Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-10 Thread Bruce Sorge
I have to agree. I used to use Yahoo but the spam filter was horrible. Then I actually paid my $20.00 for a year's subscription to their premium email, and lo and behold, I did not get any more spam. Once my subscription expired, I started getting spam. Screw that. That is bullshit. So I switch

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-10 Thread Jerry Barnes
I have to agree with most of the others in praising the spam filtering. gmail has by the far the best spam filtering I have ever seen, though I admit I have never paid for a service. I don't know why I would need to when only one or two a month make it through. ~~

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-09 Thread Dana
Bill If you invest just a little time in training the spam filter, you get bullet-proof performance. I have not seen spam in months, apart from the occasional Nigerian scam (1-2 a week). On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Man I just left my mailroute protec

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-09 Thread zaph0d . b33bl3br0x
I picked the wrong week to quit using butter. On Apr 9, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Loathe wrote: > mountains and butter hmm. > > I guess I'll just sit this one out. > > Bill Wheatley wrote: >> The jist is their spam protection sucks compared to mailroute :) >> It's like >> they don't even do greyli

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-09 Thread Loathe
mountains and butter hmm. I guess I'll just sit this one out. Bill Wheatley wrote: > The jist is their spam protection sucks compared to mailroute :) It's like > they don't even do greylisting or anything. > > Just frustrated with how everyone loves google so i finally switch to it and > it

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-09 Thread Erika L. Walker
/me hands some muffins to Billy Boy ... Well what I dont understand is how can everyone else clearly see great SPAM results and you not? There hasnt been a client that I switched over to Google that didn't see an immediate huge decrease in SPAM in their inbox ... AND - Outlook should also have it

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-09 Thread Charlie Griefer
huh? what was that about erika's mountains? TPIPWP? On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The jist is their spam protection sucks compared to mailroute :) It's like > they don't even do greylisting or anything. > > Just frustrated with how everyone loves go

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-09 Thread Bill Wheatley
The jist is their spam protection sucks compared to mailroute :) It's like they don't even do greylisting or anything. Just frustrated with how everyone loves google so i finally switch to it and it sucks a monkeys you know what. :) Just venting i need a nice muffin buttered with erika's special g

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-09 Thread Erika L. Walker
huh? On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Man I just left my mailroute protection that i paid 2 bucks a month per > email box for and went to google. And goodness this blows i know i have to > `train` my box with the report spam stuff but thats just a bs wast

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-04-09 Thread Bill Wheatley
Man I just left my mailroute protection that i paid 2 bucks a month per email box for and went to google. And goodness this blows i know i have to `train` my box with the report spam stuff but thats just a bs waste of my time. I still download my mail to outlook so i didn't want to goto webmail and

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Dave l
If thats the case then I apologize but it seemed rather smartassish to me. But if you don't read it right then say shit you damn well know what my response will be. Usually I don't make things very clear as I am usually doing other things when i write it but in this case it was pretty clear. You

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Casey Dougall
"goose fraba", "goose fraba" ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/gro

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Erika L. Walker
I did not make a smart ass comment. Tongue in cheek perhaps, having some fun joking about SPAM, but I was never a smart ass. But Hey. Whatever. If you have to bring gender and hair color into it, then you're not even worth having a conversation with let alone a discussion. >>: -Original Messa

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Dave l
"I went from getting 2000 a day to about 20 now.. I mean this is what is being caught by filter and maybe 1 a week gets through the filter. " I went back and looked at what I wrote and come on erika... it says right there "maybe 1 a week gets through the filter" I don't see how you cant underst

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Dave l
ok so i will be the cranky one and you can be the blonde. You gave a smart ass rely and i gave a smart ass reply back.. maybe you should go take your pms meds now... ok so lemme get my crayons out so the pms'n one can understand. "I went from getting 2000 a day to about 20 now.." yes... you

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Erika L. Walker
Oh man. Meh. Guess I'll go for a run instead. Meh. /reluctantly drops muffin pan... Accidently falls on Dave toe ... O_O Oops! :D >>: -Original Message- >>: From: Jerry Johnson >>: >>: Put down the cast iron muffin pans and step away!!!

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Jerry Johnson
Put down the cast iron muffin pans and step away!!! (And yes, I read his first response as you did, maybe because _we_ use postini, and that is what my _inbox_ looks like) ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Charlie Griefer
damn. dave just got smacked down by a girl :D On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well YES SIR! Aren't you a cranky little thing. OK. Re-read. Yes. Here we > go. > > > "I went from getting 2000 a day to about 20 now.." > > LET'S TAKE A CF-COMM POLL ...

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Erika L. Walker
Well YES SIR! Aren't you a cranky little thing. OK. Re-read. Yes. Here we go. "I went from getting 2000 a day to about 20 now.." LET'S TAKE A CF-COMM POLL ... who here reads that as: "2000 [spam] a day down to 20 [spam] a day" ... ??? SINCE SPAM is what we were talking about? Hands? Yes?

