Re: That was quick

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:26 PM, denstar wrote: >> >> >> I know you already said polarization, or, partisanship, isn't much of >> a problem -- not as worthy of a rally as a religious, government >> spending related rally, surely, and obviously not a po

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:55 PM, denstar wrote: >> >> You, my friend, have your head on straight.  Er.  Forward.  =) > > To be fair, I do have a slight bent. To the left, in fa *groan* =)) :Den -- You always admire what you really don't

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Sam wrote: > > Ouch! "Bennet? Hell I broke it!" Sorry, that's the only bit I remember of that joke. =) :Den -- When we see a natural style, we are astonished and charmed; for we expected to see an author, and we find a person. Blaise Pascal ~~

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:26 PM, denstar wrote: > > > I know you already said polarization, or, partisanship, isn't much of > a problem -- not as worthy of a rally as a religious, government > spending related rally, surely, and obviously not a popular concept to > those in the middle, like chores

Re: That was quick

Ouch! watch out for the line monster. . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:55 PM, denstar wrote: >> >> You, my friend, have your head on straight.  Er.  Forward.  =) > > To be fair, I do have a slight bent. To the left, in fa ~~~

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:55 PM, denstar wrote: > > You, my friend, have your head on straight.  Er.  Forward.  =) To be fair, I do have a slight bent. To the left, in fa ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.a

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:26 PM, denstar wrote: >> >> It is amazing, however, that I typed this response with my penis.  It >> was hard, because it is so big... it's constantly hitting like three >> keys at once. >> >> Heh.  I said "it was ha

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:26 PM, denstar wrote: > > It is amazing, however, that I typed this response with my penis.  It > was hard, because it is so big... it's constantly hitting like three > keys at once. > > Heh.  I said "it was hard". > > You publicly support my package, which is what really

Re: That was quick

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar wrote: ... > I don't support the whole package from any party. I didn't think > anyone did, but I did see a few party line voters on this list so. I know you already said polarization, or, partisanship, isn't m

Re: That was quick

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar wrote: > It's not about Evil, it's about Dicks.  There are more Dicks on your > side.  It's been scientifically proven.  =) > But we're not really debating that, right? Not anymore :) You're too stubborn. > If only the Tea Party was only about the consti

Re: That was quick

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:09 PM, denstar wrote: > ... I forgot you'd responded already. Major snippage follows. ... > Alright, how are you proving is evil? The tea party, republicans, > conservatives or anyone that didn't go to the fear rally? It's

Re: That was quick

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:09 PM, denstar wrote: > To you 1 instance occurring on one side is the same as 5 on the other, > but come on. I was actually two to three and that's only because you weren't offended by the hundreds of anti-semitic comments. > If that was the point of this exercise, I

Re: That was quick

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Sam wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:00 AM, denstar wrote: > >> I never said Republicans had a monopoly on retarded comments.  Just a >> majority.  =) > > And now you know they don't. That's the whole point of this exercise. We all know everybody poops. http:/

Re: That was quick

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:00 AM, denstar wrote: > I never said Republicans had a monopoly on retarded comments.  Just a > majority.  =) And now you know they don't. That's the whole point of this exercise. > Democrats can be asses too.  (lol). We have progress. >> I forgot to mention: How fun

Re: That was quick

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Sam wrote: ... > OK Woohoo! ... >> The data is in:  Abstinence Only flunks every test. > > It was an experiment started by Clinton. As much as you want to > believe it was a pure failure the jury is still out. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstinence-only_sex_e

Re: That was quick

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, denstar wrote: >> >>> But... they didn't give examples. >> >> They didn't?  I remember two in specific:  "Gays are gay by choice", >> and "I can't tell the difference between Asians and Latinos". > > You find those offe

Re: That was quick

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM, denstar wrote: >> You don't like Bush because he was religious and your mad he didn't >> use religion to influence his decisions as president? You got all >> angles covered. > I'm awesome like that.  =) OK > You could do it too!  Instead of blatantly contradicti

Re: That was quick

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:57 PM, denstar wrote: > >> But... they didn't give examples. > > They didn't?  I remember two in specific:  "Gays are gay by choice", > and "I can't tell the difference between Asians and Latinos". You find those offensive? You need thicker skin. Didn't Biden ask someon

Re: That was quick

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Sam wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:35 AM, denstar wrote: >>> Didn't Clinton start Abstinence only? >>> Why are you hating on religion again? >> I'm not hating on them.  I said I felt sorry for 'em.  They were *used*, >> dude! > > You don't like Bush because he

Re: That was quick

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Sam wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 AM, denstar wrote: > >>> I don't think so. Ever read Kos or Dowd of huffpo? >> >> Nope.  I'm more of a PBS guy.  And on PBS, they said one of the things >> hurting the Republicans was all the hate speech they were spewing.

