NOT worth the
headache. Get thee in the cloud and LIKE IT!
On Thu, Apr 28, 201
And waiting...
Better call the wife
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Sam wrote:
> Still waiting...
>
> .
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=hou
Yeah...after he unnecessarily slapped her. I would have knocked the shit
out of him if he did that to me.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:grussg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:23 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: IHOP Cop Punches Lady in the face
Eric Roberts
Sam wrote:
>
> The secrecy of not releasing the long form under the guise of it being
> a law despite the fact that it's long been ignored. The fact that they
> now have to deny everyone the ability to receive the long form to
> protect Obama.
Have you informed the Hawaiian officials who made th
Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> An officer is not allowed to use excessive force. Remember the whole Rodney
> King thing?
>
Which is typically defined as the cop striking a suspect who is not
fighting back. The lady in the tape was striking the officer
Still waiting...
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Sam wrote:
> Hello?
> Are you going to defend yourself or just point to your little bitches
> approval :P
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Sam wrote:
>> Let's try again
>>
>> You say $30b
>>
>> 80% of Exxon's earnings are from out side
That's very small of you but expected.
The secrecy of not releasing the long form under the guise of it being
a law despite the fact that it's long been ignored. The fact that they
now have to deny everyone the ability to receive the long form to
protect Obama. Why did he wait three years if he h
What secrecy? I suspect you're all about anything that denigrates
those you disagree with, even if you know it's not true.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> He was born in Hawaii
>
> I'm all about the secrecy.
>
> .
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> Just t
What secrecy?
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 07:48 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
He was born in Hawaii
I'm all about the secrecy.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Maureen wrot
He was born in Hawaii
I'm all about the secrecy.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, is it your opinion that Barack Obama was not born in
> Hawaii and that the birth certificate released by the White House is a
> forgery?
>
~~
An officer is not allowed to use excessive force. Remember the whole Rodney
King thing?
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:grussg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 04:54 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: IHOP Cop Punches Lady in the face
Maureen wrote:
>
> Disagree a
That might be a California thing...but not in every state. In most it is
not
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 04:28 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: IHOP Cop Punches Lady in the face
Disagree all you want. I can site the law
Who says?
shout, or
> even talk to a cop.
>
> You're not allowed to be involved in any way. They can arrest you
> (and do) even for making jokes:
They can arrest you for all kinds of things, even made up things. It
doesn't mean they are right.
~~
Just to clarify, is it your opinion that Barack Obama was not born in
Hawaii and that the birth certificate released by the White House is a
forgery?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> One of those long-form documents was obtained from Hawaii as recently
> as March 15, 2011, by a H
precisely.
Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
On Apr 29, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> White guilt?
>
> .
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
>>
>> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate
>> around black people to prove by some display
In May, 2001 we still had sodomy laws on the books that were long ignored.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292053
One of those long-form documents was obtained from Hawaii as recently
as March 15, 2011, by a Hawaii native who was willing to have a
redacted version revealed for this report. That was j
On 4/29/2011 3:15 PM, Sam wrote:
> I was correcting his statement you moron.
> It wasn't a longstanding law, it was a new law created less than two
> weeks ago to justify not releasing the long form.
May 15, 2001 is two weeks ago! That might explain a lot about this
conversation!!!
http://hawa
Oh so true.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You left out neo-con.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http
More like Gruss who thinks blacks are inferior but likes one black guy
because a professor he liked told him he would save the world.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Tony Weeg wrote:
>>
>> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate
>> arou
White guilt?
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
>
> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate around
> black people to prove by some display that they are "down", when all too
> often it's as hollow an attempt as they are at life.
>
> Sent from my
I was correcting his statement you moron.
It wasn't a longstanding law, it was a new law created less than two
weeks ago to justify not releasing the long form. Now the law is
moot.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> No they didn't.
>>
>> They made a new
You left out neo-con.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> The NY Times finally got around to reporting on the sexual assault of a
> reported during the Egyptian protests months ago. The thing that is not so
> surprising from the NY Times is that they left out what som
Hello?
