what the hell is independent media nowadays. As far as I can tell, anyone
can throw up a a blog and suddenly all sorts of idiots start linking to it
like it's gospel. The people that had those wacky ideas before used to
have names like, "The Goat Lady" or "Old Crazy Rufus"nowadays they're
in
so you think someone who was gang raped 4 times wouldn't be able to
decipher whether or not evidence was correct or not? Once you've been
raped, you lose your logic skills?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> You don't need to be a lawyer to answer the question.
>
> It's a logi
You, asshole! :D
On 9/10/2014 4:40 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> If you're referring to my typo, you're right Scott!
>
>
> On 9/10/2014 4:22 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>>
>>> I try to teach the women (and men) in my life to be careful about what
>>> you say and
>>> do.
>>>
>>>
>> Maybe you should tak
If you're referring to my typo, you're right Scott!
On 9/10/2014 4:22 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>>
>> I try to teach the women (and men) in my life to be careful about what
>> you say and
>> do.
>>
>>
> Maybe you should take your own advice. Do you recall saying this:
>
> 'PERSONAL RESPONSIBILIT
>
>
>
> I try to teach the women (and men) in my life to be careful about what
> you say and
> do.
>
>
Maybe you should take your own advice. Do you recall saying this:
'PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY! She shouldn't have started it and Ray should have
ended it in the way he did.'
--
Scott Stroz
-
I agree, Scott, that no civilized man would hit her. I wouldn't have.
But, it's important to note, for the safety of all females, that all men
aren't civilized
and some of them will kill just because of a verbal insult.
I try to teach the women (and men) in my life to be careful about what
you
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> Rick there are plenty of reasonable people on this list and I don't think
> any of them agree with you.
>
>
The unreasonable ones don't agree with him either.
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch thin
"Your attitude is that the victim deserved it..."
You are so wrong, Maureen. I just pointed out what any reasonable
person would.
But whatever gets you through every day, Maureen. You'll obviously
believe whatever you choose; truth or not.
On 9/10/2014 12:36 PM, Maureen wrote:
> Your attitude
Well, called for 6, served on 4, rejected during selection on 2.
It's a pretty cool process, sometimes tedious and time consuming, but never
boring.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> You have been on a jury 8 times? That is cool.
>
> I served on a grand jury once. That
Agreed, and I think this is where a lot of the push back is coming from.
Many of us,myself included were raised to never strike a woman, for any
reason. To do so would be considered cowardly.
Don't hit women, don't abuse kids, don't abuse animals, do unto others
that was the mantra from my pa
Heck. He hits HIMSELF harder than that just to get psyched before a play.
This guy gets hit for a living.
My feelings are thus:
A man should never punch a woman. Period.
He shouldn't molest children. He shouldn't steal money. He shouldn't kick
puppies. He shouldn't shoot people in a bar. And h
Block and run, that's exactly what he should've done
there was no way she was going to hurt him
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> And I agree with you on that.
>
> However the notion of restraint? I think the only course of action there is
> to block and run.
> Anything else
And I agree with you on that.
However the notion of restraint? I think the only course of action there is
to block and run.
Anything else could result in damage. Especially if she is drunk.
On 10 September 2014 12:33, Scott Stewart wrote:
> Gel,
>
> None of this matters, in a US Court regardle
You have been on a jury 8 times? That is cool.
I served on a grand jury once. That was fascinating. A part of the justice
system few get to see.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:24 PM, William Bowen
wrote:
>
> Gel, i was once dismissed from a jury by the Prosecutor because I answered
> a question of
Nor did I claim to have one. He hit her in the face with his fist.
Nothing makes that right.
And you have openly stated you would do the same, which makes you no
better than him.
I've met hundreds of bullies like you over the years working with
abuse victims. Your attitude is that the victim des
Gel,
None of this matters, in a US Court regardless of whether or not she hit
him first these questions will be asked.
1) was he in mortal danger at the time. IMO from the video, no
2) Did he use an appropriate amount of force in defending himself. IMO,
from the video, no he didn't he is strong
It was hypothetical, but forget it. You will continue to avoid answering
regardless of how the situation is posed, or how it is asked.
