Just standard humor.
Ever read Fark?
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:36 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Reason not to attack Iraq
>
> Nick McClure - "and France"?
yes it's a question of who is the biggest arsenal!
-Original Message-
From: Douglas L. Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:13 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Reason not to attack Iraq
>What can he do now that he could not do 5 years ago
We do
Nick McClure - "and France"..
ok what's this about?
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
Archives: http://
If he doesn't then he is breaking the surrender agreement made back in 91/92
Shawn Regan
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:54 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Reason not to attack Iraq
Good article. I would say thi
And all the oil we need :-)
Doug
- Original Message -
From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:10 PM
Subject: RE: Reason not to attack Iraq
> Iraq as the 51 state, not a ba
Iraq as the 51 state, not a bad idea.
> -Original Message-
> From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:05 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Reason not to attack Iraq
>
> Agreed, although there is the issue of support for suicide
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Reason not to attack Iraq
> Agreed, although there is the issue of support for suicide bombers in
> my book, but I don't know if that issue is behind Bush's thinking.
>
> Unless the govt isn't tel
Agreed, although there is the issue of support for suicide bombers in
my book, but I don't know if that issue is behind Bush's thinking.
Unless the govt isn't telling us something, then I don't see the
reason for a massive invasion just to give the land away again. If we
got to keep Iraq I might
I think he tried to defect and was killed...
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas L. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Reason not to attack Iraq
> That is true. Sev
Message -
From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: Reason not to attack Iraq
> Assassination is a very serious business. You can take him out with
reason. You can take
Hopefully...
Then again, he lost the last one too and look where he is...
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Ihrig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: Reason not to attack Iraq
&g
Here we go again.
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:44 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Reason not to attack Iraq
>
> Yeah, and they were right too.
>
> At 04:05 PM 8/12/02, Nick wrote
unity
> Subject: RE: Reason not to attack Iraq
>
> What I do not understand is why? Why take out Saddam and Iraq in the
first
> place? What can he do now that he could not do 5 years ago. He knows
that
> he
> had the crap beat out of him in the Gulf. About the only good that
cam
Assassination is a very serious business. You can take him out with reason. You can
take out some of his kids with reason as well. His clan on the other hand may not
warrant being removed. You have to give them the benefit of the doubt until they do
something that says they deserve it.
> re a
Yeah, and they were right too.
At 04:05 PM 8/12/02, Nick wrote:
>People said that about the first election also.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:57 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> &g
bstor.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:53 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Reason not to attack Iraq
>
>
> I sti
re assassinations -
will we take out his whole clan in Tikrit?
like the Saudis, Saddam has a whole passel of relatives
to take over for him. some are as ruthless as he, if not
more so, but without any judgement born of experience.
remember also that the Ba'ath Party (Saddam's) is Sunni
Mosle
TED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: Reason not to attack Iraq
> doubt that bush has a snow balls chance
> regardless of what he does now
> on winning the next
> election
>
__
uglas Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: Reason not to attack Iraq
> Good article. I would say this, if Saddam allows inspectors back into Iraq
and
> agrees with the policies that was
People said that about the first election also.
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:57 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Reason not to attack Iraq
>
> doubt that bush has a snow balls chance
> re
doubt that bush has a snow balls chance
regardless of what he does now
on winning the next
election
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
Archives: h
1. According to this site, the 'war' has already started in some small way
(http://debka.com/)/.
2. A major reason not to attack Iraq is to avoid Armageddon. Think about it, last time
Saddam decided to try to get Israel into the war by launching missiles at them. Israel
didn't nuke him back to
I still think this is just smoke and mirrors.
The US only gives him a 56% approval on an Iraq invasion. If he wants a
second term that won't work.
He is trying to scare Saddam and cause the Iraqis to oust him because
they are afraid of a US invasion. I am sure the meetings with the Iraqi
opposit
Good article. I would say this, if Saddam allows inspectors back into Iraq and
agrees with the policies that was set after Desert Storm, that we let him
stay. If he fails to comply with this, then by all means he should be removed
from power. He has the desire and the means to acquire WMD and does
24 matches
Mail list logo
