When I took the combat engineering course during my time with the
Canadian Armed Forces, I was very familiar with how effective RDX is.
We destroyed an old Sherman Tank with only about 5 pounds of the
stuff.
larry
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:50:01 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Larr
> Larry wrote:
> 380 tons is not decimal dust. Considering that only one pound of RDX
> destroyed that Pan-Am flight over Lockerbie Scotland, that's a lot of
> potential hurt.
Not to diminish the danger of the stuff, but it doesn't take much of
an explosion to take out an aircraft. They are press
380 tons is not decimal dust. Considering that only one pound of RDX
destroyed that Pan-Am flight over Lockerbie Scotland, that's a lot of
potential hurt.
When these explosvies are used by terrorists, I'll certainly be
reminding you of your decimal dust comment. Its one of your more
reprehensible
No. Quote slate.
--- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I quote you on that when the first jetliner goes
> down?
>
>
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:34:26 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 400,000 tons of the estimated 650,000 to 1 million
> > tons of Iraqi munitions
Sam wrote:
> You missed the point. They think ther was 1 millin
> tons. They got most of it and already destroyed at
> least ten times what was believed to exist.
We're crossing wires here - what I'm saying is that when asked about
the Al Quqaa site the Pentagon didn't and still doesn't have an
ac
HITLER!!!
=)
Tyler Clendenin
GSL Solutions
~|
Get the mailserver that powers this list at
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=17
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:133529
Archives:
I wonder why we didn't lob some missles into it to blow it up during
the first strikes?
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 22:30:01 -0800 (PST), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You missed the point. They think ther was 1 millin
> tons. They got most of it and already destroyed at
> least ten times what
Can I quote you on that when the first jetliner goes down?
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:34:26 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 400,000 tons of the estimated 650,000 to 1 million
> tons of Iraqi munitions have been destroyed or will be
> destroyed. Obsessing about the missing 380 ton
Sammy,
How many American soldiers and civilians will be killed by that "decimal dust"?
Is that the Bush Administrations latest lie? that 380,000 tons of high explosives in
the hands of terrorists is "no big deal".
Even at his worst, Saddam never put 380,000 tons of high explosives in the hands
You missed the point. They think ther was 1 millin
tons. They got most of it and already destroyed at
least ten times what was believed to exist.
So 380 tons is a very small amount in comparison.
But you bring up a good point. Why did the UN leave
them there?
--- Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Sam wrote:
> 400,000 tons of the estimated 650,000 to 1 million
> tons of Iraqi munitions have been destroyed or will be
> destroyed. Obsessing about the missing 380 tons is
> obsessing about decimal dust.
For me the issue is that this was an IAEA tagged site and therefore
the Pentagon should know
Since it would take 1 lb. of the stuff to down a commercial airliner I don't think 380
tons should be considered insignificant.
--- On Sunday, October 31, 2004 2:34 AM, Sam Morris scribed: ---
>
> 400,000 tons of the estimated 650,000 to 1 million
> tons of Iraqi munitions have been destroyed or
Looks liek the spins not coming from the Whitehouse.
http://slate.msn.com/id/210/
--- Sandy Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder how this is going to get spun by the
> Administration?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Messenger - Communicate in
400,000 tons of the estimated 650,000 to 1 million
tons of Iraqi munitions have been destroyed or will be
destroyed. Obsessing about the missing 380 tons is
obsessing about decimal dust.
http://slate.msn.com/id/210/
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED
whoever leaked this may well have been trying to ambush the president.
The New York TImes was just reporting what appears to be a
substantiated story
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:06:11 -0400, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Robert wrote:
> >> The plot thickens
> >
> >Somewhat, but I
it's pretty easy to get a negative opinion about Bush though. Someone
accused me the other day of unconditional support of Kerry. Heheh. If
Kerry trashed the constitution, put us billions in debt and set civil
liberties and science back a few decades, I might not favor Kerry. Tax
cut or no tax cut
Jim wrote:
> Not anything personal about Andy, but this just tripped something. I think
> we need a new "Hitler" rule.
ROTFL - It would interesting to have Won do a Monte Carlo simulation
on the mean number of posts to Hitler. By observation I'd say on this
list it's about 40.
t: Friday, October 29, 2004 11:43 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Video Suggests Explosives Disappeared After U.S. Took Control
Does your tape ever get tired of playing the same song?
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott
That tells me that the Pentagon didn't have enough tro
> Andy wrote:
> Does your tape ever get tired of playing the same song?
Surprisingly, no. This is because I'm fascinated with the reasoning
behind voting for Mr. Bush and I can't get enough of hearing about it.
It's like watching your shipmates sail for St. Elmo's Fire while you
head for land in
Does your tape ever get tired of playing the same song?