In other words, as far as you are concerned, a person's past experience and
background have no impact on their objectivity about an event similar to
one they were
Gel, i was once dismissed from a jury by the Prosecutor because I answered
a question of his that indicated that I understood that *all* persons
accused of a crime are considered *innocent* until proven guilty. Whether
or not I had been ticketed, arrested, guilty of some infraction, etc. was
immat
I cannot say, with any confidence, how I would/act feel in that situation -
nor would that decision actually be in my hands - that is what lawyers are
for. Would that information even be available to the lawyers? (Asking out
of ignorance as, as I stated, I have never been privy to the nuances of
j
You don't need to be a lawyer to answer the question.
It's a logical one, and not answering is simply prevarication.
But let us play that game, and make it even simpler until your only
response other than to answer truthfully, would be to refuse to answer.
If YOU were accused of rape, and you a
So, now it is a jury member and not a judge?
I am not a lawyer. I have never been a lawyer. I have never spoken with
lawyers about the nuances of jury selection. I have never served on a jury.
I have never discussed with anyone who has served on a jury what the
selection process was like. I will
It was a very simple question.
Let's make it even simpler.
You are a Lawyer reviewing a Jury.
Your client is accused of rape, and he is innocent.
Do you allow the woman who was gang raped four times to be on your Jury?
I mean..let's make it REALLY simple. Can you answer that?
On 10 September 2
Are you saying that people who have been raped are incapable of viewing
other rape cases objectively?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> What??
>
> If you were accused of Rape (and you are innocent) would you want your
> Judge to be someone who was gang raped four times?
>
> On
I hurt and kill people it's kind of what I do.
On Sep 10, 2014 10:39 AM, "GMoney" wrote:
>
> HE IS NOT INNOCENT
>
> For fuck's sake peoplego watch the video 10 straight times. Watch it
> with your wife or girlfriend. Talk it over between yourselves for a bit.
> Gain some perspective.
>
>
A BITCH move
On Sep 10, 2014 10:48 AM, lrssc...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm no judge and that was a birch move
> On Sep 10, 2014 10:32 AM, "Vivec" wrote:
>
>>
>> What??
>>
>> If you were accused of Rape (and you are innocent) would you want your
>> Judge to be someone who was gang raped four times?
I'm no judge and that was a birch move
On Sep 10, 2014 10:32 AM, "Vivec" wrote:
>
> What??
>
> If you were accused of Rape (and you are innocent) would you want your
> Judge to be someone who was gang raped four times?
>
> On Sep 10, 2014 10:22 AM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
> >
> > > Jesus, I'd hit y
HE IS NOT INNOCENT
For fuck's sake peoplego watch the video 10 straight times. Watch it
with your wife or girlfriend. Talk it over between yourselves for a bit.
Gain some perspective.
And quit making false analogies.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> What??
>
> If you
What??
If you were accused of Rape (and you are innocent) would you want your
Judge to be someone who was gang raped four times?
On Sep 10, 2014 10:22 AM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
>
> > Jesus, I'd hit you for that if I could
> > On Sep 10, 2014 9:45 AM, "Rick Faircloth"
> > wrote:
>
> >> Now that
Ask anyone who ever met me here, I would.
On Sep 10, 2014 10:22 AM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
> Jesus, I'd hit you for that if I could
> On Sep 10, 2014 9:45 AM, "Rick Faircloth"
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Now that's going to cause you to have a balanced perspective...
>>
>>
>> On 9/10/2014 6:04 AM, Maureen wro
Jesus, I'd hit you for that if I could
On Sep 10, 2014 9:45 AM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
> Now that's going to cause you to have a balanced perspective...
>
>
> On 9/10/2014 6:04 AM, Maureen wrote:
> > My familiarity with spousal abuse includes 19 trips to the hospital
> > and having almost eve
That's hilarious.
Mo, your injuries make it hard for you to be fair and balancedyou know,
so you can see and understand this from the attackers point of view!
wow.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Rick Faircloth
wrote:
>
> Now that's going to cause you to have a balanced perspective...
>
Now that's going to cause you to have a balanced perspective...
