gMoney wrote:
The flip flop argument tries to play on emotion over reason. It hopes to
avoid any discussion about the actual issue, and whether reason or knowledge
could have played a role in the decision to change positions.
It's seems so odd that this is true especially given the Father
On 4/19/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
isn't that pretty much the same for anybody? Some people choose
unions to follow, some people choose a religion to follow, some people
choose Howard Stern to follow. I can't see a reason why one would be
any better than the other. Some
Not any worse than Bush == Devil that most of the people here post. So stuff
your TROLL up your ass.
TROLL!
On 4/18/07, Russel Madere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
In my head there is a mirror
When I've been bad, I've been wrong
Food for the saints that are quick to judge me
Hope for a Badman
Not any worse than Bush == Devil that most of the people here post.
So stuff your TROLL up your ass.
My my what a pleasant, informed, reasoned and adult response. Gives your point
a lot of credibility now doesn't it.
~|
Russ wrote:
Not any worse than Bush == Devil that most of the people here post.
Let's take a piece of the argument: to prove Liberalism correct, the
heartbeat didn't matter.
I would offer that this person wasn't saying it doesn't matter but
rather, there are things that matter more. This gets
Seriously, isn't that post just something to get the left riled up?
The Bush == Devil is just a repercussion of the right's Bush ==
Appointed by God attitude.
The article irritated me from the first few sentences including the
one about debating with a girl about abortion. The writer made it
So what does this say about people who change or even drop thier sacred
values to match those of a populist political figure? Or those who put
political expediency over thier sacred values?
I know and am related to many like this and 99% are members of the democratic
party. The other 1% are
Then don't ping me before the first cup of coffee. I'm a nice person at my
best.
Not any worse than Bush == Devil that most of the people here post.
So stuff your TROLL up your ass.
My my what a pleasant, informed, reasoned and adult response. Gives
your point a lot of
Not necessarily. I found it just as offensive as most of the anti Bush posts
here. I was trying to stir some debate and convert some to Libertarianism.
Seriously, isn't that post just something to get the left riled up?
The Bush == Devil is just a repercussion of the right's Bush ==
Appointed
hey now, in all fairness, I posted that 21 hours ago...I'd never
call someone a troll before their first cup o' coffee...
so, is it all right to stop stuffing this troll up my ass? You'd
never believe how much that tuft of hair tickles..
On 4/19/07, Russel Madere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm archive only.
Yeah, they do tickle and the hair is tough to get frm between my teeth, just
don't start yelling Armageddon!
hey now, in all fairness, I posted that 21 hours ago...I'd never
call someone a troll before their first cup o' coffee...
so, is it all right to stop
Leeroy Jenkins!
On 4/19/07, Russel Madere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm archive only.
Yeah, they do tickle and the hair is tough to get frm between my teeth, just
don't start yelling Armageddon!
~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
The Roots - Baby (Feat. John-John Malik B.) [02:50m/192Kbps/44KHz]
~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 experience time-saving features, more productivity.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJW
Archive:
Russ wrote:
I will admit that there are republicans (i.e. Schwarzenager) out there that
do the same, but I rarely,if ever, see Libertarians pull that move.
I think you're confusing dropping values with prioritizing values.
For example, I'm fiscally conservative and usually vote for
Not necessarily. I found it just as offensive as most of the anti
Bush posts here. I was trying to stir some debate and convert some to
Libertarianism.
Correct me if I'm wrong here but isn't there a disconnect with what you're
saying? How does advocating restricting an individual
The guys I know are truly flipfloppers. My sister is one. Her guiding virtue
is whatever her union tells her. She proudly proclaims that. She has no other
guiding princliple.
Russ wrote:
I will admit that there are republicans (i.e. Schwarzenager) out
there that do the same, but I
Russ wrote:
Her guiding virtue is whatever her union tells her.
8-0
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade see new features.
I'm not advocating anything. I'm pointing out that others realize what
flipfloppers progressives have become.
Not necessarily. I found it just as offensive as most of the anti
Bush posts here. I was trying to stir some debate and convert some
to
Libertarianism.
Correct me if
gg wrote:
Russ wrote:
Her guiding virtue is whatever her union tells her.
8-0
How come vote union, live better bumper stickers are always on rusty junkers?
~|
ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe®
Dyncamically transform webcontent
A lot of union workers that I know drive rust buckets but have nice things
at home like a nice truck/car, boat, quads, bikes, etc... I have been
contemplating doing that very thing, pay cash for some junker economy car
that will carry me to the train station and back (about 75 miles round trip)
isn't that pretty much the same for anybody? Some people choose
unions to follow, some people choose a religion to follow, some people
choose Howard Stern to follow. I can't see a reason why one would be
any better than the other. Some may change their pov more often than
others. Some never
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Abortion (Re: Liberalism == God?)
Russ wrote:
Not any worse than Bush == Devil that most of the people here post.
Let's take a piece of the argument
http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=100
An interesting look at liberalism and what I see often in this forum.
===
WWRD? What Would Reagan Do?
I often write Liberal Sermons because the Democrat party seems to me more of a
religion than a political party. A party where people will change their
TROLL!
On 4/18/07, Russel Madere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=100
An interesting look at liberalism and what I see often in this forum.
===
WWRD? What Would Reagan Do?
I often write Liberal Sermons because the Democrat party seems to me more of
a religion
24 matches
Mail list logo
