An RFC for posting, lol.
Looks like I will have to scroll for more, and more, and more:-)
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains infor
>If you used Verity in CF 5, did you use the K2 engine or the VDK engine? The
>K2 engine is much better in many respects, and if I recall correctly, CFMX
>6.x uses K2 instead of VDK.
I don't realy recall any specific choice that I made. K2 sounds the most
familiar, but that may be because it's us
What lists are these?
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the e
I think that in is most cases, I am reading on my Blackberry and for long
posts, you get a scroll for more, and more just to read a reply...
I think it is a preference, got a to love a top v bottom preference!
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond,
The Object Viewer gives
[empty string]
For the same class.
On 9/6/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this work for you?
>
>
>
>
> 09/06 00:09:44 Error [web-17] - The selected method getClass was not
> found.Either there are no methods with the specified method name and
> argument
yea just log out and back in. should take care of it.
On 9/5/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I did - I logged into gmail again and now it's ok.
>
> On 9/5/06, Matt Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any other gmail users see this message where thier quick contact list
> shoul
Does this work for you?
09/06 00:09:44 Error [web-17] - The selected method getClass was not
found.Either there are no methods with the specified method name and
argument types, or the method getClass is overloaded with arguments types
that ColdFusion can't decipher reliably. If this is a Java
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
> I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it
> probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone
> else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!
Then Dave Watts responded
> No, it's just you.
I totally agree with Dave but that is jus
The reason is because to the best of my knowledge, there was never a file
called from the clientside.
The Eolas problem only affects IE and because of that, the file that's
included from CFIDE only gets called in IE.
!k
-Original Message-
From: Mark Leder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
>Hey all,
>
>We are having some dns issues where some ISP's can resolve our domain and
>some can't. Something about nameserver records pointing to multiple
>servers. It would be super duper if some folks could try to hit our domain,
>and then just reply to the list "yes" or "no" and what isp y
One added point -- on voids and credit transactions the previous transaciton ID
is sent to the gateway via variable x_ref_trans_id...
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date Co
How is "1,235" considered an integer? I know that ColdFusion is a lossely typed
language, but what CF programmer is writing code like ?
Not only is it wrong to validate numeric input with commas, it's
counter-intuitive, illogical, and just plain insecure. If the programmer wishes
the user to b
Jim Wright wrote:
> Where are mime types defined in the built-in
> web server?
Never mind...found it
C:\CFusionMX7\runtime\lib\mime.types
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to
>http://www.authorize.net/support/AIM_guide.pdf
>
>Everything you need to know about integration is contained in there.
>
Well, not quite everything -- some added thoughts for your consideration.
There also is a "card-present" pdf file on their site if you are needing to
do a point-of-sale app wh
What about this?
http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=1076
Pretty much the same, no?
Mark
On 9/6/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just made two examples.
>
> See what java got under the hood
>
> http://www.cfide.org/objectViewer.cfm
>
> Just put your url in and just the name of the clas
Massimo Gianadda wrote:
> Sorry for the OT, but I'm really frustrated,
> I have purchased Coldfusion from an Italian reseller, unfortunately CD with
> serials has been kept away by a courier who retired
> a server and are lost.
If you REGISTERED the product with Adobe, hey *MIGHT* be able to help
I'm running CFMX 7.02 (standalone) and the latest version of Fusion Reactor.
Sometimes, someone will do something on my server, because of poorly
written code by yours truly, that will suck up huge amounts of memory
and fusion reactor will start killing requests.
However, sometimes, during this
I'm running into a problem with the MX 7 Developer edition that I run
locally and I'm fairly sure it is a mime type issue (IE is not
recognizing a htc file). Where are mime types defined in the built-in
web server?
~|
Introduc
> Yes would mean No, go figure ... women.
> I have no idea why someone would say cfinvoke is the answer. When the answer
> screams decompiler.
Mostly because I just don't have your MadSkillz, man.
Cheers,
Kris
~|
Introducing the
>I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
>sense the way we read etc, but does anyone else find a reply after a message
>damn annoying?!
No. ;-)
Personally, I think it *does* make more sense the way we read, to first read
the text that the email is replying to.