On 9/10/2014 6:04 AM, Maureen wrote:
> My familiarity with spousal abuse includes 19 trips to the hospital
> and having almost every bone in my face broken. I have absolutely no
> tolerance for it and no respect for anyone who does
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> My familiarity with spousal abuse includes 19 trips to the hospital
> and having almost every bone in my face broken. I have absolutely no
> tolerance for it and no respect for anyone who does. I'm not sure
> what that makes me - radical, lib
Word
On Sep 10, 2014 6:04 AM, "Maureen" wrote:
>
> My familiarity with spousal abuse includes 19 trips to the hospital
> and having almost every bone in my face broken. I have absolutely no
> tolerance for it and no respect for anyone who does. I'm not sure
> what that makes me - radical, libe
My familiarity with spousal abuse includes 19 trips to the hospital
and having almost every bone in my face broken. I have absolutely no
tolerance for it and no respect for anyone who does. I'm not sure
what that makes me - radical, liberal, or just very pissed off at
people who abuse each other
I've heard similar arguments from what I consider to be radical feminists,
but I've always thought of you as more a realist than anything.
On Sep 10, 2014 2:43 AM, "Maureen" wrote:
>
> LOL. He's just following standard disinformation techniques. Can't
> challenge the message so he attacks the
LOL. He's just following standard disinformation techniques. Can't
challenge the message so he attacks the messenger. Then just to make
sure he is in compliance with his overlords, adds liberal and Obama to
the insults. Oooh..thinking a man shouldn't hit a woman in the face
makes me a liberal.
Your final paragraph couldn't be further from the truth.
On Sep 9, 2014 11:57 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
> That's the nature of America, Maureen.
>
> People aren't guaranteed success in the country; only the right to try
> for it.
>
> I have more compassion than you'll ever know, but it's rig
That's the nature of America, Maureen.
People aren't guaranteed success in the country; only the right to try
for it.
I have more compassion than you'll ever know, but it's rightly placed
compassion.
I don't know of a single child who has starved to death in this country?
Do you?
Can you name
Float or flight capabilities
On Sep 9, 2014 11:38 PM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
> China can't land a plane in its carrier and its subs sink on launch.
>
> Russia was proven to be a paper tiger away from its own land mass.
>
> Who had the float out Judd to come here?
>
> Who even had the technology to c
t; From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:16 PM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
>>
>>
>> Oh individuals can and are.
>>
>> I mean a military force capable of d
China can't land a plane in its carrier and its subs sink on launch.
Russia was proven to be a paper tiger away from its own land mass.
Who had the float out Judd to come here?
Who even had the technology to create that transportation and logistics
nightmare without us finding out about and squ
g we do with our soldiers is just a big waste of time
> and
> money...people can just jump in and naturally do it...gotcha...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:16 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: D
Are you kidding?
A conscripted green-recruit Army with no experience as a fighting force
called up in a
crisis and perhaps given a week's worth of training given the mobility
of threats today?
China would overrun this nation in a heartbeat without a standing,
professional military!
Scout, yo
f teeth
> about needing to secure our border is bullshit?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:01 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> In foreign lands.
&
Right...smh
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:16 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
Oh individuals can and are.
I mean a military force capable of doing anything but dying.
Again I just
o secure our border is bullshit?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:01 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> In foreign lands.
>
> No one can come
No one could come here? So all that screaming and gnashing of teeth about
needing to secure our border is bullshit?
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:01 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
y behind the curve man.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 7:33 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> That can come here and do us harm?
>
> Not one.
>
> A tru
: Democrats set to lose the senate
That can come here and do us harm?
Not one.
A true border defense force and nationwide conscription in militia in time
of need, shared sacrifice and no foreign entanglements.
On Sep 9, 2014 8:26 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
> Why in the world would y
You can't protect a nation by allowing the citizens of that nation to
suffer. You can't protect a nation by taking the hard earned dollars
of the working class and giving it to rich and their corporate
minions. You can't protect a nation by letting children starve while
you enrich the weapons in
Twice even...looking to see if the sky is falling...
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 7:26 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
What!? I agree with Eric! So it ain't so!
O
That can come here and do us harm?
Not one.