Re: That was quick

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:35 AM, denstar wrote: >> Didn't Clinton start Abstinence only? >> Why are you hating on religion again? > I'm not hating on them.  I said I felt sorry for 'em.  They were *used*, dude! You don't like Bush because he was religious and your mad he didn't use religion to in

Re: That was quick

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 AM, denstar wrote: >> I don't think so. Ever read Kos or Dowd of huffpo? > > Nope.  I'm more of a PBS guy.  And on PBS, they said one of the things > hurting the Republicans was all the hate speech they were spewing. But... they didn't give examples. > The PBS folks

Re: That was quick

Don't blame an enemy for the words of a friend. The whole "The One" thing was started by Oprah. Obama's campaign just ran with it. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Maureen wrote: > > I'd be interested to see a list of the so-called promises. Did he > really promise changes he couldn't do, or ha

Re: That was quick

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:15 PM, denstar wrote: >> >> "Abstinence only" is just backwards, dude.  And, yes, it is sad that >> Bush rode in on the Religious Right, and mostly just gave lip-service. > > Didn't Clinton start Abstinence only? > Why are y

Re: That was quick

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:09 PM, denstar wrote: > >> There's nothing wrong with nuttery, it's the hate preaching nuts that >> suck.  There are *way* more hateful nuts on "your" side. > > I don't think so. Ever read Kos or Dowd of huffpo? Nope. I'm

Re: That was quick

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:15 PM, denstar wrote: > > "Abstinence only" is just backwards, dude.  And, yes, it is sad that > Bush rode in on the Religious Right, and mostly just gave lip-service. Didn't Clinton start Abstinence only? Why are you hating on religion again? > There were a few things

Re: That was quick

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:09 PM, denstar wrote: > There's nothing wrong with nuttery, it's the hate preaching nuts that > suck.  There are *way* more hateful nuts on "your" side. I don't think so. Ever read Kos or Dowd of huffpo? > That video of the comedy central rally you posted?  Chock full

Re: That was quick

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Sam wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 4:22 AM, denstar wrote: > >> Yeah, that's it.  Because I'm anti-religion.  Or something. > > You're afraid of it. You think Bush wanted to convert this country > into a government sponsored Christian nation. Though he didn't e

Re: That was quick

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Sam wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 4:20 AM, denstar wrote: >> >>> No. I don't follow the looking for faults I can label teh entire group with. >> >> LOL!  =) >> >> Anyways tho:  we're talking about the two groups, in general. >> >> Neither one, nor myself, are

Re: That was quick

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 4:22 AM, denstar wrote: > Yeah, that's it.  Because I'm anti-religion.  Or something. You're afraid of it. You think Bush wanted to convert this country into a government sponsored Christian nation. Though he didn't even try you still blame him for thinking it, or someth

Re: That was quick

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 4:20 AM, denstar wrote: > >> No. I don't follow the looking for faults I can label teh entire group with. > > LOL!  =) > > Anyways tho:  we're talking about the two groups, in general. > > Neither one, nor myself, are perfect. So if one is a nutter the entire group get's

Re: That was quick

What do you think it says? Claims are going down? You do realize unemployment benifits only last six months and tehn you need extensions. After extensions run out you just aren't counted anymore. http://www.visualeconomics.com/a-decade-of-unemployment/ I wonder what you'll say about this. On S

Re: That was quick

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM, denstar wrote: > >> No, I'm talking about removing the checks on power, and the idea that >> since they had the power already, we don't need the checks.  Maybe >> that was Rob's argument though. > > I'm pretty sure he

Re: That was quick

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM, denstar wrote: >>> Nobody cares that they're doing it. They just don't want to share the >>> word. Abortion is about when life begins, that's a different fight. We >>> all care3 about life, when it starts is the dispu

RE: That was quick

lol -Original Message- From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 12:19 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick The job stats are bogus. The stimulus "created" a bunch of jobs that were temporary and are now gone, as did the Cens

Re: That was quick

There is an arguable point about some of the jobs created by the stimulus, but the Census jobs are almost universally excluded from the statistics and the public sector has actually been dragging statistics down for quite some time because all levels of government have been cutting positions due t