No, @ videotron.ca serving mostly the province of Quebec.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks.
~~
Use CFSaveContent to capture the CFDump in a variable.
Then, use #htmlEditFormat()# to escape all of the content when storing it in
the DB.
Oh, I strongly, STRONGLY, suggest looking at CFQueryParam.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Charles Sheehan-Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: T
Sorry for the OT, but I'm really frustrated,
I have purchased Coldfusion from an Italian reseller, unfortunately CD with
serials has been kept away by a courier who retired
a server and are lost.
I have talked with Italian support with no luck, I have of course produced
the invoice (as required)
Hello all,
Up until recently, I¹ve been using a setup to email me any exception
reports, with cfdumps of all of the interesting scopes. It¹s helpful, but
as I rework my app I¹ve building in a bug tracking function. Right now, when
the onError method in application.cfc is called, it:
1. checks to
So why will cfchart work without the per site cfide mapping when viewed in
FF, but not in IE, and, why did this break going from 7.01 to 7.02?
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 9:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: C
>Josh Nathanson wrote:
>> So, on the average, it would seem putting the reply at the top would save
>> the most
>scrolling time.
>
>Of course, there won't be much scrolling if the person replying has
>properly trimmed the previous message to highlight the particular
>question or subject that th
I just made two examples.
See what java got under the hood
http://www.cfide.org/objectViewer.cfm
Just put your url in and just the name of the class
http://www.cfide.org/RemoteObjectViewer.cfm
Just hitting submit is fine too!
~~
> > this has always been the case
>
> Show me documentation ...
I don't know from documentation, but Snake is right - you've always needed a
/CFIDE URL mapping for certain features of the product to work, starting
with CFFORM's JavaScript back in the CF 2-3 timeframe (I forget which).
Dave Watt
>> this has always been the case
Show me documentation...
Thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 11:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Updater 2 problems...
O trust me, I know. =]
I always assumed that IIS had glo
No - Onetel
And this is your DNS traversal ..
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/traversal.ch?domain=www.igigi.com&type=A
Jenny
-Original Message-
From: Josh Nathanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September 2006 22:43
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: can you resolve this domain?
Hey all,
W
Josh Nathanson wrote:
> So, on the average, it would seem putting the reply at the top would save the
> most
scrolling time.
Of course, there won't be much scrolling if the person replying has
properly trimmed the previous message to highlight the particular
question or subject that they are r
Like you, I personally prefer the reply at the top, so I don't have to
scroll down unless I need to review the OP. Usually the subject line is
enough to tell me what I'm reading about, so most of the time I don't need
to review the OP, but I do always want to read the reply. So, on the
averag
> I had the pleasure of sitting in your session at Cfun this
> year and as always you did a suburb job of speaking and
> getting your topic across. I have always found the Speakers
> from your company to be some of the best in the industry.
Well, thank you very much! There were plenty of great
Dave,
I had the pleasure of sitting in your session at Cfun this year and as
always you did a suburb job of speaking and getting your topic across. I
have always found the Speakers from your company to be some of the best in
the industry. Question for you, do you guys offer a advanced training cla
> I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it
> probably does make sense the way we read etc, but does anyone
> else find a reply after a message damn annoying?!
No, it's just you.
Here are some relevant links.
The RFC in question (yes, there is one!):
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rf
I'm still trying to figure out why gmail puts my signiture at the
bottom of the reply even though I'll br posting above it...
On 9/5/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
> sense the way we read etc, bu
> We have 1 IIS server with each client having their own
> virtual server, www.client1.com and www.client2.com.
Then the easiest thing to do is probably this:
1. Install CF Enterprise using Multiserver option.
2. During the install, don't connect CF to any external web server.
3. After the insta
We have 1 IIS server with each client having their own virtual server,
www.client1.com and www.client2.com.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Good Documentation on Setting up Multiple Instances
I know Thunderbird etc does this out of the box, and it probably does make
sense the way we read etc, but does anyone else find a reply after a message
damn annoying?!