A true border defense force and nationwide conscription in militia in time
of need, shared sacrifice and no foreign entanglements.
On Sep 9, 2014 8:26 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
> Why in the world would you want to "shut down the standing army", S
tember 09, 2014 6:22 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> You know I want to shut down the standing army for the most part.
>
> That has nothing to do with this point.
> On Sep 9, 2014 7:20 PM, "Maureen" wrote:
>
>&g
r 09, 2014 6:20 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/19/us/food-stamp-fraud-in-the-underground-eco
> nomy.html
>
> Yes, there is some fraud in the Snap Program, but much less than in other
> programs.
Why in the world would you want to "shut down the standing army", Scout?
Do you not think this nation has enemy against which we must be ready
to defend ourselves?
On 9/9/2014 7:21 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> You know I want to shut down the standing army for the most part.
>
> That has nothing to
You don't understand "general vs individual welfare", Maureen. The
Federal governments
job is to protect the nation as a whole, not every individual that makes
up the nation.
Scout was right. It is not the job of the Federal government to provide
people with food
to eat, clothes to wear, and a
Do you have information that disputes what I shared, old though it may
be Maureen?
If so, I'd be happy to see it. I'll guarantee that things have only
gotten worse under
the expansion of dependency of the Obama Administration.
And, FYI, Maureen, the Heritage Foundation got those statistics fro
we need to have
the skilled soldiers that today's technology requires.
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 6:22 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
You know I want to shut down the standing ar
Exactly...or all of the corporate welfare that goes to multi-billion dollar
corporations...
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 6:20 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
http://www.nytimes.com
Yes it is, unless you just ignore history.
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 6:07 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
That's not the government's job or concern.
On Sep 9, 20
Blah blah blah blahseriously Tim...
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 6:15 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
You can't get honesty out of any government agency. There's a new
Of course it is. Remember that clause that says "provide for the
general welfare". Plus the fact that money spent on care and food for
the elderly and impoverished goes right back into the economy. The
war of poverty has been one of the more successful government programs
in terms of raising th
Those numbers are from more than 15 years ago, and massive reform has
happened since then. You need a better source than the spin and
disinformation from the Heritage Foundation nonsense. Confirmation
bias could be your middle name.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
>
> My
You know I want to shut down the standing army for the most part.
That has nothing to do with this point.
On Sep 9, 2014 7:20 PM, "Maureen" wrote:
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/19/us/food-stamp-fraud-in-the-underground-economy.html
>
> Yes, there is some fraud in the Snap Program, but mu
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/19/us/food-stamp-fraud-in-the-underground-economy.html
Yes, there is some fraud in the Snap Program, but much less than in
other programs. It baffled me that people get so upset about food
stamp fraud but won't blink at corruption in the weapons or financial
indust
: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 5:03 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> And I'm telling you that at a minimum the food stamp program is corrupt as
> hell. These numbers are so far outside the
er...show me the
> proof...not just a paranoid I just know it is...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 5:03 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> And I
That's not the government's job or concern.
On Sep 9, 2014 6:51 PM, "Vivec" wrote:
>
> Allowing people to just survive doesn't help them escape poverty.
> What actually seems to make a difference is giving them money to lift them
> out of poverty.
>
>
> http://www.economist.com/news/internationa
er 09, 2014 5:03 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
And I'm telling you that at a minimum the food stamp program is corrupt as
hell. These numbers are so far outside the norm if urban experience as to
be ridiculous.
On Sep 9, 2014 6:01 PM, "Eric Roberts&qu
Allowing people to just survive doesn't help them escape poverty.
What actually seems to make a difference is giving them money to lift them
out of poverty.
http://www.economist.com/news/international/21588385-giving-money-directly-poor-people-works-surprisingly-well-it-cannot-deal
On 9 Septembe
ut the bulk of the people are not
> abusing it and are people that really need it.
>
> Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 1:09 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 4:34 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> The comment was in relation to internal government studies and self
> oversight.
>
LOL...most of those are not internal numbers...
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 4:34 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
The comment was in relation to internal government studies and self
out [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 3:52 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> And the VA provides the best health services in the world..