Re: That was quick

The job stats are bogus. The stimulus "created" a bunch of jobs that were temporary and are now gone, as did the Census. That's called faking an economic recovery. The President tried that. The private economy creates jobs that exist because they are part of a value chain that provides products an

Re: That was quick

>From the Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/mmls.t01.htm http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=CES01&output_view=net_1mth Be interesting to see how you interpret this. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Sam wrote

Re: That was quick

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM, denstar wrote: > No, I'm talking about removing the checks on power, and the idea that > since they had the power already, we don't need the checks.  Maybe > that was Rob's argument though. I'm pretty sure he didn't say we don't need checks. You just don't like

Re: That was quick

Wasn't popular opinion against the stimulus also? Wasn't that a bi-partisan bill where as they almost didn't have enough democrats to force it through. Sad that our representatives don't represent us but they represent the lobbyists and the bankers and wall street. Yet Wall street is owned bu the

Re: That was quick

There were no jobs created except census since Obama came to power. We were at 6 or 7 percent when he was sworn in and now 's still six million more people out of work. were at near 10%. You can spin it anyway you want but there's On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Vivec wrote: > > But Robert, >

Re: That was quick

Doesn't matter you won't listen either way. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Vivec wrote: > > Lol :-) > > I wonder what Sam will say to this. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-

Re: That was quick

ements/2010/oct/28/barack-obama/ > obama-says-most-job-loss-occurred-his-economic-pol/ > > > -Original Message- > From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 4:30 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: That was quick > > \> You sa

Re: That was quick

The stimulus bill was passed before the health care bill, and to assume that all his attention was on one bill, and he was doing nothing to solve the other problems totally ignores the reality of the office. Any president who can't multi-task will fail miserably. If he had put his whole focus on

Re: That was quick

But Robert, more private-sector jobs were created in the first eight months of 2010 than in the eight years of the Bush administration. I also question the source that the majority of Americans want healthcare reform repealed. "The latest evidence comes from the new Associated Press-GfK poll

Re: That was quick

If the job losses occurred before his policies took hold (and indeed many before he took office), why did he not understand that creating private sector jobs was priority one, two and three from day one? Instead of wasting an entire year on a divisive health care reform plan that the majority of t

Re: That was quick

Lol :-) I wonder what Sam will say to this. On 30 October 2010 18:03, Eric Roberts wrote: > > > http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/oct/28/barack-obama/ > obama-says-most-job-loss-occurred-his-economic-pol/

RE: That was quick

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/oct/28/barack-obama/ obama-says-most-job-loss-occurred-his-economic-pol/ -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 4:30 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick On Sat, Oct

Re: That was quick

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM, denstar wrote: >> Nobody cares that they're doing it. They just don't want to share the >> word. Abortion is about when life begins, that's a different fight. We >> all care3 about life, when it starts is the dispute. > > "Nobody cares" is blatantly false.  Have y

Re: That was quick

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > Umm...having the majority is not ramming through against the wishes of the > people.  Just because republicans didn't agree doesn't mean it was rammed > through.  A little honesty please instead of repeated the same tired > bullshit from R

Re: That was quick

LOL. This thread just got crushed. :Den -- Justice and truth are too such subtle points that our tools are too blunt to touch them accurately. Blaise Pascal On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Medic wrote: > > Well that's impossible for me. But I am here with your mommy. > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:58 PM, denstar wrote: >>> Those aren't moral issues. >> >> How is gay marriage not a moral issue?  You think it's a health issue? >>  Infrastructural? > > Nobody cares that they're doing it. They just don't want to share the

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: Agreed! =) :Den -- Justice and power must be brought together, so that whatever is just may be powerful, and whatever is powerful may be just. Blaise Pascal ~| Order the

RE: That was quick

You should take your own advice Sam. -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 9:51 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick Grown-ups, now move along and don't come back without yer mommy. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:

RE: That was quick

-Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 12:04 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > That's scary. Real scary. Do you vote :) > > Have

Re: That was quick

Well that's impossible for me. But I am here with your mommy. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Sam wrote: > > Grown-ups, now move along and don't come back without yer mommy. > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Medic wrote: > > > > D-Bags only? No, that can't be it, it's not just you Sam.