No fingers at anyone just a gripe.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW
> What I want to do is set up different CF instances for each
> of our bigger clients. I was looking to separate out the CF
> instances so that they each will have their own memory
> allocation and resources, so as one of the instances begins
> to slow down, it doesn't take the other CF instan
Dave,
What I want to do is set up different CF instances for each of our bigger
clients. I was looking to separate out the CF instances so that they each
will have their own memory allocation and resources, so as one of the
instances begins to slow down, it doesn't take the other CF instances with
> I am looking for more resources on setting up multiple
> instances of CF7 on IIS6. I have read through the docs at
> Adobe, but I was looking for more resources. I have set up
> CF Server many times before, but always as a single stand
> alone instance.
>
> I am looking for a good step b
Indeed, it is simply awful.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged. It is for
>>> http://www.igigi.com
Yes - bellsouth.net
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.
I am looking for more resources on setting up multiple instances of CF7 on
IIS6. I have read through the docs at Adobe, but I was looking for more
resources. I have set up CF Server many times before, but always as a single
stand alone instance.
I am looking for a good step by step document
Its definitely a big fileset situation. Ugh. :o(
I appreciate the help.
Rey
Jim Wright wrote:
> Jim Wright wrote:
>
>>This should only copy changed
>>files (although I haven't tested that much with the FTP...the local copy
>>definitely only copies over changed files, but when I'm doing the F
No (Qwest Comms, Tempe Arizona)
Original Message
> From: "Josh Nathanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:44 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: OT: can you resolve this domain?
>
> Hey all,
>
> We are having some dns issues where some ISP's can resolve our d
Jim Wright wrote:
> This should only copy changed
> files (although I haven't tested that much with the FTP...the local copy
> definitely only copies over changed files, but when I'm doing the FTP,
> I've generally made a lot of changes, so I'm not positive.)
>
Rey,
As I was throwing out some
No - Bayring (worldPath)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 5:54 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: OT: can you resolve this domain?
>
> no - nc.rr.com
>
> Josh Nathanson wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > We are having some dns is
No - Sasktel / BigPipe (Canuck ISP)
!k
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: can you resolve this domain?
No - Uniserve.com (Canadian ISPcovers whole country) Victoria, BC Canada
Bryan S
Egads. So far, so not good. Thanks for the responses.
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: can you resolve this domain?
> No - Uniserve.com (Canadian ISPcovers whole country
yes
Bresnan communications
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Nathanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:42 PM
Subject: OT: can you resolve this domain?
> Hey all,
>
> We are having some dns issues where some ISP's can resolve our domain and
> some
no - nc.rr.com
Josh Nathanson wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> We are having some dns issues where some ISP's can resolve our domain and
> some can't. Something about nameserver records pointing to multiple
> servers. It would be super duper if some folks could try to hit our domain,
> and then just re
No - Uniserve.com (Canadian ISPcovers whole country) Victoria, BC Canada
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com
~~~
Here the presentation and data are mixed with business logic in the stored
procedures not COM objects, think of each stored procedure as CF5 page.
Logic mixed with data and with some small presentation logic customizations
(there is rather little HTML in the stored procedures, so its not as bad
Hello,
I am searching for a wysiwyg editor which is based on layers? At the end I
want to save every layer with type, ... in database.
Did anyone already this?
Thank you very much in advance.
Daniel
~|
Introducing the
cox = no, but you already said that
Dawson, Michael wrote:
> No worky for me. I'm in a hotel with a VPN into my university. The
> university uses SBC to get to the internet.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Nathanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 4:43
No worky for me. I'm in a hotel with a VPN into my university. The
university uses SBC to get to the internet.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Nathanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 4:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: can you resolve this domain?
Hey all,
We
The problem is the application was originally developed like 5 years ago and
then upgraded along - I only came along few days ago - thus I am definitely
not part of the "original team".
If you thought the app you are working on is tough to debug, think of me -
we can always change places :)
TK
Hey all,
We are having some dns issues where some ISP's can resolve our domain and
some can't. Something about nameserver records pointing to multiple
servers. It would be super duper if some folks could try to hit our domain,
and then just reply to the list "yes" or "no" and what isp you are
This reminds me of a project, several years ago, where we webified some
SAP information. The VB programmer "needed" to put the HTML in the
..DLLs and it was a total pain in the ass to make any changes. They also
insisted that ASP pages were the only method of consuming the COM
objects. This is h
Lets hope no-one outside your original team ever has to work on this
application.