Are you going to defend yourself or just point to your little bitches
approval :P
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Sam wrote:
> Let's try again
>
> You say $30b
>
> 80% of Exxon's earnings are from out side the US and they pay a hefty
> income tax for it.
>
> 20% is earned in the US.
>
>
Maureen wrote:
>
> Disagree all you want. I can site the law.
>
>> the matter is, this cop committed battery against this woman by slapping her
>> and her reaction would not give her a conviction though it may give the cop
>> one.
>
If the officer doesn't want you too, you can't tap, touch, sho
um...
o_0
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> Are you serious? What about Fast 5 is tied to the marvel universe and who is
> he talking to about the Avengers?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:39 PM, William Bowen wrote:
>
>>
>> Ooo! Is it Sam Jackson wanting to discuss
Are you serious? What about Fast 5 is tied to the marvel universe and who is
he talking to about the Avengers?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:39 PM, William Bowen wrote:
>
> Ooo! Is it Sam Jackson wanting to discuss the Avengers Initiative?
>
~~~
> If you watch after credits there's even a last scene with a surprise
> that sets up the next few movies if they're smart.
Ooo! Is it Sam Jackson wanting to discuss the Avengers Initiative?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carri
It's probably a little redundant to say that Fast Five is awesome.
For anyone who follows the stories, they brought back Han who was
presumed killed in Tokyo Drift but that's ok because he's an awesome
character and deserved to be resurrected.
They also brought back the Mexican girl from the las
Disagree all you want. I can site the law.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I would disagree...that isn't even close to the definition of battery or
> even assault. Interfering with an arrest may be illegal, but the fact of
> the matter is, this cop committed battery ag
em is down.
ice is whack.
trump is a joke.
Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Tony Weeg wrote:
>>
>> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate
>> around black people to prove by some display that they are "down
Tony Weeg wrote:
>
> over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate around
> black people to prove by some display that they are "down", when all too
> often it's as hollow an attempt as they are at life.
>
Like Donald Trump saying he's, "a good friend of the blacks" an
The NY Times finally got around to reporting on the sexual assault of a
reported during the Egyptian protests months ago. The thing that is not so
surprising from the NY Times is that they left out what some consider an
important detain - what the crowd was yelling. Now some would say that what
th
over compensation. like when racist white people try to overcompensate around
black people to prove by some display that they are "down", when all too often
it's as hollow an attempt as they are at life.
Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
On Apr 29, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> The irony of you making this argument about factual numbers makes me
> twitch, Gruss.
>
> Good job though.
>
Thanks man. I'm being very sincere when I say that means a lot coming from you.
~|
Order the
Sam wrote:
>
> No they didn't.
>
> They made a new rule 11 days ago stating they would no longer have the
> long form available. I wonder why?
Because the State of Hawaii and every other state, city, county who
made any rule or procedure change regarding identity documentation in
last 2 weeks is
>
> > > I assume you have in mind political actions that have no other logical
> > > explanations besides religious favoritism?
> >
> > While his (failed) attempts at appeasement is directed towards those
> > of a certain religion and/or cultural background, I don't assume it's
> > tied to any act
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>>
>> In general, Cam, I'd agree with you but I take a different view when
>> it comes to government employees and, in particular, police officers.
>
>
> True. Still, in general
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> In general, Cam, I'd agree with you but I take a different view when
> it comes to government employees and, in particular, police officers.
True. Still, in general people take themselves too seriously.
-Cameron
...
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Michael Dinowitz <
mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
> > I assume you have in mind political actions that have no other logical
> > explanations besides religious favoritism?
>
> While his (failed) attempts at appeasement is directed towards those
> of a certai
> I assume you have in mind political actions that have no other logical
> explanations besides religious favoritism?
While his (failed) attempts at appeasement is directed towards those
of a certain religion and/or cultural background, I don't assume it's
tied to any actual belief or understandi
Pure coincidence.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:12 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Michael Dinowitz <
> mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I can but I'm going to avoid injecting his political actions via a
>> certain country into this discussion.