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott
That tells me that the Pentagon didn't have enough troops in country
to cover IAEA sites so Al Qaqaa became a lower priority.
~~~
> Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not surprised at all that it took a few days to figure out exactly what happened
> to a very small fraction of that material from a particular bunker.
But they still can't answer the question! And the Pentagon isn't
saying, "gee, we're stilling findi
>> Robert wrote:
>> The plot thickens
>
>Somewhat, but I still say the issue is, shouldn't the Pentgon know
>immediately what happened at Al Qaqaa? That is, if the IAEA tagged
>this site and the US knew about it, doesn't the fact that nobody can
>really account for the HE say it all?
Had the
It still wouldn't fly...
-Original Message-
From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:17 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Video Suggests Explosives Disappeared After U.S. Took
Control
Perhaps we'd be better off with a Mallard over
Perhaps we'd be better off with a Mallard over a dullard...
--
--
will "Quacker-ass quacker!" bowen
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Purchase from Hou
lol. And sometimes a wise-quacker!
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Video Suggests Explosives Disappeared After U.S. Took
Control
> Andy wrote:
> They could be running Donald Duck an
> Andy wrote:
> They could be running Donald Duck and most of those voting for Kerry would
> vote for the duck instead. Quack Quack.
ha! By that definition I'm a quacker.
Quack. Quack.
~|
Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressio
Why is that surprising? This election is not about Kerry, it is about Bush.
They could be running Donald Duck and most of those voting for Kerry would
vote for the duck instead. Quack Quack.
-Original Message-
From: G
The funny thing is, while the righties are spinning "Bush is all kno
> Robert wrote:
> The plot thickens
Somewhat, but I still say the issue is, shouldn't the Pentgon know
immediately what happened at Al Qaqaa? That is, if the IAEA tagged
this site and the US knew about it, doesn't the fact that nobody can
really account for the HE say it all?
For example, le
> Brian wrote:
> I think the popular political euphemism for popularity is "electability".
Excellent observation!
~|
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hostin
Latest flash:
FLASH 10.29.04 11:36:56 ET /// Soldier to brief reporters at Pentagon within the hour
that he was tasked with removing explosives from al QaQaa and he and his unit removed
200+ tons... Officer was ordered to join the 101st airborne on April 13 -- to destroy
conventional explosives
Yep.
I think the popular political euphemism for popularity is "electability".
- Original Message -
From: "Howie Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: Video Sugge
the Republicans - I doubt that Bush is the
most qualified Republican.
- Original Message -
From: "G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: Video Suggests Explosives Disappeared Af
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: Video Suggests Explosives Disappeared After U.S. Took Control
> > Brian wrote:
> > The funny thing is, while the righties are spinning "Bush is all
knowing"
>
> Yeah, good point.
>
> On
> Brian wrote:
> The funny thing is, while the righties are spinning "Bush is all knowing"
Yeah, good point.
On the funnier side, I've heard many people comment that the latest
Bush spin seems to be, "Hey if you think Bush is bad, Kerry is worse!"
The funny thing is, while the righties are spinning "Bush is all knowing"
like you said, the lefty spin is quite different. You don't see many lefties
saying "Kerry is all knowing!". Their spin is generally also pointed at
Bushmostly "Bush is all wrong".
As for blindly followingI don't kno
I thought someone had a good comment last night.
After Mayor Rudy's comments yesterday blaming the soldiers on the ground for the loss
of the weapons, this was the comment:
"Finally, someone brave enough to support the war but not support the troops."
Funny.
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED
eople make the association...
- Original Message -
From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Video Suggests Explosives Disappeared After U.S. Took Control
> > San
> Brian wrote:
> The type of "spin" you see coming from the Bush admin shouldn't surprise OR
> influence you
It's not the Whitehouse spin that's necessarily surprising. They at
least started correctly by saying,
"We've secured 10 times that. Some were bound to fall through the cracks."
It'
> Sandy wrote:
> I wonder how this is going to get spun by the Administration?
I watched MSNBC's Scarborough Country last night with guest host Laura
Ingrahm and was laughing out loud.
She changed the commentary from
"Kerry is an idiot, he doesn't know what he's talking about, this will
all blo
tober 29, 2004 9:57 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Video Suggests Explosives Disappeared After U.S. Took Control
Does it matter?
Spinning negative stories to blunt their affect isn't something the Bush
administration invented. The best you can hope to do is read a non-biased
factual acco
uldn't surprise OR
influence you
>From: "Sandy Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 8:48 AM
>Subject: RE: Video Suggests Explosives Disappeared After U.S. Took Control
&
I wonder how this is going to get spun by the Administration?
-Original Message-
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 9:36 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Video Suggests Explosives Disappeared After U.S. Took Control
Oct. 28, 2004 - The strongest
42 matches
Mail list logo