Re: That was quick

Grown-ups, now move along and don't come back without yer mommy. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Medic wrote: > > D-Bags only? No, that can't be it, it's not just you Sam. > Hmmm, on to my next guess. > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Sam wrote: > >> >> This is a private thread. >> >> Bea

Re: That was quick

D-Bags only? No, that can't be it, it's not just you Sam. Hmmm, on to my next guess. On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Sam wrote: > > This is a private thread. > > Beat it! > > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Medic wrote: > > > > blah blah blah Hitler. > > > > RIP boring thread. > > > >

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > That's scary. Real scary. Do you vote :) > > Haven't missed one yet and voted early yesterday since I will be back out of > town next week.  A politician's job is not to vote his conscience, but the > will of his/her consti

RE: That was quick

Here's the link to the article... http://napervillesun.suntimes.com/news/2147292-418/percent-september-rate-ch icago-illinois.html -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 9:42 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick On Fri

RE: That was quick

-Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 9:42 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > Interesting. So there position doesn't matter unless they have the > p

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > Interesting. So there position doesn't matter unless they have the > power to change the law. > Principals or is it Principles > *** > No...thier personal position doesn't matter as long as they don’t try and > force it

Re: That was quick

This is a private thread. Beat it! On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Medic wrote: > > blah blah blah Hitler. > > RIP boring thread. > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Antholo

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:58 PM, denstar wrote: >> Those aren't moral issues. > > How is gay marriage not a moral issue?  You think it's a health issue? >  Infrastructural? Nobody cares that they're doing it. They just don't want to share the word. Abortion is about when life begins, that's a di

RE: That was quick

-Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:58 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > So what are you saying? It;'s ok to be against gay marriage if your >

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM, denstar wrote: > >> St. Petersburg Time is a left wing paper much Like Wapo and NYT > > Speaking of seeing weird stuff in the shadows all the time... > Anyone who says we're not as bad off as we could have been must have > ties to The Left, neh? So you're saying

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > So what are you saying? It;'s ok to be against gay marriage if your > name is Obama? > * > I can care less if you are against gay marriage on a personal level.  It's > when you try to pass laws that force your religious mora

Re: That was quick

blah blah blah Hitler. RIP boring thread. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Vivec wrote: > > I thought these were some interesting points from the article. > > America's wealth gap will trigger grass-roots rebellion. Wall Street's > greed is so pervasive, gluttonous and obvious the rest will rebel. > - > The Fed's shadow banking

RE: That was quick

-Original Message- From: denstar [mailto:valliants...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 4:58 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick >> And are you *chucking kidding* me about the "morals" angle?  Remember >> Family Values?  Have the Republicans

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, denstar wrote: > >> Holier than thou kinda sucks.  Especially when you're not very holy. > > Is that supposed to be me? We're talking about Democrats and Republicans, or maybe Liberals and Conservatives. No, not yo

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: ... > The Annenberg Project hired Bill Ayers who hired Obama. It's not your > fathers Annenberg Project. > St. Petersburg Time is a left wing paper much Like Wapo and NYT Speaking of seeing weir

RE: That was quick

-Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:59 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: What are you replying to? > No...he has always been personally against it, but realiz

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: What are you replying to? > No...he has always been personally against it, but realizing that not > everyone is a Christian of his flavor, not everyone is against it and as an > elected official, he has a duty to represent people of all faith

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, denstar wrote: > Holier than thou kinda sucks.  Especially when you're not very holy. Is that supposed to be me? > He's one dude.  I'm talking party platforms.  What is the Republican > stance on gay marriage?  Abortion?  Welfare? Those aren't moral issues. >

RE: That was quick

politics. He realizes that all people deserve the same rights, gay or straight, even if he does not agree with same sex couples. -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:17 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick On Fri, Oct 29

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > rather easily by a more conservative judge or Supreme court.  He wants a > Congressional remedy that has a little more weight and solidity to it. So he was for it before he was against it? > I see this more so on the > conservative side o

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Sam wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:33 AM, denstar wrote: >> >> It's the shit that Bush did that Obama's kept running or extended that bug >> me. >> >> Domestic spying, mainly.  I'm always a sucker for that one. > > I guess you're easily molded  :) I'm flex

RE: That was quick

-Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:10 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick You keep finding conservatives in the shadows that support your theory of them. What mainstream politicians talk about morals? Do you know

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:33 AM, denstar wrote: > > It's the shit that Bush did that Obama's kept running or extended that bug me. > > Domestic spying, mainly.  I'm always a sucker for that one. I guess you're easily molded :) > Matt wasn't being kind, he was being honest.  That's how he feel