>>
>
> I assume y
In general, Cam, I'd agree with you but I take a different view when
it comes to government employees and, in particular, police officers.
Police officers have a great deal of power and they have a lot of
institutional backing that does everything in its power to shield them
from any repercussions
But he was wrong again.
Scratches head.
I guess Monday he'll go on about how he schooled me in math again.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>>
>> Sam wrote:
>>>
>>> dude!
>>> 26.6% != 5%
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 4/3 != 5% ei
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> dude!
>> 26.6% != 5%
>>
>>
>
> 4/3 != 5% either!
>
> Making up meaningless numbers is fun!
The irony of you making this argument about factual numbers makes me
twitch, Gruss.
Good job though.
Judah
~~
4 states still call themselves commonwealths
MA
PA
VA
KY
reason? cause they can.
Rhode Island is still broken up into 2 plantations. And LA has no
counties - they have parishes.
Arizona doesn't do Daylight Savings Time (but the Navajo Nation in AZ does).
%^&# individualists! Makes automating
lol, im jk about them still ruling it, but odd that its not a state,
but a commonwealth. wonder why the distinction was kept?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Ras Tafari wrote:
> ummm, VA is still a commonwealth.
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:20 PM, William Bowen
> wrote:
>>
>> used to be. th
ummm, VA is still a commonwealth.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:20 PM, William Bowen wrote:
>
> used to be. then there was that War of Independence thingy... :)
>
>> interestingly... is Virginia included in these "Commonwealths?"
>
>
> --
> will
>
> "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
used to be. then there was that War of Independence thingy... :)
> interestingly... is Virginia included in these "Commonwealths?"
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Michael Dinowitz <
mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
>
> I can but I'm going to avoid injecting his political actions via a
> certain country into this discussion.
>
I assume you have in mind political actions that have no other logical
explanations besides rel
so, i was reading about the family, and Williams mother is the 32
great grand daughter of Alfred, the first King of England.
interestingly... is Virginia included in these "Commonwealths?"
taken from
http://www.britroyals.com/
the following:
"She is Head of the Commonwealth of Nations comprisi
Until Later!
C. Hatton Humphrey
http://www.eastcoastconservative.com
No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
> So how is it working out for you?
>
> I like it myself, it's odd that the main volume is connected to the
>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
> So I went with the Behrenger unit. It was more money than I wanted to
> spend and a lot more tech than I need but the reviews and the price
> point I got it at were solid enough for me to be happy with. I didn't
> shell out the extr
I can but I'm going to avoid injecting his political actions via a
certain country into this discussion.
> Can you provide some examples of Obama showing religious favoritism? I
> honestly can't think of a single episode that would lead me to believe
> Obama favors Muslims over Christians or Jews
> They're white.
He's not white to certain groups of Whites, Blacks, Arabs, or
statisticians. To them he's a Jew (no matter his actual religious
affiliation).
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Ad
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Michael Dinowitz <
mdino...@houseoffusion.com> wrote:
> I'm hoping that this is all a hoax or something as the form they're
> talking about is beyond insane. As if anyone can remember who was at
> their baptism/circumcision/confirmation/whatever.
>
There is no wa
Funny...can't find a single reference to this on a site that isn't a right
wing nutjob site...so I calling bullsit on this...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama w
No they didn't.
They made a new rule 11 days ago stating they would no longer have the
long form available. I wonder why?
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> No they didn't. Hawaii made an exception for Obama, as they said, to put to
> rest this crap as the constant re
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Obama seems to favor Muslims of Christian and definitely over Jews.
>
> Doesn't make him a secret Muslim, but makes one wonder why.
>
>
Can you provide some examples of Obama showing religious favoritism? I
honestly can't think of a single episode
Obama seems to favor Muslims of Christian and definitely over Jews.
Doesn't make him a secret Muslim, but makes one wonder why.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The criticism of Bush being an evangelical is because he implied a lot of
> policies that favored evangel
But only one state certified him. That means the DNC did not vet him at all.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The government vets candidates to ensure eligibility. Once he showed his
> birth certificate, it should have ended. 2 years later when he shows the
> long f
They're white. So call it reverse racism if you must.
