only if you're playing golf video
On 6/19/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it a handicap, then? ;-)
>
> On 6/19/07, Dana Tierney wrote:
> >
> > wait a minute .. slow connection speed is a problem (we hear from the
> > people in Pecos all the time) but it's not a disbility ;>
> >
> >
>
>
Is it a handicap, then? ;-)
On 6/19/07, Dana Tierney wrote:
>
> wait a minute .. slow connection speed is a problem (we hear from the
> people in Pecos all the time) but it's not a disbility ;>
>
>
~|
Create robust enterprise,
wait a minute .. slow connection speed is a problem (we hear from the people in
Pecos all the time) but it's not a disbility ;>
>On 6/18/07, Dana wrote:
>>
>> js is a problem? Then blackboard is going to be an issue, right?
>
>
>It depends on the kind of disability. This is the interweb, ya kno
On 6/18/07, Dana wrote:
>
> js is a problem? Then blackboard is going to be an issue, right?
It depends on the kind of disability. This is the interweb, ya know?
Disabled could be no JS, or no vision, or no mouse... slow connection speed,
bad connectivity, no connectivity...
Yeah... seriousl
js is a problem? Then blackboard is going to be an issue, right?
On 6/18/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I decided to make even my intranet apps as "accessible" as possible,
> and not just because I like my keyboard.
>
> Besides the obvious "no pictures, large font,high contrast" settin
So I decided to make even my intranet apps as "accessible" as possible,
and not just because I like my keyboard.
Besides the obvious "no pictures, large font,high contrast" settings for
testing,
what can I use? Is JAWS the most used disability-type browser? Lynx (ha)?
Where is a good site for b
works fine for me.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:11 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Accessible (Re: Safari on Windows XP and Vista - Never
> though
> > I'd see the day
What type of Blackboard problems are you having with IE7?
It works fine for me.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:11 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Accessible (Re: Safari on Windows XP and Vista - Never
t
I said "very". Heh. Vary, even.
Yeah, we disabled the IE7 update at our place, cuz it doesn't work with
some of our multi-million dollar SW.
FWIW, you might take a quick swing through a standards compliance type
parser... there's a sweet plugin for FireFox (who'd'a thunk'it?) which uses
Tidy
an
not me. I am lost in the land of video + blackboard at the moment. And
IE7 still doesn not work. Also we will have to deal with an
institution-wide template which I suspect is a problem. So for the
moment I am a spectator but yes, I am very interested. We *will* need
to explore all this.
On 6/16/
On 6/15/07, Dana Tierney wrote:
>
> how would you know if your site was accessible to a screen reader? Short
> of actually running it through? I always thought it was a matter of making
> sure that images had text descriptions and that essential information was
> not hidden in pictures
There is a
Ha! Yeah, there are all kinds of disabilities. Trying to cater to all of
them in one layout seems
sorta silly to me. And kinda cool, so... heh. To some extent. I really
like the "plain" access,
but I guess that can be handled via things like
RSS as well. =]
Looks like I need to add some vali
On 6/15/07, Sandra Clark wrote:
>
> Don't look on it as "dumbing down". Think of it as the ability to degrade
> gracefully.
I like the degrade graceful stuff as a um... "edge case"(?) vs. using it as
a second
means of communicating for someone that's forced to use X, which
doesn't work
wit
good point, because up here we have a sign language interpreter program and the
big deal is getting the people who are using video to provide a transcript. Of
course the sign language program also uses video, but they don't use sound and
I guess we don't have to worry about anyone blind needing
how would you know if your site was accessible to a screen reader? Short of
actually running it through? I always thought it was a matter of making sure
that images had text descriptions and that essential information was not hidden
in pictures
>So... what do people feel about "separate but equ
bject: Re: Accessible (Re: Safari on Windows XP and Vista - Never though I'd
see the day.)
On 6/14/07, Sandra Clark wrote:
> I can tell you that in the accessibility and disability communities,
> text-only sites tend to be looked on as a put down. Most disabled users
> will not u
On 6/14/07, Sandra Clark wrote:
> I can tell you that in the accessibility and disability communities,
> text-only sites tend to be looked on as a put down. Most disabled users
> will not use them. They tend to not be updated as often, they aren't well
> tested, etc.
>
> Also text only in and of i
o: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Accessible (Re: Safari on Windows XP and Vista - Never though
I'd see the day.)
So... what do people feel about "separate but equal", as in, a text-only
version of a site? I think one should strive for excellence in all areas,
so I understand trying to make e
de a public funded service.
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:50 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Accessible (Re: Safari on Windows XP and Vista - Never
> though
> > I&#
service.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Accessible (Re: Safari on Windows XP and Vista - Never
though
> I'd see the day.)
>
> Right-o. I like the interna
service.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Accessible (Re: Safari on Windows XP and Vista - Never
though
> I'd see the day.)
>
> Right-o. I like the interna
Right-o. I like the internal stuff too... "you shall use X browser, if I tell
you to!" I never do... one, I tried to require firefox for... sorta worked...
Eh.
Hey, what defines a public institution? (<-- again, at anyone)
I guess if it's an intranet, doesn't matter, but do you have to get
mon
All public facing sites are accessible; it is required by law as we are
a public institution.
However I don't deal with the public facing stuff, I deal with the
internal applications where the requirements are a little more lax.
However the application vendors know that it will be a requirement.
On 6/13/07, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> guess thats why you can use a %percentage% instead of a fixed width font
> size...
Oh loard! I went and used em! Arr! This is going to be a messy search
and replace...
=-P
Which site? The Latin one?
guess thats why you can use a %percentage% instead of a fixed width font size...
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2
DOOD
my site-- e looks slick as shit on my Playstation 3 on a 37" monitor...
ftw..
On 6/13/07, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/13/07, Nick McClure wrote:
> >
> > Nah, like was already said, #3 with 1.5%
> >
> > It isn't the #3 part that is important, it's the 1.5%. I guess you
26 matches
Mail list logo
