al Message -
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
> Yeah, I've also seen where people have been cautiously warning others
about
> some LDS (mo
Yeah, I've also seen where people have been cautiously warning others about
some LDS (mormon) research. I did not ask why, and assumed it was because
maybe some people were inflating their heritage or making tenouous
connections at best.
Me, I dont care who I am descended from, just want to kno
Well, from about 1700 and back I am skeptical anyway no matter what the
source. But the ancestor of mine that this started with is from several
pretty well documented sources.
One is a book my family published in 1926 that lists her, and some specific
information about her. Then this information
I don't know much about tracing family lineage, but I wrote some sprite
class algorithms in a past life... very interesting stuff, reproduction and
life-cycle mathematics.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusio
>From: "Eric Dawson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 11:52 PM
>Subject: Re: Generational Math
>
>
>
>
>>I think inbreeding can draw from the extremes of genetics.
>>
&
e a genetics-only
problem. While the minimum genetic number might be around 50, the
sociological minimum appears to be much higher.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Dawson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, Janu
Me and 100 hot chicks..not saying the genetic lines would be pure, but
damn, I'd be having fun.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Generational Math
I think inbreeding can draw
I think inbreeding can draw from the extremes of genetics.
??? how would you populate Mars? How many couples?
Eric
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: Generational Math
Hobbits, midgets, whatever
A few years back there was an interesting study that managed to trace
humanity back to a very small group (or a single female) about a
million years ago in eastern Africa based on mitochondrial DNA
analysis. That study is one of the stronger pieces of evidence for
the Out of Africa hypothesis o
Hobbits, midgets, whatever.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Philip Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
> > Don't forget the verse in Genesi
> Don't forget the verse in Genesis that says" "And there were
> giants in the land." Seems like there were some critters to
> marry up with and produce progeny
Since inter-speciec breeding would have given some of the traits of both
species, maybe the original Humans were only about 3 feet tal
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:52 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
: > You're thinking that they had to lay with their mother. Adam
: > and Eve had children over the course of about 900 years, and
: > these children also had children. It was more likely it
d waits for the theological stuff to pass.
- Original Message -
From: Philip Arnold
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
> You're thinking that they had to lay with their mother. Adam
> and Eve had children ov
Um, no thanks. :)
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
> Google it, there are many, many such sites
> You're thinking that they had to lay with their mother. Adam
> and Eve had children over the course of about 900 years, and
> these children also had children. It was more likely it was
> brother-sister or uncle-niece rather than son-mother. It
> also says that Cain had a wife, so it could not
: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Generational Math
Hm...a website devoted to kissing cousinskinda spooky.
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: G
Hm...a website devoted to kissing cousinskinda spooky.
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
> Just to stir the pot
quot;CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
> Just to stir the pot, 5th cousins are not incest by any measurement I've
> ever heard of. You can actually legally marry your 1st cousin in the US.
> Interes
er
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
Just to stir the pot, 5th cousins are not incest by any measurement I've
ever heard of. You can actually legally marry your 1st cousin in the US.
Interestingly, you can only do the ceremony in
have been Eve since she was already Adam's wife.
That would have made Cain a Mother-er.
- Matt Small
- Original Message -
From: Dan Phillips
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
That's something I've alw
ll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:04 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Generational Math
I gotta tell ya...
My family has been in this area for a long time (South Carolina - Myrtle
Beach, Conway), and we have many kinships over the place. I haven't lived
here all of
With a little Holy intervention baby!
But the Muslims, Jews and Christians all hold to it...so it must be true
right?
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:00 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Generational Math
4:00 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Generational Math
> Actually, Adam and Eve had many offspring.
>
> Genesis 5:3
So it was Brother/Sister lovin' then?
_
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
> Actually, Adam and Eve had many offspring.
>
> Genesis 5:3
So it was Brother/Sister lovin' then?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Actually, Adam and Eve had many offspring.
Genesis 5:3
- Matt Small
- Original Message -
From: Philip Arnold
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
It all comes down to the old "12 degrees of separation" thing
Like we need incest in South Carolina.
- Matt Small
- Original Message -
From: Ian Skinner
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:44 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
Depends on how you look at it. First of all, yes the farther you go back,
the more "co
It all comes down to the old "12 degrees of separation" thing, but to a
different extent
Just think about it this way...
IF the Bible is correct, then;
We're descended from 2 people originally (Adam and Eve), plus they must
have in-bred their own children with Eve (they only had sons, right?)
Nex
grammer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:34 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Generational Math
So there must have been a ton of interfamily breeding back in the day,
espe
think it's probably a
mythological simplification of a complicated scientific concept.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: Generational
Maybe I wouldn't have these gills or these flippers either..oh wait
that's my "Innsmouth" heritage coming out.
-Original Message-
From: Andre Turrettini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:38 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Generational Ma
go back far enough and eventually we're all offspring of a brother and sister couple from Arkansas.
- Original Message -
From: Ian Skinner
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: Generational Math
You are correct, if you go back far enou
Just imagine how much better at programming coldfusion you could have been
without all that inbreeding!!
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:34 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Generational Math
So there must have been a ton
There was a neat article spoofing a scientific one based on this. It
was called "The population implosion" or something similar.
I'm not even going to try the math, though. :-)
--benD
John Stanley wrote:
> Okay doing family history research which by the way can be seen at
> http://www.netcon
Confession: I did not know who Methuselah was, so I had to look him up. Does
that make me a bad person? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:23 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Generational Math
I blame Methuselah.
-Kevin
Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 3:29 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Generational Math
You are correct, if you go back far enough we are all related to one another
one way or another. What will happen is that the farther back you go, you
will
You are correct, if you go back far enough we are all related to one another
one way or another. What will happen is that the farther back you go, you
will conceivable have that same ancestor appearing in two or more lines. A
simple example, that does happen. If you have a pair of second cousins
I blame Methuselah.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:07 PM
Subject: Generational Math
> Okay doing family history research which by the way can be seen at
> http://www.netconcepti
37 matches
Mail list logo
