CFMAIL Question

2000-10-20 Thread Les Mizzell
Not 100% sure how to handle this...looking for ideas I'm sending CFMAIL after a client fills out a form. There's up to 5 different email addresses that the mail might have to go to, depending on form input. Email *ALWAYS* goes to "email1" Needs to go to: "email2" (from the form), "email3"

RE: Wierdest Access problem ever

2000-10-20 Thread Robert Everland
I am thinking MDAC. This is the original code that froze up CF. Could be MDAC or CF cfquery name="SearchResult" datasource="Supports" dbtype="ODBC" SELECT DISTINCT problemlog.TICKET AS ResultField1, problemlog.DATE AS ResultField2,

OT: HTML and JavaScript list

2000-10-20 Thread Hong
Does anyone know any good HTML and JavaScript mailing list? Thanks! Hong _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread Jeremy Allen
Peter that was more of a theoretical guess than an actual statement but I will reenforce it. My assumptions based on how C compilers work. There is a preprocessing phase for a individual page call. Step one, preprocess any individual CF template include any files into the template do anything

RE: Domain level cookies and short host names

2000-10-20 Thread Dave Watts
We wish to implement domain level cookies, but are running into a problem. The web servers in question are accessible via an intranet, with clients that have domain name completion configured. So quote often, a user will simply type "hostname" in the address window, rather than

Re: CFMAIL Question

2000-10-20 Thread pan
From: "Les Mizzell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not 100% sure how to handle this...looking for ideas I'm sending CFMAIL after a client fills out a form. There's up to 5 different email addresses that the mail might have to go to, depending on form input. Maybe building lists before the cfmail

Re: Wierdest Access problem ever

2000-10-20 Thread pan
From: "Robert Everland" [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am thinking MDAC. This is the original code that froze up CF. Could be MDAC or CF I can't see anything immediate in the code ... (might try adding a ; after the final /cfif) Might save some time if you deconstruct the query section by section

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread Peter Theobald
Actually, using FuseBox with 10 fuses you may have 10 separate configurations, but If I have 10 "actions" that are NOT mutually exclusive then I have 100 (10x10) configurations. Perhaps the server compiles to P-Code, without the included files, and there is a P-Code instruction to include a

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread Dave Watts
I was afraid this would happen. I'm surprised that Sean Renet hasn't contributed yet, though! What-evah, Dave. Fusebox kicks ass for the very implementation you mention. COMs can be called from a single file (using a new prefix com_filename.cfm if you want), then whenever you need that

RE: CFMAIL Question

2000-10-20 Thread Jimmy B. Glass
You know... I have always used the comma for a delimiter for CFMAIL. JG -Original Message- From: pan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 2:09 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFMAIL Question From: "Les Mizzell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not 100% sure how to handle

Ben Forta I call on thee... was(RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?)

2000-10-20 Thread Donald Sparks
Mr. Forta, In other words, does the caching sytem that CF uses perform a cache per fusebox or a cache for each fuseaction? Thank you, and greatly in your debt. Don Sparks --Original Message-- From: "Jeremy Allen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 20, 2000

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread Nat Papovich
Dave Watts Said: "There just isn't that much CFML code to organize!" And that about sums it up, folks. If you have an application without "that much CFML" then you don't need any kind of organization. However, if all your business and application logic is performed by CF and SQL and you don't

RE: Wierdest Access problem ever

2000-10-20 Thread Robert Everland III
There is no error it just hangs completely. If I do the exact same query in RDS it brings back no records. I did find out what the problem is it's the left() function. Description is a memo field if that even makes any difference. Dave Watts, any suggestions? Bob Everland -Original

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread Jones, Matt
If the code is logical, organized, and well written, it shouldn't matter if you utilize the Fusebox methodology or not, fusebox assists people with accomplishing these things. If you do it without using the fusebox methodology, that doesn't make you wrong. Any approach to programming that is

RE: CFMAIL Question

2000-10-20 Thread Les Mizzell
Hmmm, that sorta makes sense. So (I'll translate this to CF code later...) 1. Create a list named CCEmails with ";" delimiter 2. If "email2" exist, append it to the list 3. If "email3" exist, append it to the list ...and so on then..in the CFMAIL tag CFMAIL.. to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread thomas daniel
well stated From: "Jones, Matt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: fusebox style: too much disk access? Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:41:59 -0500 If the code is logical, organized, and well written, it shouldn't matter if you utilize the

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread Brad Roberts
I've got a fusebox tattoo, so nah! :^) Kidding, Brad -Original Message- From: Jones, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 6:42 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: fusebox style: too much disk access? If the code is logical, organized, and well written, it shouldn't

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread Nat Papovich
I'm all for structured architectures, first and foremost. There is no way that someone like Dave Watts is building poorly architected applications. The main reason why Fuseboxers are so adamant is because of the schtuff that Hal Helms (aka Superman) is working on right now including nesting

There was a I love you virus in Sharons posts ...... and the RE: from that

2000-10-20 Thread Craig Newitt
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access? (back on track)

2000-10-20 Thread Nat Papovich
Back to the original topic of disk access... During a recent build to a production server, a friend of mine "accidentally" deleted the webroot on the live server. Because of the techincal logistics, getting a new copy on the server takes quite some time. In the meantime, the site kept plugging

RE: CFCONTENT download name

2000-10-20 Thread lsellers
Use this before your CFCONTENT tag: CFHEADER NAME="Content-Disposition" VALUE="inline; filename=myworddoc.doc" ... Sorry. This doesn't work. The form variables are lost. It should work, as should using a "fake" URL on a pre-SP6 server. It's worked for me on NT4 as well as W2K.

Re: (Admin) virus in message

2000-10-20 Thread Larry W. Virden
From: "Michael Dinowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please do not be stupid like I was. If you reply to a thread with a virus on it (even in plain text), PLEASE REMOVE THE VIRUS TEXT. Otherwise it throws Frankly, it would be great if people removed most of any msg to which they are replying; very

MSDE on Win2K... anyone successfully install it?

2000-10-20 Thread ron
Just curious... anyone out there successfully running MSDE on Win2K? If so, pros and cons vs. MSAccess for relatively low-volume sites? Ease of administration? Installation? thx, Ron Archives:

RE: CFMAIL Question

2000-10-20 Thread Warrick, Mark
Set the string of emails dynamically and use that variable as to="#email_string#". Also, output that string to the screen before you commit to going nuts trying to figure out what's wrong. And have a Jolt Coke. :) ---mark -- Mark

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread Warrick, Mark
Yeah, but hey isn't it cool when you explain your methodology to a client and bad mouth all us anal-retentive Fuseboxers and somehow look like you totally know what you're doing? (I'm totally kidding, of course.) I find that no matter what your methodology is, if someone else can easily

Re: CFMAIL Question

2000-10-20 Thread pan
From: "Les Mizzell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] So (I'll translate this to CF code later...) 1. Create a list named CCEmails with ";" delimiter 2. If "email2" exist, append it to the list 3. If "email3" exist, append it to the list ...and so on then..in the CFMAIL tag CFMAIL..

RE: fusebox style: too much disk access?

2000-10-20 Thread Peter Theobald
Actually, I find some of the "nit picking" productive, because I'd like to know what is the value some people find in some of the Fusebox conventions that I don't find valuable. Perhaps I don't realize a situation where some convention comes in really handy. But we digress too much... off to

<    1   2