> Jim wrote:
> Unknown techniques are very probable - even unknown "technologies". Where
> things get flakey is the idea that there was a highly advanced technological
> civilization that was the source of these wonders
But "highly advanced" is pretty subjective. Hell, maybe they found a
meteori
On 6/12/07, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > The Prince wrote:
> > I'll have to dig it up, but there's video out there of one man building
> HUGE
> > freaking examples of pyramids and stonehenge, using just himself and
> > the marvel of the lever and fulcrum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRRDzFROMx0
Hu
On 6/12/07, Jim Davis wrote:...
> There's no reason that vast areas of our current knowledge CAN'T be wrong
> -
> but it's very unlikely. To even consider it extraordinary proof will be
> demanded. Even Hancock admits that his work isn't "scientific" - he terms
> its "advocacy".
I don't know ho
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:22 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Fingerprints Of The Gods
>
> > Jim wrote:
> > I'm having trouble finding anything specific on the Queen's ch
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:21 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Fingerprints Of The Gods
>
> > Gel wrote:
> > +1000
> > *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
> >
>
> Wh
> The Prince wrote:
> I'll have to dig it up, but there's video out there of one man building HUGE
> freaking examples of pyramids and stonehenge, using just himself and
> the marvel of the lever and fulcrum.
Huh. Well how about this one:
The author ties the flood legends, of which he claims the
On 6/12/07, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > Gel wrote:
> > +1000
> > *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
> >
>
> Which of those are 4000+ years old and made of 100+ ton blocks?
I'll have to dig it up, but there's video out there of one man building HUGE
freaking examples of pyramids and stonehenge, using
> Jim wrote:
> Just so we're starting clear: where are these figures from? Many of them
> seem wrong.
>
They're 10 years old. Bottom line, read the book. It's a little far
fetched but, if it wasn't, it would be absolutely NO fun to read.
~~~
> Jim wrote:
> I'm having trouble finding anything specific on the Queen's chamber in this
> regard...
This book covers that issue and about 500 others. For example, even
if they use, say, a ramp, to haul up blocks, it'd have to have been
over a mile long.
http://tinyurl.com/2kz95s
The bestsell
> Gel wrote:
> +1000
> *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
>
Which of those are 4000+ years old and made of 100+ ton blocks?
Either way, all of this is supposition - but, if the book is true, it
explains a lot of stuff. If not, it's an interesting read.
Ultimately none of anything you're saying (
+1000
*clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
On 6/12/07, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In short these theories tend to insult the intelligence of the ancients.
> There's also a (giving the benefit of the doubt, problably unintentional)
> racism at work. These theories tend to focus exclus
>> Jim wrote:
>> Why would you need to get enough people under it?
>
>Due to the architecture - as I understand it, it's a false ceiling
>that was put in place after the original one. Therefore the blocks
>had to be lifted into place just like you'd install a suspended
>ceiling in your basement.
>> Jim wrote:
>> The specificity of the prediction alone sets my bullshit detector clanging.
>>
>
>Mine too, which is why I read the book.
>
>To be fair, the book doesn't use this date as the prediction, it
>simply points out that that's what an ancient culture had said. It
>further ties that date
> Jim wrote:
> The specificity of the prediction alone sets my bullshit detector clanging.
>
Mine too, which is why I read the book.
To be fair, the book doesn't use this date as the prediction, it
simply points out that that's what an ancient culture had said. It
further ties that date to astro
> Jim wrote:
> Why would you need to get enough people under it?
Due to the architecture - as I understand it, it's a false ceiling
that was put in place after the original one. Therefore the blocks
had to be lifted into place just like you'd install a suspended
ceiling in your basement.
~~~
I saw the discovery channel one day and they had a show depicting our
"ancestors". The between ape and human kind. What I don't understand is, why
do they always depict them acting like...dumb? Like scratching their heads and
walking funnymaking chimpanzees seem much smarter! I think the
I did, and thought that Carlos Casteneda did a better job with his science than
this guy.
Hey! Let's go play with mescalito and the dog.
>Anybody read this book?
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2kz95s
>The bestselling author of The Sign and the Seal reveals the true
[snip]
~~
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=686
I believe that date's based on the Mayan Calendar...
On 6/12/07, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Gel wrote:
> >> Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
> >> I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
> >>
>> Gel wrote:
>> Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
>> I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
>>
>
>No. For example, you can't get enough people under a 200 ton
>limestone block to lift it into place over the Queen's gallery. It's
>not just the labor, btw. It's
>Anybody read this book?
>
>Pretty convincing if you ask me and, if I understand him correct, the
>next end of civilization is predicted to be Dec 23rd, 2012.
People have been "scientifically" predicting the end of the world to the day
for centuries... we're still around.
>If you read the book,
>Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
>I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
>
>And the reason that other countries would not attempt it is the
>inevitable loss of life?
Yeah - the pyramids really haven't been "mysteries" for many years. A workfoce
in the million
> Gel wrote:
> Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
> I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
>
No. For example, you can't get enough people under a 200 ton
limestone block to lift it into place over the Queen's gallery. It's
not just the labor, btw. It's the arch
Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
And the reason that other countries would not attempt it is the
inevitable loss of life?
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quick
I own some beach front property around here Grussyou interested?
On 6/12/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anybody read this book?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2kz95s
> The bestselling author of The Sign and the Seal reveals the true
> origins of civilization. Connecting puzzling clues s
24 matches
Mail list logo