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Wanting to see Bush's military records when he did leave his NG Unit to work
> for one of his father's buddies campaign...yes, we have a right to know when
> he is claiming to be a
> If I point out the flaws in your position without questioning your
> right to have a position, I'm questioning your policies.
There is no question as to the right to a position. The question is
what the difference is between position and character is.
> If I call you a fool or question your bir
Sorry, i must have my "head in the sand" again.
Racism...it's definitely racioh wait, the dixie chicks are
white.it's sexism! Yeah, sexism! Hmmmor is it partisan persecution
of.man now I'm all sorts of confused as to what conclusion i'm
supposed to be jumping to on this.
I ow
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Chris Stoner wrote:
>
> Never argue with bat-shit crazy.
>
>
It's fun to take them out and toy with them every now and again though.a
lark on a Friday afternoon :)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldf
Never argue with bat-shit crazy.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:09 PM, G Money wrote:
>
>
> Let me guess.RACISM!
>
> If "keeping my head in the sand" means I don't get to make baseless leaps
> that fly in the face of basic logical argument structure to further my
> ideological opinions.then
Please...
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:07 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The poi
Yeah, I could answer most of this off the top of my head, except for
the prenatal and postnatal visits for my mom. But she might remember
her doc's name.
Though I'm not sure even *she* could answer the question about
circumstances of my birth as she had the 'ol twilight sleep... Ft
Carson Army Ho
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> You just keep that head of your buried in the sand G. Why is it that none
> of this has ever come up before...not even with Clinton. But all of a
> sudden, we have a black president and the nutballs com
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The point is that they were persecuted as being un-American and unpatriotic
> for criticizing Bush...something that Sam claimed was ok to do prior to
> Obama. What happened to them is exactly what Sam is
We should...it doesn't belong there
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:59 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@th
You just keep that head of your buried in the sand G. Why is it that none
of this has ever come up before...not even with Clinton. But all of a
sudden, we have a black president and the nutballs come out of the woodwork.
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent
The point is that they were persecuted as being un-American and unpatriotic
for criticizing Bush...something that Sam claimed was ok to do prior to
Obama. What happened to them is exactly what Sam is claiming what is
happening to anyone who criticizes Obama.
-Original Message-
From: G Mon
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The criticism of Bush being an evangelical is because he implied a lot of
> policies that favored evangelical Christianity. Obama, on the other hand
> isn't a Muslim...it has become a substitute for the
No they didn't. Hawaii made an exception for Obama, as they said, to put to
rest this crap as the constant requests for his BC is putting a strain on
manpower and resources for the state of Hawaii.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 08
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> The criticism of Bush being an evangelical is because he implied a lot of
> policies that favored evangelical Christianity. Obama, on the other hand
> isn't a Muslim...it has become a substitute for the
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
> I would disagree...that isn't even close to the definition of battery or
> even assault. Interfering with an arrest may be illegal, but the fact of
> the matter is, this cop committed battery against this
The criticism of Bush being an evangelical is because he implied a lot of
policies that favored evangelical Christianity. Obama, on the other hand
isn't a Muslim...it has become a substitute for the n word.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29
The government vets candidates to ensure eligibility. Once he showed his
birth certificate, it should have ended. 2 years later when he shows the
long form, they keep going at him with other even more insanely stupid
ideas...that is racist.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...
Wanting to see Bush's military records when he did leave his NG Unit to work
for one of his father's buddies campaign...yes, we have a right to know when
he is claiming to be a veteran. That is not racist. Wanting to see who the
actual mother of Trigg...while kind of silly...is hardly racist...t
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Remember what happened to the Dixie Chicks?
>
Nothing "happened" to the DC's...they did it to themselves. If you are a
singer, and you choose to make politics part of your shtick, then you have
to be w
Once he posted his birth certificate 2 years ago, they crossed that line...