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September 2006 21:17
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion as presentation engine and nothing more
The SQL server stored procedure
..com's are s 1999
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: I am s pissed
> You know what is weird...The site is already online!! I thought it took
> awhile, especially at networksolutions.
Drop down list are handled rather with elegance (nothing complex is meant
here by elegance) - SQL passes in the column name the caption and in the
actual field value the name of the stored procedure that is used to populate
the drop down.
TK
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Wright" <[EM
I have to agree... sounds to me like Tom has a lot of SQL DBAs in his
organization, and they effectively rule the roost. Lots of folks running
around with hammers and everything looks like a nail.
Original Message
> From: "Ian Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, S
I am not saying I like the SQL server as the driving force with CF as just
presentation tire - I am just looking over this rather strange solution for
myself (as well as many other members of this mailing list) and I am trying
to figure out what are good and what are bad points about using it.
Rey Bango wrote:
> Awesome. Thanks for the explanation Jim. I'll definitely take a look at
> this later.
>
If you do decide to use this method, you will probably need this
reference...
http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/ftp.html
~
Why not write a package that does it? You even have a name for it- Peg!
>Does anyone know of code that can match formal names, such as
>"Michael" with their less formal equivalents, such as "Mike." I was
>starting to code this but stopped after realizing that there were
>thousands of these nicknam
Probably a placeholder or could in fact be a domain squatter
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 4:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: I am s pissed
You know what is weird...The site is already online!! I thought it took
awhile,
Well a little screen scraping on Mike's link will get you most of the way
there. From that point it's one join away. That's mostly automated. After
the initial data import, it will be manually tweaking data in a simple crud
app.
-nathan strutz
http://www.dopefly.com/
On 9/5/06, Andy Matthews <[EM
Tom Kitta wrote:
> On SQL server there are 1000's of stored procedures which are used to
> display form, validate, update, delete etc. Essentialy the form building is
> done on SQL server without even looking at any CF code. CF is a black box
> which rarely changes while 99% of development is i
You know what is weird...The site is already online!! I thought it took
awhile, especially at networksolutions.
Go Figure
Doug
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:38 PM
Subject: RE: I am s pissed
> Ju
You are right, you pass every time the name of the user that is accessing
the stored procedure (your last paragraph).
TK
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion as presentation engine and
I just don't think you are getting many takers here Tom K. If this works for
you, by all means, full steam ahead. I just don't think many of us are going
to follow along. Most of us can think of just as easy ways to separate the
tiers that would allow a wider group of skill sets to be applied
Interesting idea... object viewer. But how would that differ from a straight
cfdump of the object?
>Even better is a Object Viewer. I asked for this for CF 7 as the standard
>way coldfusion produces dumping output for java objects but it's another no
>go. So now coldfusion users are left with a
Security is provided by SQL security stored procedures etc.
I'm not sure how this would work. Surely you don't mean database
permissions. Is every user to your web site set up as a user in the
database. CF always connects to the database as the same user doesn't
it?
Maybe you mean that you
At this place developers don't know much about CF since they don't need it -
they write templates in SQL without worrying about CF - they call it "black
box".
As for application level security, logic flow, and business logic - its all
SQL - CF doesn't do any of that. CF is just there to process
Actually its easy, if you want to change the look and feel of the whole
application you don't touch tables, just change CF presentation server. As
to changing some basic properties of every form, you just modify SQL as if
you were modifying CF template (you modify SQL template instead).
TK
---
To build sample form with first name last name and address SQL server would
send the following to CF presentation engine using tomForm_form stored
procedure, with pre-populated data for myself:
First NameLast NameAddressPostal Code_txt6ID_hidden
TomKitta
That would definitely be a two-tiered system. With all of your business
logic in the database, I'm not sure how well that would scale. If all
your database did was save and retrieve data, it would be easier to
accommodate more users by simple adding some more web servers, but if
your database sta
I disagree that most developers are SQL experts, but that is a separate
discussion.
As to your specific question about using CF as a presentation engine, that is a
large part of what CF apps do. However, you need additional code in your
application to control logic flow, check application-leve
So if you want to change the interface, you need to change the table
structure? Wow...