Re: That was quick

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:30 PM, denstar wrote: > I think that Obama is trying to do exactly what he said he wanted to do.   Unfortunately it's not what people really want *or* even the reason he was elected. >>> >>> He's doing what

Re: That was quick

I thought these were some interesting points from the article. It seems that these are all policies and regulations/lack of regulations that the GOP is pushing: - Lobbyists' power is lethal to our values. Special interests are running and destroying American democracy, will self-destr

Re: That was quick

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Sisk, Kris wrote: > >Unfortunately, 2012 isn't going to be any Better > > Neither will 2016, or 2020, or 2024 > Considering the stock market is eventually going to crash again and in a much larger scale, yeah I agree :-) http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the

RE: That was quick

>Unfortunately, 2012 isn't going to be any Better Neither will 2016, or 2020, or 2024 ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: h

RE: That was quick

That is because you are not from Chicago ;-) -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:50 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick I don't know how to respond to that... it's best I don't On Fri, Oct 29, 2

Re: That was quick

I don't know how to respond to that... it's best I don't On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > If he brought Chicago style politics to the Whitehouse, we would have single > payer healthcare and a booming green energy industry and every other thing > he promised on the campa

Re: That was quick

Right on track huh? So this was the plan? 5 plus years of 10% unemployment? Can we switch tracks? On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > They did just announce that indicators show that a double dip recession > isn't going to happen...so I would say we are on the right track

RE: That was quick

Chicago, the cry of Chicago style politics is pretty meaningless since you don’t have a clue as to what that means. -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:27 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: That was quick On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10

RE: That was quick

They did just announce that indicators show that a double dip recession isn't going to happen...so I would say we are on the right track. -Original Message- From: denstar [mailto:valliants...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:30 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Tha

Re: That was quick

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:30 PM, denstar wrote: >>> I think that Obama is trying to do exactly what he said he wanted to do.   >>> Unfortunately it's not what people really want *or* even the reason he was >>> elected. >> >> He's doing what I said he was going to do, not what he said. > > Comp

Re: That was quick

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:30 PM, denstar wrote: >> It's sad you see it that way but probably agree with J and G that >> anyone not loving Obama is irrational or an idiot. I'm not saying >> there aren't a few nutters amongst the tea-party, but you threw out >> the entire crop. > > You jump to "lo

Re: That was quick

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Small wrote: >> >> I think that Obama is trying to do exactly what he said he wanted to do.   >> Unfortunately it's not what people really want *or* even the reason he was >> elected. > > He's doing what I sa

Re: That was quick

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM, denstar wrote: >> >> The Tea Party has a lot of a lot of things.  Too many nutbags for my >> taste though.  Which is a shame.  "Co-opted" comes to mind, as in to >> take or assume for one's own use; appropriate. > > I

Re: That was quick

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Small wrote: > > I think that Obama is trying to do exactly what he said he wanted to do.   > Unfortunately it's not what people really want *or* even the reason he was > elected. He's doing what I said he was going to do, not what he said. > He was ele

Re: That was quick

There is a lot of truth in this statement for me, but it's more that he was the anti-McCain. McCain sold out all his values and got in bed with the Religion Right to get elected, then picked Caribou Barbie as a running mate. Any candidate, even a dead skunk, would have been preferable to me than

Re: That was quick

I think that Obama is trying to do exactly what he said he wanted to do. Unfortunately it's not what people really want *or* even the reason he was elected. He was elected as a reaction to a horrible eight years of GWB. People are hateful to Wall Street, he is the anti-Wall Street. People w

Re: That was quick

>On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:29 PM, G Money wrote: >> > >> Are you saying that people are mad because he promised all kinds of >> unprecedented sweeping changes.and then couldn't wrap them all up in 2 >> shorts years, in time for the mid term elections? > >He promised change and hope, he ne

Re: That was quick

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:42 PM, denstar wrote: > > The Tea Party has a lot of a lot of things.  Too many nutbags for my > taste though.  Which is a shame.  "Co-opted" comes to mind, as in to > take or assume for one's own use; appropriate. It's sad you see it that way but probably agree with J

Re: That was quick

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Sam wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:05 PM, denstar wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Sam wrote: >> ... >>> But you're not a lefty, you're in the middle. >> >> I find it hilarious that you think you are in the middle.  That the >> Tea Party represents th

Re: That was quick

I can proudly say you agree with him. That right there says it all. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > By the looks of your posts, I would say he is right on target. > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthol

  1   2   >