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:40 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the showing of papers by Obama was Racist
Where's the line
Hello,
We recently announced upcoming changes to the maximum number of users for
Google Apps. We want to let you know that, as a current customer, the
changes will not affect you.
As of May 10, any organization that signs up for a new account will be
required to use the paid Google Apps for Busi
I just got an email for my domains stating that I will get the 200 accounts
since that is what the limits were when I a signed up. Any new domains
would be limited to 10 unless you get a paid account.
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday,
Under Bush if you did you were unpatriotic and un-American...so that is a
bunch of bullshit. Remember what happened to the Dixie Chicks?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Sam wrote:
> Um, criticizing the President's policy was always acceptable and
> expected until Obama became president. Now
I think he likes the abuse...
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:grussg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 07:53 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Exxon taxes
Sam wrote:
>
> Smoking dope is fun eh?
>
> Let's rethink that.
>
No need to. I took my numbers directly fr
Unfortunately, no it's not Michael. You have until 1 May to respond to
this. I left my comments about it yesterday.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 07:36 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: New Roadblocks to a
I would disagree...that isn't even close to the definition of battery or
even assault. Interfering with an arrest may be illegal, but the fact of
the matter is, this cop committed battery against this woman by slapping her
and her reaction would not give her a conviction though it may give the co
"the problem with america is the black people are immediately pulling the
race
card with ANYTHING obama. once the race card is pulled, my ears close
down."
Amen. It's the boy who cried wolf syndrome. If it ever does happen, will
anyone actually notice.
"If you say anything about 'redistribu
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> We don't let labels bother us. How do you sleep knowing all those
> labeled people are out there?
>
I lock my doors.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amaz
Let's try again
You say $30b
80% of Exxon's earnings are from out side the US and they pay a hefty
income tax for it.
20% is earned in the US.
So
20% (earned in US) of 30b(earned world wide) = 6b
1.6b / 6b * 100 = 26.6%
Got it?
.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam
He's the only one. Everyone else that asked for a copy got the long form.
Weird that huh?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> Funny thing is this isn't even a real copy, it's got seven layers. But
>> if they ask to see the real one we start all over.
>> Nob
Sam wrote:
>
> dude!
> 26.6% != 5%
>
>
4/3 != 5% either!
Making up meaningless numbers is fun!
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Arch
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>>
>> 20% of 30b = 6b
>> 1.6 / 6 * 100 = 26.6%
>>
>
> (1.) You're religious. Never try to prove your religion with real
> world facts. You'll lose every time.
I haven't lost yet except in your mind.
> (2.) Exxon, even after every accounting
Sam wrote:
>
> Funny thing is this isn't even a real copy, it's got seven layers. But
> if they ask to see the real one we start all over.
> Nobody will have the guts to be branded a racist again by asking for proof.
>
Good, because that's exactly what this is. It's a shameless
humiliation mean
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> I totally agree with the cops - that lady got physically involved with
> a police officer attempting to arrest a public nuisance. Actually
> striking a cop? She's lucky she didn't get tased or batoned.
>
+1
Just getting into this thread s
Sam wrote:
>
> I thought 80% was too high.
>
>
> 20% of 30b = 6b
> 1.6 / 6 * 100 = 26.6%
>
Here's the take-away message with this:
(1.) You're religious. Never try to prove your religion with real
world facts. You'll lose every time.
(2.) Exxon, even after every accounting shenanigan in the
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Casey Dougall <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
> I'm running out of space again, either it's time to upgrade or I'll have to
> delete some mail BOO!
> You are currently using 7326 MB (96 %) of your 7575 MB.
When this happens I:
1) Search for messages wi
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:04 AM, G Money wrote:
>
>> Not at all, just pointing out the silliness of labeling it racist.
>>
>
> I agree, it's not racist, it's partisan politicsbut in this day and age,
> i'm not sure the latter is much different than the former.
> The fact that Obama is perce
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Sam wrote:
> What am I missing? Mine says $50 / user account / year
>
Paid Version:
http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/index.html
Free version:
http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/group/index.html
-Cameron
...
~~~
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