> On Sep 9, 2014 4:51 PM, "Eric Roberts"
> wrot
Some VA's do Tim...but this has nothing to do with welfare
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 3:52 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
And the VA provides the best health services i
Speaking of the VA, I found this funny.
And sad.
And funny.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10205150521469065&set=a.10200795020304258.2213235.1425649256&type=1&theater
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Those were more or less the same results when the system in Engl
Those were more or less the same results when the system in England was
examined.
A lot of hyperbole was being thrown around which were not matched by
reality.
On 9 September 2014 16:50, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
>
> http://www.roanen.com/presidential-thoughts-blog/how-much-is-welfare-fraud-c
> os
e bulk of the people are not
> abusing it and are people that really need it.
>
> Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 1:09 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the se
her are people
abusing it...there always will be...but the bulk of the people are not
abusing it and are people that really need it.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 1:09 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Democra
nal Message-
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:36 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> I have never claimed that utilizing welfare is inherently wrong. Can you
> quote me stat
Some...yes...many...no.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:36 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
I have never claimed that utilizing welfare is inherently wrong. Can you
quote me
Only conservatives include Social Security in welfare...so no...that is not
part of that number.
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:33 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
The inclusion of
AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> Because they are older and in areas that were more heavily hit by the loss
> of our industrial sector.
> On Sep 9, 2014 11:49 AM, "Eric Roberts"
> wrote:
>
>> Then why is it that th
ns...that would be conservatives.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:02 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> Because they are older and in areas that were mo
rr Rick is claiming, that liberals are abusing
> the generosity of Americans...that would be conservatives.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:02 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Democrats set
hitestonemedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 10:23 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> Let's start with 'personal responsibility'.
>
> Liberals have abused the generosity of the American Public to the point th
t: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 11:02 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
Because they are older and in areas that were more heavily hit by the loss
of our industrial sector.
On Sep 9, 2014 11:49 AM, "Eric Roberts"
wrote:
>
> Then why is it that the bul
gt; -Original Message-
>> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 10:23 AM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
>>
>>
>> Let's start with 'personal responsibility'.
>&
e dollars than blue
> states do.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 10:23 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
> Let's start with &
rnm
> ent-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:chumph...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 11:17 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
>
>
Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
Let's start with 'personal responsibility'.
Liberals have abused the generosity of the American Public to the point that
welfare is now a way of life for half our population.
On 9/9/2014 11:11 AM, William Bowen wrote:
> mmm... exce
: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:chumph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 11:17 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
> He pretty much continued all of Bush's p
False...
http://www.occasionalplanet.org/2014/02/06/how-the-media-went-wrong-on-the-cbo-obamacare-report/
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 10:33 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Democrats set to lose the senate
*Health
Let's start with 'personal responsibility'.
Liberals have abused the generosity of the American Public
to the point that welfare is now a way of life for half our population.
On 9/9/2014 11:11 AM, William Bowen wrote:
> mmm... excellent bogeymen all...
>
> Rick, it was your initial statement, c
mmm... excellent bogeymen all...
Rick, it was your initial statement, care to elaborate on your "American
values?"
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:07 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Slavery, spousal abuse and firing invasion seen to be common threads.
> On Sep 9, 2014 11:02 AM, "William Bowen" wrote:
>
Slavery, spousal abuse and firing invasion seen to be common threads.
On Sep 9, 2014 11:02 AM, "William Bowen" wrote:
>
> > It's time to fight for American values and virtue and not
> > surrender this nation to those who would only destroy it.
>
> And what precisely, pray tell, are these "Americ
> It's time to fight for American values and virtue and not
> surrender this nation to those who would only destroy it.
And what precisely, pray tell, are these "American values"?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
Conservative viewed in science and the drug war are at odds with reality
too though.
Much of the conflict around the world stems from our direct involvement.
On Sep 9, 2014 10:56 AM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
> Yes, I watch Fox News AND CNN's talk/dicussion shows to stay aware of other
> viewpo
That's a huge one.
Independent media is maligned by birth sides, and mainstream media are
corporate and even government spokespersons at this point.
It's also going to take a wave of person involvement most people have
neither the time nor the inclusion for.
On Sep 9, 2014 10:52 AM, "Sam" wrote
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