And you're handling your form validations on the SQL end? I'm sure you could
do it faster and better within CF.
Cheers,
!k
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
SQL programmers don't touch presentation - no one really touches it - its CF
that does typesetting - its automatic as far as HTML form formatting is
concerned.
Thus I said CF as a presentation engine - CF does the presentation of data
spitted out by SQL server based on some settings passed in t
The SQL server stored procedure returns: single row which is not HTML - CF
builds HTML based on that single row result set.
The data contained in SQL resultset has things like: 'User Name_txt50' -
means display a field with caption 'User Name' that is a text field with 50
chars length. It can al
I was just going to mention that you could get pretty creative with XSL
templates if XML is the main idea, but I didn't get that vibe from your
post.
I actually know of a company that uses this method quite well, but they also
have a *large* development staff.
!k
-Original Message-
From:
The fact that you have SQL experts working on your presentation layer seems
pretty crazy in that they aren't trained nor have the right toolset to be
doing it properly.
Graphic Artists / Web designers and even programmers are better suited to
handle the user interaction. IMHO Data experts should s
> I am wondering whatever anyone seen/ has opinion about the
> following system ...
Does "yecch" count as an opinion?
Seriously, though, what exactly is being returned by SQL Server? XML
documents? Recordsets? Strings containing HTML?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
IMHO... Use the systems for what they are designed for. Sure SQL
server can generate HTML but is that the best way to maintain it? The
thought of having to sort through thousands of stored procs instead of
some kind of file system to make a presentation change just sounds
like my personal version o
>>keep in mind then that they can paste anything they want into FCKeditor
Sure, but in general, they just don't want to.
I mean not in a CMS used by users who are brought out in a rash as soon
as they see an HTML tag ;-)
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
I am wondering whatever anyone seen/ has opinion about the following system:
All information that is presented on a HTML form to end user is build with
information supplied by SQL Server stored procedure. I mean the data that
makes the form + information how form should look like - information
>> I dont want them dragging and resizing images in the editor because
it will just confuse them.
Exact, IMHO, all those HTML editors around are just too poweful for the
hoi polloi.
This is why I've developed my own. Images should not been inserted in
the HTML editor,
but in the CMS. Each pag
Just wait. The person bidding might default.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: I am s pissed
No, it was just a regular type name I suppose. gobuddy.com the auction is
now at 3,800.00
--
GOING ONCE...GOING TWICESOLD!!! for 4,500.00 TOsomeone other than me
:(
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: I am s pissed
> No, it was just a regular type name I suppose. gobuddy.
Yes, but they wouldnt have pasted images. They wouldnt have thought about
it. But its not using FCK now so oh well.
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006
I wrote three chat apps and one multi-user game. 1. Flash 2. Flex 3. Java
Applet all with jabber.
On 9/5/06, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd love it if a whole bunch of folks would come into my chat room and
> hang out for a couple minutes.
>
> http://www.opensourcecf.com/cfopenchat
No, it was just a regular type name I suppose. gobuddy.com the auction is
now at 3,800.00
- Original Message -
From: "Snake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:22 PM
Subject: RE: I am s pissed
> Was it something CF related, as I have tons of CF r
Looks to me like all my crazy versions work egually well now. Must have been
something else, but nice call.
Even this crazy combo
workBook.setSheetName(0, "My First Sheet",workBook.ENCODING_UTF_16);
uglyStyle.setFillBackgroundColor(40);
workBook.getSheet("My First
Sheet").getRow(0).getCell(0).set
Was it something CF related, as I have tons of CF related domains
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September 2006 20:13
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: I am s pissed
I hate all these auctions for domain names. I was after a domain that
expired and
I was in, but got booted out and can't get back in.
"Initialization failed"
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: debugging my chat app
I'd love it if a whole bunch of folks would come into my chat
domainnamessuck.com?
Doug Brown wrote:
> I hate all these auctions for domain names. I was after a domain that expired
> and was being auctioned at snapnames, I had a limit at what I would pay and
> it was 1,000.00 and the damn thing is already up to 2,600.00
> Oh well, I guess the search contin
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
