Respectfully Tim, I disagree. I feel that people are getting a bit TOO serious on this
board, and Adam's views on it are refreshingly funny, if you don't in turn take them
too seriously. Just my .02
>So Adam how about you offer an opinion or a solution instead of the constant
>sarcasm. What wou
Adam,
You crack me up.
-d
- Original Message -
From: "cantrl. a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:29 AM
Subject: Deficit worse than ever
> You're right. I better get serious about th
2003 12:35 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Deficit worse than ever
You're right. I better get serious about this pretty quick. I'll go back to
pushing my liberal communist agenda so you can attack me for being a
'pussy', and you can continue reciting passages from Ann Coulter fi
bout things, Adam... :)
>
>M
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cantrl. a [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:29 PM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: Deficit worse than ever
>>
>>
>> You're right. I be
Never said I agreed with Fox. And now it's an insult to return sarcasm with sarcasm.
Get some armor Larry, your thin skin is showing again.
>Lets see, Franken comes out with a book that contains the phrase "Fair and
>Balanced", which last time I looked has been in the English language for a
Lets see, Franken comes out with a book that contains the phrase "Fair and
Balanced", which last time I looked has been in the English language for a
while. Fox has a temper tantrum and sues him. Fox gets laughed out of court
and with draws the suit, and continues like a petulant 5 year old. Whi
Adam, no reason to wet yourself man, I was serious. SNL needs you That's how that
idiot Al Franken got his start. You just seem to be in such lock step with him, I
thought it would be fitting. Maybe you can start the Franken Youth, I dunno, just a
thought.
>You're right. I better get serio
Why don't you tell us how you really feel about things, Adam... :)
M
> -Original Message-
> From: cantrl. a [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:29 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Deficit worse than ever
>
>
> You're righ
You're right. I better get serious about this pretty quick. I'll go back to pushing my
liberal communist agenda so you can attack me for being a 'pussy', and you can
continue reciting passages from Ann Coulter fiction novels, and then we can go back to
being really productive in changing eachoth
Hey Adam, I can hear Saturday Night Live calling!
>Does this mean I won't be getting $300 next year? :(
>
>I really liked that that George Bush gave everyone $300 out of his
>pocket last year. He probably worked hard to earn that money. I took
>the whole family to NASCAR - well, the family hung
They all do it. Just look at how much shit tried to get tacked onto the Energy bill,
from both Republican and Democrats. Is it so hard for you to acknowledge that
Democrats do it. Or can you just not bring yourself to type the words, "I agree, the
Democrats do it too."
>As I said I am again
Does this mean I won't be getting $300 next year? :(
I really liked that that George Bush gave everyone $300 out of his pocket last year.
He probably worked hard to earn that money. I took the whole family to NASCAR - well,
the family hung out in the infield because bleacher seats were $200, but
As I said I am again all pork like this. But since the republican party
controlled the House of Representatives, its been quite egregious. Just
look at the emergency appropriations supplements for 9/11 - over a third of
the funds allocated involved pork going to republican districts.
At 11:12 A
Let's get rid of Democratic pork while we are at it too. Can you "The Big Dig?" The
glut comes from both sides of the aisle Larry. I acknowledge it, can you?
>In case you didn't notice I only quoted the first couple of paragraphs. Why
>ascribe motives when you really have no reason to.
>
>I
sh feelt there was a genuine threat to our national security, like
Clinton and the rest of the Democrats did in 1998. But oh, I forgot in 4 years,
without UN inspectors, Sadaam voluntarily disarmed out of the goodness of his heart.
>- Matthew Small
>
>
>- Original Message -
&
rrive.
I can see the people who hate America carrying on and trying to preserve
the status quo, tho.
M
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:16 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Deficit worse than e
In case you didn't notice I only quoted the first couple of paragraphs. Why
ascribe motives when you really have no reason to.
I have no problem with cutting spending. Lets start with congressional
pork. Such as all the port that Trent Lott brought in to Alabama, or the
current republican leade
ssage-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Deficit worse than ever
>From the article: "The CBO's "baseline" deficit projection assumes emergency
wartime spending approved by Congress last year will co
John Stanley wrote:
>>>The data simply does not support a view that the current deficit is
>>>spending-driven.
>
>Did you use fuzzy math?
I have given the source of my numbers and the calculation methods. Which is
more as anyone else in this thread.
Jochem
~~
>>The data simply does not support a view that the current deficit is
>>spending-driven.
Did you use fuzzy math?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?l
Kevin Schmidt wrote:
>From the article: "The CBO's "baseline" deficit projection assumes
>emergency wartime spending approved by Congress last year will
>continue indefinitely, at a cost of $818 billion through 2013."
>
>Convienently left that one out didn't you Larry. Does anyone believe
>that
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:16 AM
Subject: Deficit worse than ever
> >From the article: "The CBO's "baseline" deficit projection assumes
emergency wartime spending approved by Cong
>From the article: "The CBO's "baseline" deficit projection assumes emergency wartime
>spending approved by Congress last year will continue indefinitely, at a cost of $818
>billion through 2013."
Convienently left that one out didn't you Larry. Does anyone believe that the war
will carry on f
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office blames the Bush Tax Cut and the
War in Iraq
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46805-2003Aug26.html
2004 Deficit to Reach $480 Billion, Report Forecasts
By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 27, 2003; Page A02
24 matches
Mail list logo