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Dave l
re-read what i said... I don't get 20 a day in my inbox... 20 a day is what i am being sent and is caught in postini spam filter which is down from several thousand a day. Which kind of shows me that if the emails aren't being viewed then my address isn't being kept as a good address. Now acco

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Erika L. Walker
Oh, and 20 a Day? Ha! I don't even get 20 a week now. And yes, I was up in the thousands with you before I moved to Google ... >>: -Original Message- >>: From: Dave l >>: >>: I went from getting 2000 a day to about 20 now.. I mean this is what is being caught >>: by filter and maybe 1 a

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-20 Thread Erika L. Walker
Google has been building and honing their SPAM filters for years. http://mail.google.com/mail/help/fightspam/spamexplained.html " Powered by Google Many Google teams provide pieces of the spam-protection puzzle, from distributed computing to language detection. For example, we use optical charact

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Dave l
Doesn't Google just use Postini for their spam filtering? I use it on my server and charge $1 a month per email and it pretty much kicks ass. I went from getting 2000 a day to about 20 now.. I mean this is what is being caught by filter and maybe 1 a week gets through the filter.

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Tony
will do... thanks! im stoked if this works... because one of cfdynamics class c's is currently flagged on one of the black lists and thats an issue for my clients... we live in comcast country word, aight, imma do some plannin and a thinkin' and then move forward once march madness is over wit

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Erika L. Walker
Really. Shoot me an email if you need help with anything... >>: -Original Message- >>: From: Tony >>: >>: free? >>: for my clients? >>: really. >>: >>: like i can move domain by domain, all clients email addresses >>: and for FREE they would get 6mb of storage? ~~

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Erika L. Walker
I setup IMAP to the old account, download all the old stuff, sent, drafts, inbox, etc ... then once it's down. Set up Google. IMAP into Google, and transfer it all back. Definitely work, but it works a charm. >>: -Original Message- >>: From: Casey Dougall >>: >>: It's not the quickest p

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Casey Dougall
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > free? > for my clients? > really. > > like i can move domain by domain, all clients email addresses > and for FREE they would get 6mb of storage? > Yes but it's over 6gig of storage per e-mail account http://www.google.com/a/help/

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Vivec
0_0 :-| me domain have...like...4 users Ewika. *siiigh* On 19/03/2008, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can usually transfer a domain in 30-60 minutes > now depending on how many email addresses and who the registrar is. :) But > s... don't tell Gel that ~~~

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Tony
free? for my clients? really. like i can move domain by domain, all clients email addresses and for FREE they would get 6mb of storage? tw On 3/19/08, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You did a great job Charlie! :D > > It is very straightforward. Can usually transfer a domain in 30

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Erika L. Walker
You did a great job Charlie! :D It is very straightforward. Can usually transfer a domain in 30-60 minutes now depending on how many email addresses and who the registrar is. :) But s... don't tell Gel that >>: -Original Message- >>: From: Charlie Griefer >>: >>: (in the be

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Erika L. Walker
Did you miss the word "FREE" ?? . >>: -Original Message- >>: From: Tony >>: >>: :( shite, $50/year/user is a BIT high. ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Tony
yea, but im a hosting provider, and web developer i want to move my clients, one domain at a time over there, and get that off my plate... :( shite, $50/year/user is a BIT high. tw On 3/19/08, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > free. > > there's a 'premium' account that costs $50 per

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Charlie Griefer
free. there's a 'premium' account that costs $50 per year per user. not sure what the differences are other than more storage. with my free account, i've got 6.5 GB. i think the $50 a year gets you 25 gigs. On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also, whats the cos

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Tony
also, whats the cost? thanks :) thinking about moving clients to that, and taking load off my web server. tw On 3/19/08, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Scott Stewart > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Erika, > > > > How did you go about this? I

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Charlie Griefer
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erika, > > How did you go about this? I'm considering moving my sstwebworks.com mail to > google. (in the bestest Erika voice i can muster...) http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/business/applications.html process is

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Scott Stewart
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 12:21 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_ +10 Precisely why I moved to Google Hosted. Millions of dollars worth of development and spam technology for free. Gotta love it. Might move to the paid account for a few

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Casey Dougall
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:21 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get about 2 or 3 spam messages a week sent to my inbox.very good > success rate considering the volume of spam this list has managed to send > my > way :) > Yeah seriously... the one thing that bugs me a bit though is, I

Re: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread G Money
I get about 2 or 3 spam messages a week sent to my inbox.very good success rate considering the volume of spam this list has managed to send my way :) On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just got a spam message in my gmail inbox. > > It was so out of

RE: gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Erika L. Walker
+10 Precisely why I moved to Google Hosted. Millions of dollars worth of development and spam technology for free. Gotta love it. Might move to the paid account for a few more features, but that is yet to be determined. Still a lot of Bang for the buck. We used to use Declude on our serv

gmail spam protection _rocks_

2008-03-19 Thread Jerry Johnson
I just got a spam message in my gmail inbox. It was so out of place, I was surprised. I went back through my last 2000 messages, and it is the only email that was not properly flagged as spam. There were 2 messages that were flagged as spam that shouldn't have been in that same time period. Wow